Convincing Arguments for a Moon Hoax? Sleuths?

SO YOU CAN WATCH WITH YOUR OWN EYES THE 'OFFICIAL NASA FOOTAGE' THAT
PROVES THAT WE REALLY HAVEN'T BEEN TOLD THE WHOLE TRUTH!!!

http://www.ufos-aliens.co.uk/cosmicapollo.html

One of the main anomalies that leads me to believe that the Moon
footage was taken on a film set is the fact that the same mountains
appear on different Apollo missions which are supposed to be landed
several hundreds of miles from each other. In the following sequences
you will even see the camera pan across the landscape that at one point
includes the Lunar Landing Module. In another shot from the same
mission, we see the very same mountains, but no Lander? How can this be
when the mountains appear to be exactly the same distance away from the
camera?

http://www.tntleague.com/misc/StrangeM.rm


This film shows two different Apollo missions, which are supposed to be
in different areas of the Moon, but show the exact same mountains in the
background.

http://www.tntleague.com/misc/strangem2.rm

One of the worst sun flares ever recorded happened in August 1972, which
was between the Apollo 16 and 17 missions. This single flare would have
delivered 960 rem of virtually instant death to any astronaut who was up
in Space, and yet all of the Apollo astronauts were carrying out their
missions in what amounts to nothing more than a thick linen suit. These
pressure suits may have helped protect the astronauts against heat or
micro meteorites, but certainly would not have given any radiation
protection. By the way, there is no known method of registering when and
how strong Solar flare activity will be. So, I guess NASA just struck lucky!

The radiation would have greatly affected the film that was shot on the
Moon. Physicist Dr David Groves Ph.D., has carried out radiation tests
on similar film and found that the lowest radiation level (25 rem)
applied to a portion of the film after exposure made the image on the
film almost entirely obliterated. Why didn't that happen to the Apollo
films?

Readers will be interested to hear that the biggest Solar Flare for 25
years was recorded in April, 2001. So sceptics who are claiming that
NASA know when the Solar Flares are going to appear are talking rubbish
- as usual... If this were the case, why didn't they bring down the
astronauts from the Shuttle and ISS if they knew this gigantic Solar
Flare was about to erupt?

HJP Arnold is an astronomer and keen photographer, an expert on space
and astro photography and was the assistant to the Managing Director at
Kodak during the Apollo years. He has also authored many space
photography books. He comments that the film that was supplied by Kodak
for the missions was essentially the same as used here on Earth. it was
exachrome 64 ASA or ISO as it is called today. He has commented that you
would expect to see some small dots on the films where a high velocity
nuclear particle had hit the film, however no evidence of this
whatsoever has come forward. The only thing that would protect the film
from this damage would be a thick layer of lead around the camera
casing, which according to Hasselblad was not used. Let's also remember
that the films were changed whilst outside on the Moon's surface and not
in any controlled environment.


3) There should have been a substantial crater blasted out under the
LEM's 10,000 pound thrust rocket. Sceptics would have you believe that
the engines only had the power to blow the dust from underneath the LEM
as it landed. If this is true, how did Armstrong create that famous boot
print if all the dust had been blown away?

27) CNN issued the following report, "The radiation belts surrounding
Earth may be more dangerous for astronauts than previously believed
(like when they supposedly went through them thirty years ago to reach
the Moon.) The phenomenon known as the 'Van Allen Belts' can spawn
(newly discovered) 'Killer Electrons' that can dramatically affect the
astronauts' health."

28) In 1969 computer chips had not been invented. The maximum computer
memory was 256k, and this was housed in a large air conditioned
building. In 2002 a top of the range computer requires at least 64 Mb of
memory to run a simulated Moon landing, and that does not include the
memory required to take off again once landed. The alleged computer on
board Apollo 11 had 32k of memory. That's the equivalent of a simple
calculator.

29) If debris from the Apollo missions was left on the Moon, then it
would be visible today through a powerful telescope, however no such
debris can be seen. The Clementine probe that recently maps the Moons
surface failed to show any Apollo artefacts left by Man during the
missions. Where did the Moon Buggy and base of the LEM go?



http://www.moonmovie.com/
Surrounding the earth, beginning at an altitude of 1,000 miles and
extending an additional 25,000 miles, lie lethal bands of radiation
called the Van Allen Radiation Belts. Every manned space mission in
history (including Mercury, Gemini, Soyuz, Skylab and the Space Shuttle)
has been well below this deadly radiation field... all except Apollo.
Recently uncovered footage of the crew of the Apollo 11 staging part of
their mission proves that the astronauts never made it beyond earth orbit.


Mo
The goal was to fool the Soviet Union about US strategic capability
during the height of the cold war. Deceit, Greed and Injustice... A sad
thing happened on the way to the moon. The truth will astound you!

13. The Soviets had a five-to-one superiority to the U.S. in manned
hours in space. They were first in achieving the following seven
important milestones:

1. First manmade satellite in earth orbit…
2. First man in space…
3. First man to orbit the earth…
4. First woman in space…
5. The first crew of three astronauts onboard one spacecraft…
6. The first space walk…
7. The first of two orbiting space craft rendezvousing…

And yet they didn't go to the Moon? Sleuths?

7. The moon is 250,000 miles away. The space shuttle has never gone more
than 400 miles from the Earth. Except for Apollo astronauts, no humans
even claim to have gone beyond low-earth orbit. When the space shuttle
astronauts did get to an altitude of 400 miles, the radiation of the Van
Allen belts forced them to a lower altitude. The Van Allen radiation
belts exist because the Earth's magnetic field traps the solar wind. See
streaming video: "Radiation Belts."
http://www.moonmovie.com/radiation_belt.ram

4. Take a look at the lunar module which supposedly flew from lunar
orbit to the surface of the moon. It is a cylindrical shape with a high
center of gravity and one big thrust engine at the bottom. Upon just
looking at this design, to think it would not immediately pinwheel and
crash, as the lunar module trainer did three weeks prior on Earth, is
absurd.