Neutrons Become Cubes Inside Neutron Stars

On Aug 14, 7:13*pm, Greg Sandoval wrote:
On 14/08/2011 12:28 PM, Yousuf Khan wrote:

On 14/08/2011 11:15 AM, Greg Sandoval wrote:
Bzzz, sorry, the Fe56 nucleus has the highest binding energy per
nucleon, He4 is quite a bit higher than the other low-Z nuclei but it's
not the global maximum. And besides, the electron is actually the most
stable *particle*. Protons (eventually) decay, neutrinos constantly
change flavors, and massless particles will be redshifted to nothingness
by cosmic expansion, but electrons are forever. Unless one stumbles upon
a positron.

So, the alpha particle isn't -- the beta particle is.

Proton decay is just a fairy tale left over from arguments justifying
SUSY.

Wrong; proton decay is predicted by non-supersymmetric GUTs like SU(5)
and, most likely, is a consequence of any unification of the strong
force and the electroweak at high energies. Without such unification,
the heavy proton is only stable compared to the light positron because
it has quantum numbers it can't get rid of. With such unification, it's
expected that those quantum numbers are not conserved in the unbroken
symmetry, and tunneling decay of the proton becomes inevitable in that case.

SUSY is now on its deathbed.

Prove it. From what I hear the LHC has ruled out a chunk of a narrow
swath of possible superpartner masses and other parameters, but left a
chunk so far un-ruled-out. The superpartners could still be in the
remaining chunk.
--------------------------
nasty crock
do you understand waht you are talking about ???

what is that crookish salad of words??
doyou think youcan cheat the whole world
forever ??
sort of lawyers talking that enables
a cat to be a mouse
and vice versa
iow
any experimental outcome
will be covered with that
salad of words

stick it in your you croks head

another prediction of mine
th e Higgs Boson will never be found by LHC!!
2
NO MASS - THE ONLY MASS-
NO REAL PHYSICS !!

that is more than a prediction of mine !!!

that will be another new golden basic law of real modern physics !!

that will save billions of $ wasted by professional crooks like you
that make their livings and ;''carrier '' from lies and cheating s
with lofty salads of empty words !!!
Y.Porat
-----------------------------------










No matter how much theorists think
SUSY is such an elegant explanation of the Universe, the Universe
disagrees.

Unproven, at least as of this writing.

On Aug 14, 4:19*am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
On Aug 14, 12:12*pm, "Y.Porat" wrote:





On Aug 14, 9:55*am, Martin Brown
wrote:

On 13/08/2011 22:13, Dr J R Stockton wrote:

In sci.astro , Fri, 12 Aug
2011 14:45:36, Martin *posted:

You have to wonder what happens to the extra gravitational energy
released when they pack as cubes at 100% instead of 74% - does it all
go into deforming the shape of neutrons or do these heavier stars run
hotter and spin up as they very gradually shrink?

Angular momentum will be conserved.

Exactly. So there is a chance that if you can find a fairly young
2Msolar pulsar instead of its spin slowing down with drag forces it will
actually be speeding up at first as the centre crystallises to the
higher density phase from the core outwards and it shrinks.

Regards,
Martin Brown

------------------
it is not that the neutrons themselves
become 'cobes'

it is the Alpha particle that include those
Neotrons
become *a cube
actually it became like that much longer before ie before the star
collapsed
while thatr star collaps
only the elctrons around the nuc
are shot out
so
*what was atom with * electrons
lost its electrons while itis the electrons that
orrupy most of the volume
so with those elctrons the volume of ahr was an atom shrinks
dramatically
now
what remains in he Neutron stars is the nuclei
that remained *basically unchanged
ie
composed of *alpha particles
combined to a *sort of ''rectangular pipes''

or actually more exactly *sort of '' Octangular *pipes''

see

http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-anstract

(it is copyrighted *there from 1993 !!)

ATB
Y.Porat
----------------------------

sorry i typed anstarct
instead of * *abstract

so here it is again:

http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract

hope *it is better now

TIA
Y.Porat
-------------------------- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Spread out energy is not mass. Point energy is.

On 15/08/2011 6:00 AM, Y.Porat wrote:
On Aug 14, 7:13 pm, Greg wrote:
Proton decay is predicted by non-supersymmetric GUTs like SU(5)...

SUSY is now on its deathbed.

Prove it. From what I hear the LHC has ruled out a chunk of a narrow
swath of possible superpartner masses and other parameters, but left a
chunk so far un-ruled-out. The superpartners could still be in the
remaining chunk.
--------------------------
nasty crock
do you understand waht you are talking about ???

I clearly understand it better than you.

On 15/08/2011 3:30 AM, Y.Porat wrote:
On Aug 15, 3:17 am, Greg wrote:
On 14/08/2011 8:40 PM, Y.Porat wrote:
got it idiot pompous ignorant ??

Who is "idiot pompous ignorant", Porat? There is nobody in this
newsgroup using that alias.

[rest of illucid, overpunctuated, invective-laced rant deleted unread]

-------------------
go discuss with your friend
ERICK SCHISE (GISSE)
AND HIS GANG

What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with physics,
Porat?

[rest of illucid, overpunctuated, invective-laced rant deleted unread]

Space Cubes become spheres at every gravity center.

On Aug 16, 6:02*pm, Greg Sandoval wrote:
On 15/08/2011 3:30 AM, Y.Porat wrote:

On Aug 15, 3:17 am, Greg *wrote:
On 14/08/2011 8:40 PM, Y.Porat wrote:
got it idiot pompous ignorant ??

Who is "idiot pompous ignorant", Porat? There is nobody in this
newsgroup using that alias.

[rest of illucid, overpunctuated, invective-laced rant deleted unread]

-------------------
* go discuss with your friend
ERICK * SCHISE * (GISSE)
AND HIS GANG

What does your classic erroneous presupposition have to do with physics,
Porat?

[rest of illucid, overpunctuated, invective-laced rant deleted unread]

------------------
Next
Y.P
------------------

On Aug 12, 7:19*am, "Y.Porat" wrote:
On Aug 12, 7:38*am, Yousuf Khan wrote:

Neutrons Become Cubes Inside Neutron Stars - Technology Reviewhttp://www.technologyreview.com/blog/arxiv/27074/?ref=rss

"Inside atomic nuclei, protons and neutrons fill space with a packing
density of 0.74, meaning that only 26 percent of the volume of the
nucleus in is empty.

Today, Felipe Llanes-Estrada at the Technical University of Munich in
Germany and Gaspar Moreno Navarro at Complutense University in Madrid,
Spain, say neutrons can do even better.

These guys have calculated that under intense pressure, neutrons can
switch from a spherical symmetry to a cubic one. And when that happens,
neutrons pack like cubes into crystals with a packing density that
approaches 100%. "

-----------------------
see the * abstract of my model

it is from * 1993 *!!!

http://sites.google.com/site/theyporatmodel/an-abstract

ATB
Y.Porat
------------------------

Curves go spherical.