Is the USA ready to admit that Neil Armstrong flubbed his line yet?

On Sep 23, 7:13*am, "catpandaddy" wrote:
"Anybody" wrote in message

...



In article
,
Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Sep 22, 4:20 pm, "catpandaddy" wrote:
"Anybody" wrote in message
...

Neil Armstrong didn't make a mistake. He read the lines exactly as
they
were written ... by the hopeless writers from the "Smallville" show
and
as directed / produced by Star Trek's idiot-twins B & B ... it's just
amazing he didn't have to say "Welcome to Saturn on 15 April, 1301"
while wearing a tight catsuit. ;-)

^^^^ I'll have what he's having.

I was following you up until the Saturn part- you mean we had
spaceflight in 1301?

It was a not-so-good jibe at B&B's far too often used lazy trick of
silly time travel episodes (which they love because they can simply use
the "old reset button" and pretend it never happened) and ignoring
basic Star Trek "facts" whenever they wanted (especially in
Enterprise).

Can't have fiction without the facts!

I was so worried! I thought we had developed backwards time travel at
some point there while I wasn't reading the papers much. Guess we'll
have to wait for it to instantiate.

"Rev. Richard Skull" wrote:

On Sep 19, 9:57 am, " wrote:
On Sep 18, 6:51 pm, "Rev. Richard Skull" wrote:

We all know from the interwebs that the moon landing was fake, jews
killed Hitler AND JFK, the the CIA uses the TeleTubbies to control
peoples minds

But what happened to Marilyn Monroe and Elvis Presley?

OH! You do NOT WANT TO KNOW!

THey're the true parents of Boxey

Unclaimed Mysteries wrote:

Rand Simberg wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:00:55 -0700 (PDT), in a place far, far away,
made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way
as to indicate that:

On Sep 18, 2:15�pm, eyeball wrote:
On Sep 18, 3:36�pm, Ellsworth Toohey wrote:

Let us all know when you've travelled almost a quarter million miles
from your home planet and landed on the moon.
Big deal. I just circumnavigated the sun....for the FORTY FIFTH
time!

Only forty five? You're a piker.

And you're a Fox News shill. Still covering up the existence of the
man-made inside-out planets? The Earth's second Moon? THE THIRD? The
suppressed evidence that could blow the heliocentric "theory" away? If
Roger Ailes sent you an email ordering you to describe the Tunguska
event as a mere "comet," could you keep yourself from revealing the
truth? The truth that it was a UFO CRASH? That it was a failed Alien
mission to seize all super advanced Tesla technology from mankind? WHEN
WILL THE COVERUP END?

Don't forget the nazi moon base...

http://www.ironsky.net/site/

In 1945 the Nazis fled to the moon. In 2018 they are coming back.

BD wrote:

On Sep 18, 12:36 pm, Ellsworth Toohey wrote:
It was supposed to be "one small step for *A* man," Neil. What you said
was redundant and didn't make any sense.

We've been quiet on this issue for a while now, but that doesn't excuse
your error, Mr. Armstrong.

A worse error than that was the shot from Ron Howard's miniseries
"From The Earth To The Moon", about Apollo 11. The whole miniseries is
arguably centered around the moment Armstrong stepped onto the moon.

And in the shot, when Armstrong steps off the LEM onto the moon's
surface.... there's already a footprint there in the dust. DOH! They

All this has happened before, and will happen again.

must have done a few takes, and... ummm... forgot to clean the
footprint from the set between takes.

So the real Armstrong didn't do badly at all, given that he had one
take, no script, and no director.

"Rev. Anna Dynamite" wrote:

On Sep 18, 2:36 pm, Ellsworth Toohey wrote:
It was supposed to be "one small step for *A* man," Neil. What you said
was redundant and didn't make any sense.

We've been quiet on this issue for a while now, but that doesn't excuse
your error, Mr. Armstrong.

I admit nothing! You'll never get me alive, coppers! BWA-HA-HA-HA!

*dies in a blaze of gunfire*

TOP OF THE WORLD, MA, TOP OF THE WORLD!

RT wrote:
Unclaimed Mysteries wrote:
Rand Simberg wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:00:55 -0700 (PDT), in a place far, far away,
made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way
as to indicate that:

On Sep 18, 2:15�pm, eyeball wrote:
On Sep 18, 3:36�pm, Ellsworth Toohey wrote:

Let us all know when you've travelled almost a quarter million miles
from your home planet and landed on the moon.
Big deal. I just circumnavigated the sun....for the FORTY FIFTH
time!
Only forty five? You're a piker.
And you're a Fox News shill. Still covering up the existence of the
man-made inside-out planets? The Earth's second Moon? THE THIRD? The
suppressed evidence that could blow the heliocentric "theory" away? If
Roger Ailes sent you an email ordering you to describe the Tunguska
event as a mere "comet," could you keep yourself from revealing the
truth? The truth that it was a UFO CRASH? That it was a failed Alien
mission to seize all super advanced Tesla technology from mankind? WHEN
WILL THE COVERUP END?

Don't forget the nazi moon base...

http://www.ironsky.net/site/

In 1945 the Nazis fled to the moon. In 2018 they are coming back.

Sorry, they were canceled. No refunds.

-cls

--
It Came From Corry Lee Smith's Unclaimed Mysteries.
http://www.unclaimedmysteries.net

"I'm glad you're okay, whatever that actually means in your case."
-Jagosaurus

On Sep 28, 9:38 pm, RT wrote:
Unclaimed Mysteries wrote:

Rand Simberg wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:00:55 -0700 (PDT), in a place far, far away,
made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way
as to indicate that:

On Sep 18, 2:15 pm, eyeball wrote:
On Sep 18, 3:36 pm, Ellsworth Toohey wrote:

Let us all know when you've travelled almost a quarter million miles
from your home planet and landed on the moon.
Big deal. I just circumnavigated the sun....for the FORTY FIFTH
time!

Only forty five? You're a piker.

And you're a Fox News shill. Still covering up the existence of the
man-made inside-out planets? The Earth's second Moon? THE THIRD? The
suppressed evidence that could blow the heliocentric "theory" away? If
Roger Ailes sent you an email ordering you to describe the Tunguska
event as a mere "comet," could you keep yourself from revealing the
truth? The truth that it was a UFO CRASH? That it was a failed Alien
mission to seize all super advanced Tesla technology from mankind? WHEN
WILL THE COVERUP END?

Don't forget the nazi moon base...

http://www.ironsky.net/site/

In 1945 the Nazis fled to the moon. In 2018 they are coming back.

As gamma and hard-X-ray irradiated DNA of what sort?

Most of everything via NASA has been systematically altered if not
excluded or simply forever lost in order to suit their ruse/sting of
our mutually perpetrated cold-war century. However, there are still a
few good photographic examples where they didn't catch it in time
prior to their publishing or having posted such natural looking images
for public internet review.

The Selene/moon is in fact darker than the albedo of Jupiter or Mars,
whereas those moons of Mars are somewhat darker yet, and even the
planet Mercury isn’t exactly a reflective orb. Venus being of roughly
better than twice as albedo reflective as Earth, as such isn’t a
vanishing stellar point-source of illumination, but instead cruising
rather nearby at times and fully capable of looking very good in a
full visual spectrum (unfiltered) Kodak moment, especially above the
physically dark lunar horizon or even next to Earth that isn’t half as
bright.

If you want to see real PhotoShoping as damage-control in action, take
an honest forensic kind of look-see at those pathetic HDTV JAXA/Selene
images. It's embarrassing as all get-out that our DARPA/NASA has JAXA
so firmly by their private parts. Apparently Japan caves in at the
slightest squeeze, so we don’t even have to resort to our usual
testicular electrocution and waterboarding methods.

I certainly hope we are not talking about albedo via glare, whereas
half of any given view of our solar illuminated Selene/moon is
essentially glare enhanced albedo, and not of the true 0.07 albedo
that’s as dark as coal. Those Apollo cameras each had a neutral full
hue/color visual spectrum bandpass polarized optical element, that
which by rights and those pesky laws of physics should have diminished
such surface glare by 50%, if not better, and those pure white
moonsuits were in fact still worthy of 0.85 or better, as well as
their being UV reactive (as should have been much of the lunar
surface).

Remember folks, in addition to the various complex minerals of Selene,
there’s also deposits of magnesium oxide as well as the low density
mineral of sodium within and upon the otherwise relatively dark basalt
crust of our moon that’s also offering an extremely electrostatic
charged environment and thus having collected a fairly thick amount of
solar and cosmic mineral deposits of a carbon lampblack substance,
whereas once this layer of absolutely crystal dry surface dust gets
artificially disturbed by an Apollo mission impact, in addition to
whatever becomes vaporized aluminum that would likely happen, whereas
this impact or hard landing method could in fact reveal an extremely
bright/reflective little crater that’s quite worthy of reflecting
those green photons.

Otherwise, we have the physically dark as coal moon itself as roughly
offering a 0.33 albedo in the IR spectrum, and it’s only better
reflective yet at the mid to far IR spectrum. So what’s the big
freaking deal about getting those few and far between photons out of
the trillions transmitted, to bounce off the moon without any retro-
reflector benefits?

Btw, because of our moon and solar worth of whole terrestrial body
tides that manage to flex or undulate the entire body and thin crust
of Earth about our equator by 55 cm, and even at times as much as +/-
32 cm, is reason enough to honestly interpret that there’s little
likelihood of an annual 3.8 cm recession can ever be made all that
precisely certain, whereas having a Earth-moon L1 platform of
instruments as interactively station-keeping within the Selene/moon L1
could have better established this kind of science and so much more at
not 10% the cost of one Apollo mission.

~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG

BradGuth wrote:

On Sep 28, 9:38 pm, RT wrote:
Unclaimed Mysteries wrote:

Rand Simberg wrote:
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 09:00:55 -0700 (PDT), in a place far, far away,
made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way
as to indicate that:

On Sep 18, 2:15 pm, eyeball wrote:
On Sep 18, 3:36 pm, Ellsworth Toohey wrote:

Let us all know when you've travelled almost a quarter million miles
from your home planet and landed on the moon.
Big deal. I just circumnavigated the sun....for the FORTY FIFTH
time!

Only forty five? You're a piker.

And you're a Fox News shill. Still covering up the existence of the
man-made inside-out planets? The Earth's second Moon? THE THIRD? The
suppressed evidence that could blow the heliocentric "theory" away? If
Roger Ailes sent you an email ordering you to describe the Tunguska
event as a mere "comet," could you keep yourself from revealing the
truth? The truth that it was a UFO CRASH? That it was a failed Alien
mission to seize all super advanced Tesla technology from mankind? WHEN
WILL THE COVERUP END?

Don't forget the nazi moon base...

http://www.ironsky.net/site/

In 1945 the Nazis fled to the moon. In 2018 they are coming back.

As gamma and hard-X-ray irradiated DNA of what sort?

Um. Yeah. As. As gabble dayed and... yeah.

Most of everything via NASA has been systematically altered if not
excluded or simply forever lost in order to suit their ruse/sting of
our mutually perpetrated cold-war century. However, there are still a
few good photographic examples where they didn't catch it in time
prior to their publishing or having posted such natural looking images
for public internet review.

The Selene/moon is in fact darker than the albedo of Jupiter or Mars,

Um. Heil Selene!

On Sep 18, 12:36 pm, Ellsworth Toohey wrote:
It was supposed to be "one small step for *A* man," Neil. What you said
was redundant and didn't make any sense.

We've been quiet on this issue for a while now, but that doesn't excuse
your error, Mr. Armstrong.

You silly folks and whatever 5th graders do realize that our
physically dark as coal moon does offer a fairly complex mineralogy of
surface hues or colors, don’t you?

Here’s one eye-candy example with its contrast and color or hue
saturation cranked way up, but otherwise it’s not having been
artificially colored.
http://www.coronaborealis.org/images...moon_color.png

A somewhat less contrast and hue saturated example.
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap060216.html
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/image/0602...chedler_35.jpg

And there are may other honest amateur/private examples that can be
peer replicated as often as you like, of our mineral color/hue rich
and otherwise physically dark as coal Selene/moon to pick from, though
usually not nearly as having been so contrast and hue saturation
pushed. Of course these terrestrial obtained images are not having
nearly as good of unobstructed look-see as for the HDTV images from
the JAXA/Selene mission, or from any number of equally or better color
imaging technology satellites and otherwise of those previous Kodak
color film methods with the ultimate best of optics that our NASA/
Apollo has always had at their disposal.

Oddly those JAXA/Selene images are being continually PhotoShop
processed in order to remove all signs of the natural mineral color/
hue saturation of our physically dark as coal moon. Them Japs must
think we’re really dumbfounded past the point of no return.

~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG

IMBJR wrote:


Didn't some audio analysis of that speech reveal he actually got it right
but some crackle popped all over his words?



Not yet, but apparently people keep trying:

http://www.snopes.com/quotes/onesmall.asp

--
Bill Anderson

I am the Mighty Favog