![]() |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah writes:
Double-A wrote: Twittering One wrote: Arch ~ Wrought Irony. Discuss. Overwraught! Handwrought! What does that have to do with OS/2, ah? Prima facie, Bruce. Non sequitur. |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah writes:
Double-A writes: ah writes: Double-A wrote: Twittering One wrote: Arch ~ Wrought Irony. Discuss. Overwrought! Handwrought! What does that have to do with OS/2, ah? What IBM hath wrought! OS/2 was a joint project of IBM ad Microsoft. Latin is off-topic here un AFA-B, Bruce. Non sequitur. |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah writes:
Double-A writes: ah writes: Art Deco wrote: nightbat wrote: nightbat wrote Count Floyd wrote: PJR writes: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Mikus Grinbergs writes: I've had the Innotek port of Acrobat version 5 running for some time. Lately, however, it's become effectively useless. Upon being launched, the logo will get displayed with the CPU activity pegged at 100 percent for MINUTES before the first page gets displayed. Closing it takes about as long. I'm not aware of any changes to my system since the problem started occurring. Has anybody else experienced such a dramatic slowdown in performance and figured out how to solve the problem? As soon as Acrobat version 5 became available, I posted my experience of it taking EXTREMELY long to do things. If I remember correctly, my post was pooh-poohed. Be that as it may, the difference here is that Acrobat used to be nice and speedy, but now it's slower than molassas, yet I cannot think of any change that has been made to the system. Rebooting did not cure the problem. Uninstall and reinstall, Dickless. Rebooting is the dickhead approach. You would know that if you didn't spend all your time uttering saucerhead gaga. You can get Acrobat *Five* for OS/2??? Welcome to the late 20th century, Davie! What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? PJ "he could also convert the .pdf to .ps, but he'd have to know how to" R :-) What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? Count Floyd Oh Please! Don't start this type of crap in this newsgroup! Keep it in the advocacy newsgroup with those idiots like Michael Baldwin Bruce, Bart Devo, Elizabot and the like. Yes Count while we are in serious mutual group agreement there is no use in rubbing it in to the clueless Alexa drone auk fun coffee boys for they crossposting net proudly know who they are. Including sockpuppets, ah, Dr.Flonkenstein, Bookman, Aratzio, Jade, Cujo, CJ Osterwiald, tholen. They actually sadly relish when you mention them on post lits on their scoring juvenile underdeveloped pea brains. And believe it or not we are profound Science Officer alt.astronomy constant auk sockpuppet morphing stuck with them because Darla the brave wayward net Sean Star Race traveler wants us to baby-sit tolerate them until she purportedly gets mission back, oh the humanity. 1st Officer Bohne as net public relations Science Liaison Officer has been as diplomatic as you can imagine but with no results. Don't waste your time, just Bozo file them and be done with it, we'll try to explain to hopefully returning Darla what they have all been up too. Why am I not on your lits o' haet, frootbat? You are not an auk fun coffee boy? What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, ah? Hey Dr. Tholen, Since you are posting to alt.astonomy again, why don't you lay some astronomy on us? I'm sure we could learn a lot from you if you would be serious. You're erroneously presupposing that I read alt.astronomy, Double-A. Why do you have to come here just like your kooker detractors with three-quarters of your brain tied behind your back? What does your question have to do with OS/2, Double-A? We would love for you to post something that has something to do with astronomy! This is an OS/2 newsgroup, Double-A. Hey! I got a copy of that somewhere in storage! Does it still work? Why would it stop working, ah? Dependent upon the electricity, I believe, Bruce. What you believe is irrelevant, ah. |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah writes:
Art Deco wrote: nightbat wrote: nightbat wrote Count Floyd wrote: PJR writes: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Mikus Grinbergs writes: I've had the Innotek port of Acrobat version 5 running for some time. Lately, however, it's become effectively useless. Upon being launched, the logo will get displayed with the CPU activity pegged at 100 percent for MINUTES before the first page gets displayed. Closing it takes about as long. I'm not aware of any changes to my system since the problem started occurring. Has anybody else experienced such a dramatic slowdown in performance and figured out how to solve the problem? As soon as Acrobat version 5 became available, I posted my experience of it taking EXTREMELY long to do things. If I remember correctly, my post was pooh-poohed. Be that as it may, the difference here is that Acrobat used to be nice and speedy, but now it's slower than molassas, yet I cannot think of any change that has been made to the system. Rebooting did not cure the problem. Uninstall and reinstall, Dickless. Rebooting is the dickhead approach. You would know that if you didn't spend all your time uttering saucerhead gaga. You can get Acrobat *Five* for OS/2??? Welcome to the late 20th century, Davie! What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? PJ "he could also convert the .pdf to .ps, but he'd have to know how to" R :-) What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? Count Floyd Oh Please! Don't start this type of crap in this newsgroup! Keep it in the advocacy newsgroup with those idiots like Michael Baldwin Bruce, Bart Devo, Elizabot and the like. Yes Count while we are in serious mutual group agreement there is no use in rubbing it in to the clueless Alexa drone auk fun coffee boys for they crossposting net proudly know who they are. Including sockpuppets, ah, Dr.Flonkenstein, Bookman, Aratzio, Jade, Cujo, CJ Osterwiald, tholen. They actually sadly relish when you mention them on post lits on their scoring juvenile underdeveloped pea brains. And believe it or not we are profound Science Officer alt.astronomy constant auk sockpuppet morphing stuck with them because Darla the brave wayward net Sean Star Race traveler wants us to baby-sit tolerate them until she purportedly gets mission back, oh the humanity. 1st Officer Bohne as net public relations Science Liaison Officer has been as diplomatic as you can imagine but with no results. Don't waste your time, just Bozo file them and be done with it, we'll try to explain to hopefully returning Darla what they have all been up too. Why am I not on your lits o' haet, frootbat? You are not an auk fun coffee boy? What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, ah? It's part of the tracking software, Non sequitur. "I hate ze cold." Also non sequitur. Bruce. Who is "Bruce", ah? Suffering from attribution problems? Wot? I see that you didn't answer the question, ah. No surprise there, really. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah writes:
Art Deco wrote: ah wrote: Art Deco wrote: ah wrote: Art Deco wrote: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote: ah wrote: Art Deco wrote: nightbat writes: nightbat wrote Why would you write that, nightbat? Your first encounter with the frootbat, Classic Tholenator(tm)? Count Floyd wrote: PJR writes: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Mikus Grinbergs writes: I've had the Innotek port of Acrobat version 5 running for some time. Lately, however, it's become effectively useless. Upon being launched, the logo will get displayed with the CPU activity pegged at 100 percent for MINUTES before the first page gets displayed. Closing it takes about as long. I'm not aware of any changes to my system since the problem started occurring. Has anybody else experienced such a dramatic slowdown in performance and figured out how to solve the problem? As soon as Acrobat version 5 became available, I posted my experience of it taking EXTREMELY long to do things. If I remember correctly, my post was pooh-poohed. Be that as it may, the difference here is that Acrobat used to be nice and speedy, but now it's slower than molassas, yet I cannot think of any change that has been made to the system. Rebooting did not cure the problem. Uninstall and reinstall, Dickless. Rebooting is the dickhead approach. You would know that if you didn't spend all your time uttering saucerhead gaga. You can get Acrobat *Five* for OS/2??? Welcome to the late 20th century, Davie! What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? PJ "he could also convert the .pdf to .ps, but he'd have to know how to" R :-) What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? Count Floyd Oh Please! Don't start this type of crap in this newsgroup! Keep it in the advocacy newsgroup with those idiots like Michael Baldwin Bruce, Bart Devo, Elizabot and the like. Yes Count while we are in serious mutual group agreement there is no use in rubbing it in to the clueless Alexa drone auk fun coffee boys for they crossposting net proudly know who they are. Including sockpuppets, ah, Dr.Flonkenstein, Bookman, Aratzio, Jade, Cujo, CJ Osterwiald, tholen. Suffering from reading comprehension problems, nightbat? I'm not the one who adds a bunch of irrelevant newsgroups to the distribution. No "classic" lames today, Classic Tholenator(tm)? They actually sadly relish when you mention them on post lits on their scoring juvenile underdeveloped pea brains. Leave me out of your pontification, nightbat. How ironic. How iconic. How symbolic. How systolic. How bucolic. How moronic. How imbecilic. How diabolic. How conic. How phonic. How colic. How chronic. What does that have to do with OS/2, ah? And believe it or not we are profound Science Officer alt.astronomy constant auk sockpuppet morphing stuck with them because Darla the brave wayward net Sean Star Race traveler wants us to baby-sit tolerate them until she purportedly gets mission back, oh the humanity. 1st Officer Bohne as net public relations Science Liaison Officer has been as diplomatic as you can imagine but with no results. Don't waste your time, just Bozo file them and be done with it, we'll try to explain to hopefully returning Darla what they have all been up too. Non sequitur. So you don't cotton to Darla the lizard queen, Bruce. |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah writes:
Art Deco wrote: ah wrote: Art Deco wrote: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote: ah wrote: Art Deco wrote: nightbat writes: nightbat wrote Why would you write that, nightbat? Your first encounter with the frootbat, Classic Tholenator(tm)? Count Floyd wrote: PJR writes: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Mikus Grinbergs writes: I've had the Innotek port of Acrobat version 5 running for some time. Lately, however, it's become effectively useless. Upon being launched, the logo will get displayed with the CPU activity pegged at 100 percent for MINUTES before the first page gets displayed. Closing it takes about as long. I'm not aware of any changes to my system since the problem started occurring. Has anybody else experienced such a dramatic slowdown in performance and figured out how to solve the problem? As soon as Acrobat version 5 became available, I posted my experience of it taking EXTREMELY long to do things. If I remember correctly, my post was pooh-poohed. Be that as it may, the difference here is that Acrobat used to be nice and speedy, but now it's slower than molassas, yet I cannot think of any change that has been made to the system. Rebooting did not cure the problem. Uninstall and reinstall, Dickless. Rebooting is the dickhead approach. You would know that if you didn't spend all your time uttering saucerhead gaga. You can get Acrobat *Five* for OS/2??? Welcome to the late 20th century, Davie! What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? PJ "he could also convert the .pdf to .ps, but he'd have to know how to" R :-) What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? Count Floyd Oh Please! Don't start this type of crap in this newsgroup! Keep it in the advocacy newsgroup with those idiots like Michael Baldwin Bruce, Bart Devo, Elizabot and the like. nightbat Yes Count while we are in serious mutual group agreement there is no use in rubbing it in to the clueless Alexa drone auk fun coffee boys for they crossposting net proudly know who they are. Including sockpuppets, ah, Dr.Flonkenstein, Bookman, Aratzio, Jade, Cujo, CJ Osterwiald, tholen. Suffering from reading comprehension problems, nightbat? I'm not the one who adds a bunch of irrelevant newsgroups to the distribution. No "classic" lames today, Classic Tholenator(tm)? They actually sadly relish when you mention them on post lits on their scoring juvenile underdeveloped pea brains. Leave me out of your pontification, nightbat. How ironic. How iconic. How symbolic. How systolic. How bucolic. How moronic. How imbecilic. How diabolic. What does that have to do with OS/2, ah? Non sequitur. Non sequitur. Non sequitur. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. And believe it or not we are profound Science Officer alt.astronomy constant auk sockpuppet morphing stuck with them because Darla the brave wayward net Sean Star Race traveler wants us to baby-sit tolerate them until she purportedly gets mission back, oh the humanity. 1st Officer Bohne as net public relations Science Liaison Officer has been as diplomatic as you can imagine but with no results. Don't waste your time, just Bozo file them and be done with it, we'll try to explain to hopefully returning Darla what they have all been up too. Non sequitur. So you don't cotton to Darla the lizard queen, Bruce. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTF? Version 4?? | Randall Schulz | SETI | 11 | November 18th 04 12:48 AM |
New Boinc Client 3.2 | Klaatu | SETI | 18 | July 16th 04 12:54 PM |
ANN: Trial Version of DAS software now available | Deepsky Astronomy Software | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | June 27th 04 09:18 AM |
ANN: New Version of Deepsky Software (DAS) | Deepsky Astronomy Software | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 3rd 04 11:44 PM |
ANN: New Version of Deepsky Software (DAS) | Deepsky Astronomy Software | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | June 3rd 04 11:43 PM |