|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Another reason to buy into Global Warming hype: to prevent alienattack?
I guess if you can't really convince people that Global Warming is a
threat, might as well scare them into thinking aliens will kill us if we don't fix it. It's kind of like a sci-fi version of "wait till your father gets home", implying a spanking is coming. This is actually a new take on an old sci-fi scenario from the Twilight Zone. In the old Twilight Zone episode, aliens come to Earth and threaten to destroy us if we don't stop our warring ways. In this case, aliens come to Earth instead to stop our un-ecological ways. Yousuf Khan Aliens vs. humans: Eco-friendly extraterrestrials could wipe out planet Earth to protect other civilisations | Mail Online http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...=feeds-newsxml |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Another reason to buy into Global Warming hype: to prevent alienattack?
On a sunny day (Sat, 20 Aug 2011 04:22:46 -0400) it happened Yousuf Khan
wrote in : I guess if you can't really convince people that Global Warming is a threat, might as well scare them into thinking aliens will kill us if we don't fix it. It's kind of like a sci-fi version of "wait till your father gets home", implying a spanking is coming. This is actually a new take on an old sci-fi scenario from the Twilight Zone. In the old Twilight Zone episode, aliens come to Earth and threaten to destroy us if we don't stop our warring ways. In this case, aliens come to Earth instead to stop our un-ecological ways. Yousuf Khan Aliens vs. humans: Eco-friendly extraterrestrials could wipe out planet Earth to protect other civilisations | Mail Online http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...Earth-protect- civilisations.html?ito=feeds-newsxml The biggest threat is from US financial policies now. When more Obamism happens we all will live in grass-huts. Thats is how he grew up after all, equal rights for all. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Another reason to buy into Global Warming hype: to preventalien attack?
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 04:22:46 -0400, Yousuf Khan wrote:
I guess if you can't really convince people that Global Warming is a threat, might as well scare them into thinking aliens will kill us if we don't fix it. It's kind of like a sci-fi version of "wait till your father gets home", implying a spanking is coming. This is actually a new take on an old sci-fi scenario from the Twilight Zone. In the old Twilight Zone episode, aliens come to Earth and threaten to destroy us if we don't stop our warring ways. In this case, aliens come to Earth instead to stop our un-ecological ways. Yousuf Khan Aliens vs. humans: Eco-friendly extraterrestrials could wipe out planet Earth to protect other civilisations | Mail Online http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencete...ens-vs-humans- Eco-friendly-extraterrestrials-wipe-planet-Earth-protect- civilisations.html?ito=feeds-newsxml Here's a quote from the paper: "Another recommendation is that humanity should avoid giving off the appearance of being a rapidly expansive civilization. If an ETI perceives humanity as such, then it may be inclined to attempt a preemptive strike against us so as to prevent us from growing into a threat to the ETI or others in the galaxy. Similarly, ecosystem-valuing universalist ETI may observe humanity’s ecological destructive tendencies and wipe humanity out in order to preserve the Earth system as a whole. These scenarios give us reason to limit our growth and reduce our impact on global ecosystems. It would be particularly important for us to limit our emissions of greenhouse gases, since atmospheric composition can be observed from other planets. We acknowledge that the pursuit of emissions reductions and other ecological projects may have much stronger justifications than those that derive from ETI encounter, but that does not render ETI encounter scenarios insignificant or irrelevant." I'm not making this up!! http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.4462 These guys are nuts! This isn't physics, and it isn't even science. It's fantasy from that really, really bad remake of "The Day the Earth Stood Still" that was incoherent gibbering. It shows the kinds of idiots get hired by NASA and Penn State. It shows the kinds of idiots that are "scientist" that fear monger for CAGW |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Another reason to buy into Global Warming hype: to preventalienattack?
On 08/20/2011 07:57 AM, Marvin the Martian wrote:
I'm not making this up!! http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.4462 These guys are nuts! This isn't physics, and it isn't even science. It's fantasy from that really, really bad remake of "The Day the Earth Stood Still" that was incoherent gibbering. It shows the kinds of idiots get hired by NASA and Penn State. It shows the kinds of idiots that are "scientist" that fear monger for CAGW Well, I don't know if you can blame NASA or the university for this, these guys did say later that they just submitted the paper as a fun free-time exercise on their own. They don't want their employers associated with the paper, they say. However, one worrisome trend amongst ecological types that I've noticed lately is there is a self-hatred of the human race. We saw it carried out to extremes with that guy who tried to shoot people at the Discovery Channel, James Lee, who was demanding that Discovery Channel show more documentaries about population control of the human race. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38957020.../#.Tk_SvRiYGkU There is even a British TV show, called Primeval, which had as its main villain an insane female scientists who discovered time portals and was intent on going back in time to wipe out the human species before it even evolved. For decades now, we've been watching documentaries doing nothing but outright speculating, but because they are documentaries they have the air of scientific factualism. They would for example speculate that the Wooly Mammoth was wiped out by humans, because that's when humans first came to America. Every single extinction is now blamed on man. You'd think they'd blame the dinosaur extinction on man too, if they had the chance. We're not responsible for species extinction, natural selection is. If a species can't adapt, then it goes extinct. In reality, sometimes the adaptation is the act of going extinct itself. But die-hard ecologists don't understand that, and they'll try to keep a species alive that has no business being alive. I saw a segment once about how some UK ecologists were trying to keep a certain species of white ducks alive. The ducks weren't going extinct because they weren't breeding, rather they were breeding with another species of brown ducks, and turning into brown ducks! That's not extinction, that's adaptation, and these eco-nuts are interfering with natural selection. Yousuf Khan |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Another reason to buy into Global Warming hype: to prevent alienattack?
On 20/08/2011 11:29 AM, Surfer wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 10:22:32 GMT, Jan Panteltje wrote: The biggest threat is from US financial policies now. When more Obamism happens we all will live in grass-huts. Thats is how he grew up after all, equal rights for all. The economic crisis is happening because consumer buying power has not kept pace with the ability of industry to produce goods that consumers want. This has occurred because the mechanism by which investors make profits transfers a portion of the wealth generated by workers into the hands of investors. The total quantity of all wages received by workers is then not sufficient to match the total value of all the goods they produce. So to sell all the goods that are produced, consumers need to be allowed to buy things on credit. That provided a solution in the past. There is another component in the "solution": the workers were mainly in Taiwan and China and the consumers in America, Canada, Europe, Australia, Great Britain, etc. so the consumers were buying the goods with different money than the workers were being paid with. But that of course means a net flow of money out of the affluent countries into the ones with cheap labor. In that view, the investors capturing some of the revenue actually keep that amount from fleeing overseas. But as the process is ongoing, a time must come when debts reach unsustainable levels. This, however, remains true, since the domestic money supply shrinks and must be replaced by borrowing at the national level, and associated inflation seems to cause (domestic) prices not to stay in step with (domestic) wages but instead to outpace them. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Another reason to buy into Global Warming hype: to preventalienattack?
On Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:43:19 -0400, Yousuf Khan wrote:
On 08/20/2011 07:57 AM, Marvin the Martian wrote: I'm not making this up!! http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.4462 These guys are nuts! This isn't physics, and it isn't even science. It's fantasy from that really, really bad remake of "The Day the Earth Stood Still" that was incoherent gibbering. It shows the kinds of idiots get hired by NASA and Penn State. It shows the kinds of idiots that are "scientist" that fear monger for CAGW Well, I don't know if you can blame NASA or the university for this, these guys did say later that they just submitted the paper as a fun free-time exercise on their own. They don't want their employers associated with the paper, they say. They say they did't want their employers associated with it, but they used their employer's names to submit the paper. That's a clear lie. And when these guys are caught spewing non-science and garbage that will scare the hell out of people, then it was "just fun" and "can't you take a joke?" I'm tired of these CAWG frauds. They're a syphallic pustule on the good name of science that is contracted by whoring for funding. However, one worrisome trend amongst ecological types that I've noticed lately is there is a self-hatred of the human race. We saw it carried out to extremes with that guy who tried to shoot people at the Discovery Channel, James Lee, who was demanding that Discovery Channel show more documentaries about population control of the human race. Serious, they plan on murdering 5.5 billion people. They find that only 1 person in 12 is fit to live, by their judgment, and they only want stooges who are too stupid to object to their rule and will make good little servants. They're so confident about it, they cast it in STONE for you to see, and they STILL know that we're too dumb as a people to hang them from the lamp posts!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia...s#Inscriptions I mean, damn! That's just bold. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38957020..._and_courts/t/ police-kill-discovery-building-gunman/#.Tk_SvRiYGkU There is even a British TV show, called Primeval, which had as its main villain an insane female scientists who discovered time portals and was intent on going back in time to wipe out the human species before it even evolved. For decades now, we've been watching documentaries doing nothing but outright speculating, but because they are documentaries they have the air of scientific factualism. They would for example speculate that the Wooly Mammoth was wiped out by humans, because that's when humans first came to America. Every single extinction is now blamed on man. You'd think they'd blame the dinosaur extinction on man too, if they had the chance. We're not responsible for species extinction, natural selection is. Exactly right! How many press releases out there about science are meaningless because of the word "may"? "Aliens *may* destroy earth over environment" "Listening to sun *may* improve space weather forecasts" "The universe *may* be inside a black hole" People are being conditioned to mistake stupid speculation for science. If a species can't adapt, then it goes extinct. In reality, sometimes the adaptation is the act of going extinct itself. But die-hard ecologists don't understand that, and they'll try to keep a species alive that has no business being alive. I saw a segment once about how some UK ecologists were trying to keep a certain species of white ducks alive. The ducks weren't going extinct because they weren't breeding, rather they were breeding with another species of brown ducks, and turning into brown ducks! That's not extinction, that's adaptation, and these eco-nuts are interfering with natural selection. Yousuf Khan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
dinosaur extinction/global cooling &human extinction/global warming | 281979 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 17th 06 12:05 PM |
GLOBAL WARMING | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 63 | October 27th 06 05:17 AM |
Solar warming v. Global warming | Roger Steer | Amateur Astronomy | 11 | October 20th 05 01:23 AM |
Global warming v. Solar warming | Roger Steer | UK Astronomy | 1 | October 18th 05 10:58 AM |
global warming: is it us, or is it the sun? | jjustwwondering | Policy | 146 | August 10th 04 05:04 PM |