![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Why is Usenet/newsgroups essentially shutdown or trashed again?
What’s the problem with those Google/NOVA servers, this time? The obvious newsgroup topics of mainstream damage-control as spewed gibberish, spam, smut and porn are intentionally not getting easily diverted out of the mainstream public groups, and this has always been breaking the backs and minds of those interested in sharing personal notions and ideas. However, the saturated use of media jamming via clownism isn’t hardly a new method of public crowd and opinion control, now is it. Clearly our Zionist/Nazi DARPA creators of Usenet have known better, although if their spooks and moles are going to have free access to sending and receiving their cloak and dagger messages and highly encrypted data via this global Usenet, means that the rest of us have to put up with a great deal of such crap. You’d think the entire community of “news.admin.net- abuse…..” (especially of their “MODERATED” chat groups) was actually worth something, though obviously it’s not worth squat, other than as yet another mainstream smoke-screen in order to make it look or otherwise seem as though this public Usenet/newsgroup is capable of being functional, when in fact it really never was intended to be anything but a backdoor for their sneaky cloak and dagger worth of global cold-war fun and games. Perhaps a 5th grade smuck of a code writing wizard can create a few nifty cyberbots that’ll seek out and easily divert or rid Usenet/ newsgroups of such obvious mainstream clownism and orchestrated debauchery. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The end of freedom of speechs is in sight... Google is the Beginning.
I'm not suggesting anything... I'm just watching the signs and symbols. Rev 16:18-19 ~ "BradGuth" schreef in bericht ... Why is Usenet/newsgroups essentially shutdown or trashed again? What’s the problem with those Google/NOVA servers, this time? The obvious newsgroup topics of mainstream damage-control as spewed gibberish, spam, smut and porn are intentionally not getting easily diverted out of the mainstream public groups, and this has always been breaking the backs and minds of those interested in sharing personal notions and ideas. However, the saturated use of media jamming via clownism isn’t hardly a new method of public crowd and opinion control, now is it. Clearly our Zionist/Nazi DARPA creators of Usenet have known better, although if their spooks and moles are going to have free access to sending and receiving their cloak and dagger messages and highly encrypted data via this global Usenet, means that the rest of us have to put up with a great deal of such crap. You’d think the entire community of “news.admin.net- abuse…..” (especially of their “MODERATED” chat groups) was actually worth something, though obviously it’s not worth squat, other than as yet another mainstream smoke-screen in order to make it look or otherwise seem as though this public Usenet/newsgroup is capable of being functional, when in fact it really never was intended to be anything but a backdoor for their sneaky cloak and dagger worth of global cold-war fun and games. Perhaps a 5th grade smuck of a code writing wizard can create a few nifty cyberbots that’ll seek out and easily divert or rid Usenet/ newsgroups of such obvious mainstream clownism and orchestrated debauchery. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 5, 9:19 am, "Warhol" wrote:
The end of freedom of speechs is in sight... Google is the Beginning. I'm not suggesting anything... I'm just watching the signs and symbols. Rev 16:18-19 ~ "BradGuth" schreef in ... Why is Usenet/newsgroups essentially shutdown or trashed again? What’s the problem with those Google/NOVA servers, this time? The obvious newsgroup topics of mainstream damage-control as spewed gibberish, spam, smut and porn are intentionally not getting easily diverted out of the mainstream public groups, and this has always been breaking the backs and minds of those interested in sharing personal notions and ideas. However, the saturated use of media jamming via clownism isn’t hardly a new method of public crowd and opinion control, now is it. Clearly our Zionist/Nazi DARPA creators of Usenet have known better, although if their spooks and moles are going to have free access to sending and receiving their cloak and dagger messages and highly encrypted data via this global Usenet, means that the rest of us have to put up with a great deal of such crap. You’d think the entire community of “news.admin.net- abuse…..” (especially of their “MODERATED” chat groups) was actually worth something, though obviously it’s not worth squat, other than as yet another mainstream smoke-screen in order to make it look or otherwise seem as though this public Usenet/newsgroup is capable of being functional, when in fact it really never was intended to be anything but a backdoor for their sneaky cloak and dagger worth of global cold-war fun and games. Perhaps a 5th grade smuck of a code writing wizard can create a few nifty cyberbots that’ll seek out and easily divert or rid Usenet/ newsgroups of such obvious mainstream clownism and orchestrated debauchery. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG If there's ever a Federal Reserve or government bailout of Google/NOVA is when we're in big censorship trouble. Otherwise, there are a few viable alternatives to the Usenet/newsgroup posting of messages that the public would technically have free access to, though not likely as easy nor without big-brother snooping at free will. So, you could get yourself in big ass trouble for just looking, similar to getting caught for seeking and looking at child porn. ~ BG |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 4, 5:31 am, BradGuth wrote:
Why is Usenet/newsgroups essentially shutdown or trashed again? What’s the problem with those Google/NOVA servers, this time? The obvious newsgroup topics of mainstream damage-control as spewed gibberish, spam, smut and porn are intentionally not getting easily diverted out of the mainstream public groups, and this has always been breaking the backs and minds of those interested in sharing personal notions and ideas. However, the saturated use of media jamming via clownism isn’t hardly a new method of public crowd and opinion control, now is it. Clearly our Zionist/Nazi DARPA creators of Usenet have known better, although if their spooks and moles are going to have free access to sending and receiving their cloak and dagger messages and highly encrypted data via this global Usenet, means that the rest of us have to put up with a great deal of such crap. You’d think the entire community of “news.admin.net- abuse…..” (especially of their “MODERATED” chat groups) was actually worth something, though obviously it’s not worth squat, other than as yet another mainstream smoke-screen in order to make it look or otherwise seem as though this public Usenet/newsgroup is capable of being functional, when in fact it really never was intended to be anything but a backdoor for their sneaky cloak and dagger worth of global cold-war fun and games. Perhaps a 5th grade smuck of a code writing wizard can create a few nifty cyberbots that’ll seek out and easily divert or rid Usenet/ newsgroups of such obvious mainstream clownism and orchestrated debauchery. ~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG Why are so many brown-nosed clowns posting their bogus topics of gibberish that oddly includes key search words, that's not being the least bit objected to by those of the mainstream status quo? ~ BG |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 4, 5:31*am, BradGuth wrote:
Why is Usenet/newsgroups essentially shutdown or trashed again? What’s the problem with those Google/NOVA servers, this time? The obvious newsgroup topics of mainstream damage-control as spewed gibberish, spam, smut and porn are intentionally not getting easily diverted out of the mainstream public groups, and this has always been breaking the backs and minds of those interested in sharing personal notions and ideas. *However, the saturated use of media jamming via clownism isn’t hardly a new method of public crowd and opinion control, now is it. Clearly our Zionist/Nazi DARPA creators of Usenet have known better, although if their spooks and moles are going to have free access to sending and receiving their cloak and dagger messages and highly encrypted data via this global Usenet, means that the rest of us have to put up with a great deal of such crap. You’d think the entire community of “news.admin.net- abuse…..” (especially of their “MODERATED” chat groups) was actually worth something, though obviously it’s not worth squat, other than as yet another mainstream smoke-screen in order to make it look or otherwise seem as though this public Usenet/newsgroup is capable of being functional, when in fact it really never was intended to be anything but a backdoor for their sneaky cloak and dagger worth of global cold-war fun and games. Perhaps a 5th grade smuck of a code writing wizard can create a few nifty cyberbots that’ll seek out and easily divert or rid Usenet/ newsgroups of such obvious mainstream clownism and orchestrated debauchery. *~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG Never give up on your Zionistphobia do you? D. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 7, 9:30 am, nada wrote:
On Oct 4, 5:31 am, BradGuth wrote: Why is Usenet/newsgroups essentially shutdown or trashed again? What’s the problem with those Google/NOVA servers, this time? The obvious newsgroup topics of mainstream damage-control as spewed gibberish, spam, smut and porn are intentionally not getting easily diverted out of the mainstream public groups, and this has always been breaking the backs and minds of those interested in sharing personal notions and ideas. However, the saturated use of media jamming via clownism isn’t hardly a new method of public crowd and opinion control, now is it. Clearly our Zionist/Nazi DARPA creators of Usenet have known better, although if their spooks and moles are going to have free access to sending and receiving their cloak and dagger messages and highly encrypted data via this global Usenet, means that the rest of us have to put up with a great deal of such crap. You’d think the entire community of “news.admin.net- abuse…..” (especially of their “MODERATED” chat groups) was actually worth something, though obviously it’s not worth squat, other than as yet another mainstream smoke-screen in order to make it look or otherwise seem as though this public Usenet/newsgroup is capable of being functional, when in fact it really never was intended to be anything but a backdoor for their sneaky cloak and dagger worth of global cold-war fun and games. Perhaps a 5th grade smuck of a code writing wizard can create a few nifty cyberbots that’ll seek out and easily divert or rid Usenet/ newsgroups of such obvious mainstream clownism and orchestrated debauchery. ~BradGuthBrad_GuthBrad.GuthBradGuth BG Never give up on your Zionistphobia do you? D. Are you suggesting it was those pesky Muslims making such nifty physics and advance science things happen for Hitler? Are you suggesting that mainstream religion or any of their cabal/ cartel cults play no part in government policy? Are you suggesting that all higher learning and the sorts of expertise from those having "the right stuff" has always been 100% pretend- Atheism? ~ BG |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 4, 5:31 am, BradGuth wrote:
Why is Usenet/newsgroups essentially shutdown or trashed again? What’s the problem with those Google/NOVA servers, this time? The obvious newsgroup topics of mainstream damage-control as spewed gibberish, spam, smut and porn are intentionally not getting easily diverted out of the mainstream public groups, and this has always been breaking the backs and minds of those interested in sharing personal notions and ideas. However, the saturated use of media jamming via clownism isn’t hardly a new method of public crowd and opinion control, now is it. Clearly our Zionist/Nazi DARPA creators of Usenet have known better, although if their spooks and moles are going to have free access to sending and receiving their cloak and dagger messages and highly encrypted data via this global Usenet, means that the rest of us have to put up with a great deal of such crap. You’d think the entire community of “news.admin.net- abuse…..” (especially of their “MODERATED” chat groups) was actually worth something, though obviously it’s not worth squat, other than as yet another mainstream smoke-screen in order to make it look or otherwise seem as though this public Usenet/newsgroup is capable of being functional, when in fact it really never was intended to be anything but a backdoor for their sneaky cloak and dagger worth of global cold-war fun and games. Perhaps a 5th grade smuck of a code writing wizard can create a few nifty cyberbots that’ll seek out and easily divert or rid Usenet/ newsgroups of such obvious mainstream clownism and orchestrated debauchery. ~BradGuthBrad_GuthBrad.GuthBradGuth BG Why so many Zionist/Nazi bogus topics and otherwise Republican brown- nosed clownism going on? Such silly and otherwise bogus topics seem to always include those same key search words of other serious topics, plus a good dosage of porn and smut context. Why is that? Why is it that these clownish Usenet individuals are also the very same as having no problems with the cost of energy or the cost anything else, and they seldom if ever argue or rant on behalf of salvaging our frail environment or getting corrupt Republicans out of office. ~ BG |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article 9b2bf1c0-1223-426d-a5b8-b2f1f45ee130
@a18g2000pra.googlegroups.com, says... clownish Usenet individuals Sums you up to a "T" -- Meddle ye not in the Affairs of Dragons, for Thou art Crunchy and taste Goode with Ketchup. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 8, 7:18 am, tankfixer wrote:
In article 9b2bf1c0-1223-426d-a5b8-b2f1f45ee130 @a18g2000pra.googlegroups.com, says... clownish Usenet individuals Sums you up to a "T" -- Meddle ye not in the Affairs of Dragons, for Thou art Crunchy and taste Goode with Ketchup. My nose is not even slightly mainstream brownish, and I'm certainly not Republican or Mafia enough. Sorry about that. ~ BG |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 9 okt, 20:26, BradGuth wrote:
On Oct 8, 7:18 am, tankfixer wrote: In article 9b2bf1c0-1223-426d-a5b8-b2f1f45ee130 @a18g2000pra.googlegroups.com, says... clownish Usenet individuals Sums you up to a "T" -- Meddle ye not in the Affairs of Dragons, for Thou art Crunchy and taste Goode with Ketchup. My nose is not even slightly mainstream brownish, and I'm certainly not Republican or Mafia enough. Sorry about that. ~ BG I am wondering if Google will again have the same problems as we had last weekend... |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
(",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | February 1st 05 03:07 PM |
(",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | January 29th 05 06:32 PM |
(",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 1 | January 29th 05 07:44 AM |
(",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users | [email protected] | History | 1 | January 29th 05 06:59 AM |
(",) Good News for Google Groups, Usenet and Other Users | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | January 29th 05 05:37 AM |