Today is the 2nd aniversery of the earth NOT being destroyed by a CME

On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 1:54:01 AM UTC-7, Siri Crews wrote:
In article , "greysky"

wrote:



http://science.nasa.gov/science-news...ul_superstorm/



This was the big one, perhaps even bigger than the Carrington Event of

September 1859. Turns out we missed it by only one week - a week earlier and

we would have been in the target zone and would have been knocked

technologically back over a century.



The odds of being struck by one of these things turns out to be pretty high:

12% in ten years... hope everyone here has their preps in order.



G-



Did you know you can make an EMP weapon yourself? All you need is a capacitor,

coil, fast switch, and a battery. Charge the capacitor with the battery and then

use the switch to connect to the capacitor terminals through a coil. Et voila,

an EMP. And you will discover it does not destroy all electronics manufactured

after 1914. Depending on distance of shielding, it might not even annoy them.

--

How about lightening strikes at a thousandfold greater intensity?

In article ,
Brad Guth wrote:

How about lightening strikes at a thousandfold greater intensity?

How? Lightenning strikes at the dielectric breakdown, when the potential
difference through a column of air ionises it. That's going to be roughly the
same hence lightenning strikes have roughly the same power.

--
:- Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Icke's razor: Given two equally plausible explanations, choose the weirder.

On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 2:11:10 PM UTC-7, Siri Crews wrote:
In article ,

Brad Guth wrote:


How about lightening strikes at a thousandfold greater intensity?


How? Lightenning strikes at the dielectric breakdown, when the potential

difference through a column of air ionises it. That's going to be roughly the

same hence lightenning strikes have roughly the same power.



--

Lightening starts fires, and large scale CMEs that are less deflected and manage to get through, will increase those charged ions in our atmosphere. Even a tenfold increase in lightening could be extremely problematic, except never an issue for the likes of Hitler and his oligarch, Bilderberg and Rothschild peers.

Lightening strikes are never of the same power.

In article ,
Brad Guth wrote:

On Wednesday, July 23, 2014 2:11:10 PM UTC-7, Siri Crews wrote:
In article ,

Brad Guth wrote:


How about lightening strikes at a thousandfold greater intensity?


How? Lightenning strikes at the dielectric breakdown, when the potential

difference through a column of air ionises it. That's going to be roughly
the

same hence lightenning strikes have roughly the same power.



--

Lightening starts fires, and large scale CMEs that are less deflected and
manage to get through, will increase those charged ions in our atmosphere.
Even a tenfold increase in lightening could be extremely problematic, except
never an issue for the likes of Hitler and his oligarch, Bilderberg and
Rothschild peers.

The ions are in the top of the atmosphere, way above the weather. The ions only
come down to the weather layer in the north and south far from most of the
population. Lightenning is lower atmosphere phenomena caused by friction of
rapidly moving air that dislodges electrons and then transports anions and
cations to different altitudes.

Solid pieces of rock do far more damage.

Even without a magnetic field (not going to happen for billion of years on
earth) it takes a very long time for the sun to erode an atmosphere.

--
:- Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted.
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.'
Icke's razor: Given two equally plausible explanations, choose the weirder.