|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
LORENTZ VIOLATIONS IN EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT
http://motls.blogspot.com/2007/08/ma...ropaganda.html
Motl: "Is special relativity true? According to all observations we have, it is true and exact. The effect of all hypothetical violations of special relativity on any phenomena that can be realistically observed may be summarized by Lorentz-breaking terms in the effective action. Experiments show that these terms are zero or at least extremely tiny: the bounds are very stringent. Can we imagine that special relativity is not exactly true? Even though it looks like returning before 1905, the answer is: Yes, of course, we can. Just add the small symmetry-breaking corrections. Can these hypothetical corrections be associated with other physical phenomena? Maybe. If they're associated e.g. with the quantum gravity scale, you may obtain an order-of-magnitude estimate how large these violations should be.....This violation is an assumption that has been made by many people such as Nanopoulos, Mavromatos, Sarkar, Amelino-Camelia, Mitsou, Farakos, Ellis, Kostelecky, Samuel, Pospelov, Myers, Alfaro, Morales-Tecotl, Urrutia, and others. Quite many people for this non- result, frankly speaking." Motl is silly and thinks Lorentz violations are "non-result" but all those Nanopoulos, Mavromatos, Sarkar, Amelino-Camelia, Mitsou, Farakos, Ellis, Kostelecky, Samuel, Pospelov, Myers, Alfaro, Morales- Tecotl, Urrutia, and others are not so silly and know that the "Beyond Einstein" future of Einstein criminal cult passes through Lorentz violations, more precisely through the adoption of Newton's emission theory of light: http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/i6272.html John Stachel: "Not only is the theory [of relativity] compatible with an emission theory of radiation, since it implies that the velocity of light is always the same relative to its source; the theory also requires that radiation transfer mass between an emitter and an absorber, reinforcing Einstein's light quantum hypothesis that radiation manifests a particulate structure under certain circumstances." http://ustl1.univ-lille1.fr/culture/...40/pgs/4_5.pdf Jean Eisenstaedt: "Il n'y a alors aucune raison theorique a ce que la vitesse de la lumiere ne depende pas de la vitesse de sa source ainsi que de celle de l'observateur terrestre ; plus clairement encore, il n'y a pas de raison, dans le cadre de la logique des Principia de Newton, pour que la lumiere se comporte autrement - quant a sa trajectoire - qu'une particule materielle. Il n'y a pas non plus de raison pour que la lumiere ne soit pas sensible a la gravitation. Bref, pourquoi ne pas appliquer a la lumiere toute la theorie newtonienne ? C'est en fait ce que font plusieurs astronomes, opticiens, philosophes de la nature a la fin du XVIIIeme siecle. Les resultats sont etonnants... et aujourd'hui nouveaux." Translation from French: "Therefore there is no theoretical reason why the speed of light should not depend on the speed of the source and the speed of the terrestrial observer as well; even more clearly, there is no reason, in the framework of the logic of Newton's Principia, why light should behave, as far as its trajectory is concerned, differently from a material particle. Neither is there any reason why light should not be sensible to gravitation. Briefly, why don't we apply the whole Newtonian theory to light? In fact, that is what many astronomers, opticians, philosophers of nature did by the end of 18th century. The results are surprising....and new nowadays." One of the not-so-silly Lorentz violators, Robert Meyers, has even become a Boss in the Perimeter Institute, a subdivision of the Ministry of Silly Walks (Einstein Criminal Cult): http://www.perimeterinstitute.ca/New...nounced_at_PI/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IqhlQfXUk7w The not-so-silly walk Meyers is going to develop can be formulated in the following way: "How to reintroduce Newton's emission theory of light without informing Einstein zombie world that Einstein's false light postulate has been rejected." Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
LORENTZ VIOLATIONS IN EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT
In order to camouflage the falsehood of Einstein's 1905 light
postulate http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/ "...light is always propagated in empty space with a definite velocity c which is independent of the state of motion of the emitting body" Einsteinians would advance any idiocy, even some silly version of the forbidden aether theory: http://www.astronomy.com/asy/default.aspx?c=a&id=3314 "Finding evidence that the speed of light varies slightly in different directions - proof of broken Lorentz symmetry - would radically revise scientists' notions of the universe. It would mean that space (or more properly, relativity's four-dimensional space-time) has a kind of texture - a preferred orientation." Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IN THE HEADQUARTERS OF EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 5 | August 23rd 07 11:23 AM |
THE MOST BLATANT LIE OF EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | August 15th 07 03:47 PM |
SAGNAC AND EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 37 | May 31st 07 11:41 PM |