|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#151
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.
like I sad, no-one, including your supposed supproters,
can mane any sense of your zip-a-dee-doo-dah theory, because it doesn't really approach literacy, let-alone physics. just one man's opinion, not backed by anything else. |
#152
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.
On May 23, 11:28*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote: like I sad, no-one, including your supposed supproters, can mane any sense of your zip-a-dee-doo-dah theory, because it doesn't really approach literacy, let-alone physics. just one man's opinion, not backed by anything else. Dear 1tree: Einstein, the MORON, was just one man's opinion, too. The main difference between us is that my numerical IQ is over double his. Go figure... — NE — |
#153
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.
.... any new discovery will invariably lead
to a new technology, thereby a patentable embodiment; but you appear to be puffing-up words, with a series of grammatical ****-ups. I mean, I always forget the meaning of hte word, gerund, but I already know how to use it, by way of Shakespeare's Bible. |
#154
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.
On Jun 4, 2:09*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote: ... any new discovery will invariably lead to a new technology, thereby a patentable embodiment; but you appear to be puffing-up words, with a series of grammatical ****-ups. I mean, I always forget the meaning of hte word, gerund, but I already know how to use it, by way of Shakespeare's Bible. 1tree: "You discovering the meaning of gerund." Announcers on Fox News, with the possible exception of Sheppard Smith and Gretchen Carlson, think the quoted clause makes a great sentence. “You HAVE DISCOVERED the meaning of gerund.” That slant-eyed black lady announcer messes-up at least half her (should be) sentences by not having a viable verb. Shakespeare would be upset, too! — NoEinstein — |
#155
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.
gerund is just a noun;
you clearly have a problem with English, in general, considering that all problems are really "word problems." if you would actually put these fuzzy ideas into teh language of mathematical physics, with or without the algebraization (such as Newton's mere algebraization of Kepler's three orbital constraints, "the universal law of gravitation," phoooey), you would probably see that you were "not even wrong" about kinetic energy. what was your mother tongue? |
#156
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.
On Jun 4, 7:27*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote: gerund is just a noun; you clearly have a problem with English, in general, considering that all problems are really "word problems." if you would actually put these fuzzy ideas into teh language of mathematical physics, with or without the algebraization (such as Newton's mere algebraization of Kepler's three orbital constraints, "the universal law of gravitation," phoooey), you would probably see that you were "not even wrong" about kinetic energy. what was your mother tongue? Dear 1tree: Is "falling" a noun? Like: "The bridge falling into the river." Gerunds are NOT verbs! The bridge fell into the river (past tense). — English wasn't one of your better subjects. — NE — |
#157
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.
On Jun 6, 1:47*pm, NoEinstein wrote:
On Jun 4, 7:27*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane wrote: gerund is just a noun; you clearly have a problem with English, in general, considering that all problems are really "word problems." if you would actually put these fuzzy ideas into teh language of mathematical physics, with or without the algebraization (such as Newton's mere algebraization of Kepler's three orbital constraints, "the universal law of gravitation," phoooey), you would probably see that you were "not even wrong" about kinetic energy. what was your mother tongue? Dear 1tree: *Is "falling" a noun? It can be. Here's an example: "The tree's falling made a tremendous crash." I see you don't understand yourself what you like to pontificate on. This is a sign of foolishness. Are you a fool, John? If not, why are you trying so hard to look like one? *Like: "The bridge falling into the river." *Gerunds are NOT verbs! *The bridge fell into the river (past tense). *— English wasn't one of your better subjects. *— NE — |
#158
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.
On Jun 6, 5:58*pm, PD wrote:
On Jun 6, 1:47*pm, NoEinstein wrote: On Jun 4, 7:27*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane wrote: gerund is just a noun; you clearly have a problem with English, in general, considering that all problems are really "word problems." if you would actually put these fuzzy ideas into teh language of mathematical physics, with or without the algebraization (such as Newton's mere algebraization of Kepler's three orbital constraints, "the universal law of gravitation," phoooey), you would probably see that you were "not even wrong" about kinetic energy. what was your mother tongue? Dear 1tree: *Is "falling" a noun? It can be. Here's an example: "The tree's falling made a tremendous crash." I see you don't understand yourself what you like to pontificate on. This is a sign of foolishness. Are you a fool, John? If not, why are you trying so hard to look like one? *Like: "The bridge falling into the river." *Gerunds are NOT verbs! *The bridge fell into the river (past tense). *— English wasn't one of your better subjects. *— NE — PD, the Jealous Dunce, is undeserving of a reply. — NE — |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his first relativity paper. | Androcles[_39_] | Amateur Astronomy | 464 | March 29th 11 06:09 PM |
THE ALBERT EINSTEIN OF OUR GENERATION IS LYING AGAIN | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 21 | May 30th 07 08:51 AM |
Einstein was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT | 46erjoe | Misc | 964 | March 10th 07 06:10 AM |
Paper w/cometary panspermia proof & new biology | Jason H. | SETI | 6 | March 15th 04 12:34 PM |