What's going on with the Sun?

"Brad Guth" wrote:
-- "hanson" wrote:


"Brad Guth" wrote:
Apparently, the laws of physics for Earth are always socially/
politically correct, [S] whereas on our physically dark moon...

hanson wrote:
Brad, you're almost right but you should have stopped
at [S]... because it's not the moon that is dark... it is your
reasoning that turned off and sank into its usual darkness
aka "Geistige Umnachtung" ... Poor boy, you. Pity.

"Brad Guth" wrote:
Are you now going to blame us and those off-world laws
of physics that are exactly the same everywhere else
than Earth, for the tanked economy that supposedly
your guys were in charge of?

hanson wrote:
ahahaha.... AHAHAHAHAHA... Brad, you poor fella,
what would make you feel better, a "Yes" or a "No"

Brad wrote:
Does anyone really care what you have ever had to say?

hanson wrote:
.... Yes, YOU just so did, Brad, unless consider
yourself to be a "no-one".

Brad wrote:
Clearly you can't even tell us what sort of liquid is in those
reservoirs on Venus, and why is that?

hanson wrote:
WOW, listen Brad, now you are talking. Can you get
some of that "Venusium Bradate" liquid? Can it be
sold for a good buck?.. for enough to get you off
welfare?... Let me know!... Till then, thanks for the
Laughs... ahahaha... ahahahahanson

"Brad Guth" wrote:
-- "hanson" wrote:


"Brad Guth" wrote:
I've tried to estimate the all-inclusive human created CO2 and NOx,
and it seems to be worth at least 100 billion tonnes/year (roughly
14.4 tonnes per human), and otherwise it could easily be worth a
trillion tonnes per year (144 tonnes per human). What's your best all-
inclusive swag?

hanson wrote:
"Swag?"
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=swag&page=2
1. Scientific Wild Ass Guess.
2. opinions, or judgements, about something with
less evidence than would make the opinion certain,
but more than a simple opinion with no factual basis. -
3. making a guess with some information, but not
enough to make a clear and certain determination.

Brad, try again, you are swaggering, uselessly, as usual.
But, thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson

Brad wrote:
I've already done my math that supports at least 100+
billion tonnes/year. Now it's your turn.
So therefore, what's the "hanson" swag or precise
accounting as to the all-inclusive human contributions
of CO2/year?

hanson wrote:
Why should I spend time & fulfill your wild ass yearnings.
Look it up on the internet. You'll find plenty of low-ball
as well as high-ball guestimates, each one supporting
his or her own wild ass opinionated agenda, with yours
being on the Commie-pinko end of the spectrum. Live
with it. While you cry and wanna "discuss" it, I'm making
Mula off and with it... ahahahaha...AHAHA... ahahanson

On Jul 11, 3:33*pm, "hanson" wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote:
-- "hanson" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote:
I've tried to estimate the all-inclusive human created CO2 and NOx,
and it seems to be worth at least 100 billion tonnes/year (roughly
14.4 tonnes per human), and otherwise it could easily be worth a
trillion tonnes per year (144 tonnes per human). What's your best all-
inclusive swag?

hanson wrote:
"Swag?"
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=swag&page=2
1. Scientific Wild Ass Guess.
2. opinions, or judgements, about something with
less evidence than would make the opinion certain,
but more than a simple opinion with no factual basis. -
3. making a guess with some information, but not
enough to make a clear and certain determination.

Brad, try again, you are swaggering, uselessly, as usual.
But, thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson

Brad wrote:

I've already done my math that supports at least 100+
billion tonnes/year. *Now it's your turn.
So therefore, what's the "hanson" swag or precise
accounting as to the all-inclusive human contributions
of CO2/year?

hanson wrote:

Why should I spend time & fulfill your wild ass yearnings.
Look it up on the internet. You'll find plenty of low-ball
as well as high-ball guestimates, each one supporting
his or her own wild ass opinionated agenda, with yours
being on the Commie-pinko end of the spectrum. Live
with it. While you cry and wanna "discuss" it, I'm making
Mula off and with it... ahahahaha...AHAHA... ahahanson

Obviously you never put even two honest cents worth into the general
pot, because you're either too cheap or not allowed to constructively
contribute. (FUD-masters are only allowed to topic/author stalk,
criticize and belittle others)

http://groups.google.com/group/googl...t/topics?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet/topics?hl=en
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

"Brad Guth" wrote:
-- "hanson" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote:
I've tried to estimate the all-inclusive human created CO2 and NOx,
and it seems to be worth at least 100 billion tonnes/year (roughly
14.4 tonnes per human), and otherwise it could easily be worth a
trillion tonnes per year (144 tonnes per human). What's your best all-
inclusive swag?

hanson wrote:
"Swag?"
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=swag&page=2
1. Scientific Wild Ass Guess.
2. opinions, or judgements, about something with
less evidence than would make the opinion certain,
but more than a simple opinion with no factual basis. -
3. making a guess with some information, but not
enough to make a clear and certain determination.

Brad, try again, you are swaggering, uselessly, as usual.
But, thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson

Brad wrote:
I've already done my math that supports at least 100+
billion tonnes/year. Now it's your turn.
So therefore, what's the "hanson" swag or precise
accounting as to the all-inclusive human contributions
of CO2/year?

hanson wrote:
Why should I spend time & fulfill your wild ass yearnings.
Look it up on the internet. You'll find plenty of low-ball
as well as high-ball guestimates, each one supporting
his or her own wild ass opinionated agenda, with yours
being on the Commie-pinko end of the spectrum. Live
with it. While you cry and wanna "discuss" it, I'm making
Mula off and with it... ahahahaha...AHAHA... ahahanson

Brad wrote:
Obviously you never put even two honest cents worth
into the general pot, because you're either too cheap
or not allowed to constructively contribute. (FUD-masters
are only allowed to topic/author stalk, criticize and belittle
others)

hanson wrote:
Brad, try again, you are swaggering, uselessly, as usual.
But, thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson

On Jul 11, 6:16*pm, "hanson" wrote:
"Brad Guth" wrote:
-- "hanson" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote:
I've tried to estimate the all-inclusive human created CO2 and NOx,
and it seems to be worth at least 100 billion tonnes/year (roughly
14.4 tonnes per human), and otherwise it could easily be worth a
trillion tonnes per year (144 tonnes per human). What's your best all-
inclusive swag?

hanson wrote:
"Swag?"
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=swag&page=2
1. Scientific Wild Ass Guess.
2. opinions, or judgements, about something with
less evidence than would make the opinion certain,
but more than a simple opinion with no factual basis. -
3. making a guess with some information, but not
enough to make a clear and certain determination.

Brad, try again, you are swaggering, uselessly, as usual.
But, thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson

Brad wrote:
I've already done my math that supports at least 100+
billion tonnes/year. Now it's your turn.
So therefore, what's the "hanson" swag or precise
accounting as to the all-inclusive human contributions
of CO2/year?

hanson wrote:
Why should I spend time & fulfill your wild ass yearnings.
Look it up on the internet. You'll find plenty of low-ball
as well as high-ball guestimates, each one supporting
his or her own wild ass opinionated agenda, with yours
being on the Commie-pinko end of the spectrum. Live
with it. While you cry and wanna "discuss" it, I'm making
Mula off and with it... ahahahaha...AHAHA... ahahanson

Brad wrote:

Obviously you never put even two honest cents worth
into the general pot, because you're either too cheap
or not allowed to constructively contribute. (FUD-masters
are only allowed to topic/author stalk, criticize and belittle
others)

hanson wrote:

Brad, try again, you are swaggering, uselessly, as usual.
But, thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson

It sounds more like you can't get me to dance.

Even though you can't admit to accomplishing anything wise or good for
humanity or the environment, never the less, why not tell us what FUD-
master hanson does when he's not screwing with others?

http://groups.google.com/group/googl...t/topics?hl=en
http://groups.google.com/group/guth-usenet/topics?hl=en
http://www.wanttoknow.info/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

"Brad Guth" wrote:
-- "hanson" wrote:

"Brad Guth" wrote:
I've tried to estimate the all-inclusive human created CO2 and NOx,
and it seems to be worth at least 100 billion tonnes/year (roughly
14.4 tonnes per human), and otherwise it could easily be worth a
trillion tonnes per year (144 tonnes per human). What's your best all-
inclusive swag?

hanson wrote:
"Swag?"
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=swag&page=2
1. Scientific Wild Ass Guess.
2. opinions, or judgements, about something with
less evidence than would make the opinion certain,
but more than a simple opinion with no factual basis. -
3. making a guess with some information, but not
enough to make a clear and certain determination.

Brad, try again, you are swaggering, uselessly, as usual.
But, thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson

Brad wrote:
I've already done my math that supports at least 100+
billion tonnes/year. Now it's your turn.
So therefore, what's the "hanson" swag or precise
accounting as to the all-inclusive human contributions
of CO2/year?

hanson wrote:
Why should I spend time & fulfill your wild ass yearnings.
Look it up on the internet. You'll find plenty of low-ball
as well as high-ball guestimates, each one supporting
his or her own wild ass opinionated agenda, with yours
being on the Commie-pinko end of the spectrum. Live
with it. While you cry and wanna "discuss" it, I'm making
Mula off and with it... ahahahaha...AHAHA... ahahanson

Brad wrote:
Obviously you never put even two honest cents worth
into the general pot, because you're either too cheap
or not allowed to constructively contribute. (FUD-masters
are only allowed to topic/author stalk, criticize and belittle
others)

hanson wrote:
Brad, try again, you are swaggering, uselessly, as usual.
But, thanks for the laughs... ahahahanson

Brad wrote:
It sounds more like you can't get me to dance.

hanson wrote:
.... Neeehh.. that's just another swagger of yours...

Brad wrote:
Even though you can't admit to accomplishing
anything wise or good for humanity or the environment,
never the less, why not tell us what FUD-master hanson
does when he's not screwing with others?

hanson wrote:
Brad, Brad, Brad... show me first, what "wise or good
for humanity or the environment" you have accomplished
and I'll show you mine.

On Jul 12, 5:49*am, "hanson" wrote:

show me first and I'll show you mine.

That's what they all say when they meet a real blond.

Now stop teasing Brenda and put it away! Dirty boy!

AHAHAHAHA .... ahahahaha... WONDERFUL!....
"Chris.B" is baaack and wrote:

"hanson" wrote:
Guth, Brad, Brad... show me first, what "wise or good
for humanity or the environment" you have accomplished
and I'll show you mine. --- which Chris meant to mean:
"show me first and I'll show you mine"

Chris B. wrote:
That's what they all say when they meet a real blond.
Now stop teasing Brenda and put it away! Dirty boy!

hanson wrote:
..ahaha...Yes, Chris, I said that I will stop teasing Brada,

but now back to biz, since you ,"Chris.B", my friend
& ever best mule came back &
is asking for encore #41, because Chris has wisely
recognized the need to publicize these essential but
little known facts about Einstein & his Relativity work, in
http://tinyurl.com/Crackpot-Einsteins-Crock
wherein it says:

-- "Chris.B" ( SEE end of post ) wrote:
--- KW, Koobee Wublee wrote:
---- Jan Panteltje wrote:
----- "hanson" wrote:

hanson wrote:
Einstein, in his own words, just a year before he
folded his relativity tent, closed his umbrella, kicked
the bucket and finally puffed and bit the grass,....
Einstein wrote, in 1954, to his Italian friend Besso:

|||AE:||| "as far as the laws of mathematics refer to
|||AE:||| reality, they are not certain; and as far as they
|||AE:||| are certain, they do not refer to reality."
|||AE:||| "why would anyone be interested in getting exact
|||AE:||| solutions from such an ephemeral set of equations?"
|||AE:||| "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be
|||AE:||| based on the field concept, i. e., on continuous
|||AE:||| structures. In that case nothing remains of my entire
|||AE:||| castle in the air, [my] gravitation theory included."
|||AE:||| "If I had my life to live over again, I'd be a plumber".
|||AE:||| ... [and I would make blouses instead (see link)]
http://tinyurl.com/Blouse-Plumber-Einstein

So, that then is the end of Einstein's infamous fantasy
career-journey which concludes, long last, with what
most enlightened folks have suspected for a long time,
if not outright from the start, that:
====== SR is short for STUPID RANT and ======
===== GR is just a GULLIBLE RECITATION ====

Einstein flagellated himself & came clean (1), after
he was used by the Zios for their own, to them then
noble political agenda. (2)
http://tinyurl.com/E-mc2-existed-before-Einstein (1)
http://tinyurl.com/How-Einstein-stole-E-mc-2 (1)
http://tinyurl.com/Kwublee-views-Einsteins-Theft (1)
http://tinyurl.com/Zio-Politics-with-Relativity (2)
http://tinyurl.com/Alberts-Zio-Politics-w-SR-GR (2)

GR/SR is a useless crock o'****, save it being
"a Base", an "al Qaida", for Einstein Dingleberries
to worship Albert's sphincter.. although AE said
not to do that.

Professor Panteltje wrote:
I do get a bit sick of the 'Einstein was right again crowd'.
He was not, he was just a math fiddler, curve fitter.
If somebody asks: How much is 2 + 3, and Einstein
would have answered : 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9.
Then saying: "see, he once did say 5, he was right again",
is really really bad.
He had no clue, and died without one.
That he was pushed by the US at that time as a great
scientist to brush up the Jewish image was also a mistake,
as he did not have that clue, and just jammed science
with his curve fitting replacing simple physics understanding.

KW wrote:
Please allow Yours Truly to remind everyone whether if he/she is a
true scholar of physics or another Orwellian-ill-educated Einstein
Dingleberry that fall in the following ridiculous traits:

** FAITH IS THEORY
** LYING IS TEACHING
** NITWIT IS GENIUS
** OCCULT IS SCIENCE
** PARADOX IS KOSHER
** FUDGING IS DERIVATION
** BULL**** IS TRUTH
** BELIEVING IS LEARNING
** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE
** CONJECTURE IS REALITY
** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS

Newton discovered the law of gravity in which if the gravitating mass
is positive, gravitational force is attractive. The reverse, although
never been observed, must be true. That is if the gravitating mass is
negative, the gravitational effect must be repulsive or antigravity.
shrug

Later on, it was discovered by Poisson that the gradient of the
Newtonian gravitational potential is equivalent to the mass density.
In free space, this mass density [rho] is zero.

hanson wrote:
Revisiting an earlier discussion:
http://tinyurl.com/hanson-d2G-Question
Newton in his 2 or 3rd Principia edition, 300 years
before Einstein, addresses Gravitation as
G = d2(1/rho)/dt^2.
Einstein was to lazy or stupid to incorporate
G = d2(1/rho)/dt^2 into his GR croc. Or maybe
Albert was still scared from his 1907 confession
and apology for him having stolen E-mc^2.
http://tinyurl.com/E-mc2-existed-before-Einstein
http://tinyurl.com/How-Einstein-stole-E-mc-2
http://tinyurl.com/Kwublee-views-Einsteins-Theft

Despite all that, like brainwashed addicted cultists,
current day Dingleberries still worship Einstein's
sphincter, full well knowing that for the last 70 years,
experiments show Newtonian's gravitation also to be:
G = H^2/rho
wherein H is the Hubble constent and rho is the
mas-density (even on cosmic scales), (some
small digits & pi omitted here) all of which can
be concatenated into the skeletal 1234 cosmic
envelope as
c = (GM/R)^1/2 = (GMH)^1/3 = (GM*b_r)^1/4
IOW, none of Einstein's convoluted **** has
any use in the here and real universe that we
live in. .... KW is correct in his assessment.

KW continued & wrote:
However, it does not take a genius to figure out if the
mass density is negative, gravitational effect becomes
repulsive. Poisson was the very first person to suggest
antigravity but knew better not to. Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar was just so ****ing ignorant that this
nitwit, this plagiarist, and the liar had no hesitation to claim
negative mass density in vacuum in which the giants before this
nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar knew better not to go there.
shrug

Now, the self-styled physicists are getting hard-ons whenever Dark
Energy (negative mass density in vacuum) is mentioned. What the ****
does negative mass mean? The only plausible answer is ignorance.
After all, they are still worshipping Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar as a god. Anything this nitwit, the
plagiarist, and this liar uttered just bedazzaled the hell out of
these self-styled physicists. That is called Dingleberry
worshipping. shrug

Moving on to GR, the silliness embraced by the self-styled physicists
exponentially amplifies. The Schwarzschild metric was discovered by
Hilbert not Schwarzschild. Both metrics are mathematically legal
solutions to the field equations that are static, spherically
symmetric, and asymptotically flat. Schwarzschild's original solution
does not allow for the existence of black holes. Let's look at the
Schwarzschild metric before the integrating constant is identified
through the boundary requirement of satisfying the Newtonian law of
gravity. There are more integration constants, but for the purpose of
this discussion, they are ignored.

** ds^2 = c^2 (1 + K / r) dt^2 - dr^2 / (1 + K / r) - r^2 dO^2
Where
** K = One of the many integration constants
** dO^2 = cos^2(Latitude) dLongitude^2 + dLatitude^2

Notice this particular solution predicts just about everything from
gravitation to antigravity. There is no definitive reasoning to pin-
point this particular integration constant as the following besides
through this boundary condition that emphasizes hind sights are always
20/20. shrug

** K = - 2 G M / c^2, Newtonian compatibility requirement

This point collaborates with Professor Ponte's astute observation of
how Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar reasoned.
shrug


Chris.B" wrote:
I fully agree with what KW, JP & hanson said above.
I adore and revere Koobee Wublee, Jan Panteltje and hanson
I am honored to be on the poster list as an appendage..
I have requested them to repost his note every time
I do respond to it. I need to see this post every day.
It makes me feel being intelligent and smart like they are.
I don't know any arithmetic nor algebra at all.
My personal negativity which I have posted about in my
google group profile forces me to be like this. Here is
my passport-http://tinyurl.com/Picture-of-Chris-B

This is rather more interesting than a few nutjobs bickering over
their pet idiocies:

http://www.dmi.dk/dmi/manen_fortalle...dens_klima_2-2

As an aid to climate research, automatic telescopes are being used to
measure earthshine. The degree of cloud cover on Earth is measured
from the sunlight reflected back from the dark side of the moon
monitored continuously with a 0.1% accuracy. This is 10 times better
than satellites can achieve. This telescope is mounted on Mauna Loa to
limit man-made light pollution affecting the results. Since the
reflectance area is limited to a particular geographical region, on
Earth, further telescopes will be required on other continents to
ensure fuller coverage.

No doubt Google Translate will provide a service for those unfamiliar
with modern Danish. Or just look at the pictures. Sadly there are no
prizes for spotting the Astro-Physics mounting.

"Chris.B" wrote:
This is rather more interesting research, & further required...

hanson wrote:
.... precisely, "Chris.B", my friend. Thank you! You
are the best ever mule to come
back & ask for encore #42, because Chris has wisely
recognized the need to publicize these essential but
little known facts about Einstein & his Relativity work, in
http://tinyurl.com/Crackpot-Einsteins-Crock
wherein it says:

-- "Chris.B" ( SEE end of post ) wrote:
--- KW, Koobee Wublee wrote:
---- Jan Panteltje wrote:
----- "hanson" wrote:

hanson wrote:
Einstein, in his own words, just a year before he
folded his relativity tent, closed his umbrella, kicked
the bucket and finally puffed and bit the grass,....
Einstein wrote, in 1954, to his Italian friend Besso:

|||AE:||| "as far as the laws of mathematics refer to
|||AE:||| reality, they are not certain; and as far as they
|||AE:||| are certain, they do not refer to reality."
|||AE:||| "why would anyone be interested in getting exact
|||AE:||| solutions from such an ephemeral set of equations?"
|||AE:||| "I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be
|||AE:||| based on the field concept, i. e., on continuous
|||AE:||| structures. In that case nothing remains of my entire
|||AE:||| castle in the air, [my] gravitation theory included."
|||AE:||| "If I had my life to live over again, I'd be a plumber".
|||AE:||| ... [and I would make blouses instead (see link)]
http://tinyurl.com/Blouse-Plumber-Einstein

So, that then is the end of Einstein's infamous fantasy
career-journey which concludes, long last, with what
most enlightened folks have suspected for a long time,
if not outright from the start, that:
====== SR is short for STUPID RANT and ======
===== GR is just a GULLIBLE RECITATION ====

Einstein flagellated himself & came clean (1), after
he was used by the Zios for their own, to them then
noble political agenda. (2)
http://tinyurl.com/E-mc2-existed-before-Einstein (1)
http://tinyurl.com/How-Einstein-stole-E-mc-2 (1)
http://tinyurl.com/Kwublee-views-Einsteins-Theft (1)
http://tinyurl.com/Zio-Politics-with-Relativity (2)
http://tinyurl.com/Alberts-Zio-Politics-w-SR-GR (2)

GR/SR is a useless crock o'****, save it being
"a Base", an "al Qaida", for Einstein Dingleberries
to worship Albert's sphincter.. although AE said
not to do that.

Professor Panteltje wrote:

I do get a bit sick of the 'Einstein was right again crowd'.
He was not, he was just a math fiddler, curve fitter.
If somebody asks: How much is 2 + 3, and Einstein
would have answered : 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9.
Then saying: "see, he once did say 5, he was right again",
is really really bad.
He had no clue, and died without one.
That he was pushed by the US at that time as a great
scientist to brush up the Jewish image was also a mistake,
as he did not have that clue, and just jammed science
with his curve fitting replacing simple physics understanding.

KW wrote:
Please allow Yours Truly to remind everyone whether if he/she is a
true scholar of physics or another Orwellian-ill-educated Einstein
Dingleberry that fall in the following ridiculous traits:

** FAITH IS THEORY
** LYING IS TEACHING
** NITWIT IS GENIUS
** OCCULT IS SCIENCE
** PARADOX IS KOSHER
** FUDGING IS DERIVATION
** BULL**** IS TRUTH
** BELIEVING IS LEARNING
** MYSTICISM IS WISDOM
** IGNORANCE IS KNOWLEDGE
** CONJECTURE IS REALITY
** PLAGIARISM IS CREATIVITY
** MATHEMAGICS IS MATHEMATICS

Newton discovered the law of gravity in which if the gravitating mass
is positive, gravitational force is attractive. The reverse, although
never been observed, must be true. That is if the gravitating mass is
negative, the gravitational effect must be repulsive or antigravity.
shrug

Later on, it was discovered by Poisson that the gradient of the
Newtonian gravitational potential is equivalent to the mass density.
In free space, this mass density [rho] is zero.

hanson wrote:
Revisiting an earlier discussion:
http://tinyurl.com/hanson-d2G-Question
Newton in his 2 or 3rd Principia edition, 300 years
before Einstein, addresses Gravitation as
G = d2(1/rho)/dt^2.
Einstein was to lazy or stupid to incorporate
G = d2(1/rho)/dt^2 into his GR croc. Or maybe
Albert was still scared from his 1907 confession
and apology for him having stolen E-mc^2.
http://tinyurl.com/E-mc2-existed-before-Einstein
http://tinyurl.com/How-Einstein-stole-E-mc-2
http://tinyurl.com/Kwublee-views-Einsteins-Theft

Despite all that, like brainwashed addicted cultists,
current day Dingleberries still worship Einstein's
sphincter, full well knowing that for the last 70 years,
experiments show Newtonian's gravitation also to be:
G = H^2/rho
wherein H is the Hubble constent and rho is the
mas-density (even on cosmic scales), (some
small digits & pi omitted here) all of which can
be concatenated into the skeletal 1234 cosmic
envelope as
c = (GM/R)^1/2 = (GMH)^1/3 = (GM*b_r)^1/4
IOW, none of Einstein's convoluted **** has
any use in the here and real universe that we
live in. .... KW is correct in his assessment.

KW continued & wrote:
However, it does not take a genius to figure out if the
mass density is negative, gravitational effect becomes
repulsive. Poisson was the very first person to suggest
antigravity but knew better not to. Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar was just so ****ing ignorant that this
nitwit, this plagiarist, and the liar had no hesitation to claim
negative mass density in vacuum in which the giants before this
nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar knew better not to go there.
shrug
Now, the self-styled physicists are getting hard-ons whenever Dark
Energy (negative mass density in vacuum) is mentioned. What the ****
does negative mass mean? The only plausible answer is ignorance.
After all, they are still worshipping Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar as a god. Anything this nitwit, the
plagiarist, and this liar uttered just bedazzaled the hell out of
these self-styled physicists. That is called Dingleberry
worshipping. shrug
Moving on to GR, the silliness embraced by the self-styled physicists
exponentially amplifies. The Schwarzschild metric was discovered by
Hilbert not Schwarzschild. Both metrics are mathematically legal
solutions to the field equations that are static, spherically
symmetric, and asymptotically flat. Schwarzschild's original solution
does not allow for the existence of black holes. Let's look at the
Schwarzschild metric before the integrating constant is identified
through the boundary requirement of satisfying the Newtonian law of
gravity. There are more integration constants, but for the purpose of
this discussion, they are ignored.

** ds^2 = c^2 (1 + K / r) dt^2 - dr^2 / (1 + K / r) - r^2 dO^2
Where
** K = One of the many integration constants
** dO^2 = cos^2(Latitude) dLongitude^2 + dLatitude^2

Notice this particular solution predicts just about everything from
gravitation to antigravity. There is no definitive reasoning to pin-
point this particular integration constant as the following besides
through this boundary condition that emphasizes hind sights are
always 20/20. shrug

** K = - 2 G M / c^2, Newtonian compatibility requirement

This point collaborates with Professor Ponte's astute observation of
how Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar reasoned.
shrug

Chris.B" wrote:
I fully agree with what KW, JP & hanson said above.
I adore and revere Koobee Wublee, Jan Panteltje and hanson
I am honored to be on the poster list as an appendage..
I have requested them to repost his note every time
I do respond to it. I need to see this post every day.
It makes me feel being intelligent and smart like they are.
I don't know any arithmetic nor algebra at all.
My personal negativity which I have posted about in my
google group profile forces me to be like this. Here is
my passport-http://tinyurl.com/Picture-of-Chris-B