|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Spotting Scope or Binoculars?
Hi John
My suggestion is to buy a pretty decent pair of binoculars in the 10x50 configuration, but not the SE's. Rather save the extra money for a proper telescope. If your interest in astronomy goes for a dip in the future (unlikely), then a decent pair of 10x50s will still be useful for other terrestrial stuff too. Start off by looking at Nikon's 10x50 models just below the SE's and other brands in that price range. Compare the different brands side by side, if you can. I am sure you know by now what makes bino's good for astronomy. If you go for 10x or higher magnification, be prepared to buy a tripod or binocular mount. I use a Manfrotto model 75 tripod (they go by some other name in the US) - they are very sturdy and not too heavy. You will have to buy a tripod head as well. The benefit is that one just sees so much more through mounted binoculars, especially if you can leave them on a specific spot and then consult your maps or notes. Talking of which, get yourself a set of detailed maps like Sky Atlas 2000 which complements the 10x50s very well - hundreds of objects to explore. I would also recommend Crossen & Tirion's 'Binocular Astronomy' book. Make best use of this setup for a year or so and save the extra Euro's for a decent telescope - either a 80mm+ 'grab & go' or a 8" or bigger scope - depending on your mobility requirements. If you are still interested in astronomy (most likely), the extra money saved will be well spent on a telescope and accessories. I promise you, you will be very tempted to buy a telescope as the bino's makes you feel that you are missing out on something. The benefit of starting out with the binoculars are that you will learn the sky well, the objects up there and their motions throughout the seasons. When you feel you have seen enough through the bino's and/or you have enough money saved for a decent telescope, you will appreciate the views through a telescope so much more. Eye relief is important if you will be wearing glasses while looking through the binoculars. If so, then longer eye relief should be a consideration, otherwise you don't see the full field of view. Regards |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Spotting Scope or Binoculars?
John Honan wrote in message ... I have spent the last month in my garden (well, when there hasn't been cloud cover) with a pair of old 7x50 binoculars and a starchart. Mainly finding my way around the constellations, and roughly locating the Messier objects. I'm in a light-polluted area so can't resolve much detail (I need to arrange a trip to a dark site one of these days!) At this point I want to get a new pair of binoculars or a spotting scope (the 7x50's are borrowed) I've spent some time reading reviews and forums looking for the best options for a new pair of binoculars - And I can't decide between getting binoculars or a spotting scope. I've narrowed it down to the following; (It's just coincidence that they're all Nikon - honest!) - Nikon 12x50 Se cf binoculars (I assume these are Superior E) 780 euro - Nikon 10x42 Se cf binoculars 720 euro - Nikon spotting scope 80A http://www.nikon.co.jp/main/eng/news...ope80_e_00.htm 515 euro (with 20-60 zoom) Hi John, I have the Nikon 12x50 SE and 10x42 SE. Both are very nice, but I prefer the 12x50 for astronomy and the 10x42 for bird watching. I also have a Leica 77mm APO Trinivid spotting scope. Unless you are going to use the spotting scope for daytime activities, like bird watching, you can get a telescope better for astronomy for much less money. The Leica gives fine images but eyepiece selection only allows it only goes up to 60x. If you must have a small refractor, consider a TV 76 or Tak FS-78. Then again, why not a Takahashi FS-102? I suggest you consider a good 8" Newtonian on a Dob mount. Lots of bang for the Euro. I also suggest you get a good non magnifying finder like a Telrad. They make finding objects much easier. Yes, you will need to learn how to collimate the Newt. But that is not difficult. For the price of a good APO spotting scope you could get an 8" Celestron SCT. A non magnifying finder like a Telrad is still a very good idea. Because of the increased magnification and increase in light gathering, a telescope, like an 8" Newt. will let you see objects in much more detail than a 12x50 binocular. You migh also consider a 15x50 Canon IS binocular. Good luck, Rich Binocular advantages: Using 2 eyes, not one - how much difference does this really make? Binocular astronomers love the Nikon Superiors! Robust General purpose use, take them anywhere Easier to hold than a scope (?) Scope advantages: 80mm aperture versus 50mm in the binoculars 20-60 zoom (don't know how useable the 60 zoom would be, wouldn't this give a *very* small exit pupil?) Robust, rubber coated Can take various lenses, and possibly camera adapter (almost a small refractor telescope) Cost less (although not really a prob if the binocs would be a better choice) I haven't read much about scopes in this newsgroup. Do people generally favour binoculars for astronomy? I've looked at Zeiss, Swarovski, and Leica as well. Leica Trinovids are another option, although this would be pushing the price up even more, and I think I'd be happy with the Nikon Superiors. If you had 700 euro burning a hole in your pocket, which one would you buy? One last question, what is 'eye relief' ? What effect does it have when you're using a scope with poor eye relief? Thanks, John. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Spotting Scope or Binoculars?
Trane Francks wrote:
On 2003-09-18 11:28 +0900, Phil Wheeler wrote: The real answer with binos is a parallelogram mount. My Unimount makes No, the real answer is a Starchair TM 3000! http://www.starchair.com/ At $4650, you might as well buy the big JMI 6" binos at $4000! My Unimount was under $500, including the really nice surveyor's tripod. And is quite portable (the Starchair looks pretty bulky and heavy). And I can use any chair. Phil |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Spotting Scope or Binoculars?
My vote goes for a decent pair of binoculars, although the people
advising one of the short tube scopes make some very good points. Binoculars are great for making a quick run around the sky, checking out maybe a dozen DSOs at a time, sweeping the Milky Way, and just taking in the grand scheme of things. Binoculars are also the best way to simply learn your way around the sky. (Some would say that in this age of GOTO scopes, learning the sky is a waste of time, but for me personally, it's the most satisfying part of the hobby.) A scope is better for homing in on individual objects, or looking at planets. Most amateur astronomers use both binoculars and telescopes. I have a nice scope, but limited time, and my binocs spend a lot more time under starlight than my scope does. And, as others have pointed out, if your interest in astronomy wanes, you can always use the binoculars. In some ways, they're completely different tools. If you were a carpenter, would you need a hammer or a screwdriver? Marty |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Spotting Scope or Binoculars?
One more point. If you go for the binoculars, you've caught on by now
that using them on a mount, if you choose to do so, can be a problem. I usually hand hold mine, and feel that that's one of the big advantages of binoculars, but more detail in DSOs etc. does pop out with a steady mount. If you go for a plain old tripod with a binocular adapter, get a HUGE one. If you can't stand up straight and look up into your binocs, you'll be so uncomfortable that you won't benefit from the added steadiness. Even with a gigantic tripod, you won't be able to get up toward the zenith. Since money was an object for my choice, I watched ebay until an enormous but ugly old tripod, (an old Davidson "Star D") went by for 5 bucks. I have a rather tall binocular adapter too, and although I'm about an even 6 feet, I can crank everything all the way up, tilt the pan head back, and look up to about two thirds of the way up to the zenith. Fancier mounts would be better, but this ain't bad for CHEAP. Marty |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Spotting Scope or Binoculars?
"John Honan" wrote in message
... At this point I want to get a new pair of binoculars or a spotting scope snip Thanks very much for the excellent replies. Since making my original post, I've been thinking again about what I could really get for 700 euros. The advice here has been very helpful. Essentially I was obsessed with getting the 'best' bino or spotting scope optics and pushing the price up to (and past) the 1,000 mark. And what would I essentially have? - Still a pair of binoculars. Some interesting points were also made about the importance of having a tripod for binocular viewing. Some good advice also about which books to get. I have a few things on my Amazon wishlist already! - Up until now I've been printing off sky charts from heavens-above (as well as getting picky about working out my EXACT latitude and longtitude!). But A4 pages tend to crease and flutter around, and aren't that easy to read. So, in re-thinking all of this, I've been looking at either a) A pair of binoculars for 100-200 PLUS an 80mm short tube scope for 300-400 (Vixen Planet 80s for 412 euro) OR b) for 700 euro, I could even consider an 8" f6 Newtonian on an Eq mount, something like http://www.orionoptics.co.uk/en-gb/p_353.html If I had to choose between the 8" or the expensive Nikons, I think I'd go with the 8" Newt... But I think I need to get to a few club meetings and try out the different types of scope myself, to at least work out what type I want! To be honest, before I started looking at prices on the internet, I was using a local supplier here in Ireland as my benchmark for prices. They appear to supply only Celestrons, and the sorts of prices they were talking for anything with a decent aperture was way above what I was intending to spend. For example; Celestron NexStar 114GT - 1,014 euro (US$1,140) NexStar N8 (8" f/10 SCT) - 4,107 euro (US$4,620) C102-HD (4" refractor) - 926 euro (US$1,042) Do these (Irish) prices seem unreasonable? - I'm glad I did a bit of shopping around on the internet before going to their showroom, lets put it that way. I was going to give up on the hobby at one stage with prices like that! - It'd take me ten years before I could afford to progress from the 7x50's.... :-/ An excellent site I found is http://www.orionoptics.co.uk/index-1.html They're a short boat trip from Dublin, and the prices are much friendlier. 1,000 euro would pay for the boat trip, the petrol, the 8" newt, and I'd still have change left over for a pair of binoculars (and a nice lunch) One final point - Nobody seemed to give spotting scopes much of a rating. Although what got me interested in spotting scopes as an option were the good reviews I'd read on a few sites (Tele Vue Ranger and Pronto, or the Leica Televid http://www.cloudynights.com/reviews/leica.htm) But for the sort of money these high-end spotting scopes cost, surely an 80mm short tube would be more flexible, and an overall better option for the beginner astronomer? John. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Spotting Scope or Binoculars?
"John Honan" wrote in message ...
At this point I want to get a new pair of binoculars or a spotting scope Several have advised you that spotting scopes are not good for astronomy. However, the ST80 scopes so popular for widefield astronomy on this group make good spotting scopes when used with a 45 degree diaganol. Celestron sells a version of this scope, the Celestron 80mm Wide View, which comes with a 45 degree diaganol. You could then add a good quality 90 degree mirror diaganol for astronomy and have a dual purpose scope. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Spotting Scope or Binoculars?
On Thu, 18 Sep 2003 21:14:39 +0100, "John Honan"
wrote: "John Honan" wrote in message So, in re-thinking all of this, I've been looking at either a) A pair of binoculars for 100-200 PLUS an 80mm short tube scope for 300-400 (Vixen Planet 80s for 412 euro) OR b) for 700 euro, I could even consider an 8" f6 Newtonian on an Eq mount, something like http://www.orionoptics.co.uk/en-gb/p_353.html If I had to choose between the 8" or the expensive Nikons, I think I'd go with the 8" Newt... ME TOO! But I think I need to get to a few club meetings and try out the different types of scope myself, to at least work out what type I want! Very Good idea. One final point - Nobody seemed to give spotting scopes much of a rating. Although what got me interested in spotting scopes as an option were the good reviews I'd read on a few sites (Tele Vue Ranger and Pronto, or the Leica Televid http://www.cloudynights.com/reviews/leica.htm) But for the sort of money these high-end spotting scopes cost, surely an 80mm short tube would be more flexible, and an overall better option for the beginner astronomer? The ST80 is a mighty fine spotting scope for the price. I use mine for spying on a Hawk nest nearby, Viewing the sun with a Ha filter and I pack it along when I go camping when I leave my big telescope at home. Binoculars, Spotting scopes and Telescopes. I use all 3 but for different purposes. Cheers, Kruger |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Spotting Scope or Binoculars?
"John Honan" wrote in message ...
One final point - Nobody seemed to give spotting scopes much of a rating. Well, spotting scopes are useful for anything *but* astronomy, like birding, watching wildlife and so forth. During this last year I have found literally twenty "new" speices of birds that I didn't know were here. My brother-in-law, who hunts moose every autumn, has asked to borrow the scope to try and see if his hunting team can use it to decide if any moose they see during long-range scouting is part of their quota and can be felled, or has to be left. Usually, they know only when they see the the animal in the rifle scope, the second they decide whether to pull the trigger or not. My brother-in-law wants to see if they can decide *before* they launch a full-scale "expedition". And the spotting scope is way less bulky than most astro scopes, so it is way easier both to transport and to store. Certainly something to be considered if you have limited storage space or don't have a car to move the scope around with. If you take a parallel in the world of cars, I would say that the spotting scope is like the average Volvo that can be used for anything, anywhere, but that doesn't necessarily do any of it extremely well. The astro scope, on the other hand, is more like the racing car that is highly specialized towards one type of use in one set of circumstances, that is virtually useless for other purposes. A spotting scope is better than naked eyes for astronomy, so if a spotting scope is what you have, use it. But if astronomy is the main reason for buying a new scope, the majority of arguments point towards getting an astro scope. Rune |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Spotting Scope or Binoculars?
Victor wrote:
I would also recommend Crossen & Tirion's 'Binocular Astronomy' book. I forgot to mention Phil Harrington's "Touring the Universe Through Binoculars" - these 2 books complement each other very well! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
gracefully stepping into amateur astronomy.. HELP! :) | Moe | Astronomy Misc | 4 | February 7th 04 12:06 PM |
Vixen 114mm ED f/5.3 nice scope! | CHASLX200 | Amateur Astronomy | 46 | September 21st 03 09:24 PM |
aperture vs. light pollution | Chuck | Amateur Astronomy | 34 | September 11th 03 02:17 PM |
new eyepiece for spotting scope? | Boatman | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | September 8th 03 07:44 AM |
Would you make this scope trade? | GoldfishPanda | Amateur Astronomy | 5 | July 12th 03 04:36 PM |