![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#51
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Pat Flannery" wrote in message ... AH-HA! I thought as much! Besides all being Sperry Ball Turret fans, we are also all _IRONCLAD_ fans! That sounds like an iron-clad guarantee. |
#52
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#53
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , dave
schneider writes (Hallerb) wrote in message ... The Rolling Stones My all time favorite book ![]() Ahh, the zinc-propellant nuclear blow-down (er, nuclear thermal) rocket. Refuel at the next corner. One of Joe Haldeman's stories goes one better than this, with "the most polluting exhaust in the history of transportation: hot ionised lead, slightly radioactive". -- Save the Hubble Space Telescope! Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#54
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
dave schneider wrote:
(Hallerb) wrote in message ... The Rolling Stones My all time favorite book ![]() Ahh, the zinc-propellant nuclear blow-down (er, nuclear thermal) rocket. Refuel at the next corner. Smaller than your SUV, so no need for a new garage. Damn, I wish I had gone along.... /dps I think you're mistaken. I haven't reread it in awhile but I'm pretty sure The Rolling Stones (and most of Heilein's novels set in that corner of his multiverse) family ship was "The Rolling Stone" and it used monatomic hydrogen (rather than diatomic H2) as a reaction medium. Anyone else remember more clearly? -- Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D. Reformed Aerospace Engineer Remove invalid nonsense for email. |
#55
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I think you're mistaken. I haven't reread it in awhile but I'm pretty sure The Rolling Stones (and most of Heilein's novels set in that corner of his multiverse) family ship was "The Rolling Stone" and it used monatomic hydrogen (rather than diatomic H2) as a reaction medium. Thsat might be true. Personally I liked the story and characters, theb science was secondary. |
#56
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 08:40:15 -0600, Herb Schaltegger wrote:
dave schneider wrote: "The Rolling Stones Ahh, the zinc-propellant nuclear blow-down (er, nuclear thermal) rocket. I had gone along.... I think you're mistaken. I haven't reread it in awhile but I'm pretty sure The Rolling Stones (and most of Heilein's novels set in that corner of his multiverse) family ship was "The Rolling Stone" and it used monatomic hydrogen (rather than diatomic H2) as a reaction medium. Correct. Dave was also correct about zinc propellant, but he had the wrong book. The Zinc Hellburner Fallout Generator(tm) was what powered "Rocket Ship Galileo". -- Chuck Stewart "Anime-style catgirls: Threat? Menace? Or just studying algebra?" |
#57
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Herb Schaltegger
lid writes dave schneider wrote: (Hallerb) wrote in message ... The Rolling Stones My all time favorite book ![]() Ahh, the zinc-propellant nuclear blow-down (er, nuclear thermal) rocket. Refuel at the next corner. Smaller than your SUV, so no need for a new garage. Damn, I wish I had gone along.... /dps I think you're mistaken. I haven't reread it in awhile but I'm pretty sure The Rolling Stones (and most of Heilein's novels set in that corner of his multiverse) family ship was "The Rolling Stone" and it used monatomic hydrogen (rather than diatomic H2) as a reaction medium. Anyone else remember more clearly? You're dead right. It's the Galileo that uses zinc; the Rolling Stone uses stablized (spelling as in my book) monatomic hydrogen. How is it stabilised? And here's another for the experts; the Galileo uses thorium in her reactor. Does any current nuclear reactor use it? -- Save the Hubble Space Telescope! Remove spam and invalid from address to reply. |
#58
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Herb Schaltegger lid wrote
I think you're mistaken. I haven't reread it in awhile but I'm pretty sure The Rolling Stones (and most of Heilein's novels set in that corner of his multiverse) family ship was "The Rolling Stone" and it used monatomic hydrogen (rather than diatomic H2) as a reaction medium. Anyone else remember more clearly? That's right, "single-H." A 1947 Heinlein juvenile, "Rocketship Galileo," had the intreped lads going to the moon(*) in a nuclear rocket that used some metal as reaction mass. I thought it was mercury, but apparently it was zinc. (*) They found a bunch of Nazi die-hards there. |
#59
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jonathan Silverlight wrote: You're dead right. It's the Galileo that uses zinc; the Rolling Stone uses stablized (spelling as in my book) monatomic hydrogen. How is it stabilised? That's a good question. A very good question. It would be worth a lot to know the answer... Since it's pretty much inevitably going to come unstabilized in reactor conditions, the first thing that will happen is that all that expensive uranium, graphite, etc. hardware cluttering up the engine interior is going to melt and wash out the tailpipe. And the rocket won't miss it, either. The temperatures reached by the 2H-H2 reaction *far* exceed those of any solid-core nuclear rocket; a chemical rocket running on stabilized atomic hydrogen would have double or triple the Isp of that nuclear rocket. The only problem is that we have no idea how to stabilize the stuff, and it's not because people haven't *tried*. (Well, the *other* problem is that it would also be the mother of all chemical explosives, making TNT or cyclonite look like damp gunpowder by comparison...) And here's another for the experts; the Galileo uses thorium in her reactor. Does any current nuclear reactor use it? As far as I know, that turned out to be impractical -- the only way you can make thorium into a useful nuclear fuel is to process it through a breeder reaction, turning Th-232 into U-233. (Experimental reactors *have* been run on U-233, and for that matter experimental fission bombs have been built with it.) -- MOST launched 30 June; science observations running | Henry Spencer since Oct; first surprises seen; papers pending. | |
#60
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Allen Thomson wrote: ...A 1947 Heinlein juvenile, "Rocketship Galileo," had the intreped lads going to the moon(*) in a nuclear rocket that used some metal as reaction mass. I thought it was mercury, but apparently it was zinc. They'd have preferred mercury, but couldn't afford it. (Evidently they didn't consider its toxicity an issue, a mistake no modern scientist would make...) -- MOST launched 30 June; science observations running | Henry Spencer since Oct; first surprises seen; papers pending. | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | August 5th 04 01:36 AM |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Space Shuttle | 150 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
National Space Policy: NSDD-42 (issued on July 4th, 1982) | Stuf4 | Policy | 145 | July 28th 04 07:30 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |