CHANDRAYAAN = ? Photoshop + cut and paste ?

On Nov 13, 9:46*pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
(Rand Simberg) wrote:

:On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 18:57:34 -0500, in a place far, far away, kevin
:willoughby made the phosphor on my
:monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that:
::Rand Simberg wrote:

: Your posts are responses to Guth, whose posts we don't want to see,
: but you show them to us anyway.
:
:Pot, Kettle, black...
:
:Honestly, I've got a pretty well defined set of killfiles, yet between
:OM and you I see a heck of a lot of the noise that dominates this group..
:Could both of you follow your own advise and just shut up on the
:toller's threads?
:
:If we do so, then no one will learn to not feed the troll.
:

Perhaps they don't need you and OM to tell them who they should and
should not read? *Your option is the same as everyone else's. *If they
generate too much noise for you in exchanges with people you think are
a waste of time, your killfile presumably still works.

Hint: *The only time I see El Chimpko is when you argue with him. *Buy
a clue...


Rand can't help it. You OTOH ignore me because you're a coward. We
tangled about computers and you lost...

On Nov 13, 8:03 pm, Steve T. wrote:
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:46:36 -0700, Fred J. McCall

wrote:
Hint: The only time I see El Chimpko is when you argue with him. Buy
a clue...

Funny. According to most of the regulars around here, you two are
married. Don't you see him in bed every night, or are you separated
these days?

OM

? "According to most of the regulars around here" ?

Do tell.

~ BG

"BradGuth" wrote in message...
...
On Nov 13, 10:57 am, "Painius" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message
...
On Nov 12, 5:01 pm, "Painius" wrote:
"OM" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:02:25 GMT,
(Rand
Simberg) wrote:

When you reply to him, you are feeding a troll, and our only
recourse is to killfile you as well, if we don't want to see his
verbal diarrhea.

...The sheer irony is that Rand replied with more than two
sentences,
and it probably had about as much effect as my initial attempt to
get
this guy to stop feeding Guthball his troll treats.

If you'd plonked me, then how would you know?

Tch-tch, guess i wasn't much of a log, huh.

Fibber! g

Interesting how OM and Rand Simberg need to topic/author stalk and
killfile so much. They also have to use clipping services that only
feed NASA approved context, as everything else gets blocked or
rejected. We don't necessarily understand because it's a genetic
Zionist/Nazi thing, similar to Muslims having WMD.

Since those fine specimens of wussiedom don't post
regularly to alt.astronomy, i'm hardly moved. They're
"plonking", however superficial, therefore means very
little. Personally, i think they *like* having high blood
pressure. g

They're DARPA, NASA and MI5 spooks and moles of the Zionist/Nazi kind,
so what else would we expect from such brown-nosed minions and clowns?

They 100% back whatever warlord or faith-based puppet master is in
charge, and without ever so much as any speck of remorse.

~ BG

Not only that, but they are hypocrites in that they
obviously don't or can't take their own silly advice.

It's becoming very clear that at least one of the
newsgroups in the headers is regularly read by
folks who get very bored if the likes of you ain't
occasionally allowed to "slip thru" their radar.

I'm impressed. Keep up the good work!

*********************************

UseNet

A great place to work and play!

(Censorship frowned upon.)

"From now on, ending a sentence with a
preposition is something up with which I
will not put." Sir Winston Churchill

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth

P.S.: "Be ashamed to die until you have won some
victory for humanity."
Horace Mann

P.P.S.: http://yummycake.secretsgolden.com
http://garden-of-ebooks.blogspot.com
http://painellsworth.net

Steve T. wrote in message
...
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:04:15 GMT, "Painius"
wrote:

Since you are posting from a different newsgroup than
the one i read, alt.astronomy, plonking me isn't the least
bit meaningful, your Grace.

Then remove soc.culture.indian, sci.space.history and .policy from
your follow-ups, and you won't have to deal with us bashing you, your
stupid git! If you want to jack off with Brad Guth on alt.astronomy,
then keep your crap over there.

-Steve-


Censor**** might be *your* bag, but it ain't mine,
your Majesty.

You don't control UseNet. You don't control me.
And it's painfully obvious that you can't control
yourself. One word for you and your buds...

pffft

Other than that, you're all probably basically nice
people. Why don't you just accept the fact that
you secretly *like* to read Brad Guth and be done
with it? You'll save a lot of money by making fewer
visits to your shrinks!

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth

P.S.: "Be ashamed to die until you have won some
victory for humanity."
Horace Mann

P.P.S.: http://yummycake.secretsgolden.com
http://garden-of-ebooks.blogspot.com
http://painellsworth.net

"OM" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 21:15:25 GMT, h (Rand
Simberg) wrote:

What an idiot. He thinks that killfiling him isn't going to work for
me, or isn't "meaningul," because he posts in a different group?

...The first clue that he's an idiot was the extended dialog with
Guthball, with the occasional "you may be right" thrown in. His
website just screams EPIC FAIL, just like his posts.

...Anyway, he and Guthy can swap K-Y in the showers in Killfile Hell
for all I care, because that's where they're both exiled. Guth
actually has about four filters just in case one breaks.

Wussies Galore!

You people need to wake up and smell the **** you
write.

Censorship ain't good. And you all just love to practice
it. I'm not talking about killfiling. If you just killfiled me
and then shut the **** up, that's okay. But you seem to
feel the need to go on and on and on in an effort to shut
me up... TO CENSOR ME.

God'll get you for that! or is it "Godwin?" I forget.

Anyways, it's not nice to **** with Mother Nature, and
it's *really* not nice to attempt censorship on UseNet.

Get real.

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine Ellsworth

P.S.: "Be ashamed to die until you have won some
victory for humanity."
Horace Mann

P.P.S.: http://yummycake.secretsgolden.com
http://garden-of-ebooks.blogspot.com
http://painellsworth.net

Steve T. wrote:

:On Thu, 13 Nov 2008 19:46:36 -0700, Fred J. McCall
wrote:
:
:Hint: The only time I see El Chimpko is when you argue with him. Buy
:a clue...
:
:Funny. According to most of the regulars around here, you two are
:married. Don't you see him in bed every night, or are you separated
:these days?
:

I don't know how to break it to you, but you are not "most of the
regulars". You're just one particularly stupid ****.

--
"Ordinarily he is insane. But he has lucid moments when he is
only stupid."
-- Heinrich Heine

Painius wrote:

God'll get you for that! or is it "Godwin?" I forget.




That's right!
OM mentioned the Nazis several times, so it has indeed fulfilled
"Godwin's Law" about it all getting around to Hitler and the Nazi's
sooner or later.
I think I'm going to start bringing CPFM's into all my postings at some
point, so that "Flannery's Law" comes into existance; this being that:
"As a Usenet discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison
involving Cute, Personality-Filled Monkeys to something in a Patrick
Flannery posting approaches one."
I think I've already been doing this for several years, so let's make it
official.
Now, about those monkeys:
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...1111142606.htm
Monkey teeth = higher IQ.
You read it here first. :-D

Pat

On Nov 13, 11:07 pm, "Painius" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message...

...



On Nov 13, 10:57 am, "Painius" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message
...
On Nov 12, 5:01 pm, "Painius" wrote:
"OM" wrote in message
. ..
On Wed, 12 Nov 2008 21:02:25 GMT,
(Rand
Simberg) wrote:

When you reply to him, you are feeding a troll, and our only
recourse is to killfile you as well, if we don't want to see his
verbal diarrhea.

...The sheer irony is that Rand replied with more than two
sentences,
and it probably had about as much effect as my initial attempt to
get
this guy to stop feeding Guthball his troll treats.

If you'd plonked me, then how would you know?

Tch-tch, guess i wasn't much of a log, huh.

Fibber! g

Interesting how OM and Rand Simberg need to topic/author stalk and
killfile so much. They also have to use clipping services that only
feed NASA approved context, as everything else gets blocked or
rejected. We don't necessarily understand because it's a genetic
Zionist/Nazi thing, similar to Muslims having WMD.

Since those fine specimens of wussiedom don't post
regularly to alt.astronomy, i'm hardly moved. They're
"plonking", however superficial, therefore means very
little. Personally, i think they *like* having high blood
pressure. g

They're DARPA, NASA and MI5 spooks and moles of the Zionist/Nazi kind,
so what else would we expect from such brown-nosed minions and clowns?

They 100% back whatever warlord or faith-based puppet master is in
charge, and without ever so much as any speck of remorse.

~ BG

Not only that, but they are hypocrites in that they
obviously don't or can't take their own silly advice.

It's becoming very clear that at least one of the
newsgroups in the headers is regularly read by
folks who get very bored if the likes of you ain't
occasionally allowed to "slip thru" their radar.

I'm impressed. Keep up the good work!

I have an entire poopdeck full of lose cannons, and from time to time
I manage to hit their private parts.

There's no doubt that our CIA/MI5, DARPA and NASA are fully in charge
of their army of brown-nosed minions and clowns. It's what they do
best, perhaps because it's all that's left of what can be done
whenever outsiders cause their good ship USS LOLLIPOP to rock.

Take to mentioning anything about our Selene/moon, of its L1 or any
usage thereof, plus mentioning Venus L2 or Venus itself is almost as
topic taboo/nondisclosure as is the Sirius star system that we're
currently headed back towards.

It's as though these folks are ETs in charge of keeping us village
idiots unaware of such off-world matters. If I were an ET mining
Venus, I'd certainly have my fair share of brown-nosed minions and
clowns doing exactly what Pat Flannery and fellow parrot borgs have
been doing.

Unless something goes terribly wrong with Chandrayaan-1, by now we
should be getting a few of those terrific images in 5 m/pixel format,
plus color/hue saturated images that are not going to look anything
like our NASA/Apollo version of our physically dark Selene/moon by way
of those unfiltered Kodak moments that looked so unusually terrestrial
guano island like.

~ BG

On Nov 14, 6:25 am, OM wrote:
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 07:24:05 -0600, Pat Flannery
wrote:

OM mentioned the Nazis several times, so it has indeed fulfilled
"Godwin's Law" about it all getting around to Hitler and the Nazi's
sooner or later.

...Mike Godwin's an old friend of mine. He'd agree that back in the
days before AOHell ruined Usenet, and Google Groups castrated it, all
you had to do with idiots like Guthball and Pain-in-the-ass was to
file complaints with his ISP and/or whoever was providing the Usenet
feeds, and gone they were.

OM

Just like in the good old Zionist/Nazi days, you wish.

~ BG

On Nov 13, 2:38 pm, "harmony" wrote:
still no good pictures!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

"BradGuth" wrote in message

...
What gives? (why the delay?)

Is our DARPA and NASA telling India/ISRO what they can or can't do?

Is our Selene/moon still nondisclosure rated?

Why not allow India/ISRO to share raw/unaltered science data from all
11 instruments, including those original full digital frames of raw
(monochrome and color) images?

~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG / “Guth Usenet”

They must be having lots of HySI and TMC imaging problems, likely due
to the local gamma, X-rays and the UV reactive surface of Selene. As
otherwise there should have been at least dozens of crisp monochrome
and otherwise color/hue saturated images to behold, not to mention
from whatever their impactor probe had to share.

Apparently public funded science is strictly a need-to-know policy,
though I can't hardly believe our DARPA and NASA don't have a firm
grip upon their private parts.

~ BG