![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Last night, when I'd calmed down a bit, I had a mild flashback to STAR
TREK (which I loved) and AVATAR (which I haven't seen yet), and what they had in common: They could be hits or flops, nothing in between. Especially with all the money Cameron put into Avatar, if it wasn't the biggest movie ever (which it is) he'd be out of a job. Obama has taken a gamble of similar magnitude in space. Right now, administration officials and anti-NASA coolaid addicts are the only ones celebrating the end of Constellation. The mainstream media has been negative, with phrases like "end of an era" common. This story on Yahoo .... http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20100203/..._budget_impact ..... sums up the mood of a lot of people. And this says nothing of the fact that other governments are continuing manned programs while we, who wrote the book on it, are not. CATS cats may be celebrating, but in the real world, people are not. The only way to counter the negative coverage and for this to work out for Obama is for his plans -- assuming he gets them through Congress unaltered -- to deliver on everything and more. The commercial space taxis HAVE to be on time, at or below budget, and awesome looking, too. (If ULA et al know what's good for them, they'll have videos on Youtube within a month.) The talk of NASA still sending people beyond LEO HAS to pan out, with programs being spelled out. No way to get away with, "no we're researching this so it can be used someday." Uh-uh. And "re-vamping" KSC had bettern not include bulldozing LC39. Where's the Augustine commission's heavy lifter going to fly from without them? Unfortunately, the NASA budget page calls for RESEARCH into heavy lifter technology, not actually building one. I don't like the sound of that. Anything short of launching counts as staying grounded. So everything has to work out as advertised and more. Anything less is putting lipstick on a pig and calling it a supermodel. And given that Obama is already being compared to Jimmy Carter, another public relations disaster probably won't do him any good even if, by itself, it doesn't cost him the election (although Texas does have a lot of electoral votes, doesn't it; and Florida decided the 2000 election. Hmmmm). And the CATS cats who have been bashing NASA for years have to put up or shut up. If you don't live up to your own boasting, you'll look like idiots. No in-between, guys, sorry. If Obama's space plan isn't a hit, it will be a flop, and he'll probably spend the rest of his life explaining it. I won't vote for him next time, but I still hope he knows what he's doing. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Obama's Space Policy | LauraM | Policy | 147 | July 23rd 11 11:47 PM |
Barack Obama's Sense of Drift on Space Policy | Mark R. Whittington | Policy | 11 | March 18th 09 04:25 PM |
Barack Obama's Real Space Omission | Quadibloc | Policy | 85 | June 14th 08 09:18 AM |
huge cock big dicks,riding huge dick,free huge dick video | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | March 13th 08 06:40 PM |