Aether has mass

On Dec 9, 6:04*pm, mpc755 wrote:
On Dec 9, 8:50*pm, Brad Guth wrote:









On Dec 9, 5:40*pm, mpc755 wrote:

On Dec 9, 3:05*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Dec 9, 11:54*am, mpc755 wrote:

On Dec 9, 2:28*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Dec 9, 10:30*am, mpc755 wrote:

On Dec 9, 12:40*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Dec 9, 8:09*am, mpc755 wrote:

On Dec 9, 10:38*am, Brad Guth wrote:

On Dec 9, 7:26*am, mpc755 wrote:

On Dec 9, 10:21*am, Brad Guth wrote:

On Dec 9, 7:12*am, mpc755 wrote:

On Dec 9, 9:59*am, Brad Guth wrote:

On Dec 8, 10:17*pm, mpc755 wrote:

On Dec 9, 1:11*am, Brad Guth wrote:

You have two dice. They are exact opposites. If you roll one and it is
a 6 the other is going to be a 1. One is a 5 the other a 2. One is a 4
the other a 3.

So, when you roll the dice and one shows up as a 5 you know the other
one is going to be a 2. The dice are not entangled. There is no tunnel
or wormhole between them. They are created as exact opposites and will
be detected with 'opposite' numbers.

That's a silly analogy that doesn't make any sense as to the science
accomplishments of photon entanglement.

That's because you are unable to understand there is no such thing as
photon entanglement.

That's only because you and others can't seem to objectively prove
that individual photons actually travel.

That's only because you are incapable of understanding photons move.

Then show us the objective proof that an individual photon and its
phantom particle moves through aether from its source to whatever
target. *If nothing else, you'll be the first.

Something moves from the Sun to your eye. That something travels
through a single slit in a double slit experiment. This means the
something which moves has properties of a singularity.

And yet you and all others can't objectively prove that any original
singular photon and its phantom particle actually travels anywhere, as
in all by itself. *Why is that?

The solar wind that can exceed 1000 km/sec moves physical 3D stuff
away from our sun. *The phantom particle of your displaced aether
conducted photon has no 3D volume and thus represents no particle
mass. *Can you give us a 2D photon mass?

The moving singularity which passes through a single slit in a double
slit experiment is the photon particle. The associated wave is a wave
in the aether.

So, how much does this phantom singularity particle of zero volume
weigh?

Who said it has zero volume?

I did, though I've previously stipulated a swag on behalf of a photon
having mass (though damn little) long before you ever came along.

If it has mass then it has volume. If it has volume then it has mass.

Except as far as anyone knows, photons represent zero volume, as
though they are only 2D.

When are you going to provide objective proof-positive about your
aether stuff?

In the optical ring cavity, each reflected photon is a secondary/
recoil to the one before.