The Real Reason Bush Wants to Go to the Moon

"Bob Schmall" wrote in message
...

"Al" wrote in message
news
I'm a French-looking, Jewish black man.

Like hell you are. You're just a two-for-a-nickel bigot.


Why are you resorting to name calling? If you knew me, you would know that
I'm not a bigot...I may be a conservative, but I'm not a bigot. Now take my
advice...take your meds and go to bed.

Al

"Bob Schmall" wrote in message
...

"Al" wrote in message
news
I'm a French-looking, Jewish black man.

Like hell you are. You're just a two-for-a-nickel bigot.


Why are you resorting to name calling? If you knew me, you would know that
I'm not a bigot...I may be a conservative, but I'm not a bigot. Now take my
advice...take your meds and go to bed.

Al

The issue isn't one of liberal vs conservative and which one is okay to
poke fun at. The issue is that this is SAA - about Astronomy. The cartoon
was about Astronomy. I would love for us to go back to the Moon. But, Bush
has no real intention of doing so. It's strictly political. Anybody - the
President, a Senator, a liberal - who is going to trash the Hubble (because
it has no clear purpose) because he says we should go to the moon (did Bush
ever say why exactly we should?) deserves to be lampooned.
Again, the original was Astronomy related. Your reply was not. That's why
so many posters have reacted strongly to your opinion.

Joe




In article Al wrote:
Thanks for your support! It appears that the majority of this group is
liberal, and that's okay with me, as "some of my best friends are
liberal.":-) Nevertheless, it's okay for one of the liberals to poke fun
at
Bush or the administration. After all, "Bush Whacking" is good, clean fun
and perfectly acceptable among liberals. However, if one has the audacity
to poke fun back at the liberals, he is accused of having a low IQ, of
being
"not funny"...completely without humor, of being KKK material and of being
racially slanderous. I really feel sorry for them...what will they do when
dubya wins a second term?:-)

The issue isn't one of liberal vs conservative and which one is okay to
poke fun at. The issue is that this is SAA - about Astronomy. The cartoon
was about Astronomy. I would love for us to go back to the Moon. But, Bush
has no real intention of doing so. It's strictly political. Anybody - the
President, a Senator, a liberal - who is going to trash the Hubble (because
it has no clear purpose) because he says we should go to the moon (did Bush
ever say why exactly we should?) deserves to be lampooned.
Again, the original was Astronomy related. Your reply was not. That's why
so many posters have reacted strongly to your opinion.

Joe




In article Al wrote:
Thanks for your support! It appears that the majority of this group is
liberal, and that's okay with me, as "some of my best friends are
liberal.":-) Nevertheless, it's okay for one of the liberals to poke fun
at
Bush or the administration. After all, "Bush Whacking" is good, clean fun
and perfectly acceptable among liberals. However, if one has the audacity
to poke fun back at the liberals, he is accused of having a low IQ, of
being
"not funny"...completely without humor, of being KKK material and of being
racially slanderous. I really feel sorry for them...what will they do when
dubya wins a second term?:-)

The issue isn't one of liberal vs conservative and which one is okay to
poke fun at. The issue is that this is SAA - about Astronomy. The cartoon
was about Astronomy. I would love for us to go back to the Moon. But, Bush
has no real intention of doing so. It's strictly political. Anybody - the
President, a Senator, a liberal - who is going to trash the Hubble (because
it has no clear purpose) because he says we should go to the moon (did Bush
ever say why exactly we should?) deserves to be lampooned.
Again, the original was Astronomy related. Your reply was not. That's why
so many posters have reacted strongly to your opinion.

Joe




In article Al wrote:
Thanks for your support! It appears that the majority of this group is
liberal, and that's okay with me, as "some of my best friends are
liberal.":-) Nevertheless, it's okay for one of the liberals to poke fun
at
Bush or the administration. After all, "Bush Whacking" is good, clean fun
and perfectly acceptable among liberals. However, if one has the audacity
to poke fun back at the liberals, he is accused of having a low IQ, of
being
"not funny"...completely without humor, of being KKK material and of being
racially slanderous. I really feel sorry for them...what will they do when
dubya wins a second term?:-)

I would love for us to go back to the Moon.

So would I.


But, Bush
has no real intention of doing so.

How do you know? You are expressing your personal political opinion
here...which by your own admission has no place on SAA.

Anybody - the
President, a Senator, a liberal - who is going to trash the Hubble

The recent Columbia tragedy revealed to NASA and the entire world that we do
not have a safe and reliable space vehicle to make the required maintenance
trips to Hubble. As I saw it, it was not a presidential decision to call it
quits on Hubble, but rather a NASA decision.

(did Bush
ever say why exactly we should?)

Did you listen to the President's State Of The Union address? If you had,
you would have heard him tell the country _exactly_ why he believes we
(America) should go back to the moon.

Again, the original was Astronomy related. Your reply was not.

Actually, both of our posts (your comic strip thing and my reply) were _not_
astronomy related, and the group could have done very well without either of
them.

Al



"Joe Geller" wrote in message
...
The issue isn't one of liberal vs conservative and which one is okay to
poke fun at. The issue is that this is SAA - about Astronomy. The
cartoon
was about Astronomy. I would love for us to go back to the Moon. But,
Bush
has no real intention of doing so. It's strictly political. Anybody -
the
President, a Senator, a liberal - who is going to trash the Hubble
(because
it has no clear purpose) because he says we should go to the moon (did
Bush
ever say why exactly we should?) deserves to be lampooned.
Again, the original was Astronomy related. Your reply was not. That's
why
so many posters have reacted strongly to your opinion.

Joe




In article Al wrote:
Thanks for your support! It appears that the majority of this group is
liberal, and that's okay with me, as "some of my best friends are
liberal.":-) Nevertheless, it's okay for one of the liberals to poke fun
at
Bush or the administration. After all, "Bush Whacking" is good, clean
fun
and perfectly acceptable among liberals. However, if one has the
audacity
to poke fun back at the liberals, he is accused of having a low IQ, of
being
"not funny"...completely without humor, of being KKK material and of
being
racially slanderous. I really feel sorry for them...what will they do
when
dubya wins a second term?:-)

I would love for us to go back to the Moon.

So would I.


But, Bush
has no real intention of doing so.

How do you know? You are expressing your personal political opinion
here...which by your own admission has no place on SAA.

Anybody - the
President, a Senator, a liberal - who is going to trash the Hubble

The recent Columbia tragedy revealed to NASA and the entire world that we do
not have a safe and reliable space vehicle to make the required maintenance
trips to Hubble. As I saw it, it was not a presidential decision to call it
quits on Hubble, but rather a NASA decision.

(did Bush
ever say why exactly we should?)

Did you listen to the President's State Of The Union address? If you had,
you would have heard him tell the country _exactly_ why he believes we
(America) should go back to the moon.

Again, the original was Astronomy related. Your reply was not.

Actually, both of our posts (your comic strip thing and my reply) were _not_
astronomy related, and the group could have done very well without either of
them.

Al



"Joe Geller" wrote in message
...
The issue isn't one of liberal vs conservative and which one is okay to
poke fun at. The issue is that this is SAA - about Astronomy. The
cartoon
was about Astronomy. I would love for us to go back to the Moon. But,
Bush
has no real intention of doing so. It's strictly political. Anybody -
the
President, a Senator, a liberal - who is going to trash the Hubble
(because
it has no clear purpose) because he says we should go to the moon (did
Bush
ever say why exactly we should?) deserves to be lampooned.
Again, the original was Astronomy related. Your reply was not. That's
why
so many posters have reacted strongly to your opinion.

Joe




In article Al wrote:
Thanks for your support! It appears that the majority of this group is
liberal, and that's okay with me, as "some of my best friends are
liberal.":-) Nevertheless, it's okay for one of the liberals to poke fun
at
Bush or the administration. After all, "Bush Whacking" is good, clean
fun
and perfectly acceptable among liberals. However, if one has the
audacity
to poke fun back at the liberals, he is accused of having a low IQ, of
being
"not funny"...completely without humor, of being KKK material and of
being
racially slanderous. I really feel sorry for them...what will they do
when
dubya wins a second term?:-)

I would love for us to go back to the Moon.

So would I.


But, Bush
has no real intention of doing so.

How do you know? You are expressing your personal political opinion
here...which by your own admission has no place on SAA.

Anybody - the
President, a Senator, a liberal - who is going to trash the Hubble

The recent Columbia tragedy revealed to NASA and the entire world that we do
not have a safe and reliable space vehicle to make the required maintenance
trips to Hubble. As I saw it, it was not a presidential decision to call it
quits on Hubble, but rather a NASA decision.

(did Bush
ever say why exactly we should?)

Did you listen to the President's State Of The Union address? If you had,
you would have heard him tell the country _exactly_ why he believes we
(America) should go back to the moon.

Again, the original was Astronomy related. Your reply was not.

Actually, both of our posts (your comic strip thing and my reply) were _not_
astronomy related, and the group could have done very well without either of
them.

Al



"Joe Geller" wrote in message
...
The issue isn't one of liberal vs conservative and which one is okay to
poke fun at. The issue is that this is SAA - about Astronomy. The
cartoon
was about Astronomy. I would love for us to go back to the Moon. But,
Bush
has no real intention of doing so. It's strictly political. Anybody -
the
President, a Senator, a liberal - who is going to trash the Hubble
(because
it has no clear purpose) because he says we should go to the moon (did
Bush
ever say why exactly we should?) deserves to be lampooned.
Again, the original was Astronomy related. Your reply was not. That's
why
so many posters have reacted strongly to your opinion.

Joe




In article Al wrote:
Thanks for your support! It appears that the majority of this group is
liberal, and that's okay with me, as "some of my best friends are
liberal.":-) Nevertheless, it's okay for one of the liberals to poke fun
at
Bush or the administration. After all, "Bush Whacking" is good, clean
fun
and perfectly acceptable among liberals. However, if one has the
audacity
to poke fun back at the liberals, he is accused of having a low IQ, of
being
"not funny"...completely without humor, of being KKK material and of
being
racially slanderous. I really feel sorry for them...what will they do
when
dubya wins a second term?:-)

In article ,
Joe Bergeron wrote:

In article , Bob Schmall
wrote:

"French-looking"
"Jewish"
"Black"

What nationality are you? And don't say, "American."

He forgot the other candidate who will be in the race...the
simple-minded, ignorant, lying, simian-looking, clueless
figurehead...you know the guy I mean?

You're running for office?

ducks

In article ,
Joe Bergeron wrote:

In article , Bob Schmall
wrote:

"French-looking"
"Jewish"
"Black"

What nationality are you? And don't say, "American."

He forgot the other candidate who will be in the race...the
simple-minded, ignorant, lying, simian-looking, clueless
figurehead...you know the guy I mean?

You're running for office?

ducks