Brad Guth's Credentials

wrote:

Get an expander and do the same experiment and see the effect change.
What's an expander? Well, you can shine the laser into the eyepiece of
a telescope and it will expand the beam. You might want to put a
piece of wax paper across the eyepiece depending on the quality of the
laser.

hmm..

I wanted to respond to some private messages I've received since in the
past I have spoken in defense of the ethereal versus the mundane. lol.
Have I gone over to the other side? Aren't you making an exception of
tomass and guthball just to win an argument? Haven't you made similar
statements in the past on precisely this same topic?



Although I do occasionally run into stuff (say, every day or so) that
seems odd in a world that is presumably run by the laws of physics and
mathematics, I tend toward a strictly rationalist world view in regards
to chance, and lack of predestination for the individual or a society.
Guth is out of his ever-loving mind, Tomcat is floating around in
Timothy Leary's kaleidoscope heaven, and if you really want to torque
off OM just keep top posting and not trimming your quotes.
His teeth have extra nerves, his gall bladder has croaked, and in his
state (Texas) he is probably about as safe to **** off as Vermithrax
Pejorative in "Dragonslayer".
That having been said, I'm still going to attach the minus to the plus,
the plus to the minus, and reanimate dead matter...as that is my
family's and my own personal destiny....DESTINY! DESTINY! NO ESCAPING
DESTINY!
MY NAME ISN'T FLANNERY.....IT'S FLANENSTEIN! ;-)

Pat

Pat Flannery wrote:
wrote:

Get an expander and do the same experiment and see the effect change.
What's an expander? Well, you can shine the laser into the eyepiece of
a telescope and it will expand the beam. You might want to put a
piece of wax paper across the eyepiece depending on the quality of the
laser.

hmm..

I wanted to respond to some private messages I've received since in the
past I have spoken in defense of the ethereal versus the mundane. lol.
Have I gone over to the other side? Aren't you making an exception of
tomass and guthball just to win an argument? Haven't you made similar
statements in the past on precisely this same topic?



Although I do occasionally run into stuff (say, every day or so) that
seems odd in a world that is presumably run by the laws of physics and
mathematics, I tend toward a strictly rationalist world view in regards
to chance, and lack of predestination for the individual or a society.
Guth is out of his ever-loving mind, Tomcat is floating around in
Timothy Leary's kaleidoscope heaven, and if you really want to torque
off OM just keep top posting and not trimming your quotes.
His teeth have extra nerves, his gall bladder has croaked, and in his
state (Texas) he is probably about as safe to **** off as Vermithrax
Pejorative in "Dragonslayer".
That having been said, I'm still going to attach the minus to the plus,
the plus to the minus, and reanimate dead matter...as that is my
family's and my own personal destiny....DESTINY! DESTINY! NO ESCAPING
DESTINY!
MY NAME ISN'T FLANNERY.....IT'S FLANENSTEIN! ;-)

Pat




". . . Tomcat is floating around in Timothy Leary's kaleidoscope heaven
.. . ."


For the record, I don't use drugs. I sit down at my computer with a
steaming hot cup of coffee and a chocolate bar. That's it.


tomcat

William.Mook; We must first say what we do not know, before
we can even hope to learn more. Guthball and tomass don't do
that. They assert all sorts of things without evidence because
it feels good."
How typically out-of-context, of pagan incest bigotry and just plain
old and mean and pathetic is that statement of your's, or what?

Mooks's naysayism of such obvious lies upon lies is now worth something
less than used toilet paper.

For everything that I think that I know, I've asked a thousand
questions and given credit wherever possible. However, time after time
only to get the incest naysayism of Lord Mook's anti-everything in the
universe in return. As such I do believe there's crapolla on Earth
that's more honest and thereby more intelligent than Mook.
-

"If you're not looking for the truth, you will not find it."
-Brad Guth

"To believe with certainty we must begin with doubting."
-Stanislaus I

"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes,
but having new eyes."
-Marcel Proust

"Truth is given, not to be contemplated, but to be done. Life is an
action, not a thought."
-F.W. Robertson
~
Even Kurt Vonnegut would have to agree that; WAR is WAR, thus "in war
there are no rules" - In fact, war has been the very reason why honest
folks are having to deal with the likes of others that haven't been
playing by whatever the supposed rules, such as our resident LLPOF
warlord(GW Bush) having invented WMD seems to come to mind.

Life upon Venus, a township w/Bridge & ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm

In article om,
mumbled

What are Beta Lights?

The glowing numbers on the front of Brad's Sony VCR...

Tankfixer wrote:
In article om,
mumbled

What are Beta Lights?

The glowing numbers on the front of Brad's Sony VCR...



Officially Beta Lights are tritium glow lights. But they have been
said to protect against external radiation? Perhaps this was an error
on the author's part, or it may indicate some possible 'classified'
technology used on the Apollo Missions.


tomcat

On Tue, 04 Jul 2006 22:42:58 GMT, Tankfixer
wrote:

In article om,
mumbled

What are Beta Lights?

The glowing numbers on the front of Brad's Sony VCR...

....You mean the *blinking* numbers.
OM

--

]=====================================[
] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [
] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [
] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [
]=====================================[

tomcat wrote:
Tankfixer wrote:
In article om,
mumbled

What are Beta Lights?

The glowing numbers on the front of Brad's Sony VCR...



Officially Beta Lights are tritium glow lights. But they have been
said to protect against external radiation? Perhaps this was an error
on the author's part, or it may indicate some possible 'classified'
technology used on the Apollo Missions.

There's nothing all that magical about stopping gamma and hard-X-rays,
and the moon is physically much worse off than what the Van Allen belts
have to offer.

Generating a few spare terajoules of energy for that of sustaining an
artificial lunar magnetosphere seems doable. Although that's only
trapping the nasty stuff as much as it's capable of deflecting solar
wind. Then what? Don't you still need a robust atmosphere?
-
Brad Guth

Brad Guth wrote:
William.Mook; We must first say what we do not know, before
we can even hope to learn more. Guthball and tomass don't do
that. They assert all sorts of things without evidence because
it feels good."
How typically out-of-context, of pagan incest bigotry and just plain
old and mean and pathetic is that statement of your's, or what?

Mooks's naysayism

You're the one who spouts naysayism whenever anyone points out
something rather simple in a vain effort to protect your INSANE world
view.

I mean, you went off the deep end talking about how bad the radiation
environment was, and TOTALLY IGNORE and TALK DOWN, clearly obvious
evidence like the actual record of radiation exposure of the Apollo
astronauts taken on their voyage.

of such obvious lies upon lies is now worth something
less than used toilet paper.

Listen to yourself. You accuse me of naysayism, but what is that
statement here but naysaysim itself. You say obvious lies - what the
hell are you talking about? What obvious lies? Calling something an
obvious lie without showing clear obvious evidence supporting it is
naysayism pure and simple. You are engaged in the very activity you
decry. Shut the **** up and learn a thing or two before you waste my
time and eveyrone else who has to put up with your obvious BULL****!

For everything that I think that I know, I've asked a thousand
questions

And yet have not listend to ONE answer! ****, you asked an intelligent
question once about mass ratio - and I went into gory detail going over
every mass fraction of every stage, and the performance of every
engine, and went through the delta vee requirements and all the rest to
show you how the Saturn V not only was capable of sending Apollo to the
Moon and bringing it back, but showing that the Saturn V was OPTIMAL
for that journey. SURPRISE SURPRISE why the hell wouldn't it be? The
best and the brightest of a generatiion designed and built it sparing
no expense. Sheez. You are a freakin' LUNATIC with no respect for the
truth, no capacity for logic, and no appreciation of the hard work of
others - even those who are trying to get you through whatever bad spot
you're obviously going through.

and given credit wherever possible.

The best liars lie to themselves, and that describes you GUTHBALL!

However, time after time
only to get the incest naysayism of Lord Mook's anti-everything in the
universe in return.

BULL****! I spent hours analyziing Saturn V for your step by step.
YOU **** ON IT DOING NO WORK WHATEVER TO TRY TO UNDERSTAND WHAT I WAS
SAYING - TALK ABOUT NAYSAYISM - THAT'S YOU TO A TEE GUTHBALL.

I spend hours analyziing your flawed Radon/Radium rocket bull**** -
showing you the power levels oare hopelessly too low, that the
quantities of Radium on Earth are hopelessly too small to achieve
anything, even if the power levels were up to par. Spent hours trying
to educate you on the concept that fission achieves what you want to
achieve, but at power levels that make sense. What do you do? YOU
**** ON IT DOING NO WORK WHATEVER TO TRY TO UNDERSTAND WHAT I WAS
SAYING - TALK ABOUT NAYSAYISM - THAT'S YOU TO A TEE GUTHBALL!


As such I do believe there's crapolla on Earth
that's more honest and thereby more intelligent than Mook.

I may not be the brightest bulb in the pack Guthball, but one things
certain, I'm brighter than you by about a billion times! LOL


"If you're not looking for the truth, you will not find it."
-Brad Guth

Which explains why you are still confused and mystified by life the
universe and everythying you worthless piece of ****.

"To believe with certainty we must begin with doubting."
-Stanislaus I

Well, you should do more than read quotes, you should read entire works
asshole, then you'd get the whole picture;

Have the courage to face a difficulty lest it kick you harder than you
bargain for.
Stanislaus I

"The real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking new landscapes,
but having new eyes."
-Marcel Proust

Gee Guthball, if you'd actually read these quotes and come to
understand them then there might be hope for you. But I doubt you even
read them, let alone take time to consider them fully. Here's another
for you... hopefully when you have new eyes you will come to
understand it.

There is no man, however wise, who has not at some period of his youth
said things, or lived in a way the consciousness of which is so
unpleasant to him in later life that he would gladly, if he could,
expunge it from his memory.
- Marcel Proust

"Truth is given, not to be contemplated, but to be done. Life is an
action, not a thought."
-F.W. Robertson
~

Do you just go to Brainy Quote and pull **** up? You don't read any of
this **** do you? Do you even know who Robertson is? What is your
favorite work of his? lol. You pathetic moron.

Instruction ends in the schoolroom, but education ends only with life.
A child is given to the universe to be educated.
-Frederick W. Robertson

Even Kurt Vonnegut would have to agree that; WAR is WAR, thus "in war
there are no rules" -

Bull****. Read The Art of War


In fact, war has been the very reason why honest
folks are having to deal with the likes of others that haven't been
playing by whatever the supposed rules, such as our resident LLPOF
warlord(GW Bush) having invented WMD seems to come to mind.

Totally pointless ranting having nothing to do with the fact that the
US went to the moon, there is no life on Venus, Guthballs' radon/radium
rocket won't work, and nothing guthball ever said or is likely to say,
or is saying now, has an ounce of credibility or validity to it.

Life upon Venus, a township w/Bridge & ET/UFO Park-n-Ride Tarmac:
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-town.htm
The Russian/China LSE-CM/ISS (Lunar Space Elevator)
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/lunar-space-elevator.htm
Venus ETs, plus the updated sub-topics; Brad Guth / GASA-IEIS
http://guthvenus.tripod.com/gv-topics.htm


hahaha....

Brad, you idiot.. Please edit your cross-posts so that you only post to the
newsgroups that give a darn. As you've not been able to grasp this concept
over the last few months, it's clear that you are a moron!


"Brad Guth" wrote in message
oups.com...
tomcat wrote:
Tankfixer wrote:
In article om,
mumbled

What are Beta Lights?

The glowing numbers on the front of Brad's Sony VCR...



Officially Beta Lights are tritium glow lights. But they have been
said to protect against external radiation? Perhaps this was an error
on the author's part, or it may indicate some possible 'classified'
technology used on the Apollo Missions.

There's nothing all that magical about stopping gamma and hard-X-rays,
and the moon is physically much worse off than what the Van Allen belts
have to offer.

Generating a few spare terajoules of energy for that of sustaining an
artificial lunar magnetosphere seems doable. Although that's only
trapping the nasty stuff as much as it's capable of deflecting solar
wind. Then what? Don't you still need a robust atmosphere?
-
Brad Guth

"AZ Woody" wrote in message
...
Brad, you idiot.. Please edit your cross-posts so that you only post to
the
newsgroups that give a darn. As you've not been able to grasp this
concept
over the last few months, it's clear that you are a moron!


You assume ANY group gives a damn about what he has to say.

Hint, none of the ones listed do. Followup to dev.null I suppose. :-/



"Brad Guth" wrote in message
oups.com...
tomcat wrote:
Tankfixer wrote:
In article om,
mumbled

What are Beta Lights?

The glowing numbers on the front of Brad's Sony VCR...



Officially Beta Lights are tritium glow lights. But they have been
said to protect against external radiation? Perhaps this was an error
on the author's part, or it may indicate some possible 'classified'
technology used on the Apollo Missions.

There's nothing all that magical about stopping gamma and hard-X-rays,
and the moon is physically much worse off than what the Van Allen belts
have to offer.

Generating a few spare terajoules of energy for that of sustaining an
artificial lunar magnetosphere seems doable. Although that's only
trapping the nasty stuff as much as it's capable of deflecting solar
wind. Then what? Don't you still need a robust atmosphere?
-
Brad Guth