Japanese nuke power has nearly ended

On Jan 13, 5:44*pm, bob haller wrote:
On Jan 13, 7:18*pm, Brad Guth wrote:









On Jan 12, 10:54*pm, |"

wrote:
On Jan 12, 8:52*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Jan 12, 1:24*pm, bob haller wrote:

Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline

This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for
regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90
percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service.

Shikoku Electric Power Company will start procedures on Friday to
reduce the power output from the No.2 reactor at the Ikata nuclear
power plant in Ehime Prefecture, western Japan.

The reactor will shut down on Saturday for a 3-month inspection.

When it shuts down, 49 of the country's 54 reactors will be out of
service.

Stress tests are required before the reactors can resume operations.

In addition, Ehime Prefecture and Ikata Town officials say they can't
decide whether to approve resumption of operations for the nuclear
reactors until the central government draws up new safety guidelines
that take into account the Fukushima nuclear accident.

Other local authorities are also cautious about putting nuclear
reactors in their areas back online.

All currently operating nuclear reactors in Japan are scheduled to
undergo inspection by this spring, at the latest.

If the present deadlock continues, the country could see all 54
nuclear reactors shut down.

Friday, January 13, 2012 02:04 +0900 (JST

They should plan on paying at least $1/kwhr, and choking pollution for
the next decade.

What could possibly go wrong with LNG supertankers in several harbors
at any one time?

*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

If you think some sort of nuclear power is relatively safe, then I
suspect
LNG might handled relatively safely. Of course, the excution will
likely
be flawed. So some great yellow flash in the night will a possible.
And an earthquake could be the trigger. Imagine the results of
a wave driven by quake effects on a supertanker in harbor.

I do think they could do better than a dollar per KW.
Nonetheless, Japan is a nation with huge problems.

Thorium fueled reactors of the AP-1000 configuration that's greatly
simplified, are as close to failsafe as Big-Energy gets. *Of course
you'd have to make do with paying not more than 5 cents per kwhr,
because it wouldn't cost one half cent per kwhr to create.

*http://nextbigfuture.com/2010/10/min...or-group-talks...
*http://realdoctorstu.files.wordpress...m-waste-compar...
*http://www.greentechmedia.com/articl...-Generate-Safe...
*http://energyfromthorium.com/joomla/...m_content&view...

*There are thousands of such links pertaining to the positive/
constructive use of thorium instead of uranium.

*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I am all for nuke power, as long as a meltdown is unlikely but if it
does occur the reactor still wouldnt leak.

I'll ditto that view. Though I see it as only stop gap on earth or for
off planet use.

On Jan 13, 5:44*pm, bob haller wrote:
On Jan 13, 7:18*pm, Brad Guth wrote:









On Jan 12, 10:54*pm, |"

wrote:
On Jan 12, 8:52*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Jan 12, 1:24*pm, bob haller wrote:

Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline

This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for
regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90
percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service.

Shikoku Electric Power Company will start procedures on Friday to
reduce the power output from the No.2 reactor at the Ikata nuclear
power plant in Ehime Prefecture, western Japan.

The reactor will shut down on Saturday for a 3-month inspection.

When it shuts down, 49 of the country's 54 reactors will be out of
service.

Stress tests are required before the reactors can resume operations.

In addition, Ehime Prefecture and Ikata Town officials say they can't
decide whether to approve resumption of operations for the nuclear
reactors until the central government draws up new safety guidelines
that take into account the Fukushima nuclear accident.

Other local authorities are also cautious about putting nuclear
reactors in their areas back online.

All currently operating nuclear reactors in Japan are scheduled to
undergo inspection by this spring, at the latest.

If the present deadlock continues, the country could see all 54
nuclear reactors shut down.

Friday, January 13, 2012 02:04 +0900 (JST

They should plan on paying at least $1/kwhr, and choking pollution for
the next decade.

What could possibly go wrong with LNG supertankers in several harbors
at any one time?

*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

If you think some sort of nuclear power is relatively safe, then I
suspect
LNG might handled relatively safely. Of course, the excution will
likely
be flawed. So some great yellow flash in the night will a possible.
And an earthquake could be the trigger. Imagine the results of
a wave driven by quake effects on a supertanker in harbor.

I do think they could do better than a dollar per KW.
Nonetheless, Japan is a nation with huge problems.

Thorium fueled reactors of the AP-1000 configuration that's greatly
simplified, are as close to failsafe as Big-Energy gets. *Of course
you'd have to make do with paying not more than 5 cents per kwhr,
because it wouldn't cost one half cent per kwhr to create.

*http://nextbigfuture.com/2010/10/min...or-group-talks...
*http://realdoctorstu.files.wordpress...m-waste-compar...
*http://www.greentechmedia.com/articl...-Generate-Safe...
*http://energyfromthorium.com/joomla/...m_content&view...

*There are thousands of such links pertaining to the positive/
constructive use of thorium instead of uranium.

*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I am all for nuke power, as long as a meltdown is unlikely but if it
does occur the reactor still wouldnt leak.

Most any new generation thorium fueled reactor qualifies, with
failsafe to spare.

On Jan 13, 6:12*pm, |"
wrote:
On Jan 13, 5:44*pm, bob haller wrote:









On Jan 13, 7:18*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Jan 12, 10:54*pm, |"

wrote:
On Jan 12, 8:52*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Jan 12, 1:24*pm, bob haller wrote:

Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline

This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for
regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90
percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service.

Shikoku Electric Power Company will start procedures on Friday to
reduce the power output from the No.2 reactor at the Ikata nuclear
power plant in Ehime Prefecture, western Japan.

The reactor will shut down on Saturday for a 3-month inspection..

When it shuts down, 49 of the country's 54 reactors will be out of
service.

Stress tests are required before the reactors can resume operations.

In addition, Ehime Prefecture and Ikata Town officials say they can't
decide whether to approve resumption of operations for the nuclear
reactors until the central government draws up new safety guidelines
that take into account the Fukushima nuclear accident.

Other local authorities are also cautious about putting nuclear
reactors in their areas back online.

All currently operating nuclear reactors in Japan are scheduled to
undergo inspection by this spring, at the latest.

If the present deadlock continues, the country could see all 54
nuclear reactors shut down.

Friday, January 13, 2012 02:04 +0900 (JST

They should plan on paying at least $1/kwhr, and choking pollution for
the next decade.

What could possibly go wrong with LNG supertankers in several harbors
at any one time?

*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

If you think some sort of nuclear power is relatively safe, then I
suspect
LNG might handled relatively safely. Of course, the excution will
likely
be flawed. So some great yellow flash in the night will a possible.
And an earthquake could be the trigger. Imagine the results of
a wave driven by quake effects on a supertanker in harbor.

I do think they could do better than a dollar per KW.
Nonetheless, Japan is a nation with huge problems.

Thorium fueled reactors of the AP-1000 configuration that's greatly
simplified, are as close to failsafe as Big-Energy gets. *Of course
you'd have to make do with paying not more than 5 cents per kwhr,
because it wouldn't cost one half cent per kwhr to create.

*http://nextbigfuture.com/2010/10/min...or-group-talks...
*http://realdoctorstu.files.wordpress...m-waste-compar...
*http://www.greentechmedia.com/articl...-Generate-Safe...
*http://energyfromthorium.com/joomla/...m_content&view...

*There are thousands of such links pertaining to the positive/
constructive use of thorium instead of uranium.

*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I am all for nuke power, as long as a meltdown is unlikely but if it
does occur the reactor still wouldnt leak.

I'll ditto that view. Though I see it as only stop gap on earth or for
off planet use.

William Mook will supply either extremely cheap LH2 or help with Li-6
fusion alternatives that can be even cheaper than using his hydrogen.

The Mokenergy H2 used with a fuel-cells that are near 50% efficient,
is actually pretty darn good.

Nuclear reactors can even be converted to burning H2 along with coal
or natural gas.

On Jan 13, 6:12*pm, |"
wrote:
On Jan 13, 5:44*pm, bob haller wrote:









On Jan 13, 7:18*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Jan 12, 10:54*pm, |"

wrote:
On Jan 12, 8:52*pm, Brad Guth wrote:

On Jan 12, 1:24*pm, bob haller wrote:

Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline

This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for
regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90
percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service.

Shikoku Electric Power Company will start procedures on Friday to
reduce the power output from the No.2 reactor at the Ikata nuclear
power plant in Ehime Prefecture, western Japan.

The reactor will shut down on Saturday for a 3-month inspection..

When it shuts down, 49 of the country's 54 reactors will be out of
service.

Stress tests are required before the reactors can resume operations.

In addition, Ehime Prefecture and Ikata Town officials say they can't
decide whether to approve resumption of operations for the nuclear
reactors until the central government draws up new safety guidelines
that take into account the Fukushima nuclear accident.

Other local authorities are also cautious about putting nuclear
reactors in their areas back online.

All currently operating nuclear reactors in Japan are scheduled to
undergo inspection by this spring, at the latest.

If the present deadlock continues, the country could see all 54
nuclear reactors shut down.

Friday, January 13, 2012 02:04 +0900 (JST

They should plan on paying at least $1/kwhr, and choking pollution for
the next decade.

What could possibly go wrong with LNG supertankers in several harbors
at any one time?

*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

If you think some sort of nuclear power is relatively safe, then I
suspect
LNG might handled relatively safely. Of course, the excution will
likely
be flawed. So some great yellow flash in the night will a possible.
And an earthquake could be the trigger. Imagine the results of
a wave driven by quake effects on a supertanker in harbor.

I do think they could do better than a dollar per KW.
Nonetheless, Japan is a nation with huge problems.

Thorium fueled reactors of the AP-1000 configuration that's greatly
simplified, are as close to failsafe as Big-Energy gets. *Of course
you'd have to make do with paying not more than 5 cents per kwhr,
because it wouldn't cost one half cent per kwhr to create.

*http://nextbigfuture.com/2010/10/min...or-group-talks...
*http://realdoctorstu.files.wordpress...m-waste-compar...
*http://www.greentechmedia.com/articl...-Generate-Safe...
*http://energyfromthorium.com/joomla/...m_content&view...

*There are thousands of such links pertaining to the positive/
constructive use of thorium instead of uranium.

*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

I am all for nuke power, as long as a meltdown is unlikely but if it
does occur the reactor still wouldnt leak.

I'll ditto that view. Though I see it as only stop gap on earth or for
off planet use.

Thorium fueled reactors would still be the best long-term solution.

On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:25:45 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote:

Dan wrote:

On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:24:23 -0800 (PST), bob haller wrote:

Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline

This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for
regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90
percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service.

Cite? None?

*STFU* bob


This is actually being reported, Dan. What puzzles me is what the
hell they're using for electricity while this is going on, since
something like 25% of all electricity in Japan comes from nuclear
reactors.

Buy stock in candle manufacturers...

You're an asshole but I feel in the Xmas mood so.............

I have some helpful information for you.

There are exactly two categories of people who might read any article
you post. The first group comprises those who know you're a liar, a
plagiarist, a fraud and an idiot. The second includes only those who
have never heard of you.

Your lies and incoherent nonsense just give the first group an
opportunity to laugh at you, and any of the second group who see that
crap will immediately migrate to the first.

If you want to maintain as good an image as possible, your best bet?

Shut the **** up.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

On Jan 14, 6:06*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
It's really sad when the only thing you can find to do with your time
is vandalize Usenet News, Not Dan.







Dan wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jan 2012 17:25:45 -0700, Fred J. McCall wrote:

Dan wrote:

On Thu, 12 Jan 2012 13:24:23 -0800 (PST), bob haller wrote:

Over 90% of Japan's reactors to be offline

This week another nuclear reactor in Japan will be shut down for
regular inspections. With this addition to the list, more than 90
percent of the reactors in the country will be out of service.

Cite? None?

*STFU* bob

This is actually being reported, Dan. *What puzzles me is what the
hell they're using for electricity while this is going on, since
something like 25% of all electricity in Japan comes from nuclear
reactors.

Buy stock in candle manufacturers...

You're an asshole but I feel in the Xmas mood so.............

I have some helpful information for you.

There are exactly two categories of people who might read any article
you post. The first group comprises those who know you're a liar, a
plagiarist, a fraud and an idiot. The second includes only those who
have never heard of you.

Your lies and incoherent nonsense just give the first group an
opportunity to laugh at you, and any of the second group who see that
crap will immediately migrate to the first.

If you want to maintain as good an image as possible, your best bet?

Shut the **** up.

Dan, U.S. Air Force, retired

What have you ever contributed that's not public knowledge and
mainstream status quo?

On Jan 15, 10:31*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Brad Guth wrote:
On Jan 14, 6:06*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
It's really sad when the only thing you can find to do with your time
is vandalize Usenet News, Not Dan.

What have you ever contributed that's not public knowledge and
mainstream status quo?

What have you ever contributed that's not delusional ravings and
fringe nutzoid bleating?

--
"Ordinarilyzfred is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
*only stupid."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine

On Jan 15, 11:36*am, bob haller wrote:
On Jan 15, 10:31*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:







Brad Guth wrote:
On Jan 14, 6:06*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
It's really sad when the only thing you can find to do with your time
is vandalize Usenet News, Not Dan.

What have you ever contributed that's not public knowledge and
mainstream status quo?

What have you ever contributed that's not delusional ravings and
fringe nutzoid bleating?

--
"Ordinarilyzfred is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
*only stupid."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine

Actually, Fred's asshole is certainly way bigger than most. Must be
from over-use by those brown-nosed clowns he always hangs with.

On Jan 15, 5:55*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
bob haller wrote:
On Jan 15, 10:31*am, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Brad Guth wrote:
On Jan 14, 6:06*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
It's really sad when the only thing you can find to do with your time
is vandalize Usenet News, Not Dan.

What have you ever contributed that's not public knowledge and
mainstream status quo?

What have you ever contributed that's not delusional ravings and
fringe nutzoid bleating?

--
"Ordinarilyzfred is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
*only stupid."
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Heinrich Heine

Leave it to Bobbert to copy the scrofulous practice of editing things
he quotes...

--
"False words are not only evil in themselves, but they infect the
*soul with evil." Fred posts falsehoods
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -- Socrates- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Actually, Fred's asshole is certainly way bigger than most. *Must be
from over-use by those brown-nosed clowns he always hangs with.

Another Guthball heard from. *Isn't it interesting how vandalizing
nymskulls, Bobberts, and Guthballs all surge together?


you are a super easy target to be discredited