What has this user group come to?

Wfoley2 wrote:


My GOD, you're supposed to turn the lights OFF??????
Clear, Dark, Steady Skies!
(And considerate neighbors!!!)


Jeeze, wait until YOU'VE been married for 44 years ;-

Wfoley2 wrote:


My GOD, you're supposed to turn the lights OFF??????
Clear, Dark, Steady Skies!
(And considerate neighbors!!!)


Jeeze, wait until YOU'VE been married for 44 years ;-

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:33:57 -0500, "Shawn Grant"
wrote:

Last Saturday someone posted a link to pornography on this user group. This
wasn't random spam. It was from a contributor who wished to share things.
What was posted was a link to a woman posing next to a Meade LX 90
telescope. This woman had no pants or underwear on and she spread her legs
out very far so you could see all she had down below in full detail.
I was deeply offended by this. Nudity is very offensive. That is why we
can't walk around nude no matter how free you may feel. People don't like to
look at private parts. People have sex with the lights turned off because
nudity is so offensive.
What surprised me was no one was upset. I was appalled by this. I post say
no to refractors and oh no I have to leave my home overnight due to an acid
spill and I can't get an account with astromart. But this individual post a
link to a series of photos with a woman spreading her legs wide and I mean
very wide to reveal her genitalia in full detail and it was welcomed in this
user group. No one yelled troll, plonk, you are kill filed, how dare you
post this or other such protest. Instead comments were used that the woman
was flexable and the telescope was well taken care of.
I guess I know what this user group wants. They would rather I post photos
of me naked with my genitalia in full view standing next to my telescope
instead of informative post such as goto ruins the fun and refractors and
questars are over priced. Hey I look a heck lot better then the cat woman.


Most US folk get embarrassed or offended because they don't see "that
very often on TV or movies. Go to Europe for a while and watch their
TV and their big movies. You will see a massive difference in what
European TV allows vs the US. It's almost like the taste of beer, you
get accustomed to it. Either way I like both beer and women (dressed
or undressed).

BTW, The original poster did give a "warning". So if you went to the
site, it's only your fault.

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:33:57 -0500, "Shawn Grant"
wrote:

Last Saturday someone posted a link to pornography on this user group. This
wasn't random spam. It was from a contributor who wished to share things.
What was posted was a link to a woman posing next to a Meade LX 90
telescope. This woman had no pants or underwear on and she spread her legs
out very far so you could see all she had down below in full detail.
I was deeply offended by this. Nudity is very offensive. That is why we
can't walk around nude no matter how free you may feel. People don't like to
look at private parts. People have sex with the lights turned off because
nudity is so offensive.
What surprised me was no one was upset. I was appalled by this. I post say
no to refractors and oh no I have to leave my home overnight due to an acid
spill and I can't get an account with astromart. But this individual post a
link to a series of photos with a woman spreading her legs wide and I mean
very wide to reveal her genitalia in full detail and it was welcomed in this
user group. No one yelled troll, plonk, you are kill filed, how dare you
post this or other such protest. Instead comments were used that the woman
was flexable and the telescope was well taken care of.
I guess I know what this user group wants. They would rather I post photos
of me naked with my genitalia in full view standing next to my telescope
instead of informative post such as goto ruins the fun and refractors and
questars are over priced. Hey I look a heck lot better then the cat woman.


Most US folk get embarrassed or offended because they don't see "that
very often on TV or movies. Go to Europe for a while and watch their
TV and their big movies. You will see a massive difference in what
European TV allows vs the US. It's almost like the taste of beer, you
get accustomed to it. Either way I like both beer and women (dressed
or undressed).

BTW, The original poster did give a "warning". So if you went to the
site, it's only your fault.

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:33:57 -0500, "Shawn Grant"
wrote:

Last Saturday someone posted a link to pornography on this user group. This
wasn't random spam. It was from a contributor who wished to share things.
What was posted was a link to a woman posing next to a Meade LX 90
telescope. This woman had no pants or underwear on and she spread her legs
out very far so you could see all she had down below in full detail.
I was deeply offended by this. Nudity is very offensive. That is why we
can't walk around nude no matter how free you may feel. People don't like to
look at private parts. People have sex with the lights turned off because
nudity is so offensive.
What surprised me was no one was upset. I was appalled by this. I post say
no to refractors and oh no I have to leave my home overnight due to an acid
spill and I can't get an account with astromart. But this individual post a
link to a series of photos with a woman spreading her legs wide and I mean
very wide to reveal her genitalia in full detail and it was welcomed in this
user group. No one yelled troll, plonk, you are kill filed, how dare you
post this or other such protest. Instead comments were used that the woman
was flexable and the telescope was well taken care of.
I guess I know what this user group wants. They would rather I post photos
of me naked with my genitalia in full view standing next to my telescope
instead of informative post such as goto ruins the fun and refractors and
questars are over priced. Hey I look a heck lot better then the cat woman.


Most US folk get embarrassed or offended because they don't see "that
very often on TV or movies. Go to Europe for a while and watch their
TV and their big movies. You will see a massive difference in what
European TV allows vs the US. It's almost like the taste of beer, you
get accustomed to it. Either way I like both beer and women (dressed
or undressed).

BTW, The original poster did give a "warning". So if you went to the
site, it's only your fault.

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:34:08 -0000, "OG"
wrote:

a heck lot better then the cat woman.

Shawn,
you forgot to include the link


As requested,

If you are easily offended, please dont go to this webpage.
Contains full female nudity posing with a Meade LX-90.

http://www.between-legs.com/gallerie.../009tb/el.html

A woman who (un)dresses up as catwoman and likes SCT go-to scopes.
Now we know which type of scope is the best..

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:34:08 -0000, "OG"
wrote:

a heck lot better then the cat woman.

Shawn,
you forgot to include the link


As requested,

If you are easily offended, please dont go to this webpage.
Contains full female nudity posing with a Meade LX-90.

http://www.between-legs.com/gallerie.../009tb/el.html

A woman who (un)dresses up as catwoman and likes SCT go-to scopes.
Now we know which type of scope is the best..

On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 22:34:08 -0000, "OG"
wrote:

a heck lot better then the cat woman.

Shawn,
you forgot to include the link


As requested,

If you are easily offended, please dont go to this webpage.
Contains full female nudity posing with a Meade LX-90.

http://www.between-legs.com/gallerie.../009tb/el.html

A woman who (un)dresses up as catwoman and likes SCT go-to scopes.
Now we know which type of scope is the best..

If you are easily offended, please dont go to this webpage.
Contains full female nudity posing with a Meade LX-90.

http://www.between-legs.com/gallerie.../009tb/el.html

A woman who (un)dresses up as catwoman and likes SCT go-to scopes.
Now we know which type of scope is the best..

No that is shameful and immoral. Don't look at it. evil. This is worse then
someone owning a Questar with goto. Children could see that. There is no
place for that in an astronomy user group even if a telescope is in the
photo. I am discussed.

If you are easily offended, please dont go to this webpage.
Contains full female nudity posing with a Meade LX-90.

http://www.between-legs.com/gallerie.../009tb/el.html

A woman who (un)dresses up as catwoman and likes SCT go-to scopes.
Now we know which type of scope is the best..

No that is shameful and immoral. Don't look at it. evil. This is worse then
someone owning a Questar with goto. Children could see that. There is no
place for that in an astronomy user group even if a telescope is in the
photo. I am discussed.