#21
|
|||
|
|||
Georges Lemaître
On 10/30/2012 2:25 AM, Painius wrote:
I really hate to fight with you all the time, but you are WRONG all the time. Your foolish argument here is a perfect example. To have it your way would involve a completely new set of physical laws for the universe. Question: Do you have any basis for inventing a new set of laws for the universe? I didn't think so. You really should stick to what you know, Harlow - kookfites, slut leagues, plagiarism and copyright infringement. You don't know **** about "physical laws for the Universe". LMBO ! Excellent. You have nothing, NO-THING to refute my argument, so you bash me. No longer will you be allowed to just make **** up without evidence, so get used to it. -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. å˜äº® http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Georges Lemaître
On 10/30/2012 2:25 AM, Painius wrote:
I really hate to fight with you all the time, but you are WRONG all the time. Your foolish argument here is a perfect example. To have it your way would involve a completely new set of physical laws for the universe. Question: Do you have any basis for inventing a new set of laws for the universe? I didn't think so. You really should stick to what you know, Harlow Since my area of expertise is astrophysics, I would say that EVERYTHING that exists is 'what I know'. In matters of the paranormal and religion, I bow to your superior knowledge. -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. å˜äº® http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Georges Lemaître
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 06:43:05 -0400, HVAC wrote:
On 10/30/2012 2:25 AM, Painius wrote: I really hate to fight with you all the time, but you are WRONG all the time. Your foolish argument here is a perfect example. To have it your way would involve a completely new set of physical laws for the universe. Question: Do you have any basis for inventing a new set of laws for the universe? I didn't think so. You really should stick to what you know, Harlow - kookfites, slut leagues, plagiarism and copyright infringement. You don't know **** about "physical laws for the Universe". LMBO ! Excellent. You have nothing, NO-THING to refute my argument, so you bash me. No longer will you be allowed to just make **** up without evidence, so get used to it. Not bashing you, Harlow - no - of course not. I'm your friend - I'm just trying to help you. It's just tough love, so suck it up. Sound familiar? It's right out of your repertoire. I'll make **** up without evidence anytime I want to when I feel like making speculations about science, twerp! And bottom line? There's nothing you can do about it. (Except, well maybe you could pull the stick outta your arse.) LMFAO ! -- Indelibly yours, Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Either this thread is dead or my watch has stopped." |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Georges Lemaître
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 07:24:42 -0400, HVAC wrote:
On 10/30/2012 2:25 AM, Painius wrote: I really hate to fight with you all the time, but you are WRONG all the time. Your foolish argument here is a perfect example. To have it your way would involve a completely new set of physical laws for the universe. Question: Do you have any basis for inventing a new set of laws for the universe? I didn't think so. You really should stick to what you know, Harlow Since my area of expertise is astrophysics, I would say that EVERYTHING that exists is 'what I know'. In matters of the paranormal and religion, I bow to your superior knowledge. You seem to like to humiliate yourself with each post you write, Harlow. You probably should be put on suicide watch! LMFAO ! -- Indelibly yours, Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Either this thread is dead or my watch has stopped." |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Georges Lemaître
On 10/30/2012 3:42 PM, Painius wrote:
Excellent. You have nothing, NO-THING to refute my argument, so you bash me. No longer will you be allowed to just make **** up without evidence, so get used to it. Not bashing you, Harlow - no - of course not. I'm your friend - I'm just trying to help you. It's just tough love, so suck it up. OK. Sorry...It must have been the drugs. -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. å˜äº® http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Georges Lemaître
On 10/30/2012 3:50 PM, Painius wrote:
You really should stick to what you know, Harlow Since my area of expertise is astrophysics, I would say that EVERYTHING that exists is 'what I know'. In matters of the paranormal and religion, I bow to your superior knowledge. You seem to like to humiliate yourself with each post you write, Harlow. It's true...You DO have vastly superior knowledge about god and the paranormal than I do. -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. å˜äº® http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Georges Lemaître
On Wed, 31 Oct 2012 08:20:03 -0400, HVAC wrote:
On 10/30/2012 3:42 PM, Painius wrote: Excellent. You have nothing, NO-THING to refute my argument, so you bash me. No longer will you be allowed to just make **** up without evidence, so get used to it. Not bashing you, Harlow - no - of course not. Lie noted. I'm your friend - I'm Lie noted. just trying to help you. Lie noted. It's just tough love, so suck it up. It's the "love" of a rapist or a stalker. Or a pimply adolescent who hasn't got his hormones under control yet and can't understand why the object of his or her affections isn't interested but imposes him- or herself where he or she is neither wanted nor needed. OK. Sorry...It must have been the drugs. Something, anyway. Pain-in-arse has no friends because of his arrogant, in-your-face stupidity and rudeness. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Georges Lemaître
On 10/31/2012 8:30 AM, Christopher A. Lee wrote:
Not bashing you, Harlow - no - of course not. Lie noted. I'm your friend - I'm Lie noted. just trying to help you. Lie noted. It's just tough love, so suck it up. It's the "love" of a rapist or a stalker. Or a pimply adolescent who hasn't got his hormones under control yet and can't understand why the object of his or her affections isn't interested but imposes him- or herself where he or she is neither wanted nor needed. OK. Sorry...It must have been the drugs. Something, anyway. Pain-in-arse has no friends because of his arrogant, in-your-face stupidity and rudeness. Notice how *I* apologized while Painus lashes out in hate. -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. å˜äº® http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lemaître’s Hubble relationship | Sam Wormley[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | August 4th 11 01:38 AM |
AIDAN...GEORGES ' TWIN ? | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 9 | March 3rd 08 08:14 AM |