A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Astro Pictures
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

FGC 189A and kkh 84



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 3rd 15, 06:05 AM
WA0CKY WA0CKY is offline
Senior Member
 
First recorded activity by SpaceBanter: Feb 2008
Posts: 689
Default FGC 189A and kkh 84

First post got scrambled. Trying again.

This field is located in northeastern Virgo very near the border with Bootes. It contains two objects I had on my to-do list. FGC 179A a flat galaxy, about 73,000 light-years across. For some reason NED shows it as an irregular Magellanic galaxy rather than an edge on spiral. It does seem not to have a dust lane. It's companion in distance anyway, kkh 84 a very blue irregular galaxy that looks like a dwarf but is a bit large for one at 30,000 light-years. It is just classified as an irregular galaxy. Both are 70 million light-years distant by their redshift so likely part of the same group. Unfortunately I found very little on either of these galaxies. Both have rather low surface brightness.

To make the Flat Galaxy Catalog the galaxy must be at least 40" of arc long and have a length to width ratio of at least 7:1. In most galaxy catalogs when a letter is appended to the number it means the galaxy is very near by its namesake in angular distance. They may actually lie millions of light years apart in three dimensions. But not this time. In fact FGC 189 lies almost exactly 180 degrees opposite FGC 189A in Right Ascension. So how they determine this number/letter system is a mystery to me. If someone out there knows let me know and I'll pass it on. I have to admit I've not had time to delve into this very deeply. Flat galaxies have little to no central bulge. Studies are showing that the size of a galaxies massive central black hole is proportional to the size of the bulge. Big bulge -- big black hole. That would indicate the galaxies in the FGC are all harboring unusually small black holes for the size of the disk.

The field happened to contain 3 asteroids and an assortment of very distant galaxies along with even more distant quasars and one candidate quasar (CQ) that is very faint. It's redshift has been determined only photographically. These can be wrong so until it has been verified with a spectroscope it will remain a candidate quasar. Too many times I've seen these turn out to be very nearby blue stars in our neighborhood of our galaxy.

14" LX200R @ f/10, L=4x10' RGB=2x10', STL-11000XM, Paramount ME

Rick
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	KKH84L4X10RGB2X10.JPG
Views:	297
Size:	237.3 KB
ID:	5866  Click image for larger version

Name:	KKH84L4X10RGB2X10ID.JPG
Views:	160
Size:	199.4 KB
ID:	5867  

Last edited by WA0CKY : September 3rd 15 at 08:44 AM. Reason: Fix typos and change wording to avoid ad links
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.