|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Garver breaks with POTUS: lists lunar surface as NASA exploration destination.
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012 21:01:24 -0700, Fred J. McCall
wrote: Nonsense. There is ZERO connection between government deficits (and a failure to even PASS a budget or come to any agreement on how to deal with a budget) and trade balance. How do you figure that? Because it's a fact. Are you saying you didn't figure it? That you are a true believer who don't need to figure it? Or are you just choosing to not answer the question? -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Garver breaks with POTUS: lists lunar surface as NASA exploration destination.
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:56:55 -0700, Fred J. McCall
wrote: Nonsense. There is ZERO connection between government deficits (and a failure to even PASS a budget or come to any agreement on how to deal with a budget) and trade balance. How do you figure that? Because it's a fact. Are you saying you didn't figure it? That you are a true believer who don't need to figure it? Do you believe water is wet? How do you figure that? That's a matter of definition. Or are you just choosing to not answer the question? Try asking one that makes sense. It doesn't make sense to ask "How do you figure that?"!?!?!?! -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Garver breaks with POTUS: lists lunar surface as NASA exploration destination.
On Sep 21, 2:29*pm, Howard Brazee wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:56:55 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote: Nonsense. *There is ZERO connection between government deficits (and a failure to even PASS a budget or come to any agreement on how to deal with a budget) and trade balance. How do you figure that? Because it's a fact. Are you saying you didn't figure it? * That you are a true believer who don't need to figure it? Do you believe water is wet? *How do you figure that? That's a matter of definition. Or are you just choosing to not answer the question? Try asking one that makes sense. It doesn't make sense to ask "How do you figure that?"!?!?!?! -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison Via multiple retaxation and those numerous hidden fees that always adds to the end-user/consumer paying more for less, is how the feds and oligarchs keep getting their dirty hands on our had earned loot. Obviously the consumers are the only ones get to pay for everything, and if you're too poor to be a retail/wholesale consumer, they simply let you die or at best only survive at minimal life-support. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Garver breaks with POTUS: lists lunar surface as NASA exploration destination.
On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 21:37:25 -0700, Fred J. McCall
wrote: Howard Brazee wrote: On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:56:55 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote: Nonsense. There is ZERO connection between government deficits (and a failure to even PASS a budget or come to any agreement on how to deal with a budget) and trade balance. How do you figure that? Because it's a fact. Are you saying you didn't figure it? That you are a true believer who don't need to figure it? Do you believe water is wet? How do you figure that? That's a matter of definition. Exactly. Or are you just choosing to not answer the question? Try asking one that makes sense. It doesn't make sense to ask "How do you figure that?"!?!?!?! How did you figure that water is wet? What are you, some kind of 'true believer'? So you're saying that " Nonsense. There is ZERO connection between government deficits (and a failure to even PASS a budget or come to any agreement on how to deal with a budget) and trade balance." is a matter of definition and thus cannot be tested? I don't see it. It is a testable hypothesis that may be true or may be false, or is more likely somewhere in between. -- "In no part of the constitution is more wisdom to be found, than in the clause which confides the question of war or peace to the legislature, and not to the executive department." - James Madison |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Garver breaks with POTUS: lists lunar surface as NASA explorationdestination.
On 23/09/2012 4:26 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Your myopia is your problem. I'm ok with you being wrong. But you're never ok with you being wrong, are you Fred because you never believe you are wrong. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Garver breaks with POTUS: lists lunar surface as NASA explorationdestination.
On 23/09/2012 4:26 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Howard Brazee wrote: On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 21:37:25 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote: Howard Brazee wrote: On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:56:55 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote: Nonsense. There is ZERO connection between government deficits (and a failure to even PASS a budget or come to any agreement on how to deal with a budget) and trade balance. How do you figure that? Because it's a fact. Are you saying you didn't figure it? That you are a true believer who don't need to figure it? Do you believe water is wet? How do you figure that? That's a matter of definition. Exactly. Or are you just choosing to not answer the question? Try asking one that makes sense. It doesn't make sense to ask "How do you figure that?"!?!?!?! How did you figure that water is wet? What are you, some kind of 'true believer'? So you're saying that " Nonsense. There is ZERO connection between government deficits (and a failure to even PASS a budget or come to any agreement on how to deal with a budget) and trade balance." is a matter of definition and thus cannot be tested? I don't see it. It is a testable hypothesis that may be true or may be false, or is more likely somewhere in between. Your myopia is your problem. I'm ok with you being wrong. Just don't be surprised when someone points out that you're spouting nonsense. But you're never ok with you being wrong, are you Fred because you never believe you are wrong. Better? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Garver breaks with POTUS: lists lunar surface as NASA explorationdestination.
On 24/09/2012 7:44 AM, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Alan Erskine wrote: On 23/09/2012 4:26 PM, Fred J. McCall wrote: Howard Brazee wrote: On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 21:37:25 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote: Howard Brazee wrote: On Fri, 21 Sep 2012 13:56:55 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote: Nonsense. There is ZERO connection between government deficits (and a failure to even PASS a budget or come to any agreement on how to deal with a budget) and trade balance. How do you figure that? Because it's a fact. Are you saying you didn't figure it? That you are a true believer who don't need to figure it? Do you believe water is wet? How do you figure that? That's a matter of definition. Exactly. Or are you just choosing to not answer the question? Try asking one that makes sense. It doesn't make sense to ask "How do you figure that?"!?!?!?! How did you figure that water is wet? What are you, some kind of 'true believer'? So you're saying that " Nonsense. There is ZERO connection between government deficits (and a failure to even PASS a budget or come to any agreement on how to deal with a budget) and trade balance." is a matter of definition and thus cannot be tested? I don't see it. It is a testable hypothesis that may be true or may be false, or is more likely somewhere in between. Your myopia is your problem. I'm ok with you being wrong. Just don't be surprised when someone points out that you're spouting nonsense. But you're never ok with you being wrong, are you Fred because you never believe you are wrong. Better? Not really. Still Stupid Usenet Tricks 101 tactics. You seem to be the one who has a problem with being wrong, judging by your dodging here. So calm down. No need to lose your temper. I'm not dodging anything. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Garver breaks with POTUS: lists lunar surface as NASA exploration destination. | Howard Brazee | Policy | 6 | September 25th 12 06:02 PM |
NASA Instruments Reveal Water Molecules on Lunar Surface | ron | News | 0 | September 24th 09 08:14 PM |
NASA formally unveils lunar exploration architecture | AA Institute | Policy | 738 | October 18th 05 08:53 AM |