![]() |
#71
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah writes:
Art Deco wrote: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote: ah wrote: Art Deco wrote: nightbat writes: nightbat wrote Why would you write that, nightbat? Your first encounter with the frootbat, Classic Tholenator(tm)? Count Floyd wrote: PJR writes: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Mikus Grinbergs writes: I've had the Innotek port of Acrobat version 5 running for some time. Lately, however, it's become effectively useless. Upon being launched, the logo will get displayed with the CPU activity pegged at 100 percent for MINUTES before the first page gets displayed. Closing it takes about as long. I'm not aware of any changes to my system since the problem started occurring. Has anybody else experienced such a dramatic slowdown in performance and figured out how to solve the problem? As soon as Acrobat version 5 became available, I posted my experience of it taking EXTREMELY long to do things. If I remember correctly, my post was pooh-poohed. Be that as it may, the difference here is that Acrobat used to be nice and speedy, but now it's slower than molassas, yet I cannot think of any change that has been made to the system. Rebooting did not cure the problem. Uninstall and reinstall, Dickless. Rebooting is the dickhead approach. You would know that if you didn't spend all your time uttering saucerhead gaga. You can get Acrobat *Five* for OS/2??? Welcome to the late 20th century, Davie! What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? PJ "he could also convert the .pdf to .ps, but he'd have to know how to" R :-) What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? Count Floyd Oh Please! Don't start this type of crap in this newsgroup! Keep it in the advocacy newsgroup with those idiots like Michael Baldwin Bruce, Bart Devo, Elizabot and the like. nightbat Yes Count while we are in serious mutual group agreement there is no use in rubbing it in to the clueless Alexa drone auk fun coffee boys for they crossposting net proudly know who they are. Including sockpuppets, ah, Dr.Flonkenstein, Bookman, Aratzio, Jade, Cujo, CJ Osterwiald, tholen. Suffering from reading comprehension problems, nightbat? I'm not the one who adds a bunch of irrelevant newsgroups to the distribution. No "classic" lames today, Classic Tholenator(tm)? They actually sadly relish when you mention them on post lits on their scoring juvenile underdeveloped pea brains. Leave me out of your pontification, nightbat. How ironic. How iconic. How symbolic. How systolic. How bucolic. How moronic. How imbecilic. How diabolic. What does that have to do with OS/2, ah? Non sequitur. I see that you didn't answer the question, ah. No surprise there, really. And believe it or not we are profound Science Officer alt.astronomy constant auk sockpuppet morphing stuck with them because Darla the brave wayward net Sean Star Race traveler wants us to baby-sit tolerate them until she purportedly gets mission back, oh the humanity. 1st Officer Bohne as net public relations Science Liaison Officer has been as diplomatic as you can imagine but with no results. Don't waste your time, just Bozo file them and be done with it, we'll try to explain to hopefully returning Darla what they have all been up too. Non sequitur. So you don't cotton to Darla the lizard queen, Bruce. |
#72
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah writes:
Art Deco wrote: ah wrote: Art Deco wrote: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote: ah wrote: Art Deco wrote: nightbat writes: nightbat wrote Why would you write that, nightbat? Your first encounter with the frootbat, Classic Tholenator(tm)? Count Floyd wrote: PJR writes: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Mikus Grinbergs writes: I've had the Innotek port of Acrobat version 5 running for some time. Lately, however, it's become effectively useless. Upon being launched, the logo will get displayed with the CPU activity pegged at 100 percent for MINUTES before the first page gets displayed. Closing it takes about as long. I'm not aware of any changes to my system since the problem started occurring. Has anybody else experienced such a dramatic slowdown in performance and figured out how to solve the problem? As soon as Acrobat version 5 became available, I posted my experience of it taking EXTREMELY long to do things. If I remember correctly, my post was pooh-poohed. Be that as it may, the difference here is that Acrobat used to be nice and speedy, but now it's slower than molassas, yet I cannot think of any change that has been made to the system. Rebooting did not cure the problem. Uninstall and reinstall, Dickless. Rebooting is the dickhead approach. You would know that if you didn't spend all your time uttering saucerhead gaga. You can get Acrobat *Five* for OS/2??? Welcome to the late 20th century, Davie! What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? PJ "he could also convert the .pdf to .ps, but he'd have to know how to" R :-) What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? Count Floyd Oh Please! Don't start this type of crap in this newsgroup! Keep it in the advocacy newsgroup with those idiots like Michael Baldwin Bruce, Bart Devo, Elizabot and the like. Yes Count while we are in serious mutual group agreement there is no use in rubbing it in to the clueless Alexa drone auk fun coffee boys for they crossposting net proudly know who they are. Including sockpuppets, ah, Dr.Flonkenstein, Bookman, Aratzio, Jade, Cujo, CJ Osterwiald, tholen. Suffering from reading comprehension problems, nightbat? I'm not the one who adds a bunch of irrelevant newsgroups to the distribution. No "classic" lames today, Classic Tholenator(tm)? They actually sadly relish when you mention them on post lits on their scoring juvenile underdeveloped pea brains. Leave me out of your pontification, nightbat. How ironic. How iconic. How symbolic. How systolic. How bucolic. How moronic. How imbecilic. How diabolic. How conic. How phonic. What does that have to do with OS/2, ah? And believe it or not we are profound Science Officer alt.astronomy constant auk sockpuppet morphing stuck with them because Darla the brave wayward net Sean Star Race traveler wants us to baby-sit tolerate them until she purportedly gets mission back, oh the humanity. 1st Officer Bohne as net public relations Science Liaison Officer has been as diplomatic as you can imagine but with no results. Don't waste your time, just Bozo file them and be done with it, we'll try to explain to hopefully returning Darla what they have all been up too. Non sequitur. So you don't cotton to Darla the lizard queen, Bruce. |
#73
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah writes:
Art Deco wrote: nightbat writes: nightbat wrote Why would you write that, nightbat? Your first encounter with the frootbat, Classic Tholenator(tm)? Count Floyd wrote: PJR writes: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Mikus Grinbergs writes: I've had the Innotek port of Acrobat version 5 running for some time. Lately, however, it's become effectively useless. Upon being launched, the logo will get displayed with the CPU activity pegged at 100 percent for MINUTES before the first page gets displayed. Closing it takes about as long. I'm not aware of any changes to my system since the problem started occurring. Has anybody else experienced such a dramatic slowdown in performance and figured out how to solve the problem? As soon as Acrobat version 5 became available, I posted my experience of it taking EXTREMELY long to do things. If I remember correctly, my post was pooh-poohed. Be that as it may, the difference here is that Acrobat used to be nice and speedy, but now it's slower than molassas, yet I cannot think of any change that has been made to the system. Rebooting did not cure the problem. Uninstall and reinstall, Dickless. Rebooting is the dickhead approach. You would know that if you didn't spend all your time uttering saucerhead gaga. You can get Acrobat *Five* for OS/2??? Welcome to the late 20th century, Davie! What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? PJ "he could also convert the .pdf to .ps, but he'd have to know how to" R :-) What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? Count Floyd Oh Please! Don't start this type of crap in this newsgroup! Keep it in the advocacy newsgroup with those idiots like Michael Baldwin Bruce, Bart Devo, Elizabot and the like. nightbat Yes Count while we are in serious mutual group agreement there is no use in rubbing it in to the clueless Alexa drone auk fun coffee boys for they crossposting net proudly know who they are. Including sockpuppets, ah, Dr.Flonkenstein, Bookman, Aratzio, Jade, Cujo, CJ Osterwiald, tholen. Suffering from reading comprehension problems, nightbat? I'm not the one who adds a bunch of irrelevant newsgroups to the distribution. No "classic" lames today, Classic Tholenator(tm)? They actually sadly relish when you mention them on post lits on their scoring juvenile underdeveloped pea brains. Leave me out of your pontification, nightbat. How ironic. How iconic. And believe it or not we are profound Science Officer alt.astronomy constant auk sockpuppet morphing stuck with them because Darla the brave wayward net Sean Star Race traveler wants us to baby-sit tolerate them until she purportedly gets mission back, oh the humanity. 1st Officer Bohne as net public relations Science Liaison Officer has been as diplomatic as you can imagine but with no results. Don't waste your time, just Bozo file them and be done with it, we'll try to explain to hopefully returning Darla what they have all been up too. Non sequitur. So you don't cotton to Darla the lizard queen, Bruce. What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, ah? It's part of the tracking software, Non sequitur. Bruce. Who is "Bruce", Someone, Bruce. Who is "Bruce", ah? Still suffering from attribution problems? ah? Feels good, doesn't it? Non sequitur. Suffering from attribution problems? I have a corn on my lefty big-toe, is all. Non sequitur. |
#74
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah writes:
Art Deco wrote: Fred wrote: , , whose name means "doesn't do housework; wears leather pants; likes to call his penis his 'manmeat'", squalled: Non sequitur. I enjoyed tonight, too. But you know, we both have our lives. Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Anyone could be "classic tholenator(tm)", if they only tried. Suffering from attribution problems? From midgets to giants. What does your question have to do with OS/2, Bookman? What if no one reads your post? Non sequitur. Sweet are the uses of adversity. Bite him, Fred. *woof* What does that have to do with OS/2, ah? |
#75
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah writes:
Art Deco wrote: nightbat writes: nightbat wrote Why would you write that, nightbat? Your first encounter with the frootbat, Classic Tholenator(tm)? Count Floyd wrote: PJR writes: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Mikus Grinbergs writes: I've had the Innotek port of Acrobat version 5 running for some time. Lately, however, it's become effectively useless. Upon being launched, the logo will get displayed with the CPU activity pegged at 100 percent for MINUTES before the first page gets displayed. Closing it takes about as long. I'm not aware of any changes to my system since the problem started occurring. Has anybody else experienced such a dramatic slowdown in performance and figured out how to solve the problem? As soon as Acrobat version 5 became available, I posted my experience of it taking EXTREMELY long to do things. If I remember correctly, my post was pooh-poohed. Be that as it may, the difference here is that Acrobat used to be nice and speedy, but now it's slower than molassas, yet I cannot think of any change that has been made to the system. Rebooting did not cure the problem. Uninstall and reinstall, Dickless. Rebooting is the dickhead approach. You would know that if you didn't spend all your time uttering saucerhead gaga. You can get Acrobat *Five* for OS/2??? Welcome to the late 20th century, Davie! What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? PJ "he could also convert the .pdf to .ps, but he'd have to know how to" R :-) What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? Count Floyd Oh Please! Don't start this type of crap in this newsgroup! Keep it in the advocacy newsgroup with those idiots like Michael Baldwin Bruce, Bart Devo, Elizabot and the like. nightbat Yes Count while we are in serious mutual group agreement there is no use in rubbing it in to the clueless Alexa drone auk fun coffee boys for they crossposting net proudly know who they are. Including sockpuppets, ah, Dr.Flonkenstein, Bookman, Aratzio, Jade, Cujo, CJ Osterwiald, tholen. Suffering from reading comprehension problems, nightbat? I'm not the one who adds a bunch of irrelevant newsgroups to the distribution. No "classic" lames today, Classic Tholenator(tm)? They actually sadly relish when you mention them on post lits on their scoring juvenile underdeveloped pea brains. Leave me out of your pontification, nightbat. How ironic. How iconic. And believe it or not we are profound Science Officer alt.astronomy constant auk sockpuppet morphing stuck with them because Darla the brave wayward net Sean Star Race traveler wants us to baby-sit tolerate them until she purportedly gets mission back, oh the humanity. 1st Officer Bohne as net public relations Science Liaison Officer has been as diplomatic as you can imagine but with no results. Don't waste your time, just Bozo file them and be done with it, we'll try to explain to hopefully returning Darla what they have all been up too. Non sequitur. So you don't cotton to Darla the lizard queen, Bruce. What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, ah? What does this have to do with alt.****nozzles, Classic Tholenator(tm)? What does this have to do with UFOs, Flying Teapot? What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, ah? Pardon? I see that you didn't answer the question, ah. No surprise there, really. |
#76
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah writes:
Art Deco wrote: ah wrote: Art Deco wrote: ah writes: Art Deco wrote: nightbat writes: nightbat wrote Why would you write that, nightbat? Your first encounter with the frootbat, Classic Tholenator(tm)? Count Floyd wrote: PJR writes: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Mikus Grinbergs writes: I've had the Innotek port of Acrobat version 5 running for some time. Lately, however, it's become effectively useless. Upon being launched, the logo will get displayed with the CPU activity pegged at 100 percent for MINUTES before the first page gets displayed. Closing it takes about as long. I'm not aware of any changes to my system since the problem started occurring. Has anybody else experienced such a dramatic slowdown in performance and figured out how to solve the problem? As soon as Acrobat version 5 became available, I posted my experience of it taking EXTREMELY long to do things. If I remember correctly, my post was pooh-poohed. Be that as it may, the difference here is that Acrobat used to be nice and speedy, but now it's slower than molassas, yet I cannot think of any change that has been made to the system. Rebooting did not cure the problem. Uninstall and reinstall, Dickless. Rebooting is the dickhead approach. You would know that if you didn't spend all your time uttering saucerhead gaga. You can get Acrobat *Five* for OS/2??? Welcome to the late 20th century, Davie! What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? PJ "he could also convert the .pdf to .ps, but he'd have to know how to" R :-) What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? Count Floyd Oh Please! Don't start this type of crap in this newsgroup! Keep it in the advocacy newsgroup with those idiots like Michael Baldwin Bruce, Bart Devo, Elizabot and the like. nightbat Yes Count while we are in serious mutual group agreement there is no use in rubbing it in to the clueless Alexa drone auk fun coffee boys for they crossposting net proudly know who they are. Including sockpuppets, ah, Dr.Flonkenstein, Bookman, Aratzio, Jade, Cujo, CJ Osterwiald, tholen. Suffering from reading comprehension problems, nightbat? I'm not the one who adds a bunch of irrelevant newsgroups to the distribution. No "classic" lames today, Classic Tholenator(tm)? They actually sadly relish when you mention them on post lits on their scoring juvenile underdeveloped pea brains. Leave me out of your pontification, nightbat. How ironic. How iconic. And believe it or not we are profound Science Officer alt.astronomy constant auk sockpuppet morphing stuck with them because Darla the brave wayward net Sean Star Race traveler wants us to baby-sit tolerate them until she purportedly gets mission back, oh the humanity. 1st Officer Bohne as net public relations Science Liaison Officer has been as diplomatic as you can imagine but with no results. Don't waste your time, just Bozo file them and be done with it, we'll try to explain to hopefully returning Darla what they have all been up too. Non sequitur. So you don't cotton to Darla the lizard queen, Bruce. What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, ah? What does this have to do with alt.****nozzles, Classic Tholenator(tm)? What does this have to do with UFOs, Flying Teapot? What does this have to do with freight trains, St. Barnard? What does this have to do with vaccuum tolerances, St. Bruce? What does that have to do with OS/2, ah? |
#78
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#79
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#80
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTF? Version 4?? | Randall Schulz | SETI | 11 | November 18th 04 12:48 AM |
New Boinc Client 3.2 | Klaatu | SETI | 18 | July 16th 04 12:54 PM |
ANN: Trial Version of DAS software now available | Deepsky Astronomy Software | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | June 27th 04 09:18 AM |
ANN: New Version of Deepsky Software (DAS) | Deepsky Astronomy Software | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 3rd 04 11:44 PM |
ANN: New Version of Deepsky Software (DAS) | Deepsky Astronomy Software | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | June 3rd 04 11:43 PM |