|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
MECO theory to replace black-hole theory #41 ;3rd edition book: ATOMTOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY
I don't know why sometimes I make it hard on myself. There
I was, just two or three days ago trying to conjure up a mechanism for why the quasars when in the last edition of this book I had read about this MECO theory which offers to replace all black-holes and offers to explain any large amount of radiation in the cosmos. Do you ever get yourself in that situation, where you look and look for a explanation, and yet it is sitting there in front of you just inviting you by saying "here I am." http://www.newscientist.com/article/...uasar-casts-do... Mysterious quasar casts doubt on black holes Now I have to check into that MECO theory but it appears to be a Dirac Radioactivities theory where the particles slip in and out of the Dirac ocean of positrons or antimatter. I am going to expand Dirac's Ocean from that of only positrons to that of being just simply Antimatter. So when MECO theory posits the slipping in and out of particles it becomes a matter to antimatter conversion into energy and thus any high energy is emitted. So this MECO theory is even better than the old black-hole theory because it is matter to antimatter conversion whereas the black-hole theory had to rely upon the stripping away of matter and for that matter to so to speak "fall into the black-hole to derive energy out of the falling matter". So that MECO is even stronger of a energy source than black-hole theory. Now I am going to make MECO theory the 5th chapter of this book for it offers astronomy and physics a far better mechanism of explaining unexplained high energy sources. Chapters of this book: (1) what is this theory? (2) pictures of the Atom Totality theory and history of the theory and precursor hints Observational and experimental support (3) density and distribution of galaxies (4) Tifft quantized galaxy speeds (5) MECO theory to explain high energy sources and removes black-hole theory from science (6) layered age of Cosmos with 6.5 billion years old Cosmos yet old galaxies of the Uranium Atom Totality 20.2 billion years old; the data including discussion over the layered ages of the Solar System where Earth and Sun are likely to be twice as old as Jupiter. (7) Cores of the Solar System destroys both the Big Bang theory and Nebular Dust Cloud theory and what replaces them is the Atom Totality theory and Growing Solar System via Dirac Radioactivities. (8) uniform blackbody 2.71 K cosmic microwave background radiation and the Dark Night sky: Olber's Paradox (9) missing mass conundrum and the cosmic distribution of chemical elements (10) shape of the Cosmos as 6 lobes of 5f6 as nonrelativistic as Cubic or as relativistic Dodecahedron (11) color of the cosmos as plutonium off-white Mathematical and logic beauty support (12) inverse fine structure constant and proton to electron mass ratio explained (13) Bell Inequality with Superdeterminism fits only in an Atom Totality theory (14) "pi" and "e" explained (15) Unification of Forces of Physics to that of one force-- Coulomb force makes sense only in an Atom Totality (16) Gravity becomes the Dirac Ocean of positron-space in a Coulomb Unification (17) Atomic Theory as the foundation of science universal laws such as the Maxwell Equations (18) Physics due to Atom Totality makes all the other sciences, especially mathematics as tiny subsets inside of physics (19) Atomic theory Syllogism (20) Future News and Research Reports supporting the Atom Totality Theory and future news and research reports commentary Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
thanks to Schild and Leitner who cleaned out the black-hole nonsense
--- Quoting in parts from NEW SCIENTIST ---
http://www.newscientist.com/article/...uasar-casts-do... Mysterious quasar casts doubt on black holes The researchers found that the disc of material surrounding the central object has a hole in it with a width of about 4000 Astronomical Units (1 AU is the distance between the Earth and the Sun). This gap suggests that material has been swept out by magnetic forces from the central object, the researchers say, and must therefore be a MECO, not a black hole. (snipped) According to the MECO theory, objects in our universe can never actually collapse to form black holes. When an object gets very dense and hot, subatomic particles start popping in and out of existence inside it in huge numbers, producing copious amounts of radiation. Outward pressure from this radiation halts the collapse so the object remains a hot ball of plasma rather than becoming a black hole. (snipped) Journal reference: The Astronomical Journal (vol 132, p 420) --- end quoting from NEW SCIENTIST --- The researchers were Schild and Leitner of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center of Astrophysics. The term MECO is derived from "magnetospheric eternally collapsing object" and the physics involved is that whereever these high energy sources in astronomy come from, seem to have a magnetic field around them, something that a black-hole cannot have a magnetic field. So the new challenge to astronomy is to examine high energy sources of stars or galaxies and determine if they have a magnetic field via gravitational lensing. So, one by one, all the previous proclaimed and acclaimed black-hole objects are going to be swept under the rug of shame in science. Simply re- examine all those old proclaimed black-holes and find out their "magnetic field". Now the MECO theory appears to be a version of the Dirac Radioactivities where particles slip in and out of the Dirac Ocean of Antimatter. You can only have a Ocean of Antimatter sitting alongside a Cosmos of Matter in an Atom Totality theory, not a Big Bang. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
thanks to Schild and Leiter who cleaned out the black-hole
Sorry for mispelling it should be Leiter |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
pretty question: can a MECO be found inside an atom? or can a
The answer to this question is not going to prove the Universe is an
Atom Totality and is not a Big Bang with black-holes. But the answer to this question ought to give any believers of the Big Bang and black-holes, a moment to pause and reflect that they have probably been on the wrong side of the truth of science. The MECO theory as far as I can tell ends up as the force law of radioactivity with the Maxwell Equations so the inside of an atom would definitely be a place in which MECO interactions occurr. On the other hand, the inside of an atom would not have any instances of a black-hole. That does not prove the Atom Totality theory but it sure gives pause for alarm to anyone who believes in the Big Bang with its black-holes. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
MECO theory to replace black-hole theory #41 ;3rd edition book:ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY
MECOs are an ad-hoc hypothesis invented to bring nature into line with
its proponents' calculus mistakes. And black holes have accretion disks which can generate magnetic fields. Choose better revolutionaries. -- Jim E. Black |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
MECO theory to replace black-hole theory #41 ;3rd edition book:ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY
Jim Black wrote: MECOs are an ad-hoc hypothesis invented to bring nature into line with its proponents' calculus mistakes. And black holes have accretion disks which can generate magnetic fields. Choose better revolutionaries. -- Jim E. Black You sided with the camp that violates all laws of physics when you accepted black-holes. I sided with the camp that keeps the laws of physics and looks to explain new phenomenon within those kept laws. So I cannot tell you, Jim Black chose a better brain since you cannot switch brains, but is stuck with a poor performing brain. And when the world of astronomy and physics has flushed black-hole theory out of science, will you, Jim Black pretend as if you all along had never accepted black-hole theory? Usually in science, scientists often go through a pretense stage in their career, where they stick to one camp and then pretend as if they never did. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Invasion of Iraq in 2003 related to black-hole theory in science MECO theory to replace black-hole theory
wrote: Jim Black wrote: MECOs are an ad-hoc hypothesis invented to bring nature into line with its proponents' calculus mistakes. And black holes have accretion disks which can generate magnetic fields. Choose better revolutionaries. -- Jim E. Black You sided with the camp that violates all laws of physics when you accepted black-holes. I sided with the camp that keeps the laws of physics and looks to explain new phenomenon within those kept laws. So I cannot tell you, Jim Black chose a better brain since you cannot switch brains, but is stuck with a poor performing brain. And when the world of astronomy and physics has flushed black-hole theory out of science, will you, Jim Black pretend as if you all along had never accepted black-hole theory? Usually in science, scientists often go through a pretense stage in their career, where they stick to one camp and then pretend as if they never did. When a science like astronomy and physics becomes lazy, so lazy that whenever a signal is reported of high-energy then the fall-back explanation is a black-hole, is when a science has become rotten. Black-holes violate all the laws of physics as they violate the Pauli Exclusion Principle to name one violation. In a past century of physics where most went astray by following the silly theory of general-relativity with the exclusion of the Quantum Mechanics is a folly era of physics and astronomy. And our recent history in politics is similar to the past century in physics and astronomy. The USA invaded Iraq, not because of justifiable reasons for invading but simply due to a few men -- Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz who wanted to invade and thence looked for some reasons to fobb off the general public. The reason that was finally glummed onto by Bush Cheney et al was weapons of mass destruction. The same mind game went on in physics and astronomy for the past century. A lousy and worthless theory of General Relativity was placed center stage and given worship rather than scrutiny and with GR was borne a totally dumb idea of black-holes. Just as Weapons of Mass destruction was going to dumbify the general public and allow a few persons to enter into an Iraq War. If we allowed Quantum Mechanics center stage for the past century we would have known that the Pauli Exclusion Principle alone forbids the formation of a neutron star and a black-hole. In Politics or Political Science, if in 2003 we had a Political Priority Mandate Doctrine in place that says a politician of a country cannot wage war if other world priorities take more pressing need, then Bush and Cheney et al could not have waged their own personal war dragging the USA and other countries into a "unneeded war". In 2003, there were more pressing priorities of Pakistan-India nuclear war sabre rattling, Iran and North Korea nuclear program, and of course Israel-Palestine In the long view of history after say 500 years or 1000 years hence, when they look back to 2009 and see the folly and sillyness of black-hole theory, would be the same silliness of having invaded Iraq in 2003 on the excuse of weapons of mass destruction. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Invasion of Iraq in 2003 related to black-hole theory in science
wrote:
And our recent history in politics is similar to the past century in physics and astronomy. The USA invaded Iraq, not because of justifiable reasons for invading but simply due to a few men -- Bush, Cheney, Wolfowitz who wanted to invade and thence looked for some reasons to fobb off the general public. The reason that was finally glummed onto by Bush Cheney et al was weapons of mass destruction. The same mind game went on in physics and astronomy for the past century. A lousy and worthless theory of General Relativity was placed center stage and given worship rather than scrutiny and with GR was borne a totally dumb idea of black-holes. Just as Weapons of Mass destruction was going to dumbify the general public and allow a few persons to enter into an Iraq War. Don't forget the collapse of the real estate market and the revival of Britney Spears's singing career. More seriously, if you want to get rid of black holes, you should obviously get rid of general relativity, the theory of gravitation which predicts them. Leiter et. al. think general relativity is right; they only get different conclusions because they **** up the math. Like I said, choose better revolutionaries. -- Jim E. Black |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Invasion of Iraq in 2003 related to black-hole theory in science
Jim Black wrote: More seriously, if you want to get rid of black holes, you should obviously get rid of general relativity, the theory of gravitation which predicts them. Leiter et. al. think general relativity is right; they only get different conclusions because they **** up the math. Like I said, choose better revolutionaries. -- Jim E. Black You can have MECO's without general-relativity. You can have gravity without general-relativity. But you are not smart enough for either. Read Dirac's "Directions in Physics", but you probably can never understand Dirac. Gravity without general-relativity? That is very easy, but difficult for Jim. Space as ocean of positrons, Jim, that gives you gravity and no general-relativity. But stay inside your cacoon of ignorance. Jim, you belong in Hollywood, not physics. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Tifft quantized galaxy speeds #22 ;3rd edition book: ATOM TOTALITY(Atom Universe) THEORY | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 9th 09 11:01 PM |
#1 new book; ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY REPLACES BIG BANGTHEORY IN PHYSICS | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 13 | May 1st 09 06:25 AM |
Farm Theory, Also Called, Spring Theory, Yard Theory And TheEvolution Of Our Universe | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 3 | September 29th 08 01:11 PM |
#262 new book Continental Drift and Plate Tectonic theory updated andbased on Atom Totality theory | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 8 | April 11th 08 08:24 PM |
#1 preface to new book: Growing-Solar-System theory via Dirac New-Radioactivity replaces Nebular-Dust-Cloud theory | a_plutonium[_1_] | Astronomy Misc | 26 | September 12th 07 01:20 AM |