#761
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On 11/27/2012 1:21 PM, Brad Guth wrote:
Otherwise, your topic was hijacked and systematically ripped to shreds by and official mainstream FUD-master known as Harlow(aka H V A C). Wow. Paranoid much? Hint: When I want to 'systematically rip you to shreds', rest assured you won't be posting ANYTHING for quite some time. Are you computer retarded and/or browser dysfunctional, or were you simply born extra stupid and dysfunctional? It's an honest question, MP3. What's the answer? Your parrot-speak is only further proving how dysfunctional and pathetic you really are. Obviously you don't give a tinkers damn what others do by way of hijacking and trashing your topics. You obviously have not a clue as to what you and others are up against. LOL Goth claims to have a clue! -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. 变亮 http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
#762
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
your "balls" are just the atoms of "free space,"
index of refraction closer to one than air; I mean, how else do you even bother to explain "electromagnetism?" |
#763
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Dec 7, 9:22*am, mpc755 wrote:
On Dec 7, 12:16*pm, Brad Guth wrote: And your nomination for that Nobel is on hold because??????? 'Milky Way's halo more squished than spherical'http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34735679/ns/technology_and_science-space/... The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether. The matter which would form the Milky Way was moving as it displaced the aether. The aether displaced perpendicular to the major direction of motion became the majority force of the displaced aether and forced the matter into the disk. This resulted in the angular momentum of the matter. It is the aether which is displaced outward relative to the plane of the angular momentum which exerts force toward the center of the Milky Way. This force, along with the state of displacement of the aether as determined by the angular momentum of the Milky Way, forced the matter closer together which resulted in the displaced aether looking like a squished beach ball. Aether displacement explains how the Milky Way was created, how the disk and halo formed and why the rotational speed can not be accounted for by the mass of the matter of the Milky Way itself. Does any of this help: http://www.orgonelab.org/energyinspace.htm Can you add anything to the above link, such as where they are asking for more feedback? |
#764
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Dec 8, 2:27*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Dec 7, 9:22*am, mpc755 wrote: On Dec 7, 12:16*pm, Brad Guth wrote: And your nomination for that Nobel is on hold because??????? 'Milky Way's halo more squished than spherical'http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34735679/ns/technology_and_science-space/... The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether. The matter which would form the Milky Way was moving as it displaced the aether. The aether displaced perpendicular to the major direction of motion became the majority force of the displaced aether and forced the matter into the disk. This resulted in the angular momentum of the matter. It is the aether which is displaced outward relative to the plane of the angular momentum which exerts force toward the center of the Milky Way. This force, along with the state of displacement of the aether as determined by the angular momentum of the Milky Way, forced the matter closer together which resulted in the displaced aether looking like a squished beach ball. Aether displacement explains how the Milky Way was created, how the disk and halo formed and why the rotational speed can not be accounted for by the mass of the matter of the Milky Way itself. Does any of this help: *http://www.orgonelab.org/energyinspace.htm Can you add anything to the above link, such as where they are asking for more feedback? That link refers to ether drift. Just as I'm not sure we can know if aether consists of particles or not, I'm not sure we can know if the ether drifts. Watch the following video starting at 0:45 to see a visual representation of the state of the aether. What is referred to as a twist in spacetime is the state of displacement of the aether. What is referred to as frame-dragging is the state of displacement of the aether. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9ITt44-EHE The analogy is putting a mesh bag full of marbles into a supersolid and spinning the bag of marbles. If you were unable to determine if the superfluid consists of particles or not you would still be able to detect the state of displacement of the supersolid. The supersolid connected to and neighboring the mesh bag of marbles is in the same state throughout the rotation of the bag in the supersolid. The aether connected to and neighboring the Earth is in the same state, or almost the same state, throughout the Earth's rotation about its axis and orbit of the Sun. The state of which as determined by its connections with the Earth and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether. |
#765
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Dec 8, 5:32*am, mpc755 wrote:
On Dec 8, 2:27*am, Brad Guth wrote: On Dec 7, 9:22*am, mpc755 wrote: On Dec 7, 12:16*pm, Brad Guth wrote: And your nomination for that Nobel is on hold because??????? 'Milky Way's halo more squished than spherical'http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34735679/ns/technology_and_science-space/... The Milky Way's halo is the state of displacement of the aether. The matter which would form the Milky Way was moving as it displaced the aether. The aether displaced perpendicular to the major direction of motion became the majority force of the displaced aether and forced the matter into the disk. This resulted in the angular momentum of the matter. It is the aether which is displaced outward relative to the plane of the angular momentum which exerts force toward the center of the Milky Way. This force, along with the state of displacement of the aether as determined by the angular momentum of the Milky Way, forced the matter closer together which resulted in the displaced aether looking like a squished beach ball. Aether displacement explains how the Milky Way was created, how the disk and halo formed and why the rotational speed can not be accounted for by the mass of the matter of the Milky Way itself. Does any of this help: *http://www.orgonelab.org/energyinspace.htm Can you add anything to the above link, such as where they are asking for more feedback? That link refers to ether drift. Just as I'm not sure we can know if aether consists of particles or not, I'm not sure we can know if the ether drifts. Watch the following video starting at 0:45 to see a visual representation of the state of the aether. What is referred to as a twist in spacetime is the state of displacement of the aether. What is referred to as frame-dragging is the state of displacement of the aether. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9ITt44-EHE The analogy is putting a mesh bag full of marbles into a supersolid and spinning the bag of marbles. If you were unable to determine if the superfluid consists of particles or not you would still be able to detect the state of displacement of the supersolid. The supersolid connected to and neighboring the mesh bag of marbles is in the same state throughout the rotation of the bag in the supersolid. The aether connected to and neighboring the Earth is in the same state, or almost the same state, throughout the Earth's rotation about its axis and orbit of the Sun. The state of which as determined by its connections with the Earth and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether. Meanwhile, you can't manage to contribute any better context to this link? http://www.orgonelab.org/energyinspace.htm Why not focus your interpretations of aether with those actually looking at ether/aether considerations? Can you get others on your side to come here, into alt.astronomy or any other unmoderated public newsgroup? |
#766
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Dec 8, 4:41*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
Meanwhile, you can't manage to contribute any better context to this link? *http://www.orgonelab.org/energyinspace.htm That link refers to ether drift. Just as I'm not sure we can know if aether consists of particles or not, I'm not sure we can know if the ether drifts. Watch the following video starting at 0:45 to see a visual representation of the state of the aether. What is referred to as a twist in spacetime is the state of displacement of the aether. What is referred to as frame-dragging is the state of displacement of the aether. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9ITt44-EHE The analogy is putting a mesh bag full of marbles into a supersolid and spinning the bag of marbles. If you were unable to determine if the superfluid consists of particles or not you would still be able to detect the state of displacement of the supersolid. The supersolid connected to and neighboring the mesh bag of marbles is in the same state throughout the rotation of the bag in the supersolid. The aether connected to and neighboring the Earth is in the same state, or almost the same state, throughout the Earth's rotation about its axis and orbit of the Sun. The state of which as determined by its connections with the Earth and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether. |
#767
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Dec 8, 1:51*pm, mpc755 wrote:
On Dec 8, 4:41*pm, Brad Guth wrote: Meanwhile, you can't manage to contribute any better context to this link? *http://www.orgonelab.org/energyinspace.htm That link refers to ether drift. Just as I'm not sure we can know if aether consists of particles or not, I'm not sure we can know if the ether drifts. Watch the following video starting at 0:45 to see a visual representation of the state of the aether. What is referred to as a twist in spacetime is the state of displacement of the aether. What is referred to as frame-dragging is the state of displacement of the aether. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9ITt44-EHE The analogy is putting a mesh bag full of marbles into a supersolid and spinning the bag of marbles. If you were unable to determine if the superfluid consists of particles or not you would still be able to detect the state of displacement of the supersolid. The supersolid connected to and neighboring the mesh bag of marbles is in the same state throughout the rotation of the bag in the supersolid. The aether connected to and neighboring the Earth is in the same state, or almost the same state, throughout the Earth's rotation about its axis and orbit of the Sun. The state of which as determined by its connections with the Earth and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether. Are you somehow unable to work with anyone other than myself? You do realize that I do not buy into everything that you claim aether to be. I suppose if I were to become independently wealthy enough, as such I could share my resources with you and others attempting to make better sense of our complex universe. Do you happen to know something about my future? |
#768
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Dec 8, 5:02*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
Are you somehow unable to work with anyone other than myself? You do realize that I do not buy into everything that you claim aether to be. I suppose if I were to become independently wealthy enough, as such I could share my resources with you and others attempting to make better sense of our complex universe. *Do you happen to know something about my future? "It is ironic that Einstein's most creative work, the general theory of relativity, should boil down to conceptualizing space as a medium when his original premise [in special relativity] was that no such medium existed [..] The word 'ether' has extremely negative connotations in theoretical physics because of its past association with opposition to relativity. This is unfortunate because, stripped of these connotations, it rather nicely captures the way most physicists actually think about the vacuum. . . . Relativity actually says nothing about the existence or nonexistence of matter pervading the universe, only that any such matter must have relativistic symmetry. [..] It turns out that such matter exists. About the time relativity was becoming accepted, studies of radioactivity began showing that the empty vacuum of space had spectroscopic structure similar to that of ordinary quantum solids and fluids. Subsequent studies with large particle accelerators have now led us to understand that space is more like a piece of window glass than ideal Newtonian emptiness. It is filled with 'stuff' that is normally transparent but can be made visible by hitting it sufficiently hard to knock out a part. The modern concept of the vacuum of space, confirmed every day by experiment, is a relativistic ether. But we do not call it this because it is taboo." - Robert B. Laughlin, Nobel Laureate in Physics, endowed chair in physics, Stanford University "According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense." - Albert Einstein The relativistic ether referred to by Laughlin is the ether which propagates light referred to by Einstein |
#769
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Sat, 8 Dec 2012 14:02:52 -0800 (PST), Brad Guth
wrote: On Dec 8, 1:51*pm, mpc755 wrote: On Dec 8, 4:41*pm, Brad Guth wrote: Meanwhile, you can't manage to contribute any better context to this link? *http://www.orgonelab.org/energyinspace.htm That link refers to ether drift. Just as I'm not sure we can know if aether consists of particles or not, I'm not sure we can know if the ether drifts. Watch the following video starting at 0:45 to see a visual representation of the state of the aether. What is referred to as a twist in spacetime is the state of displacement of the aether. What is referred to as frame-dragging is the state of displacement of the aether. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s9ITt44-EHE The analogy is putting a mesh bag full of marbles into a supersolid and spinning the bag of marbles. If you were unable to determine if the superfluid consists of particles or not you would still be able to detect the state of displacement of the supersolid. The supersolid connected to and neighboring the mesh bag of marbles is in the same state throughout the rotation of the bag in the supersolid. The aether connected to and neighboring the Earth is in the same state, or almost the same state, throughout the Earth's rotation about its axis and orbit of the Sun. The state of which as determined by its connections with the Earth and the state of the aether in neighboring places is the state of displacement of the aether. Are you somehow unable to work with anyone other than myself? You do realize that I do not buy into everything that you claim aether to be. I suppose if I were to become independently wealthy enough, as such I could share my resources with you and others attempting to make better sense of our complex universe. Do you happen to know something about my future? I checked my xtal ball, Brad, and it showed a really beautiful, gorgeous lady in your near future. Yeah, it surprised me, too! lol! -- Happy Holidays! and Warm Wishes for the New Year! Indelibly yours, Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Light - it can glow and illuminate, or it can glare and obscure." |
#770
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On 8 Dic, 23:23, mpc755 wrote:
On Dec 8, 5:02*pm, Brad Guth wrote: Are you somehow unable to work with anyone other than myself? You do realize that I do not buy into everything that you claim aether to be. I suppose if I were to become independently wealthy enough, as such I could share my resources with you and others attempting to make better sense of our complex universe. *Do you happen to know something about my future? "It is ironic that Einstein's most creative work, the general theory of relativity, should boil down to conceptualizing space as a medium when his original premise [in special relativity] was that no such medium existed [..] The word 'ether' has extremely negative connotations in theoretical physics because of its past association with opposition to relativity. This is unfortunate because, stripped of these connotations, it rather nicely captures the way most physicists actually think about the vacuum. . . . Relativity actually says nothing about the existence or nonexistence of matter pervading the universe, only that any such matter must have relativistic symmetry. [..] It turns out that such matter exists. About the time relativity was becoming accepted, studies of radioactivity began showing that the empty vacuum of space had spectroscopic structure similar to that of ordinary quantum solids and fluids. Subsequent studies with large particle accelerators have now led us to understand that space is more like a piece of window glass than ideal Newtonian emptiness. It is filled with 'stuff' that is normally transparent but can be made visible by hitting it sufficiently hard to knock out a part. The modern concept of the vacuum of space, confirmed every day by experiment, is a relativistic ether. But we do not call it this because it is taboo." - Robert B. Laughlin, Nobel Laureate in Physics, endowed chair in physics, Stanford University "According to the general theory of relativity space without ether is unthinkable; for in such space there not only would be no propagation of light, but also no possibility of existence for standards of space and time (measuring-rods and clocks), nor therefore any space-time intervals in the physical sense." - Albert Einstein The relativistic ether referred to by Laughlin is the ether which propagates light referred to by Einstein Thanking to your patient insistence I finally understood what I was measuring. Because I made an electromagnetic interferometer since 2007 and from that date I measured vertically a Doppler effect of wavefronts (not of frequency) *, very difficult to interpretate... * see my pdf http://www.scribd.com/doc/114076563/...oppler-Applied The experiment is here described: http://www.scribd.com/doc/114161991/Eolotropy Finally I understood that: if our galaxy is immersed in a dark matter ball, then the wave medium is dark matter, and not the free space ether as thought Maxwell,( and for this Michelson did'nt show interferences in horizontal plane. But Grusenick shown that vertically, and I with microwaves measured the escape speed as logical , because dark matter has a mass, ) I MEASURE THE DARK MATTER! http://youtu.be/8UevWmexiCk Thank you, MYSTERIOUS mr. mpc755! please , contact me. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Experimental evidence aether has mass | mpc755 | Astronomy Misc | 4 | November 27th 10 01:50 PM |
Yes, REAL suspected Black Holes can RiP you APART.!! But NOT in GR gtr Tivity.!! Because in GR Tivity you would be a POiNT ..and if you COULD have a mass, in GR, you would be a POiNT-mass. POiNT-mass CANNOT *STRETCH* with TOP & BOTTOM ROCKETs att | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 16th 05 08:54 AM |
Yes, REAL suspected Black Holes can RiP you APART.!! But NOT in GR gtr Tivity.!! Because in GR Tivity you would be a POiNT ..and if you COULD have a mass, in GR, you would be a POiNT-mass. POiNT-mass CANNOT *STRETCH* with TOP & BOTTOM ROCKETs attache | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 15th 05 12:22 PM |
Causation - A problem with negative mass. Negastive mass implies imaginary mass | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 1st 05 08:36 PM |