A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

WHY EINSTEIN WORLD IS A ZOMBIE WORLD



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 24th 07, 06:26 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default WHY EINSTEIN WORLD IS A ZOMBIE WORLD

Simply because for 24 years a distinguished hypnotist in Einstein
criminal cult has been teaching the text below and the world has not
found it suitable to react:

http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/...relativity.htm
This reprints an essay written ca. 1983, "'What Song the Syrens Sang':
How Did Einstein Discover Special Relativity?" in John Stachel,
Einstein from "B" to "Z".
"The idea that a light beam consisted of a stream of particles had
been espoused by Newton and maintained its popularity into the middle
of the 19th century. It was called the "emission theory" of light, a
phrase I shall use. The need to explain the phenomena of interference,
diffraction and polarization of light gradually led physicists to
abandon the emission theory in favor of the competing wave theory,
previously its less-favored rival. Maxwell's explanation of light as a
type of electromagnetic wave seemed to end the controversy with a
definitive victory of the wave theory. However, if Einstein was right
(as events slowly proved he was) the story must be much more
complicated. Einstein was aware of the difficulties with Maxwell's
theory-and of the need for what we now call a quantum theory of
electromagnetic radiation-well before publishing his SRT paper. He
regarded Maxwell's equations as some sort of statistical average-of
what he did not know, of course-which worked very well to explain many
optical phenomena, but could not be used to explain all the
interactions of light and matter. A notable feature of his first light
quantum paper is that it almost completely avoids mention of the
ether, even in discussing Maxwell's theory. Giving up the ether
concept allowed Einstein to envisage the possibility that a beam of
light was "an independent structure," as he put it a few years later,
"which is radiated by the light source, just as in Newton's emission
theory of light."

Pentcho Valev

  #2  
Old September 24th 07, 06:38 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
Androcles[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,040
Default WHY EINSTEIN WORLD IS A ZOMBIE WORLD


"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
oups.com...
: Simply because for 24 years a distinguished hypnotist in Einstein
: criminal cult has been teaching the text below and the world has not
: found it suitable to react:
:
: http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/...relativity.htm
: This reprints an essay written ca. 1983, "'What Song the Syrens Sang':
: How Did Einstein Discover Special Relativity?"

Another "Do you still beat your mother?" type of question.

How did Einstein kook up Special Relativity?

He said:
'we establish by definition that the "time" required by
light to travel from A to B equals the "time" it requires
to travel from B to A' because I SAY SO and you have to
agree because I'm the great genius, STOOOPID, don't you
dare question it. -- Rabbi Albert Einstein

http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...rt/tAB=tBA.gif


Even one of his faithful dingleberries said:
'we establish by definition that the "time" required by
light to travel from A to B doesn't equal the "time" it requires
to travel from B to A in the stationary system, obviously.' --
Heretic Jan Bielawski, Polish assistant light-bulb changer.

Ref: ups.com



  #3  
Old September 24th 07, 06:51 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
Dirk Van de moortel
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 247
Default WHY EINSTEIN WORLD IS A ZOMBIE WORLD


"Androcles" wrote in message . uk...

"Pentcho Valev" wrote in message
oups.com...
: Simply because for 24 years a distinguished hypnotist in Einstein
: criminal cult has been teaching the text below and the world has not
: found it suitable to react:
:
: http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/...relativity.htm
: This reprints an essay written ca. 1983, "'What Song the Syrens Sang':
: How Did Einstein Discover Special Relativity?"

Another "Do you still beat your mother?" type of question.

How did Einstein kook up Special Relativity?

He said:
'we establish by definition that the "time" required by
light to travel from A to B equals the "time" it requires
to travel from B to A' because I SAY SO and you have to
agree because I'm the great genius, STOOOPID, don't you
dare question it. -- Rabbi Albert Einstein

http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...rt/tAB=tBA.gif


Even one of his faithful dingleberries said:
'we establish by definition that the "time" required by
light to travel from A to B doesn't equal the "time" it requires
to travel from B to A in the stationary system, obviously.' --
Heretic Jan Bielawski, Polish assistant light-bulb changer.

Ref: ups.com


I bet that even an already severely less-gifted imbecile like Pentcho
Valev looks at you as if you were some brown substance sticking
to the bottom of his shoe.
Right, Poncho? Try to be honest for a change.

Dirk Vdm
  #4  
Old September 24th 07, 08:30 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default WHY EINSTEIN WORLD IS A ZOMBIE WORLD

On 24 Sep, 19:26, Pentcho Valev wrote:
Simply because for 24 years a distinguished hypnotist in Einstein
criminal cult has been teaching the text below and the world has not
found it suitable to react:

http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/...relativity.htm
This reprints an essay written ca. 1983, "'What Song the Syrens Sang':
How Did Einstein Discover Special Relativity?" in John Stachel,
Einstein from "B" to "Z".
"The idea that a light beam consisted of a stream of particles had
been espoused by Newton and maintained its popularity into the middle
of the 19th century. It was called the "emission theory" of light, a
phrase I shall use. The need to explain the phenomena of interference,
diffraction and polarization of light gradually led physicists to
abandon the emission theory in favor of the competing wave theory,
previously its less-favored rival. Maxwell's explanation of light as a
type of electromagnetic wave seemed to end the controversy with a
definitive victory of the wave theory. However, if Einstein was right
(as events slowly proved he was) the story must be much more
complicated. Einstein was aware of the difficulties with Maxwell's
theory-and of the need for what we now call a quantum theory of
electromagnetic radiation-well before publishing his SRT paper. He
regarded Maxwell's equations as some sort of statistical average-of
what he did not know, of course-which worked very well to explain many
optical phenomena, but could not be used to explain all the
interactions of light and matter. A notable feature of his first light
quantum paper is that it almost completely avoids mention of the
ether, even in discussing Maxwell's theory. Giving up the ether
concept allowed Einstein to envisage the possibility that a beam of
light was "an independent structure," as he put it a few years later,
"which is radiated by the light source, just as in Newton's emission
theory of light."


Einstein zombie world does not react even when hypnotists teach that
the theory of relativity and the emission theory of light are
COMPATIBLE:

http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/i6272.html
John Stachel: "Not only is the theory [of relativity] compatible with
an emission theory of radiation, since it implies that the velocity of
light is always the same relative to its source; the theory also
requires that radiation transfer mass between an emitter and an
absorber, reinforcing Einstein's light quantum hypothesis that
radiation manifests a particulate structure under certain
circumstances."

Pentcho Valev

  #5  
Old September 25th 07, 10:06 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro,fr.sci.physique,fr.sci.astrophysique
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default WHY EINSTEIN WORLD IS A ZOMBIE WORLD

On 24 Sep, 22:30, Pentcho Valev wrote:
On 24 Sep, 19:26, Pentcho Valev wrote:

Simply because for 24 years a distinguished hypnotist in Einstein
criminal cult has been teaching the text below and the world has not
found it suitable to react:


http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/...relativity.htm
This reprints an essay written ca. 1983, "'What Song the Syrens Sang':
How Did Einstein Discover Special Relativity?" in John Stachel,
Einstein from "B" to "Z".
"The idea that a light beam consisted of a stream of particles had
been espoused by Newton and maintained its popularity into the middle
of the 19th century. It was called the "emission theory" of light, a
phrase I shall use. The need to explain the phenomena of interference,
diffraction and polarization of light gradually led physicists to
abandon the emission theory in favor of the competing wave theory,
previously its less-favored rival. Maxwell's explanation of light as a
type of electromagnetic wave seemed to end the controversy with a
definitive victory of the wave theory. However, if Einstein was right
(as events slowly proved he was) the story must be much more
complicated. Einstein was aware of the difficulties with Maxwell's
theory-and of the need for what we now call a quantum theory of
electromagnetic radiation-well before publishing his SRT paper. He
regarded Maxwell's equations as some sort of statistical average-of
what he did not know, of course-which worked very well to explain many
optical phenomena, but could not be used to explain all the
interactions of light and matter. A notable feature of his first light
quantum paper is that it almost completely avoids mention of the
ether, even in discussing Maxwell's theory. Giving up the ether
concept allowed Einstein to envisage the possibility that a beam of
light was "an independent structure," as he put it a few years later,
"which is radiated by the light source, just as in Newton's emission
theory of light."


Einstein zombie world does not react even when hypnotists teach that
the theory of relativity and the emission theory of light are
COMPATIBLE:

http://press.princeton.edu/chapters/i6272.html
John Stachel: "Not only is the theory [of relativity] compatible with
an emission theory of radiation, since it implies that the velocity of
light is always the same relative to its source; the theory also
requires that radiation transfer mass between an emitter and an
absorber, reinforcing Einstein's light quantum hypothesis that
radiation manifests a particulate structure under certain
circumstances."


The compatibility between the theory of relativity and the emission
theory of light discovered by John Stachel will have serious
consequences in Einstein zombie world. All new relativities that are
more than Special - e.g. Sheldon Glashow's Very Special Relativity and
Lee Smolin's Doubly Special Relativity - will be forbidden. Hypnotists
will try to create relativities that are less than Special - e.g. Not
Quite Special Relativity, Insignificantly Special Relativity,
Vanishingly Special Relativity, Virtually Newtonian Relativity.

Pentcho Valev

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
LOGIC IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 4 September 8th 07 02:50 PM
LACK OF QUESTIONS IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 6 August 9th 07 09:28 AM
LENGTH CONTRACTION IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 4 August 6th 07 10:42 AM
Albert Einstein, the Rational World and the Zombie World brian a m stuckless Policy 0 October 25th 05 09:48 PM
Albert Einstein, the Rational World and the Zombie World brian a m stuckless Astronomy Misc 0 October 25th 05 09:48 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:34 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.