A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » History
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #501  
Old June 7th 08, 08:37 PM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,soc.history.what-if,alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth

On May 13, 2:20 pm, "Scott Hedrick" wrote:
"Pat Flannery" wrote in message

dakotatelephone...

He's going to claim the Moon only recently went into Earth orbit - a few
thousand years ago, no doubt brought here by aliens. :-)


So, then, the Moon was an alien nuclear waste dumping ground?

** Posted fromhttp://www.teranews.com**


That's entirely possible, especially since it's so gamma producing
like no other moon, planet or even that of our sun. An icy proto-moon
is also providing a darn good interstellar craft, as well as nicely
thermal insulated and otherwise ideally shielded from cosmic and local
gamma. Must also be the reason(s) why most everything of JAXA/Selene
has become so unusually taboo/nondisclosure rated.

BTW, the 2e20 N/sec worth of holding onto our moon is always twice as
tidal force worthy as our sun. If that mutual tidal force of 2e20 N/
sec were converted into hourly energy, it's absolutely impressive as
all get out, even if only 0.0001% of that force--energy becomes
global warming worthy.

If our trusty moon were to be relocated out to Earth's L1, and
interactively kept there for obtaining roughly 3+% worth of solar
isolation, as such we'd still have half the amount of tidal action to
deal with. Because that relocated moon always being in alignment with
our sun, those ocean tides would never change amplitude or their 24
hour cycle.

If the moon were somehow to be eliminated, we'd still have roughly a
third the tidal action, but at least our badly polluted environment
would then be having a singular 24 hour tidal cycle that was always as
regular as high noon, and lowest tides as regular as midnight, as well
as Earth would be getting extremely cold from the inside out. Those
supercomputer simulations would have easily proven all of this out,
but sadly they are taboo/nondisclosure or simply DARPA need-to-know
rated.

It seems them nifty Google-Groups gold stars are no longer working, at
least not for me. One of my lose cannons must have nailed their DARPA
status quo (upsetting their apple cart or rocking their good ship
LOLLIPOP). Of course few if none others were into giving out those
gold stars, no matters how interesting the contributed topic or reply.

When so much of DARPA/newsgroups are of such silly or intentionally
misleading/diversion topics, it’s interesting how the really good
topics or replies can’t seem to be given any of them Google-Groups
gold stars. I wonder why them DARPA Gods of Usenet/newsgroups are
upset enough to banish them gold stars.

Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

  #502  
Old June 9th 08, 09:40 PM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,soc.history.what-if,alt.astronomy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 242
Default Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth

On Jun 7, 12:37*pm, BradGuth wrote:
That's entirely possible, especially since it's so gamma producing
like no other moon, planet or even that of our sun.


Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite.
Links please.
Thanks.
  #503  
Old June 10th 08, 04:42 AM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,soc.history.what-if,alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth

On Jun 9, 1:40*pm, wrote:
On Jun 7, 12:37*pm, BradGuth wrote:

That's entirely possible, especially since it's so gamma producing
like no other moon, planet or even that of our sun.


Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite.
Links please.
Thanks.


Cite yourself.

Our NASA supposedly took pictures within the gamma spectrum, and our
moon indicated as rather nicely gamma worthy as all get out. I think
most of that gamma was secondary/recoil photons, although some of that
gamma must have been directly from the radioactive moon itself.

The sodium cloud that surrounds our moon by more than 8r, and trails
by 900,000 km may be of the metallic mineral of sodium, although the
extremely low density of the moon's core might otherwise suggest
there's plain old salt that's sequestered below that unusually thick
crust.

Earth seems to have received way more than its fair share of salt.
So, where's the moon salt hiding, and for that matter where's all the
Mars salt hiding??
- Brad Guth
  #504  
Old June 10th 08, 06:22 PM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,soc.history.what-if,alt.astronomy
Damien Valentine
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 273
Default Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth

On Jun 9, 1:40*pm, wrote:
Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite.
Links please.
Thanks.


Mr. Guth neither cites nor researches. He simply asserts.
Apparently, his unpublished "subjective opinion" -- which at this
point I am forced to read as "made up out of whole cloth" -- is
supposed to be worth more to us than published, objective findings
from generations of professionals. (Not to mention plain common
sense.)

We established this at least as far back as the "there are no
Paleolithic depictions of the Moon" farce...and probably farther back
than that. Why is this thread still active?
  #505  
Old June 11th 08, 05:38 AM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,soc.history.what-if,alt.astronomy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 242
Default Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth

On Jun 9, 8:42*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 9, 1:40*pm, wrote:

On Jun 7, 12:37*pm, BradGuth wrote:


That's entirely possible, especially since it's so gamma producing
like no other moon, planet or even that of our sun.


Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite.
Links please.
Thanks.


Cite yourself.

Our NASA supposedly took pictures within the gamma spectrum, and our


Only word worth any of your gamma salt is "supposedly." I have n-ASS-a
moon rocks - $1,000ea. Ca$h only.

moon indicated as rather nicely gamma worthy as all get out. *I think
most of that gamma was secondary/recoil photons, although some of that
gamma must have been directly from the radioactive moon itself.


The sodium cloud that surrounds our moon by more than 8r, and trails
by 900,000 km may be of the metallic mineral of sodium, although the
extremely low density of the moon's core might otherwise suggest
there's plain old salt that's sequestered below that unusually thick
crust.

Earth seems to have received way more than its fair share of salt.

wrt what? your french fries?

So, where's the moon salt hiding, and for that matter where's all the
Mars salt hiding??


Where's those sources hiding I requested?
  #506  
Old June 11th 08, 06:58 AM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,soc.history.what-if,alt.astronomy
Timberwoof[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 799
Default Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth

In article
,
Damien Valentine wrote:

On Jun 9, 1:40*pm, wrote:
Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite.
Links please.
Thanks.


Mr. Guth neither cites nor researches. He simply asserts.
Apparently, his unpublished "subjective opinion" -- which at this
point I am forced to read as "made up out of whole cloth"


Woven paper towels, I'd say.

-- is
supposed to be worth more to us than published, objective findings
from generations of professionals. (Not to mention plain common
sense.)

We established this at least as far back as the "there are no
Paleolithic depictions of the Moon" farce...and probably farther back
than that. Why is this thread still active?


It was quiet for a while, but Brad keeps coming back to scratch at the
scab, to see if he can get anyone else to bite.

I've made a practice of ignoring any post in which he scampers off into
the weeds about DARPA, the Nazis, the Zionists, or any permutation
thereof. If he wants to be taken seriously, then he can act that way. If
he wants to be mistaken for a kook, then he should go on making kooky
concatenations of calamitous cabals.

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot com http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ‹Chris L.
  #507  
Old June 11th 08, 01:29 PM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,soc.history.what-if,alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth

On Jun 10, 10:22 am, Damien Valentine wrote:
On Jun 9, 1:40 pm, wrote:

Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite.
Links please.
Thanks.


Mr.Guth neither cites nor researches. He simply asserts.
Apparently, his unpublished "subjective opinion" -- which at this
point I am forced to read as "made up out of whole cloth" -- is
supposed to be worth more to us than published, objective findings
from generations of professionals. (Not to mention plain common
sense.)

We established this at least as far back as the "there are no
Paleolithic depictions of the Moon" farce...and probably farther back
than that. Why is this thread still active?


I've always given credit where credit was due.

Why bother to make stuff up, when some of our best science comes
directly via your DARPA/NASA?

Of course, having an independent mind that can deductively connect the
dots is kinda necessary, whereas your mindset is kinda like used
toilet paper.

Why not run computer simulations?

Why is JAXA/Selene taboo/nondisclosure rated?

Why is Venus so unusually taboo/nondisclosure rated?

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

David Grinspoon quotes: http://thinkexist.com/quotes/david_grinspoon/
“We're ignorant of life in the universe. We only have one planet that
serves as an example and in science it's not good to derive
information from a sample size of one.”
  #508  
Old June 11th 08, 01:45 PM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,soc.history.what-if,alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth

On Jun 10, 9:38 pm, wrote:
On Jun 9, 8:42 pm, BradGuth wrote:

On Jun 9, 1:40 pm, wrote:


On Jun 7, 12:37 pm, BradGuth wrote:


That's entirely possible, especially since it's so gamma producing
like no other moon, planet or even that of our sun.


Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite.
Links please.
Thanks.


Cite yourself.


Our NASA supposedly took pictures within the gamma spectrum, and our


Only word worth any of your gamma salt is "supposedly." I have n-ASS-a
moon rocks - $1,000ea. Ca$h only.


Are you now admitting that our NASA lied to us?

What's "gamma salt"? (mos DARPA damage-control)


moon indicated as rather nicely gamma worthy as all get out. I think
most of that gamma was secondary/recoil photons, although some of that
gamma must have been directly from the radioactive moon itself.
The sodium cloud that surrounds our moon by more than 8r, and trails
by 900,000 km may be of the metallic mineral of sodium, although the
extremely low density of the moon's core might otherwise suggest
there's plain old salt that's sequestered below that unusually thick
crust.


Earth seems to have received way more than its fair share of salt.


wrt what? your french fries?

So, where's the moon salt hiding, and for that matter where's all the
Mars salt hiding??


Where's those sources hiding I requested?


If Mars had salt; would not that have been one of the very first of
most basic elements discovered and quantified?

If we'd walked on the physically dark moon; besides blinded by the
vibrant look of Venus, wouldn't we have noticed all the remainders of
salt, and otherwise noticed the terrific vapors of sodium leaving that
gamma saturated moon of ours?

Why isn't there any science as to raw ice in space?

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

David Grinspoon quotes: http://thinkexist.com/quotes/david_grinspoon/
“We're ignorant of life in the universe. We only have one planet that
serves as an example and in science it's not good to derive
information from a sample size of one.”
  #509  
Old June 11th 08, 02:01 PM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,soc.history.what-if,alt.astronomy
BradGuth
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 21,544
Default Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth

On Jun 10, 10:58 pm, Timberwoof
wrote:
In article
,
Damien Valentine wrote:

On Jun 9, 1:40 pm, wrote:
Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite.
Links please.
Thanks.


Mr.Guthneither cites nor researches. He simply asserts.
Apparently, his unpublished "subjective opinion" -- which at this
point I am forced to read as "made up out of whole cloth"


Woven paper towels, I'd say.

-- is
supposed to be worth more to us than published, objective findings
from generations of professionals. (Not to mention plain common
sense.)


We established this at least as far back as the "there are no
Paleolithic depictions of the Moon" farce...and probably farther back
than that. Why is this thread still active?


It was quiet for a while, butBradkeeps coming back to scratch at the
scab, to see if he can get anyone else to bite.

I've made a practice of ignoring any post in which he scampers off into
the weeds about DARPA, the Nazis, the Zionists, or any permutation
thereof. If he wants to be taken seriously, then he can act that way. If
he wants to be mistaken for a kook, then he should go on making kooky
concatenations of calamitous cabals.

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot comhttp://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ‹Chris L.


You'd like us to believe that no such faith-based group is ever in
charge of anything, and that our government doesn't make mistakes or
much less tells us lies. Have you told that funny one to our resident
LLPOF warlord(GW Bush)?

Your MI5/CIA~DARPA/NASA and their Zionist/Nazi army of brown-nosed
minions appreciates those damage-control efforts of keeping us
snookered and dumbfounded. Your bonus check is in the mail, and you
can now go back to the usual status quo of perpetrating cold and hot
wars, killing off innocent folks and otherwise inflating the cost of
energy.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth
  #510  
Old June 11th 08, 03:59 PM posted to sci.geo.geology,sci.space.history,sci.space.policy,soc.history.what-if,alt.astronomy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 242
Default Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth

On Jun 11, 5:45*am, BradGuth wrote:

Are you now admitting that our NASA lied to us?

oh heaven's noooooo
diversion noted


What's "gamma salt"? (mos DARPA damage-control)

look it up
diversion noted

If Mars had salt; *would not that have been one of the very first of
most basic elements discovered and quantified?

now onto mars .. diversion noted

If we'd walked on the physically dark moon; *besides blinded by the
vibrant look of Venus, wouldn't we have noticed all the remainders of
salt, and otherwise noticed the terrific vapors of sodium leaving that
gamma saturated moon of ours?

now venus
so we walked on the moon - you spin in every direction


Why isn't there any science as to raw ice in space?

google "comet"


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth BradGuth Policy 523 June 20th 08 07:17 PM
Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review LIBERATOR Space Shuttle 39 April 22nd 06 08:40 AM
Aliens based on moon Brad Guth please review honestjohn Misc 2 April 19th 06 05:55 PM
Moon is less hot by earthshine, says Brad Guth / IEIS~GASA Ami Silberman History 13 December 15th 03 09:13 PM
Moon is less hot by earthshine, says Brad Guth / IEIS~GASA Ami Silberman Astronomy Misc 13 December 15th 03 09:13 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.