A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

distribution of galaxies implies a cosmic atom; Chapt.10; #181; 3rded; Atom Totality theory



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 15th 09, 06:44 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.math,sci.astro
Archimedes Plutonium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 858
Default distribution of galaxies implies a cosmic atom; Chapt.10; #181; 3rded; Atom Totality theory

As mentioned in previous posts, I will start 4th edition
of this book as soon as this 3rd is completed in that
I need this book organized for once. I have posts scattered from
different chapters and is annoying. So
I want this book organized and will devote full attention
to that prospect.

High Energy Ray from direction of Centaurus

Anyway, there is news from Univ Chicago and the South American
telescopes of these High
Energy Cosmic Rays or Gamma bursts. And their reports in the latest
science journals.


And they claim the source are 13 million light years away of the
Centaurus A, Hamburger Galaxy.
And they seem to think that their galactic nucleus is the source of
those high energy bursts.


But I have my doubts. Since their mind frame is within a Big Bang
theory and blackhole nonsense.
While my mind is with Atom Totality where the nucleus of the Atom
Totality is in the direction
of the Great Attractor and the Sloan Great Wall. So that according to
my way of thinking
that most of these high energy Rays would come from the direction of
the Great Attractor and
Sloan Great Wall.


So I had a Google search for Centaurus Great Attractor Sloan Great
Wall
and found these hits:


What is the Large-Scale Structure of the Cosmos?
The largest known structure in the cosmos is the Sloan Great Wall, ...
anomaly in the adjacent Hydra-Centaurus supercluster known as the
Great Attractor. ...
http://www.wisegeek.com/what-is-the-...the-cosmos.htm -
20k - Cached - Similar pages - Note this
Large-scale structure of the cosmos - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Several superclusters stand out, such as the Sloan Great Wall, the
largest structure in the ... in the direction of the Hydra and
Centaurus constellations. ...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large-scale_structure_of_the_cosmos - 43k -
Cached - Similar pages - Note this
Astrophysics Majors
Senior Thesis: "Portrait of the Sloan Great Wall" Advisor: Richard
Gott. Lear Janiv Senior Thesis: "The Local Galactic Escape Velocity:
The Mass of the ...
http://www.astro.princeton.edu/acade...s_research.htm - 39k
- Cached - Similar pages - Note this
[PDF]
arXiv:astro-ph/0610762 v1 25 Oct 2006
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
partly due to the Sloan Great Wall of Galaxies; this shift also
appears in a sub-sample not ..... the Sloan Great Wall which Gott et
al. (2006) measured ...
arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0610762 - Similar pages - Note this
[PDF]
arXiv:astro-ph/0408583 v1 31 Aug 2004
File Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
and distance (Gott et al. 2003) clearly shows the largest structure
seen to date, a "Sloan. Great Wall" that extends over roughly 420h ...
arxiv.org/pdf/astro-ph/0408583 - Similar pages - Note this
Front: [astro-ph/0610762] Topology of structure in the Sloan ...
The data show a ``meatball'' shift (only partly due to the Sloan Great
Wall of Galaxies; this shift also appears in a sub-sample not
containing the Wall) ...
front.math.ucdavis.edu/0610.1762 - 6k - Cached - Similar pages - Note
this
Mapping the cosmic web with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
2003) clearly shows the largest structure seen to date, a "Sloan.
Great Wall" that extends over roughly 420h. -1. Mpc. This supercluster-
scale structure ...
journals.cambridge.org/production/action/cjoGetFulltext?
fulltextid=250742 -


---


I believe there is more of a correlation of the Cosmic Rays and Gamma
Rays as aligned with
the Great Attractor and Sloan Great Wall than there is any other
correlation.


In the Atom Totality, most Dirac radioactivity goes into growing new
stars and galaxies, but
a predominant amount of "Dirac Radioactivity" should be observable in
the direction of the
Nucleus of the Atom Totality and that direction is a line of sight
from Earth to the Great Attractor
and Sloan Great Wall.


So apparently Centaurus is in that line of sight. Now, not all high
energy Rays have to fall in
that line of sight to support the Atom Totality theory but a large
majority of those Rays
should come from that line of sight since that is the Nucleus of the
Atom Totality which is
the source of Dirac Radioactivity as outlined in his book Directions
in Physics.


Now recent news of a journal report of a high energy Ray in the
direction of Centaurus A about 13.7 million light years away
and of another Ray about 326 million light years away makes me
want to give some order to these newsflashes because they do not
make the basic information briefing. They neglect to tell us what
position of the Cosmic Sky those Rays are in the "direction of"
and that is a very important piece of information. Because the
direction of drawing a straight line from Earth to the Great
Attractor which also has the Great Wall and then the Sloan
Great Wall all involved in this one straight line drawn.

Of course this information belittles the Big Bang theory and
places it in jeopardy as being a fake theory.

But scientists need to be more precise and detailed and focused
in their reports. They seem to want to tell us how far away
Centaurus A is from Earth but they never seem to want to say
where in the Cosmic Sky that Centaurus is relative to a straight
line drawn from Earth to the Great Attractor. So that if scientists
had said in this newsflash that Centaurus A was directly on that
Cosmic line of sight to the Great Attractor and Great Wall and
Sloan Great Wall, then they would have made a far better report then
their sloppy report.

Now here I have gathered a partial list of Cosmic Gamma Rays:
--- quoting Wikipedia ---
GRBs of significant historical or scientific importance include:

* 670702: The first GRB ever detected.[28]
* 970228: The first GRB with a successfully detected afterglow.
The
location of the afterglow was coincident with a very faint galaxy,
providing strong evidence that GRBs are extragalactic.[29]
* 970508: The first GRB with a measured redshift (distance). At
z=0.835, it confirmed unambiguously that GRBs are extragalactic.[30]
* 971214: In 1997, this was believed by some to be the most
energetic event in the universe. This claim has since been
discredited.[31][32]
* 980425: The first GRB with an observed associated supernova
(1998bw), providing strong evidence of the link between GRBs and
supernovae. The GRB itself was very unusual for being extremely
underluminous. Also the closest GRB to date.[33]
* 990123: This GRB had the optically brightest afterglow measured
to date, momentarily reaching or exceeding a magnitude of 8.9, which
would be visible with an ordinary pair of binoculars, despite its
distance of nearly 10 billion light years. This was also the first GRB
for which optical emission was detected before the gamma-ray emission
had ceased.[34]
* 030329A: An extremely close (z=0.168),[35] and therefore
extremely bright GRB, with an unambiguous supernova association.[36]
GRB
030329 was so bright that its gamma radiation ionized the Earth's
upper
atmosphere.[37]
* 050509B: The first short GRB with a host association. Provided
evidence that (some) short GRBs, unlike long GRBs, occur in old
galaxies
and do not have accompanying supernovae.[38]
* 050724: A thoroughly observed short gamma-ray burst with an
afterglow suggesting the demise of a neutron star orbiting a black
hole.[39]
* 050904: The most distant GRB observed as of 2005, at z=6.29 (13
billion light-years).[40]
* 060218: A low-redshift GRB with an accompanying supernova.[41]
* 060505: The first, well-observed, long duration GRB not
accompanied by a bright supernova.[42]
--- end quoting an encyclopedia ---

Now what I will try to track down is whether any or many of the above
originated from the line of sight of Earth to the Great Attractor.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
distribution and density of galaxies matches dot pattern of plutoniumatom, Chp 10; #179; Atom Totality theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 3 November 14th 09 04:54 AM
distribution of galaxies points to Atom Totality not Big Bang #176 ;3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 November 6th 09 09:29 AM
whether I can believe most stars are solo and not binary; #168; 3rded; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 August 22nd 09 07:18 AM
CellWell1 & 2; how water gets concentrated on astro bodies #160; 3rded; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 August 20th 09 08:28 AM
Cangaroo Cosmic (gamma) Ray project for southern hemisphere #120; 3rded; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 0 August 4th 09 07:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.