Hot Rocks of Venus that are looking intelligent

Come on folks, this topic needs more of those nifty little gold stars.

Give this one all the gold stars you can muster, and keep it on top of
the Google/NOVA Usenet index topic stack by contributing anything.
.. - Brad Guth

If Venus along with its unlimited local energy cache to burn (sort of
speak) isn't intelligent ET doable (including on behalf of us), then
perhaps no other planet in the universe is worthy of a viable habitat
or even as a nifty mineral resource. With all the MRSA, Stauff and
numerous hybrid forms of humanly lethal pestilence running amuck, not
to mention animal/plant extinctions and of even hybrid plant rot
taking place and mother nature going GW postal as we prepare ourselves
for WWIII, as such Earth is not exactly ET worthy, especially after
humanity has so terribly pillaged, raped and mostly burned off its
fossil fuels with no apparent regard for the future of having far less
dry land for 1e10 souls to survive upon.

Just for those of you that either can't or simply wouldn't dare think
independently within the box, much less deductively think outside,
here's a little something special that's quite interesting, as of
lately getting the peer reviewed benefit of the doubt.

Alex Collier / By Michael Salla, PhD
http://www.exopolitics.org
http://www.rense.com/general54/zlecx.htm
http://utenti.lycos.it/paolaharris/acollier_eng.htm
http://www.exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-66.htm
plus many other links worth getting our undivided attention.

For those of you hell bent upon sticking with your terrestrial limited
God(s) instead of accepting physics and science, never mind because,
no matters what the evidence or physics that's backing up the best
available science, there's simply no hope for those in charge of
snookering humanity for all it's worth, or otherwise simply self
dumbfounded past the point of no return. In other words, there's not
much sense or logic in beating a dead horse to death.
.. - Brad Guth


On Feb 12, 8:45 am, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 17 2007, 7:57 am, BradGuth wrote:



On Oct 22, 6:09 am, BradGuth wrote:

Whenever sharing about our moon or Venus, it's exactly as though we're
not being told the whole truth and nothing but the truth about much of
anything these days. Talk about revising history, science and a whole
lot more, whereas those hot rocks of Venus that so happen to look as
though having been arranged so gosh darn unusually intelligent, are
most likely still there to behold, and we've had the technology for
having taken a much closer look-see for better than a good decade.

This observationology of image interpretation isn't the least bit
hocus-pocus phony, nor is it having any ulterior motives or hidden
agenda like our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s), or even hot-war(s)
over fossil and yellowcake energy as of lately, and there's nothing
but an all around win-win for science and humanity if in fact any of
those hot rocks of Venus are actually of those modified and/or having
been put to good use by intelligent other life. At least there's
nothing about Venus that's technically all that insurmountable, that
is unless you're not quite half as smart as a hot rock.

The official NASA/Magellan image of GIF format, as being that of a 36
look per pixel composite as having been given essentially the benefit
of those 36 confirming radar looks per each pixel, is by itself worthy
of our consideration for all kinds of honest reasons besides those
patterns of whatever's interpreting as so AI /(intelligent/
artificial), as opposed to all of the perfectly natural appearing
items that are of equally outstanding planetology, such as the
impressive FLUID ARCH.

The big question of the day is; Does anyone within Google/NOVA's
usenetland of such all-knowing wizards care to discuss/review the long
and growing list of what-ifs? (after all, for all we know those hot-
foot Venusians could even be of a Zion/semitic faith)

For a topic starter, we are obviously not talking about any cool and
wet Earth like environment, or even that of our weird, naked and
somewhat salty moon, nor of any such dead and nearly frozen to the
core likes of Mars or of whatever's so much further away. At times
Venus is actually extremely nearby (a little over 100X the distance of
our moon), and it's absolutely chuck full of its very own geothermal
cache of raw energy that's sharing a surface of 20.5 w/m2 (roughly 256
fold greater than Earth), that which only a born-again dork of a
naysayer like most of our usenet anti-think-tank rusemasters couldn't
possibly appreciate.

Why exclude the unknown simply because it's unknown? In other words,
most likely your whole intellectual mindset worth of whatever's
supposedly wiser and thus greater than most, that's simply faiyjh-
based obligated on behalf of what has to go out of its infomercial
spewing way in order to exclude upon any such off-world intelligent
other life, regardless of whatever's the applied technology, or even
to banish anything that's of off-world intelligent potential
regardless of whatever's the alternative planetology and of its local
evolution, of which you and I know absolutely nothing about is what
seems a bit counter-productive.

If at all possible, please do further explain as to those very
intelligent and/or rational community looking items, as if somehow
those were being purely natural, by way of offering us some other
image examples, as to sharing in where such a rational complex
community looking group of planetology considerations are otherwise to
be found within common/terrestrial planetology w/o AI benefit of
whatever intelligent life accomplished, such as right here on Earth
should offer. For one basic observationology argument example; How
many complex looking tarmacs are there on Earth that had absolutely
nothing whatsoever of AI to do with their having been created or
otherwise crafted/modified for their rational use by intelligent life?

Thanks once again to our once upon a time "tomcat", for once having
posted a link to this updated page of Venus images.http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting AI information can be found within image
No.17 from the top left, as being the 225 m/pixel composite frame of
such radar obtained pixels that so happens to include the robust,
rather sizable and somewhat complex community of 'GUTH Venus', of
which you should apply your own PhotoShop/resampling enlargement of at
least 3X, along with whatever unsharp mask filter plus other image
cleaning or treatment options you'd care to apply. Remember that a
purely negative or naysay mindset of a true rusemaster simply can't
accomplish such PhotoShop enlargements without making the image look
worse off than it really is.
"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles, Venus from Magellan Cycle 1"http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/html/object_page/mgn_c115s095_1.html

If you still can not find this community of interesting pixels, then
you are not nearly as good at observationology as you think you are.
- Brad Guth -

If you have a working eye and so much as half a brain (unless it's
snookered and dumbfounded past the point of no return), you can see
for yourself.
- Brad Guth

If you folks still can't manage to count those SAR composite pixels,
or much less do the basic math of 225 meters per pixel, then perhaps
you should go back to bed and stay there until you die.

Unlike most others here in this mindset anti-think-tank of such a
Usenet of denial from hell, whereas I and most anyone with so much as
half a brain and at least one good eye can deductively put these
extremely artificial looking pixels together, every bit as easily as
putting 2 plus 2 always becomes four, or in the case of those
composite SAR image pixels is where two of those becomes worth 450
meters of what's more than large enough to count as being artificial
worthy, especially when giving us such interesting patterns of large
scaled items that simply do not otherwise exist in nature.

If you folks can't even honestly count those most obvious of pixels,
much less deductively connect any of those odd looking patterns as
long as there's any slim chance that I'm actually right about there
having been intelligent other life existing/coexisting on Venus, then
what can I or anyone possibly have to say about all the other fancy
eye candy that's hyped as supposedly so important about matters that
are typically hundreds, thousands and even millions of light years
away, especially when we still can't safely walk on our own physically
dark moon or much less include the planet Venus within any number of
FOVs that should have existed.

eyeball wrote:
Yes Brad you're right, and we're wrong. You convinced us of the
coverup. Now what can we ever do about it?

Coverup, oversight or just plain old systematic banishment by the
mainstream status quo, as imposed upon all outsiders doesn't matter,
since either or all of the above has clearly been applied. Of what we
can do is what I'd suggested as of 8 years ago, starting off by
focusing our best talents and limited resources upon Venus.

This doesn't mean that we need to go there in person, even though with
a sufficient degree of applied technology would make the geothermally
toasty environment of Venus is humanly doable as long at that effort
included a composite insulated and thermally compensated rigid
airship, as their interplanetary shuttle and planetary exploration
platform, that if need be never has to set down onto that toasty
surface unless invited.

In the mean time, I'd like to see a Magellan-II mission, as having
roughly a 10 fold improved resolution, or better yet is just to send
our existing shuttle bay SAR imaging capability on its way, along with
a few of those robotic rigid airship probes that could cruise
efficiently for months on end, operating well enough below those
acidic clouds and reporting back to the orbiting mothership, or
perhaps even of having something placed within Venus L2 might be worth
our doing for a multitude of scientific reasons.

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/ht...115s095_1.html

I still have no idea why whatever moderator bot or perhaps I'd
previously left off the L from the HTM. Since no one of this warm and
fuzzy Usenet anti-think-tank bothered to mention it, is perhaps why
others that can only barely manage to mouse point and click haven't
noticed the amount of sufficient detail that's available.

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/ht...115s095_1.html

http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif

Just using your screen magnifier set to as little as 4X is sufficient
to count those raw pixels of roughly 225 meters each, although a
PhotoShop of increased contrast helps. It also helps to ask for a
little extra instructions if you can't manage to find these large and
highly intelligent looking items of interest.

BTW, a new and improved Magellan-II mission of better than one meter/
pixel of DoD or MI5/CIA spy technically via SAR imaging has been
doable within existing technology. However, that good of resolution
simply isn't required for identifying those much larger items that
look perfectly intelligent and thus artificial or as community
infrastructure rational as is.

I have my thoughts as to what the next phase of robotic missions could
be, and of what those efforts might better accomplish without ever
intentionally landing on Venus until the end of their global mapping
and geology surveying has been completed to the best we can
accomplish. Perhaps you'd like to share another thing or two on
behalf of our ...

read more

On Feb 21, 4:11 am, Saul Levy wrote:
Maybe Usenet's telling you to stop posting, Brad? lmao!

Only you, of course. lmao!

Saul Levy

On Tue, 19 Feb 2008 07:37:03 -0800 (PST), BradGuth

wrote:
On Fri, 15 Feb 2008 08:10:49 -0800 (PST), BradGuth

wrote:
Is Venus life smarter than a 5th Grader? (apparently so)

Venus wasn't always as cloudy and solar heated to death, for the same
reason that once upon a time our proto-Earth w/o moon and having that
What's so rabbi Art deco or Saul Levy worthy about alt.astronomy?

. -BradGuth

Once again, I post a couple of reply items and suddenly Usenet gets
summarily all screwed up again, as in down to its knees or dead in the
water(sort of speak).

Google error / Server Error
The server encountered a temporary error and could not complete your
request.
Please try again in 30 seconds.

What exactly is it about sharing the truth that Usenet doesn't like or
can't manage to cope with?

Without my having posted anything is where Usenet seems to be working
perfectly fine and dandy. How the hell can my posting cause such a
horrific drain on these Usenet server resources?

I had no idea my stuff was so sleeper-cell powerful.
. - Brad Guth

In this anti-think-tank of such a nayism Usenet from hell, anything is
possible.

BTW, if Venus along with its unlimited local energy cache to burn
(sort of speak) isn't intelligent ET doable (including on behalf of
us), then perhaps no other planet in the universe is worthy of a
viable habitat or even as a nifty mineral resource. With all the
MRSA, Stauff and numerous hybrid forms of humanly lethal pestilence
running amuck, not to mention animal/plant extinctions and of even
hybrid plant rot taking place and mother nature going GW postal as we
prepare ourselves for WWIII, as such Earth is not exactly ET worthy,
especially after humanity has so terribly pillaged, raped and mostly
burned off its fossil fuels with no apparent regard for the future of
having far less dry land for 1e10 souls to survive upon.

Just for those of you that either can't or simply wouldn't dare think
independently within the box, much less deductively think outside,
here's a little something special that's quite interesting, as of
lately getting the peer reviewed benefit of the doubt.

Alex Collier / By Michael Salla, PhD
http://www.exopolitics.org
http://www.rense.com/general54/zlecx.htm
http://utenti.lycos.it/paolaharris/acollier_eng.htm
http://www.exopolitics.org/Exo-Comment-66.htm
plus many other links worth getting our undivided attention.

For those of you hell bent upon sticking with your terrestrial limited
God(s) instead of accepting physics and science, never mind because,
no matters what the evidence or physics that's backing up the best
available science, there's simply no hope for those in charge of
snookering humanity for all it's worth, or otherwise simply self
dumbfounded past the point of no return. In other words, there's not
much sense or logic in beating a dead horse to death.
.. - Brad Guth