|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
*all* of the "classical" experimental evidence reveals
teh properties of light to be wavelike, including the photoelectrical effect, if the detector is properly seen as an antenna (essentially, a tank-circuit). |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
On Mar 23, 4:48*pm, rasterspace wrote:
*all* of the "classical" experimental evidence reveals teh properties of light to be wavelike, including the photoelectrical effect, if the detector is properly seen as an antenna (essentially, a tank-circuit). And all such "classical" (STUPID) evidence is wrong! — NE — |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
in other words,
you just refuse to play ball in "mathematical physics," at any level, if only because of your level of English (or, perhaps, of any language). so, have a nice ___! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
On Mar 24, 7:53*pm, rasterspace wrote:
in other words, you just refuse to play ball in "mathematical physics," at any level, if only because of your level of English (or, perhaps, of any language). so, have a nice ___! rasterspace: Anyone knowledgeable of 'mathematical physics' should realize that F = ma isn't an equation; nor are KE = 1/2 mv^2 and E = mc^2 / beta valid ENERGY-Mass equations. Both of the latter get out more "hamburger" than was the "steak" that was ground-up. Of course doing that violates the Law of the Conservation of Energy-Mass, thus disproving Einstein's moronic Special Relativity Theory and more than a century of the associated ilk. — NoEinstein — |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
I suggest that you try to convince some one,
in person, of your derivation of your disproof of Liebniz's KE = mvv. as for Coriolis, anyone who could discover the Coriolis effect, is obviously able to derive teh correct coefficient for that, using calculus or what ever, KE = (mvv)/2. if you can really prove Glileo's KE = mv, you'll have some sort of reasoning for that. (incidentally, perhaps your experiment with the balls dropped into the clay, used an assumption that the force was directly proportional to the volume of the dent; eh?) |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
On Mar 26, 11:46*pm, rasterspace wrote:
I suggest that you try to convince some one, in person, of your derivation of your disproof of Liebniz's KE = mvv. *as for Coriolis, anyone who could discover the Coriolis effect, is obviously able to derive teh correct coefficient for that, using calculus or what ever, KE = (mvv)/2. if you can really prove Glileo's KE = mv, you'll have some sort of reasoning for that. *(incidentally, perhaps your experiment with the balls dropped into the clay, used an assumption that the force was directly proportional to the volume of the dent; eh?) rasterspace: There is no precedent that will ever uphold KE = 1/2 mv^2. Get off of the sauce gent. Your head needs to be cleared. — NE — |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
so, did you hypothesize that the volume of the dent
is proportional to teh force of the ball, dropped? do you have any special sauce for your ideas? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
if you're not going to answer any questions,
why are you in this forum, with only me, myself and Brian to talk to? unfortunately, you picked the least-likely target to attack, in Liebniz, who actually ennunciated teh very, modern definition of "to prove a mathematical argument, pure or applied." |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
I mean, you don't have to a rocket-scientist;
just a friendly suggestion; there are other jobs ... (say) bathroom attendant. "Ladies and Germs, adjust the toilet-seat when necessary, and I've got really good ears!" |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.
On Mar 29, 7:09*pm, rasterspace wrote:
so, did you hypothesize that the volume of the dent is proportional to teh force of the ball, dropped? do you have any special sauce for your ideas? rasterspace: Great question! The characteristics of the clay become non issues if the experiment hits the same (whatever firmness) clay with equal kinetic energy for two, same size, but different weight balls. If Coriolis's KE - 1/2 mv^2 was correct, such should predict the height of drop to cause both different weight balls to impact with identical KEs and thus to make identical indentations into the soft clay. If you will email me directly, I'll reply with the color photo showing the nowhere-near-equal depths of penetration. — NE — |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his first relativity paper. | Androcles[_39_] | Amateur Astronomy | 464 | March 29th 11 06:09 PM |
THE ALBERT EINSTEIN OF OUR GENERATION IS LYING AGAIN | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 21 | May 30th 07 08:51 AM |
Einstein was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT | 46erjoe | Misc | 964 | March 10th 07 06:10 AM |
Paper w/cometary panspermia proof & new biology | Jason H. | SETI | 6 | March 15th 04 12:34 PM |