Our Moon as BattleStar

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 02:52:37 GMT, (Rick Sobie) wrote:

In article , says...

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 01:39:39 GMT, (Rick Sobie) wrote:

In article , says...

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 15:42:21 GMT, (Rick Sobie) wrote:

In article , says...

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 05:53:58 GMT, (Rick Sobie) wrote:

In article , says...

(Rick Sobie) wrote:

If you are still in doubt that the moon does not rotate
on its axis, then take two plastic cups and see for
yourself.

So, you took two plastic cups of...what? Everclear? Castor oil?

What's its axis?



What's this? One of the on-board cabins number 139,999 has just come
vacant. That leaves a vacancy for the trip home. Feel free to
make suggestions as to who shouuld fill that spot. Jennifer Lopez?

I most heartily agree with that suggestion. All in favor say I. "I"
motion passed.

Terribly sorray old chap.

They can change their mind any time they want you know.




What you mean 'they' white man.

Troll! Your math is off.


You are assuming he was the last of the Mohicans.

I'm the Lone Ranger.


Say hello to Tonto for me.
And give Silver a sugar cube for me as well.

;-)

Okee dokee.

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 02:54:10 GMT, (Rick Sobie) wrote:

In article , says...

On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 17:00:14 GMT, The Ghost In The Machine
wrote:

In sci.physics, *

wrote
on Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:09:33 GMT
:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:03:32 -0500, "The Lord of the Rain\( Suresh
__NoJunkMail kumar\)" wrote:

The moon also a neat place to hide your ET saucer.

Maybe. Bear in mind we've photographed the far side
using satellites. Of course one can always cover it using
moondust-colored camo gear... :-)

Haha, first you have to beadle to fly it, and you can't. Geez, it takes
more than one telepath and they have to be mind synched.

Humans aren't capable.

I was trained to beadle. (I think)

You weren't. And It's be able. GaWd, PLZ deliver us from typo flambes.




hey, the moon has craters to seclude, every animal from every other animal.
-suresh

"Rick Sobie" wrote in message
news:1YoSb.330011$JQ1.286938@pd7tw1no...
In article ,
says...

how about the Moon as Noah's Arch?
-suresh


Well it ain't no Von Neuman Probe.
It is much too big to be a nanobot.

(Rick Sobie) wrote in message news:p5YTb.387431$JQ1.23585@pd7tw1no...
In article , says...

(Rick Sobie) wrote in message news:BdISb.335505$JQ1.42778@pd7tw1no...

For example some moons rotate one way and others rotate another
and still others like ours, doesn't rotate at all except
for around the earth. Which of course is unheard of anywhere else
in the known universe.

'Hell you talking about? Our moon does rotate, but is tidally
locked, so that its rotational & orbital periods are synchronised. And
it's not whatsoever the only such body to be so configured. There are
a number of other moons right here in this solar system which are
tidally locked with their larger massed so-called parent bodies. The
Moon is hardly unique in this respect.

-Mark Martin


You mean like this one...

http://www.astronomy.com/images/astr..._deathstar.jpg

It's a crater, dillweed, and it hasn't a thing to do with the fact
that tidal locking is a common consequence of orbital dynamics.

-Mark Martin

In article , says...

(Rick Sobie) wrote in message news:p5YTb.387431$JQ1.23585@pd7tw1no...
In article , says...

(Rick Sobie) wrote in message news:BdISb.335505$JQ1.42778@pd7tw1no...

For example some moons rotate one way and others rotate another
and still others like ours, doesn't rotate at all except
for around the earth. Which of course is unheard of anywhere else
in the known universe.

'Hell you talking about? Our moon does rotate, but is tidally
locked, so that its rotational & orbital periods are synchronised. And
it's not whatsoever the only such body to be so configured. There are
a number of other moons right here in this solar system which are
tidally locked with their larger massed so-called parent bodies. The
Moon is hardly unique in this respect.

-Mark Martin


Look I don't want to argue with any lower forms of life on this planet OK?

I know Steve has a battle planet, and I know Jonesy has a battle planet,
and unless the one above our heads belongs to David, then it must be mine.

Now I watched as David spinned the thing one full revolution right
after telling me he was about to. So I'm sorry but your gravlock
theory is just pure bunk.

The only thing in question here is who brought it through the worhole.

And as you can see by the work done at Naval Space Command to determine
this, the jury is still out.

Check out this Navy TYCHO link, where they discuss the wormholes
near Jupiter and Mars, at lagrangian points.

http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/trojan.html

Rick Sobie wrote:

In article , says...

(Rick Sobie) wrote in message news:p5YTb.387431$JQ1.23585@pd7tw1no...
In article , says...

(Rick Sobie) wrote in message news:BdISb.335505$JQ1.42778@pd7tw1no...

For example some moons rotate one way and others rotate another
and still others like ours, doesn't rotate at all except
for around the earth. Which of course is unheard of anywhere else
in the known universe.

'Hell you talking about? Our moon does rotate, but is tidally
locked, so that its rotational & orbital periods are synchronised. And
it's not whatsoever the only such body to be so configured. There are
a number of other moons right here in this solar system which are
tidally locked with their larger massed so-called parent bodies. The
Moon is hardly unique in this respect.

-Mark Martin

Look I don't want to argue with any lower forms of life on this planet OK?

I know Steve has a battle planet, and I know Jonesy has a battle planet,
and unless the one above our heads belongs to David, then it must be mine.

Now I watched as David spinned the thing one full revolution right
after telling me he was about to. So I'm sorry but your gravlock
theory is just pure bunk.

The only thing in question here is who brought it through the worhole.

And as you can see by the work done at Naval Space Command to determine
this, the jury is still out.

Check out this Navy TYCHO link, where they discuss the wormholes
near Jupiter and Mars, at lagrangian points.

http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/trojan.html

How the hell do you manage to feed yourself?

What were you smoking when you posted this?

(Rick Sobie) wrote in message news:_EwUb.408259$ts4.385677@pd7tw3no...
In article , says...

(Rick Sobie) wrote in message news:p5YTb.387431$JQ1.23585@pd7tw1no...
In article , says...

(Rick Sobie) wrote in message news:BdISb.335505$JQ1.42778@pd7tw1no...

For example some moons rotate one way and others rotate another
and still others like ours, doesn't rotate at all except
for around the earth. Which of course is unheard of anywhere else
in the known universe.

'Hell you talking about? Our moon does rotate, but is tidally
locked, so that its rotational & orbital periods are synchronised. And
it's not whatsoever the only such body to be so configured. There are
a number of other moons right here in this solar system which are
tidally locked with their larger massed so-called parent bodies. The
Moon is hardly unique in this respect.

-Mark Martin


Look I don't want to argue with any lower forms of life on this planet OK?

I know Steve has a battle planet, and I know Jonesy has a battle planet,
and unless the one above our heads belongs to David, then it must be mine.

Now I watched as David spinned the thing one full revolution right
after telling me he was about to. So I'm sorry but your gravlock
theory is just pure bunk.

The only thing in question here is who brought it through the worhole.

And as you can see by the work done at Naval Space Command to determine
this, the jury is still out.

Check out this Navy TYCHO link, where they discuss the wormholes
near Jupiter and Mars, at lagrangian points.

http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/trojan.html

On 5 Feb 2004 20:44:03 -0800, (M Fielding)
wrote:

What were you smoking when you posted this?


Rick's on a sort of natural high. Of course, mental health
workers have another term for it.





--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com

"You are the kook, not me - and I won't even bother to see
what that acronym means."
- Joseph Bartlo responds to IKYABWAI

On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 04:47:25 GMT, DrPostman wrote:

On 5 Feb 2004 20:44:03 -0800, (M Fielding)
wrote:

What were you smoking when you posted this?


Rick's on a sort of natural high. Of course, mental health
workers have another term for it.

Psychological operative.

On 5 Feb 2004 20:44:03 -0800, (M Fielding) wrote:

What were you smoking when you posted this?

'sobie' is one of the nyms the psychological operatives use in the aliens
newsgroups.

On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 04:51:05 GMT, * wrote:

On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 04:47:25 GMT, DrPostman wrote:

On 5 Feb 2004 20:44:03 -0800, (M Fielding)
wrote:

What were you smoking when you posted this?


Rick's on a sort of natural high. Of course, mental health
workers have another term for it.

Psychological operative.


Not when it comes to fag hags like you, and Rick.





--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com

"You are the kook, not me - and I won't even bother to see
what that acronym means."
- Joseph Bartlo responds to IKYABWAI