![]() |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phoenix writes:
ah writes: Art Deco wrote: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote: ah wrote: Art Deco wrote: nightbat writes: nightbat wrote Why would you write that, nightbat? Your first encounter with the frootbat, Classic Tholenator(tm)? Count Floyd wrote: PJR writes: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Mikus Grinbergs writes: I've had the Innotek port of Acrobat version 5 running for some time. Lately, however, it's become effectively useless. Upon being launched, the logo will get displayed with the CPU activity pegged at 100 percent for MINUTES before the first page gets displayed. Closing it takes about as long. I'm not aware of any changes to my system since the problem started occurring. Has anybody else experienced such a dramatic slowdown in performance and figured out how to solve the problem? As soon as Acrobat version 5 became available, I posted my experience of it taking EXTREMELY long to do things. If I remember correctly, my post was pooh-poohed. Be that as it may, the difference here is that Acrobat used to be nice and speedy, but now it's slower than molassas, yet I cannot think of any change that has been made to the system. Rebooting did not cure the problem. Uninstall and reinstall, Dickless. Rebooting is the dickhead approach. You would know that if you didn't spend all your time uttering saucerhead gaga. You can get Acrobat *Five* for OS/2??? Welcome to the late 20th century, Davie! What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? PJ "he could also convert the .pdf to .ps, but he'd have to know how to" R :-) What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? Count Floyd Oh Please! Don't start this type of crap in this newsgroup! Keep it in the advocacy newsgroup with those idiots like Michael Baldwin Bruce, Bart Devo, Elizabot and the like. nightbat Yes Count while we are in serious mutual group agreement there is no use in rubbing it in to the clueless Alexa drone auk fun coffee boys for they crossposting net proudly know who they are. Including sockpuppets, ah, Dr.Flonkenstein, Bookman, Aratzio, Jade, Cujo, CJ Osterwiald, tholen. Suffering from reading comprehension problems, nightbat? I'm not the one who adds a bunch of irrelevant newsgroups to the distribution. No "classic" lames today, Classic Tholenator(tm)? They actually sadly relish when you mention them on post lits on their scoring juvenile underdeveloped pea brains. Leave me out of your pontification, nightbat. How ironic. How iconic. How symbolic. How systolic. How bucolic. How moronic. How imbecilic. How diabolic. What does that have to do with OS/2, ah? What does this have to do with Art Bell, Ask the person who added the Art Bell newsgroup to the distribution, Phoenix; I did not. Dave? Who is "Dave", Phoenix? Suffering from attribution problems? And believe it or not we are profound Science Officer alt.astronomy constant auk sockpuppet morphing stuck with them because Darla the brave wayward net Sean Star Race traveler wants us to baby-sit tolerate them until she purportedly gets mission back, oh the humanity. 1st Officer Bohne as net public relations Science Liaison Officer has been as diplomatic as you can imagine but with no results. Don't waste your time, just Bozo file them and be done with it, we'll try to explain to hopefully returning Darla what they have all been up too. Non sequitur. So you don't cotton to Darla the lizard queen, Bruce. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Double-A writes:
ah writes: Double-A wrote: Twittering One wrote: Arch ~ Wrought Irony. Discuss. Overwrought! Handwrought! What does that have to do with OS/2, ah? What IBM hath wrought! OS/2 was a joint project of IBM ad Microsoft. |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phoenix writes:
ah writes: Art Deco wrote: nightbat writes: nightbat wrote Why would you write that, nightbat? Your first encounter with the frootbat, Classic Tholenator(tm)? Note: no response. Non sequitur. Note: still no response. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Count Floyd wrote: PJR writes: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Mikus Grinbergs writes: I've had the Innotek port of Acrobat version 5 running for some time. Lately, however, it's become effectively useless. Upon being launched, the logo will get displayed with the CPU activity pegged at 100 percent for MINUTES before the first page gets displayed. Closing it takes about as long. I'm not aware of any changes to my system since the problem started occurring. Has anybody else experienced such a dramatic slowdown in performance and figured out how to solve the problem? As soon as Acrobat version 5 became available, I posted my experience of it taking EXTREMELY long to do things. If I remember correctly, my post was pooh-poohed. Be that as it may, the difference here is that Acrobat used to be nice and speedy, but now it's slower than molassas, yet I cannot think of any change that has been made to the system. Rebooting did not cure the problem. Uninstall and reinstall, Dickless. Rebooting is the dickhead approach. You would know that if you didn't spend all your time uttering saucerhead gaga. You can get Acrobat *Five* for OS/2??? Welcome to the late 20th century, Davie! What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? PJ "he could also convert the .pdf to .ps, but he'd have to know how to" R :-) What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? Count Floyd Oh Please! Don't start this type of crap in this newsgroup! Keep it in the advocacy newsgroup with those idiots like Michael Baldwin Bruce, Bart Devo, Elizabot and the like. nightbat Yes Count while we are in serious mutual group agreement there is no use in rubbing it in to the clueless Alexa drone auk fun coffee boys for they crossposting net proudly know who they are. Including sockpuppets, ah, Dr.Flonkenstein, Bookman, Aratzio, Jade, Cujo, CJ Osterwiald, tholen. Suffering from reading comprehension problems, nightbat? I'm not the one who adds a bunch of irrelevant newsgroups to the distribution. No "classic" lames today, Classic Tholenator(tm)? Note: no response. Non sequitur. Note: still no response. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. They actually sadly relish when you mention them on post lits on their scoring juvenile underdeveloped pea brains. Leave me out of your pontification, nightbat. How ironic. How iconic. Note: no response. Non sequitur. Note: still no response. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. And believe it or not we are profound Science Officer alt.astronomy constant auk sockpuppet morphing stuck with them because Darla the brave wayward net Sean Star Race traveler wants us to baby-sit tolerate them until she purportedly gets mission back, oh the humanity. 1st Officer Bohne as net public relations Science Liaison Officer has been as diplomatic as you can imagine but with no results. Don't waste your time, just Bozo file them and be done with it, we'll try to explain to hopefully returning Darla what they have all been up too. Non sequitur. So you don't cotton to Darla the lizard queen, Bruce. What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, ah? It's part of the tracking software, Non sequitur. Why? Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Phoenix? I asked a simple question, Unnecessarily, Phoenix, given that the answer is obvious. Dave. Who is "Dave", Phoenix? Suffering from attribution problems? Bruce. Who is "Bruce", ah? Suffering from attribution problems? Classic taking out of context, as expected from one who can't make a logical argument. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. On your part, Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Dave. Who is "Dave", Phoenix? Suffering from attribution problems? |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phoenix writes:
ah writes: Art Deco wrote: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Bruce AKA Art Deco wrote: ah wrote: Art Deco wrote: nightbat writes: nightbat wrote Why would you write that, nightbat? Your first encounter with the frootbat, Classic Tholenator(tm)? Count Floyd wrote: PJR writes: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Mikus Grinbergs writes: I've had the Innotek port of Acrobat version 5 running for some time. Lately, however, it's become effectively useless. Upon being launched, the logo will get displayed with the CPU activity pegged at 100 percent for MINUTES before the first page gets displayed. Closing it takes about as long. I'm not aware of any changes to my system since the problem started occurring. Has anybody else experienced such a dramatic slowdown in performance and figured out how to solve the problem? As soon as Acrobat version 5 became available, I posted my experience of it taking EXTREMELY long to do things. If I remember correctly, my post was pooh-poohed. Be that as it may, the difference here is that Acrobat used to be nice and speedy, but now it's slower than molassas, yet I cannot think of any change that has been made to the system. Rebooting did not cure the problem. Uninstall and reinstall, Dickless. Rebooting is the dickhead approach. You would know that if you didn't spend all your time uttering saucerhead gaga. You can get Acrobat *Five* for OS/2??? Welcome to the late 20th century, Davie! What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? PJ "he could also convert the .pdf to .ps, but he'd have to know how to" R :-) What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? Count Floyd Oh Please! Don't start this type of crap in this newsgroup! Keep it in the advocacy newsgroup with those idiots like Michael Baldwin Bruce, Bart Devo, Elizabot and the like. nightbat Yes Count while we are in serious mutual group agreement there is no use in rubbing it in to the clueless Alexa drone auk fun coffee boys for they crossposting net proudly know who they are. Including sockpuppets, ah, Dr.Flonkenstein, Bookman, Aratzio, Jade, Cujo, CJ Osterwiald, tholen. Suffering from reading comprehension problems, nightbat? I'm not the one who adds a bunch of irrelevant newsgroups to the distribution. No "classic" lames today, Classic Tholenator(tm)? They actually sadly relish when you mention them on post lits on their scoring juvenile underdeveloped pea brains. Leave me out of your pontification, nightbat. How ironic. How iconic. How symbolic. How systolic. How bucolic. How moronic. How imbecilic. How diabolic. What does that have to do with OS/2, ah? What does this have to do with Art Bell, Ask the person who added the Art Bell newsgroup to the distribution, Phoenix; I did not. Why didn't you subtract it, How ironic, coming from the person who didn't subtract it. Dave? Who is "Dave", Phoenix? Suffering from attribution problems? Dave? Who is "Dave", Phoenix? Suffering from attribution problems? Oh, I'm sorry, Davie. My bad. Who is "Davie", Phoenix? Suffering from attribution problems? And believe it or not we are profound Science Officer alt.astronomy constant auk sockpuppet morphing stuck with them because Darla the brave wayward net Sean Star Race traveler wants us to baby-sit tolerate them until she purportedly gets mission back, oh the humanity. 1st Officer Bohne as net public relations Science Liaison Officer has been as diplomatic as you can imagine but with no results. Don't waste your time, just Bozo file them and be done with it, we'll try to explain to hopefully returning Darla what they have all been up too. Non sequitur. So you don't cotton to Darla the lizard queen, Bruce. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Phoenix writes:
ah writes: Double-A wrote: Twittering One wrote: Arch ~ Wrought Irony. Discuss. Overwraught! Handwrought! What does that have to do with OS/2, ah? What does that have to do with Art Bell Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Phoenix? I answered that same question from you in another message earlier today. which group you failed to subtract, How ironic, coming from the person who failed to subtract the newsgroup. Dave? Who is "Dave", Phoenix? Still suffering from attribution problems? |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bookman writes:
ah writes: Art Deco wrote: nightbat writes: nightbat wrote Why would you write that, nightbat? Your first encounter with the frootbat, Classic Tholenator(tm)? Count Floyd wrote: PJR writes: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Mikus Grinbergs writes: I've had the Innotek port of Acrobat version 5 running for some time. Lately, however, it's become effectively useless. Upon being launched, the logo will get displayed with the CPU activity pegged at 100 percent for MINUTES before the first page gets displayed. Closing it takes about as long. I'm not aware of any changes to my system since the problem started occurring. Has anybody else experienced such a dramatic slowdown in performance and figured out how to solve the problem? As soon as Acrobat version 5 became available, I posted my experience of it taking EXTREMELY long to do things. If I remember correctly, my post was pooh-poohed. Be that as it may, the difference here is that Acrobat used to be nice and speedy, but now it's slower than molassas, yet I cannot think of any change that has been made to the system. Rebooting did not cure the problem. Uninstall and reinstall, Dickless. Rebooting is the dickhead approach. You would know that if you didn't spend all your time uttering saucerhead gaga. You can get Acrobat *Five* for OS/2??? Welcome to the late 20th century, Davie! What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? PJ "he could also convert the .pdf to .ps, but he'd have to know how to" R :-) What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? Count Floyd Oh Please! Don't start this type of crap in this newsgroup! Keep it in the advocacy newsgroup with those idiots like Michael Baldwin Bruce, Bart Devo, Elizabot and the like. nightbat Yes Count while we are in serious mutual group agreement there is no use in rubbing it in to the clueless Alexa drone auk fun coffee boys for they crossposting net proudly know who they are. Including sockpuppets, ah, Dr.Flonkenstein, Bookman, Aratzio, Jade, Cujo, CJ Osterwiald, tholen. Suffering from reading comprehension problems, nightbat? I'm not the one who adds a bunch of irrelevant newsgroups to the distribution. No "classic" lames today, Classic Tholenator(tm)? They actually sadly relish when you mention them on post lits on their scoring juvenile underdeveloped pea brains. Leave me out of your pontification, nightbat. How ironic. How iconic. And believe it or not we are profound Science Officer alt.astronomy constant auk sockpuppet morphing stuck with them because Darla the brave wayward net Sean Star Race traveler wants us to baby-sit tolerate them until she purportedly gets mission back, oh the humanity. 1st Officer Bohne as net public relations Science Liaison Officer has been as diplomatic as you can imagine but with no results. Don't waste your time, just Bozo file them and be done with it, we'll try to explain to hopefully returning Darla what they have all been up too. Non sequitur. So you don't cotton to Darla the lizard queen, Bruce. What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, ah? What does this have to do with alt.****nozzles, Classic Tholenator(tm)? What does this have to do with UFOs, Flying Teapot? What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, ah? What does that have to do with AT&T logos, Non sequitur. What does your inappropriate use of the phrase "non sequitor" You're erroneously presupposing that I used the phrase "non sequitor", Bookman. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems? have to do with O/S2, What is "O/S2", Bookman? Classic Tholenator(tm)? Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? Classic Tholenator(tm)? Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? Non sequitor. What is "Non sequitor", Bookman? Digest much? What does your question have to do with OS/2, Bookman? What does your question have to do with OS/2, I see that you didn't answer the question, Bookman. No surprise there, really. I also see that you've still suffering from reading comprehension problems, as evidenced by your inability to comprehend the second-last item in my question, Bookman. Classic Tholenator(tm)? Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? ESL! Non sequitur. What does your inappropriate use of the phrase "non sequitor" You're erroneously presupposing that I used the phrase "non sequitor", Bookman. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems? have to do with O/S2, What is "O/S2", Bookman? Classic Tholenator(tm)? Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? ESL! Non sequitur. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bookman writes:
ah writes: Art Deco wrote: nightbat writes: nightbat wrote Why would you write that, nightbat? Your first encounter with the frootbat, Classic Tholenator(tm)? Count Floyd wrote: PJR writes: Michael Baldwin Bruce wrote: Mikus Grinbergs writes: I've had the Innotek port of Acrobat version 5 running for some time. Lately, however, it's become effectively useless. Upon being launched, the logo will get displayed with the CPU activity pegged at 100 percent for MINUTES before the first page gets displayed. Closing it takes about as long. I'm not aware of any changes to my system since the problem started occurring. Has anybody else experienced such a dramatic slowdown in performance and figured out how to solve the problem? As soon as Acrobat version 5 became available, I posted my experience of it taking EXTREMELY long to do things. If I remember correctly, my post was pooh-poohed. Be that as it may, the difference here is that Acrobat used to be nice and speedy, but now it's slower than molassas, yet I cannot think of any change that has been made to the system. Rebooting did not cure the problem. Uninstall and reinstall, Dickless. Rebooting is the dickhead approach. You would know that if you didn't spend all your time uttering saucerhead gaga. You can get Acrobat *Five* for OS/2??? Welcome to the late 20th century, Davie! What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? PJ "he could also convert the .pdf to .ps, but he'd have to know how to" R :-) What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, PJR? Count Floyd Oh Please! Don't start this type of crap in this newsgroup! Keep it in the advocacy newsgroup with those idiots like Michael Baldwin Bruce, Bart Devo, Elizabot and the like. nightbat Yes Count while we are in serious mutual group agreement there is no use in rubbing it in to the clueless Alexa drone auk fun coffee boys for they crossposting net proudly know who they are. Including sockpuppets, ah, Dr.Flonkenstein, Bookman, Aratzio, Jade, Cujo, CJ Osterwiald, tholen. Suffering from reading comprehension problems, nightbat? I'm not the one who adds a bunch of irrelevant newsgroups to the distribution. No "classic" lames today, Classic Tholenator(tm)? They actually sadly relish when you mention them on post lits on their scoring juvenile underdeveloped pea brains. Leave me out of your pontification, nightbat. How ironic. How iconic. And believe it or not we are profound Science Officer alt.astronomy constant auk sockpuppet morphing stuck with them because Darla the brave wayward net Sean Star Race traveler wants us to baby-sit tolerate them until she purportedly gets mission back, oh the humanity. 1st Officer Bohne as net public relations Science Liaison Officer has been as diplomatic as you can imagine but with no results. Don't waste your time, just Bozo file them and be done with it, we'll try to explain to hopefully returning Darla what they have all been up too. Non sequitur. So you don't cotton to Darla the lizard queen, Bruce. What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, ah? What does this have to do with alt.****nozzles, Classic Tholenator(tm)? What does this have to do with UFOs, Flying Teapot? What does that have to do with alt.astronomy, ah? What does that have to do with AT&T logos, Non sequitur. What does your inappropriate use of the phrase "non sequitor" You're erroneously presupposing that I used the phrase "non sequitor", Bookman. That's correct, you do not use the phrase "non sequitor", Classic Tholenator(tm). Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? The fact is that you abuse the phrase "non sequitur". Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems? No, just laughing at your spelling lame, Classic Tholenator(tm). Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? have to do with O/S2, What is "O/S2", Bookman? If you don't know what O/S2 is, Classic Tholenator(tm), then I'm not going to bother trying to inform you. Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? Evidence indicates you're clooless. What is "clooless", Bookman? Classic Tholenator(tm)? Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? Why don't you know who you are, Classic Tholenator(tm)? Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? Still suffering from an identity crisis? Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic Tholenator(tm)? Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? Non sequitor. What is "Non sequitor", Bookman? Spelling lame bait for you, Classic Tholenator(tm). Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? And you bit. What does that have to do with OS/2, Bookman? Digest much? What does your question have to do with OS/2, Bookman? What does your question have to do with OS/2, I see that you didn't answer the question, Bookman. Why should I, Classic Tholenator(tm)? Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? You never do. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. No surprise there, really. That's right, I'm not surprised that you never answer questions, Classic Tholenator(tm). Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? I also see that you've still suffering from reading comprehension problems, as evidenced by your inability to comprehend the second-last item in my question, Bookman. Classic invective, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. as to be expected from one who will not answer questions, Classic erroneous presupposition. but demands that others do so. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic Tholenator(tm)? Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? Why don't you know who you are, Classic Tholenator(tm)? Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? Still suffering from an identity crisis? Classic erroneous presupposition. ESL! Non sequitur. What does your inappropriate use of the phrase "non sequitor" You're erroneously presupposing that I used the phrase "non sequitor", Bookman. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems? Nope, Then why did you falsely accuse me of using the phrase "non sequitor", Bookman? more spelling lame bait for you, Classic Tholenator(tm). Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? And you bit again. What does that have to do with OS/2, Bookman? have to do with O/S2, What is "O/S2", Bookman? If you don't know what O/S2 is, Classic Tholenator(tm), then I'm not going to bother trying to inform you. Classic evasion. Evidence indicates you're clooless. What is "clooless", Bookman? Classic Tholenator(tm)? Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? Why don't you know who you are, Classic Tholenator(tm)? Who is "Classic Tholenator(tm)", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? Still suffering from an identity crisis? Classic erroneous presupposition. ESL! Non sequitur. Non sequitur. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. ESL! Non sequitur. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
WTF? Version 4?? | Randall Schulz | SETI | 11 | November 18th 04 12:48 AM |
New Boinc Client 3.2 | Klaatu | SETI | 18 | July 16th 04 12:54 PM |
ANN: Trial Version of DAS software now available | Deepsky Astronomy Software | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | June 27th 04 09:18 AM |
ANN: New Version of Deepsky Software (DAS) | Deepsky Astronomy Software | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 3rd 04 11:44 PM |
ANN: New Version of Deepsky Software (DAS) | Deepsky Astronomy Software | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | June 3rd 04 11:43 PM |