|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
I don't recall, but I'ms sure that both KE and momentum
are done in Physics wioth Lab One. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
all I am say-ing is,
Give the very definitions of "momentum" and "kinetic energy" a chance. I mean, your idea of research seems to be limited to the God-am googolplex & wookiepoopeya. just to say, based upon your own reverence for your own opinions, that Liebniz is wrong ... doesn't do it for me, even though I have not actually gone back & tried to recreate the Physics with Lab, One "experience." and then, to hieghten your illusion, by disagreeing with the guy who found the correct -- til proven, otherwise -- coefficient for "mvv," namely, mvv/2 = KE ... that is really very humorous. I mean, what universe was Coriolis in, that he was able to derive such a simple & fundamental thing, as his effect, or force? would you at least tell us, what direction the toilet flushes, in *your* universe?... I mean, clockwise may have nothing to do with it! |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
pay attention;
it's just you, yourself, Neinstien and me, who are actually bothering with your alleged theory. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
.... and, if you don't bother to engage
in the debate, such as it is, then mey next reply will be, "wow, Neinstein, you win; I'm going to recommend you to the Swedish Bank for the 'Nobel Prize' in economics." yeah; the fake one that the NYTimes columnist, got! |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
.... so, were you confusing teh result that
teh speed of acceleration is the same for different weight objects, ignoring resistance of the surface area? |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
On Apr 5, 4:53*pm, rasterspace wrote:
I don't recall, but I'ms sure that both KE and momentum are done in Physics wioth Lab One. rasterspace: KE and momentum are identical except that KE adds back one unit of the static weight of the moving object. Note the a/g (m) in: KE = a/g (m) + v / 32.174 (m). Because the conversion factor is correctly placed in the velocity rather than in the mass, the units of the result have pounds = pounds, which doesn't violate the Law of the Conservation of energy, and is an actual equation, which F = ma is not! Sorry, Sir Isaac. NoEinstein |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
On Apr 5, 9:41*pm, rasterspace wrote:
all I am say-ing is, Give the very definitions of "momentum" and "kinetic energy" a chance. *I mean, your idea of research seems to be limited to the God-am googolplex & wookiepoopeya. just to say, based upon your own reverence for your own opinions, that Liebniz is wrong ... doesn't do it for me, even though I have not actually gone back & tried to recreate the Physics with Lab, One "experience." *and then, to hieghten your illusion, by disagreeing with the guy who found the correct -- til proven, otherwise -- coefficient for "mvv," namely, mvv/2 = KE ... that is really very humorous. *I mean, what universe was Coriolis in, that he was able to derive such a simple & fundamental thing, as his effect, or force? would you at least tell us, what direction the toilet flushes, in *your* universe?... *I mean, clockwise may have nothing to do with it! rasterspace: You are hypnotized by the SOUND of the name Leibniz! Two men with the names Lorentz and FitzGerald came up with a contraction factor, beta, (math, NOT science) whose only credibility was the studious names of the two men. If you can't understand that "equations" must be equal across the = sign, and have the same UNITS for both sides, then you are continuing to waste my time. NE |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
On Apr 5, 9:42*pm, rasterspace wrote:
pay attention; it's just you, yourself, Neinstien and me, who are actually bothering with your alleged theory. Dear r: For several months now, YOU have been bothering. Why is that, if you don't like either my following on this group or my New Science? NE |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
On Apr 5, 9:46*pm, rasterspace wrote:
... and, if you don't bother to engage in the debate, such as it is, then mey next reply will be, "wow, Neinstein, you win; I'm going to recommend you to the Swedish Bank for the 'Nobel Prize' in economics." *yeah; the fake one that the NYTimes columnist, got! Dear r.: You don't have to agree with me. You can always choose to just go away. NE |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
On Apr 6, 7:31*pm, rasterspace wrote:
... so, were you confusing teh result that teh speed of acceleration is the same for different weight objects, ignoring resistance of the surface area? Dear r.: Amazingly, you are correct that the surface area (frontal area, as in an automobile traveling into the wind) is the main determinate of the upper speed limit of ordinary masses that are speeding into the ether. That same ether also impacts the atoms within the mass. That's why flowing ether (gravity) applies a mass proportional force to all objects near the Earth. Newton never explained how masses long distances away can "know" the mass of the other objects so that the correct force of gravity can be applied. Einstein assumed (HA!) that masses warp space and time. But by what mechanism is space and time... "warped" beyond blind stupidity? The resistance from the ether won't slow any spaceship which first magnetizes the IOTAs in the ether and lets the 'strings' of magnetic lines of flux cause the ether to flow AROUND, not through, the spaceship. It would be advantageous to allow some ether, as matches the flow rate on Earth, to flow through the spaceship so that there will be an Earth-like gravity inside. That's why flying saucers are 'flat', so there can be the maximum of floor space in the most efficient use of materialsa disk shape. NE |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his first relativity paper. | Androcles[_39_] | Amateur Astronomy | 464 | March 29th 11 06:09 PM |
THE ALBERT EINSTEIN OF OUR GENERATION IS LYING AGAIN | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 21 | May 30th 07 08:51 AM |
Einstein was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT | 46erjoe | Misc | 964 | March 10th 07 07:10 AM |
Paper w/cometary panspermia proof & new biology | Jason H. | SETI | 6 | March 15th 04 01:34 PM |