A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Amateur Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his firstrelativity paper.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old May 24th 11, 04:28 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.math,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
1treePetrifiedForestLane
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 974
Default Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.

like I sad, no-one, including your supposed supproters,
can mane any sense of your zip-a-dee-doo-dah theory,
because it doesn't really approach literacy,
let-alone physics.

just one man's opinion,
not backed by anything else.
  #152  
Old May 25th 11, 01:10 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.math,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
NoEinstein
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,799
Default Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.

On May 23, 11:28*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote:
like I sad, no-one, including your supposed supproters,
can mane any sense of your zip-a-dee-doo-dah theory,
because it doesn't really approach literacy,
let-alone physics.

just one man's opinion,
not backed by anything else.


Dear 1tree: Einstein, the MORON, was just one man's opinion, too.
The main difference between us is that my numerical IQ is over double
his. Go figure... — NE —
  #153  
Old June 4th 11, 07:09 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.math,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
1treePetrifiedForestLane
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 974
Default Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.

.... any new discovery will invariably lead
to a new technology, thereby a patentable embodiment;
but you appear to be puffing-up words,
with a series of grammatical ****-ups.

I mean, I always forget the meaning
of hte word, gerund, but I already know
how to use it, by way of Shakespeare's Bible.
  #154  
Old June 4th 11, 11:04 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.math,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
NoEinstein
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,799
Default Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.

On Jun 4, 2:09*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote:
... any new discovery will invariably lead
to a new technology, thereby a patentable embodiment;
but you appear to be puffing-up words,
with a series of grammatical ****-ups.

I mean, I always forget the meaning
of hte word, gerund, but I already know
how to use it, by way of Shakespeare's Bible.


1tree: "You discovering the meaning of gerund." Announcers on Fox
News, with the possible exception of Sheppard Smith and Gretchen
Carlson, think the quoted clause makes a great sentence. “You HAVE
DISCOVERED the meaning of gerund.” That slant-eyed black lady
announcer messes-up at least half her (should be) sentences by not
having a viable verb. Shakespeare would be upset, too! — NoEinstein —
  #155  
Old June 5th 11, 12:27 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.math,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
1treePetrifiedForestLane
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 974
Default Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.

gerund is just a noun;
you clearly have a problem with English, in general,
considering that all problems are really "word problems."

if you would actually put these fuzzy ideas
into teh language of mathematical physics,
with or without the algebraization (such as
Newton's mere algebraization of Kepler's three
orbital constraints, "the universal law
of gravitation," phoooey),
you would probably see that you were "not even wrong"
about kinetic energy.

what was your mother tongue?
  #156  
Old June 6th 11, 07:47 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.math,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
NoEinstein
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,799
Default Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.

On Jun 4, 7:27*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote:
gerund is just a noun;
you clearly have a problem with English, in general,
considering that all problems are really "word problems."

if you would actually put these fuzzy ideas
into teh language of mathematical physics,
with or without the algebraization (such as
Newton's mere algebraization of Kepler's three
orbital constraints, "the universal law
of gravitation," phoooey),
you would probably see that you were "not even wrong"
about kinetic energy.

what was your mother tongue?


Dear 1tree: Is "falling" a noun? Like: "The bridge falling into the
river." Gerunds are NOT verbs! The bridge fell into the river (past
tense). — English wasn't one of your better subjects. — NE —
  #157  
Old June 6th 11, 10:58 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.math,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
PD
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,572
Default Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.

On Jun 6, 1:47*pm, NoEinstein wrote:
On Jun 4, 7:27*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote:

gerund is just a noun;
you clearly have a problem with English, in general,
considering that all problems are really "word problems."


if you would actually put these fuzzy ideas
into teh language of mathematical physics,
with or without the algebraization (such as
Newton's mere algebraization of Kepler's three
orbital constraints, "the universal law
of gravitation," phoooey),
you would probably see that you were "not even wrong"
about kinetic energy.


what was your mother tongue?


Dear 1tree: *Is "falling" a noun?


It can be. Here's an example: "The tree's falling made a tremendous
crash."
I see you don't understand yourself what you like to pontificate on.
This is a sign of foolishness. Are you a fool, John? If not, why are
you trying so hard to look like one?

*Like: "The bridge falling into the
river." *Gerunds are NOT verbs! *The bridge fell into the river (past
tense). *— English wasn't one of your better subjects. *— NE —


  #158  
Old June 8th 11, 03:21 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.math,sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics
NoEinstein
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,799
Default Proof that Liebniz is a LYING IDIOT hundreds of years AFTER hisfirst *vis viva* paper.

On Jun 6, 5:58*pm, PD wrote:
On Jun 6, 1:47*pm, NoEinstein wrote:









On Jun 4, 7:27*pm, 1treePetrifiedForestLane
wrote:


gerund is just a noun;
you clearly have a problem with English, in general,
considering that all problems are really "word problems."


if you would actually put these fuzzy ideas
into teh language of mathematical physics,
with or without the algebraization (such as
Newton's mere algebraization of Kepler's three
orbital constraints, "the universal law
of gravitation," phoooey),
you would probably see that you were "not even wrong"
about kinetic energy.


what was your mother tongue?


Dear 1tree: *Is "falling" a noun?


It can be. Here's an example: "The tree's falling made a tremendous
crash."
I see you don't understand yourself what you like to pontificate on.
This is a sign of foolishness. Are you a fool, John? If not, why are
you trying so hard to look like one?







*Like: "The bridge falling into the
river." *Gerunds are NOT verbs! *The bridge fell into the river (past
tense). *— English wasn't one of your better subjects. *— NE —


PD, the Jealous Dunce, is undeserving of a reply. — NE —
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Proof that Einstein is a LYING IDIOT 15 years AFTER his first relativity paper. Androcles[_39_] Amateur Astronomy 464 March 29th 11 06:09 PM
THE ALBERT EINSTEIN OF OUR GENERATION IS LYING AGAIN Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 21 May 30th 07 08:51 AM
Einstein was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT 46erjoe Misc 964 March 10th 07 07:10 AM
Paper w/cometary panspermia proof & new biology Jason H. SETI 6 March 15th 04 01:34 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.