Would Darla Want to Post Here???

Painius wrote:

"Michael Baldwin, Bruce" wrote in message...
oups.com...

Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote:

G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote:

After over 7 years of posting I can say at this spacetime with all
these kooks posting just garbage its not worth posting any more.
Double-A,oc,Painius,and I'm sure Nightbat are in reality fed up.
TreBert

By, Beert. Mind the @$$/door interface on your way out.

Judging by all the whelts on his arse, Bruce, either the doors hate him
too or he doesn't mind getting banged by them.

Sap-sukkin' gooseling.

What does that have to do with astronomy, fanboi?

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official Agent of Deception
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005

"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief

Painius wrote:

"Saul Levy" wrote in message...
news

No, the frootbat's out at JPL getting a STD! Didn't you read his
posting about this? He'll be back!

Saul Levy

On Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:42:07 -0500, (G=EMC^2
Glazier) wrote:

After over 7 years of posting I can say at this spacetime with all
these kooks posting just garbage its not worth posting any more.
Double-A,oc,Painius,and I'm sure Nightbat are in reality fed up.
TreBert

Wouldya *please* quit top-posting, stud?

All it does is make the threads you post in that much
harder to follow. It makes *your* posts that much harder
to read. So most people won't read them. They'll just skip
over you and not read what you wrote. This is the first of
your posts i've read in a long time. And here you are still
top-posting. Please read up on why top-posting is unliked
and how top-posting posts are almost always ignored by
other readers.

Saul? don't you want to be widely read?

Then *please* stop top-posting!
All you need to do is CTRL-END to get to the bottom of
the post you're responding to. How hard is that?

C'mon, Saul... i'm thinking you have lots to say about
astronomy. But people who don't like top-posting (that's
most readers) won't ever know it until you start bottom-
posting your responses.

Thank you, Saul.

How the crusade going for you, fanboi? Your white horse looks like it
could stand a couple weeks of R&R and grooming.

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official Agent of Deception
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005

"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief

"Art Deco" wrote in message...
...

How the crusade going for you, fanboi? Your white horse looks like it
could stand a couple weeks of R&R and grooming.

Thanks for asking, MG. And i'll have a talk with the groom,
if necessary.

The crusade will hopefully end with this thread. This may
be the last time we communicate directly, Deco. Because
this is...

* The Post *

This is the post for you to respond to with your decision.

You once wrote that i'm powerless. Maybe you're right.
Frankly, i haven't spent any time looking into what all my
options are, if any. I've been hoping i wouldn't have to.
I've been hoping that you and your gooselings would do
the right ting.

I *have* noticed fewer BS posts here in the last couple of
days. Thank you and the little waddlers for that! I would
still like to hear it from you, though. I'd like to hear what
choice you make. Are you going to stay? and learn and
teach about astronomy? or are you and your pals going to
leave alt.astronomy alone for a few millennia. Of course,
all your gooselings from the two other newsgroups we've
xposted to are welcome to stay or leave as well, as they
wish, after making the same choice for themselves.

Frankly i don't care which ya'll choose, as long as the
quasi-email bombing stops. That's what it resembles to
me... it's UseNet newsgroup bombing. And i don't have
this HUGE MOUNTAIN of TIME to deal with it. When
i leave for a few days, or a week, or two weeks, and i'm
out there working my buns off for you and lots of people
just like you, and then i come home for some leisure time,
i don't expect to have to wade through hundreds, even
thousands of BS posts to get to the meat and potatoes
astronomy articles.

Can't you and the waddlers see how what you're doing is
wrong? Maybe it seems right to you to come into a group
and disrupt it like you do. But it's *not* right for me.

So i'm willing, if necessary, to find out just how "powerless"
i really am. This isn't the old UseNet, though, and i'm sure
you must be aware of this. This is a different UseNet from
the old days. Back then, you get somebody kicked off
their ISP and big deal, right? They just get another ISP
and there they are back again starting their **** again. Now
*that's* powerless.

Here in the 21st-century UseNet, things are less lawless.
I'm thinking right now of the Hitchcock case. Remember
that one? It may be before your time, but i doubt it. Of
course, that one was all about stalkers and stalking. And
that's not really what you do, is it. I'm sure that i couldn't
make a case against you for stalking, although i have to
tell you... i consider what you and your pals have done to
alt.astronomy to be just as bad as stalking. And last i
heard, the Hitchcock stalkers are presently doing jail time.

I don't know... maybe if i look hard enough, i can find a
judge somewhere who agrees with me? Maybe not.

Now i'm thinking about all those other test cases that are
going on out there right this minute. Most of these seem
to be about spam, spammers and spamming, i guess. I
don't really know because i haven't checked into it lately.
Here again, i consider what you and your gooselings have
done to my favorite newsgroup, alt.astronomy, to be far
worse than any idiot spammer who has "graced" this
newsgroup with their occasional spam posts, FAR worse!
Maybe i can find a judge who agrees with this. I don't
know.

I really don't want to get into this with you, Deco, sincerely.
I would *so* much rather you and your pals do the right
ting. I'm not asking anything difficult, and i'm not asking you
to do anything unwise. All i'm asking is for you to choose
either to stay on in alt.astronomy as a science poster, or just
leave alt.astronomy alone altogether.

Now, if you respond to *this post* without including what
your choice is, then i will assume the worst... that you want
to fight it out. Or, if you don't respond to this post at all
within a reasonable amount of time, say two days, then i
guess i'll give you another day. That's three days for you to
make your choice. If you haven't answered me by then, i
shall have to conclude that you have no intention of doing
the right ting, and i will proceed to see what my options are.
Like i said, i really don't want to get into a fight with you
and your gooselings, but to get my favorite newsgroup
back without all the BS posts to sift through, i will definitely
check to see what i can and cannot do.

I'd *much* rather that you please do the right ting on your
own without any other action to be taken by me.

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

--
Are you sleeping?
Stars are waiting,
Shining high they wait for you.

Are you looking?
Stars are soaring,
Flashing, twinkling just for you.

Indelibly yours,
Paine

Hey Paine
Your efforts at resuscitating the NG are commendable.
But it certainly appears the NG is for all practical purpose, DEAD. The
corpse has begun to liquify, and about all one can see anymore is the
swarming mass of maggots feasting on it.
To make supplication to one of those maggots to "do
the right thing" is admirable but pretty naive thinking IMHO. They're
simply doin' what maggots do.

The NG's sun has set in the manner of Ecclesiastes' "a time to live, a
time to die" (though i would love to be proven wrong on this).
oc

Painius wrote:

"Art Deco" wrote in message...
...

How the crusade going for you, fanboi? Your white horse looks like it
could stand a couple weeks of R&R and grooming.

Thanks for asking, MG. And i'll have a talk with the groom,
if necessary.

The crusade will hopefully end with this thread. This may
be the last time we communicate directly, Deco. Because
this is...

* The Post *

This is the post for you to respond to with your decision.

You once wrote that i'm powerless. Maybe you're right.
Frankly, i haven't spent any time looking into what all my
options are, if any. I've been hoping i wouldn't have to.
I've been hoping that you and your gooselings would do
the right ting.

I *have* noticed fewer BS posts here in the last couple of
days. Thank you and the little waddlers for that! I would
still like to hear it from you, though. I'd like to hear what
choice you make. Are you going to stay? and learn and
teach about astronomy? or are you and your pals going to
leave alt.astronomy alone for a few millennia. Of course,
all your gooselings from the two other newsgroups we've
xposted to are welcome to stay or leave as well, as they
wish, after making the same choice for themselves.

Frankly i don't care which ya'll choose, as long as the
quasi-email bombing stops. That's what it resembles to
me... it's UseNet newsgroup bombing. And i don't have
this HUGE MOUNTAIN of TIME to deal with it. When
i leave for a few days, or a week, or two weeks, and i'm
out there working my buns off for you and lots of people
just like you, and then i come home for some leisure time,
i don't expect to have to wade through hundreds, even
thousands of BS posts to get to the meat and potatoes
astronomy articles.

Can't you and the waddlers see how what you're doing is
wrong? Maybe it seems right to you to come into a group
and disrupt it like you do. But it's *not* right for me.

So i'm willing, if necessary, to find out just how "powerless"
i really am. This isn't the old UseNet, though, and i'm sure
you must be aware of this. This is a different UseNet from
the old days. Back then, you get somebody kicked off
their ISP and big deal, right? They just get another ISP
and there they are back again starting their **** again. Now
*that's* powerless.

Here in the 21st-century UseNet, things are less lawless.
I'm thinking right now of the Hitchcock case. Remember
that one? It may be before your time, but i doubt it. Of
course, that one was all about stalkers and stalking. And
that's not really what you do, is it. I'm sure that i couldn't
make a case against you for stalking, although i have to
tell you... i consider what you and your pals have done to
alt.astronomy to be just as bad as stalking. And last i
heard, the Hitchcock stalkers are presently doing jail time.

I don't know... maybe if i look hard enough, i can find a
judge somewhere who agrees with me? Maybe not.

Now i'm thinking about all those other test cases that are
going on out there right this minute. Most of these seem
to be about spam, spammers and spamming, i guess. I
don't really know because i haven't checked into it lately.
Here again, i consider what you and your gooselings have
done to my favorite newsgroup, alt.astronomy, to be far
worse than any idiot spammer who has "graced" this
newsgroup with their occasional spam posts, FAR worse!
Maybe i can find a judge who agrees with this. I don't
know.

I really don't want to get into this with you, Deco, sincerely.
I would *so* much rather you and your pals do the right
ting. I'm not asking anything difficult, and i'm not asking you
to do anything unwise. All i'm asking is for you to choose
either to stay on in alt.astronomy as a science poster, or just
leave alt.astronomy alone altogether.

Now, if you respond to *this post* without including what
your choice is, then i will assume the worst... that you want
to fight it out. Or, if you don't respond to this post at all
within a reasonable amount of time, say two days, then i
guess i'll give you another day. That's three days for you to
make your choice. If you haven't answered me by then, i
shall have to conclude that you have no intention of doing
the right ting, and i will proceed to see what my options are.
Like i said, i really don't want to get into a fight with you
and your gooselings, but to get my favorite newsgroup
back without all the BS posts to sift through, i will definitely
check to see what i can and cannot do.

I'd *much* rather that you please do the right ting on your
own without any other action to be taken by me.

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

Be sure to post a list of all those who will be named as defendants in
your forthcoming ko0kso0t, saucerhead.

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official Agent of Deception
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005

"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief

On Mon, 06 Mar 2006 21:49:59 +0000, Painius wrote:

"Art Deco" wrote in message...
...

How the crusade going for you, fanboi? Your white horse looks like it
could stand a couple weeks of R&R and grooming.

Thanks for asking, MG. And i'll have a talk with the groom,
if necessary.

The crusade will hopefully end with this thread. This may
be the last time we communicate directly, Deco. Because
this is...

* The Post *

This is the post for you to respond to with your decision.

You once wrote that i'm powerless. Maybe you're right.
Frankly, i haven't spent any time looking into what all my
options are, if any. I've been hoping i wouldn't have to.
I've been hoping that you and your gooselings would do
the right ting.

I *have* noticed fewer BS posts here in the last couple of
days. Thank you and the little waddlers for that! I would
still like to hear it from you, though. I'd like to hear what
choice you make. Are you going to stay? and learn and
teach about astronomy? or are you and your pals going to
leave alt.astronomy alone for a few millennia. Of course,
all your gooselings from the two other newsgroups we've
xposted to are welcome to stay or leave as well, as they
wish, after making the same choice for themselves.

Frankly i don't care which ya'll choose, as long as the
quasi-email bombing stops. That's what it resembles to
me... it's UseNet newsgroup bombing. And i don't have
this HUGE MOUNTAIN of TIME to deal with it. When
i leave for a few days, or a week, or two weeks, and i'm
out there working my buns off for you and lots of people
just like you, and then i come home for some leisure time,
i don't expect to have to wade through hundreds, even
thousands of BS posts to get to the meat and potatoes
astronomy articles.

Can't you and the waddlers see how what you're doing is
wrong? Maybe it seems right to you to come into a group
and disrupt it like you do. But it's *not* right for me.

So i'm willing, if necessary, to find out just how "powerless"
i really am. This isn't the old UseNet, though, and i'm sure
you must be aware of this. This is a different UseNet from
the old days. Back then, you get somebody kicked off
their ISP and big deal, right? They just get another ISP
and there they are back again starting their **** again. Now
*that's* powerless.

Here in the 21st-century UseNet, things are less lawless.
I'm thinking right now of the Hitchcock case. Remember
that one? It may be before your time, but i doubt it. Of
course, that one was all about stalkers and stalking. And
that's not really what you do, is it. I'm sure that i couldn't
make a case against you for stalking, although i have to
tell you... i consider what you and your pals have done to
alt.astronomy to be just as bad as stalking. And last i
heard, the Hitchcock stalkers are presently doing jail time.

I don't know... maybe if i look hard enough, i can find a
judge somewhere who agrees with me? Maybe not.

Now i'm thinking about all those other test cases that are
going on out there right this minute. Most of these seem
to be about spam, spammers and spamming, i guess. I
don't really know because i haven't checked into it lately.
Here again, i consider what you and your gooselings have
done to my favorite newsgroup, alt.astronomy, to be far
worse than any idiot spammer who has "graced" this
newsgroup with their occasional spam posts, FAR worse!
Maybe i can find a judge who agrees with this. I don't
know.

I really don't want to get into this with you, Deco, sincerely.
I would *so* much rather you and your pals do the right
ting. I'm not asking anything difficult, and i'm not asking you
to do anything unwise. All i'm asking is for you to choose
either to stay on in alt.astronomy as a science poster, or just
leave alt.astronomy alone altogether.

Now, if you respond to *this post* without including what
your choice is, then i will assume the worst... that you want
to fight it out. Or, if you don't respond to this post at all
within a reasonable amount of time, say two days, then i
guess i'll give you another day. That's three days for you to
make your choice. If you haven't answered me by then, i
shall have to conclude that you have no intention of doing
the right ting, and i will proceed to see what my options are.
Like i said, i really don't want to get into a fight with you
and your gooselings, but to get my favorite newsgroup
back without all the BS posts to sift through, i will definitely
check to see what i can and cannot do.

I'd *much* rather that you please do the right ting on your
own without any other action to be taken by me.

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

I am truly sorry. I must change my ways. timecube.com

Bill Sheppard wrote:

Hey Paine
Your efforts at resuscitating the NG are commendable.
But it certainly appears the NG is for all practical purpose, DEAD. The
corpse has begun to liquify, and about all one can see anymore is the
swarming mass of maggots feasting on it.
To make supplication to one of those maggots to "do
the right thing" is admirable but pretty naive thinking IMHO. They're
simply doin' what maggots do.

The NG's sun has set in the manner of Ecclesiastes' "a time to live, a
time to die" (though i would love to be proven wrong on this).
oc

Dear Webbie:

Please post a list of all the maggots. Thanks.

Yer pal,

Art

--
Official Associate AFA-B Vote Rustler
Official Overseer of Kooks and Saucerheads in alt.astronomy
Official Agent of Deception
Co-Winner, alt.(f)lame Worst Flame War, December 2005

"Causation of gravity is missing frame field always attempting
renormalization back to base memory of equalized uniform momentum."
-- nightbat the saucerhead-in-chief

"Art Deco" wrote in message...
...

Be sure to post a list of all those who will be named as defendants in
your forthcoming ko0kso0t, saucerhead.

I see that you have decided to fight me. Bad choice.
As i may have mentioned, at this point i don't even know if
legal action is an option. But as you wish, i shall check to
see if there is a case.

It would have been so much better if you had just done the
right thing on your own.

I pay good money for this service, and i feel that you're
stealing from me, you and all your gooselings. You steal
my time, my money, and you're trying to steal my favorite
newsgroup. You don't have to bother responding or
trying to elicit any further response from me.

Good luck to you, Deco... you may need it, soon.

--
Delectably yours,
Paine

On Tue, 07 Mar 2006 03:59:09 GMT, "Painius" got
double secret probation because:

"Art Deco" wrote in message...
...

Be sure to post a list of all those who will be named as defendants in
your forthcoming ko0kso0t, saucerhead.

I see that you have decided to fight me. Bad choice.
As i may have mentioned, at this point i don't even know if
legal action is an option. But as you wish, i shall check to
see if there is a case.

It would have been so much better if you had just done the
right thing on your own.

I pay good money for this service, and i feel that you're
stealing from me, you and all your gooselings. You steal
my time, my money, and you're trying to steal my favorite
newsgroup. You don't have to bother responding or
trying to elicit any further response from me.

Good luck to you, Deco... you may need it, soon.

****ing moron. How many people prior to you do you think have made the
same impotent threats? All of which have been laughed at with great
gusto.

But please don't let me rain on your parade of incredibly stupid
online wanking.

--

alt.hackers.malicious - ****** Stomping Award - 2005

alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - May, 2005
alt.usenet.kooks - Pierre Salinger Hook, Line & Sinker - Jan, 2006

alt.usenet.kooks - Hammer of Thor - July, 2005

alt.flame - Worst Flame War - 2005

David Formosa (aka ? the Platypus) on 10-22-2005
Message-Id:
"But it is not isolated AUK has a massive impact the rest of usenet."

"Bill Sheppard" wrote in message...
...

Hey Paine
Your efforts at resuscitating the NG are commendable.
But it certainly appears the NG is for all practical purpose, DEAD. The
corpse has begun to liquify, and about all one can see anymore is the
swarming mass of maggots feasting on it.
To make supplication to one of those maggots to "do
the right thing" is admirable but pretty naive thinking IMHO. They're
simply doin' what maggots do.

The NG's sun has set in the manner of Ecclesiastes' "a time to live, a
time to die" (though i would love to be proven wrong on this).
oc

I once thought that Jayne Hitchcock was being naive...

http://www.lifetimetv.com/community/...les_index.html

....when she tackled the stalkers of the Woodside Literary
Agency. I knew her in misc.writing back before all that
happened. Maybe you're right, Bill. God knows, i have
little time for this, so i'll have to get help. One of my
attorneys specializes in the entertainment industry, and
what is UseNet but a form of entertainment?

As for my appeal to Deco's good sense of right? I laugh
at myself when i look in the mirror. But i figure it is good
that i at least tried.

I look forward to proving you wrong about the future of
alt.astronomy.

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

--
Are you sleeping?
Stars are waiting,
Shining high they wait for you.

Are you looking?
Stars are soaring,
Flashing, twinkling just for you.

Indelibly yours,
Paine