Is the USA ready to admit that Neil Armstrong flubbed his line yet?

bow down to money power

"SODDI" wrote in message
. ..

"Terence" wrote in message
...
It was supposed to be "one small step for *A* man," Neil. What you said
was redundant and didn't make any sense.

We've been quiet on this issue for a while now, but that doesn't excuse
your error, Mr. Armstrong.

Austrailians are not ready to admit it either...
http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/7...eech-rewritten


That is becaused they are enslaved to Rupert Murdoch.

"Rupert Murdoch - who has ruined one country and is intent on ruining
another." Keith Olberman

wrote:
On Sep 18, 2:15�pm, eyeball wrote:
On Sep 18, 3:36�pm, Ellsworth Toohey wrote:

Let us all know when you've travelled almost a quarter million miles
from your home planet and landed on the moon.

Big deal. I just circumnavigated the sun....for the FORTY FIFTH
time!

Oh, please. I did that back in August.

On Sep 20, 2:41*pm, Tim McGaughy wrote:
wrote:
On Sep 18, 2:15 pm, eyeball wrote:
On Sep 18, 3:36 pm, Ellsworth Toohey wrote:

Let us all know when you've travelled almost a quarter million miles
from your home planet and landed on the moon.

Big deal. *I just circumnavigated the sun....for the FORTY FIFTH
time!

Oh, please. I did that back in August.

***************************************

(And now for Neil's historic first words from the lunar surface


"That's one small step for Man, one giant leap for.....for.......
Danm my nuts itch. God, itz terrible. I mean,under the circumstances
I'd not say anything about it, but this is too much. Could I take a
quick trip back to my farm and just scratch the bejabbers outta them
two suckers behind my barn, and then get back here purdry quick? I
can't, Mr. Kranz? Well, doggone it, I'd scratch 'em right here but I
can't get to them with this suit on. Poor, poor, pitiful me."

On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 14:21:37 -0400, in a place far, far away, "SODDI"
made the phosphor on my monitor
glow in such a way as to indicate that:


"Terence" wrote in message
...
It was supposed to be "one small step for *A* man," Neil. What you said
was redundant and didn't make any sense.

We've been quiet on this issue for a while now, but that doesn't excuse
your error, Mr. Armstrong.

Austrailians are not ready to admit it either...
http://www.cosmosmagazine.com/news/7...eech-rewritten


That is becaused they are enslaved to Rupert Murdoch.

"Rupert Murdoch - who has ruined one country and is intent on ruining
another." Keith Olberman

Keith Olberman--worst person in the world, every day.

On Sep 19, 6:16 pm, "Bill Becker" wrote:
"BradGuth" wrote in message

...
On Sep 18, 12:36 pm, Ellsworth Toohey wrote:

It was supposed to be "one small step for *A* man," Neil. What you said
was redundant and didn't make any sense.

We've been quiet on this issue for a while now, but that doesn't excuse
your error, Mr. Armstrong.

Can Mr. Armstrong say cheese, without cracking a smirk?

Mainstream truth-lag never had it so good. Call it truth irony on
steroids.

Here’s yet another good one for the old gipper, as recently published
in Popular Science, of where the DARPA orchestrated and otherwise
Zionist controlled mainstream media is continually trying to snooker
and dumbfound its way along.

“To get the resolution to the point where one pixel was the size of a
foot print, Hubble would need a primary mirror of 2,400 feet in
diameter”

Every 5th grader knows or at least by rights should know that the size
of a primary mirror has nothing to do with optical magnification

I'll call you on that one. Larger apertures *will *allow the user to push
their scopes to greater magnifications *if* the seeing allows it. And by
seeing, I'm referring to the steadiness of the atmosphere.

KECK with a few soft modifications and a green laser cannon
illuminating the otherwise earthshine dark moon will accomplish one
meter/pixel.

Big mirrors capture more photons than do small mirrors. Big mirrors
can make up for otherwise crappy optics and use of relatively large
CCD pixels.

Our DARPA Apollo debris of white and otherwise shiny stuff as situated
upon the dark as coal Selene/moon is what offers loads of photons to
spare, and then some.

~ Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth BG

Neil Armstrong didn't make a mistake. He read the lines exactly as they
were written ... by the hopeless writers from the "Smallville" show and
as directed / produced by Star Trek's idiot-twins B & B ... it's just
amazing he didn't have to say "Welcome to Saturn on 15 April, 1301"
while wearing a tight catsuit. ;-)

"Anybody" wrote in message
...

Neil Armstrong didn't make a mistake. He read the lines exactly as they
were written ... by the hopeless writers from the "Smallville" show and
as directed / produced by Star Trek's idiot-twins B & B ... it's just
amazing he didn't have to say "Welcome to Saturn on 15 April, 1301"
while wearing a tight catsuit. ;-)

^^^^ I'll have what he's having.

On Sep 22, 4:20*pm, "catpandaddy" wrote:
"Anybody" wrote in message

...



Neil Armstrong didn't make a mistake. He read the lines exactly as they
were written ... by the hopeless writers from the "Smallville" show and
as directed / produced by Star Trek's idiot-twins B & B ... it's just
amazing he didn't have to say "Welcome to Saturn on 15 April, 1301"
while wearing a tight catsuit. * *;-)

^^^^ I'll have what he's having.

I was following you up until the Saturn part- you mean we had
spaceflight in 1301?

In article
,
Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Sep 22, 4:20*pm, "catpandaddy" wrote:
"Anybody" wrote in message
...

Neil Armstrong didn't make a mistake. He read the lines exactly as they
were written ... by the hopeless writers from the "Smallville" show and
as directed / produced by Star Trek's idiot-twins B & B ... it's just
amazing he didn't have to say "Welcome to Saturn on 15 April, 1301"
while wearing a tight catsuit. * *;-)

^^^^ I'll have what he's having.

I was following you up until the Saturn part- you mean we had
spaceflight in 1301?

It was a not-so-good jibe at B&B's far too often used lazy trick of
silly time travel episodes (which they love because they can simply use
the "old reset button" and pretend it never happened) and ignoring
basic Star Trek "facts" whenever they wanted (especially in
Enterprise).

"Anybody" wrote in message
...
In article
,
Don Stockbauer wrote:

On Sep 22, 4:20 pm, "catpandaddy" wrote:
"Anybody" wrote in message
...

Neil Armstrong didn't make a mistake. He read the lines exactly as
they
were written ... by the hopeless writers from the "Smallville" show
and
as directed / produced by Star Trek's idiot-twins B & B ... it's just
amazing he didn't have to say "Welcome to Saturn on 15 April, 1301"
while wearing a tight catsuit. ;-)

^^^^ I'll have what he's having.

I was following you up until the Saturn part- you mean we had
spaceflight in 1301?

It was a not-so-good jibe at B&B's far too often used lazy trick of
silly time travel episodes (which they love because they can simply use
the "old reset button" and pretend it never happened) and ignoring
basic Star Trek "facts" whenever they wanted (especially in
Enterprise).

Can't have fiction without the facts!