If the moon landing was faked...

You are the one who is not looking for the truth.

You don't understand basic photography/videography.
And is not able to carry out simple tests either. I have just been
outside and taken a photograph of the sky with a shortish exposure as
the astronauts used and, do you know what, THERE ARE NO STARS!!!!!
I mean, gosh, I look up at the sky and they are there, but when I take a
picture they clearly aren't. Is this some form of conspiracy? I demand
to know the truth. Or not.

Malcolm B

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 01:34 +0100 (BST), (Malcolm
Bacchus) wrote:

And is not able to carry out simple tests either. I have just been
outside and taken a photograph of the sky with a shortish exposure as
the astronauts used and, do you know what, THERE ARE NO STARS!!!!!

But there are stars in space in almost all sci-fi movies. :-)
---
Replace you know what by j to email

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 01:34 +0100 (BST), (Malcolm
Bacchus) wrote:

And is not able to carry out simple tests either. I have just been
outside and taken a photograph of the sky with a shortish exposure as
the astronauts used and, do you know what, THERE ARE NO STARS!!!!!

From:
http://ottawa.rasc.ca/articles/taylo...m/digicam.html

"Another easy way to start is to mount the camera on a steady tripod,
aim it at the sky and take the longest exposure possible. The maximum
sensitivity of modern commercial CCD chips is equivalent to ISO 400
film, which means that the brighter stars can be captured with an
exposure of just a few seconds. "
---
Replace you know what by j to email

"Jud McCranie" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 01:34 +0100 (BST), (Malcolm
Bacchus) wrote:

And is not able to carry out simple tests either. I have just been
outside and taken a photograph of the sky with a shortish exposure as
the astronauts used and, do you know what, THERE ARE NO STARS!!!!!

But there are stars in space in almost all sci-fi movies. :-)

Yes, but in space no one can hear you scream at the stars.


---
Replace you know what by j to email

In article ,
(Jud McCranie) wrote:

*From:* Jud McCranie
*Date:* Tue, 11 Jul 2006 22:44:23 -0400

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 01:34 +0100 (BST), (Malcolm
Bacchus) wrote:

And is not able to carry out simple tests either. I have just been
outside and taken a photograph of the sky with a shortish exposure
as the astronauts used and, do you know what, THERE ARE NO STARS!!!!!

From:
http://ottawa.rasc.ca/articles/taylo...m/digicam.html

"Another easy way to start is to mount the camera on a steady tripod,
aim it at the sky and take the longest exposure possible. The maximum
sensitivity of modern commercial CCD chips is equivalent to ISO 400
film, which means that the brighter stars can be captured with an
exposure of just a few seconds. "
---
Replace you know what by j to email


Do that whilst trying to take a picture of a man in a large bright white
suit working on the ground at the same time and see what you get.

Malcolm B

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:41 +0100 (BST), (Malcolm
Bacchus) wrote:

Do that whilst trying to take a picture of a man in a large bright white
suit working on the ground at the same time and see what you get.

The man would be vastly overexposed - 10 stops or so.
---
Replace you know what by j to email

Greg D. Moore (Strider) wrote:


"Jud McCranie" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 01:34 +0100 (BST), (Malcolm
Bacchus) wrote:

And is not able to carry out simple tests either. I have just been
outside and taken a photograph of the sky with a shortish exposure as
the astronauts used and, do you know what, THERE ARE NO STARS!!!!!

But there are stars in space in almost all sci-fi movies. :-)

Yes, but in space no one can hear you scream at the stars.

"BE CAREFUL, SIGOURNEY!"

In article ,
(Jud McCranie) wrote:

*From:* Jud McCranie
*Date:* Wed, 12 Jul 2006 10:16:59 -0400

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 09:41 +0100 (BST), (Malcolm
Bacchus) wrote:

Do that whilst trying to take a picture of a man in a large bright
white suit working on the ground at the same time and see what you
get.

The man would be vastly overexposed - 10 stops or so.
---
Replace you know what by j to email

Exactly. Which is why the astronauts' cameras were not set up that way
and why the stars can't be seen. Easy, isn't it?

Malcolm B

On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:22 +0100 (BST), (Malcolm
Bacchus) wrote:

Exactly. Which is why the astronauts' cameras were not set up that way
and why the stars can't be seen. Easy, isn't it?

For us it is, but not for some people. That question STILL comes up.
---
Replace you know what by j to email

It is easy to understand, but just try and tell Brad that !!


Jud McCranie wrote:
On Wed, 12 Jul 2006 17:22 +0100 (BST), (Malcolm
Bacchus) wrote:

Exactly. Which is why the astronauts' cameras were not set up that way
and why the stars can't be seen. Easy, isn't it?

For us it is, but not for some people. That question STILL comes up.
---
Replace you know what by j to email