The hot rocks of Venus, looking intelligent

BradGuth wrote:
Whenever sharing science and honest notions about our moon or
Venus, it's almost exactly as though we're not being told the
whole truth and nothing but the truth about much of anything these
days. Talk about revising history, science and a whole lot more,
whereas those hot rocks of Venus that just so happen to look as
though having been arranged so gosh darn unusually intelligent, are
most likely still there to behold, and we've had the technology for
having taken a much closer look-see for better than a decade.

This observationology of image interpretation isn't the least bit
hocus-pocus phony, nor is it having any ulterior motives or hidden
agenda like our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s), or even hot-war(s)
over fossil and yellowcake energy as of lately, and there's nothing
but an all around win-win for science and humanity if in fact any
of those hot rocks of Venus are actually of those modified and/or
having been put into good use by intelligent other life. At least
there's nothing about surviving Venus that's technically all that
insurmountable, that is unless you're not quite half as smart as a
hot rock.

The official NASA/Magellan image of a GIF format, as being that which
offers a 36 look per pixel composite as having been given essentially
the benefit of those 36 confirming radar looks per each pixel, is by
itself worthy of getting our consideration for all kinds of honest
reasons besides those extremely interesting patterns of whatever's
interpreting as so AI/(intelligent/artificial), as opposed to all of
the perfectly natural appearing items that are of equally outstanding
planetology, such as their absolutely impressive FLUID ARCH.

The bigger question of the day is; Does anyone within Google/NOVA's
usenetland of such all-knowing wizards care to discuss/review the long
and growing list of what-ifs? (after all, for all we know those hot-
foot Venusians could even be of a Zion/semitic faith)

For a topic starter, we are obviously not talking about any such cool
and wet Earth like polluted environment, or even as to that of our
local naked orbiting mascon and somewhat salty moon, nor of any such
planetology that's dead and nearly frozen to the core likes of Mars,
or of whatever's so much further away. At times Venus is actually
crusing extremely nearby (a little over 100X the distance of our moon),
and it's absolutely chuck full of its very own geothermal cache of raw
energy that's sharing a surface of 20.5 w/m2 (roughly 256 fold greater
than Earth), that which only a born-again dork of a naysayer like most
of our usenet anti-think-tank rusemasters couldn't possibly appreciate.

Why exclude the unknown simply because it's unknown? In other words,
most likely your whole intellectual mindset worth of whatever's
supposedly so much wiser and thus greater than what most of us can
muster, that's simply faith-based obligated on behalf of what has to
go out of its infomercial spewing way in order to exclude upon any
such off-world intelligent other life, regardless of whatever's the
applied technology, or even to banish anything that's of off-world
intelligent potential regardless of whatever's the viable alternative
planetology and of its local evolution, of which yourself, others and
even I know absolutely nothing objective about, is what seems a bit
anti-research or just downright counter-productive.

If at all possible, please do further share your review as to those
very intelligent and/or rational community looking items, as if
somehow those were being purely natural, by way of offering us some
other image examples, as to sharing in where such a rational complex
community looking group of planetology considerations are otherwise
to be found within common/terrestrial planetology w/o AI benefit of
whatever intelligent life accomplished, such as right here on Earth
should offer. For one basic observationology argument example; How
many complex looking tarmacs are there on Earth that had absolutely
nothing whatsoever of AI to do with their having been created or
otherwise crafted/modified for their rational use by intelligent life?

Thanks once again to our once upon a time "tomcat", for his once
having posted a link to this updated page of Venus images.
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting AI worthy information can be found
within image No.17 from the top left, as being the 225 m/pixel
composite frame of such radar obtained pixels that so happens to
include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex community
of 'GUTH Venus', of which you should apply your very own PhotoShop/
resampling enlargement of at least 3X, along with whatever unsharp
mask filter plus other image cleaning or worthy treatment options
you'd care to apply. Remember that a purely negative or naysay
mindset of a true rusemaster simply can't accomplish such PhotoShop
enlargements without knowingly making the image look worse off than
it really is.
"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles,Venusfrom Magellan Cycle 1"
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/ht...115s095_1.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif

If you still can not find this community of interesting pixels, then
you are not nearly as good at observationology as you think you are.
- Brad Guth -


Ever take notice how the usenet borg collective backs itself way the
hell off from a given topic, such as whenever we catch them red-handed
and/or brown-=nosed with their phony (pretend atheist) faith-based
pants all the way down?

Apparently their Yiddish nose browning is priority No.1 in usenet
naysayville, and secondly is their infowar/infomercial spewing
regardless of the consequences and without a speck of remorse for
whatever's the collateral damage or carnage of the innocent, and
typically these very same folks never give a tinkers damn as to how
bloody or spendy energy gets. (go figure otherwise)

Meanwhile, we have an extremely interesting and most likely
intelligent and rational looking items of whatever's existing/
coexisting on Venus, that has been recorded by way of radar imaging
and as such is about as good and trustworthy of what such image pixels
can offer, yet it's still being treated as taboo/nondisclosure rated,
as is the ESA Venus Express PFS data being kept in stealth (aka need-
to-know) status.

BTW, the ongoing rusemaster expertise of usenet robo word tagging with
whatever's before of after a given key word or link isn't going
unnoticed, or under appreciated by those few of us attempting to share
the whole truth and nothing but the truth, as always based upon the
regular laws of physics and otherwise supported from the best
available science that's independently replicated via peers of the
honest kind.
- Brad Guth -

Why exactly is our resident spook/mole "MI5 Persecution" getting so
gosh darn upset, as in going Usenet robo-posting postal (aka, bent out
of shape) about the sorts of good and decent folks sharing perfectly
honest ideas along with the best available whole truth and nothing but
the truth?

- Brad Guth


On Nov 6 2007, 10:46 am, BradGuth wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
Whenever sharing science and honest notions about our moon or
Venus, it's almost exactly as though we're not being told the
whole truth and nothing but the truth about much of anything these
days. Talk about revising history, science and a whole lot more,
whereas thosehotrocksofVenusthat just so happen to look as
though having been arranged so gosh darn unusually intelligent, are
most likely still there to behold, and we've had the technology for
having taken a much closer look-see for better than a decade.

This observationology of image interpretation isn't the least bit
hocus-pocus phony, nor is it having any ulterior motives or hidden
agenda like our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s), or evenhot-war(s)
over fossil and yellowcake energy as of lately, and there's nothing
but an all around win-win for science and humanity if in fact any
of thosehotrocksofVenusare actually of those modified and/or
having been put into good use by intelligent other life. At least
there's nothing about survivingVenusthat's technically all that
insurmountable, that is unless you're not quite half as smart as a
hotrock.

The official NASA/Magellan image of a GIF format, as being that which
offers a 36 look per pixel composite as having been given essentially
the benefit of those 36 confirming radar looks per each pixel, is by
itself worthy of getting our consideration for all kinds of honest
reasons besides those extremely interesting patterns of whatever's
interpreting as so AI/(intelligent/artificial), as opposed to all of
the perfectly natural appearing items that are of equally outstanding
planetology, such as their absolutely impressive FLUID ARCH.

The bigger question of the day is; Does anyone within Google/NOVA's
usenetland of such all-knowing wizards care to discuss/review the long
and growing list of what-ifs? (after all, for all we know thosehot-
foot Venusians could even be of a Zion/semitic faith)

For a topic starter, we are obviously not talking about any such cool
and wet Earth like polluted environment, or even as to that of our
local naked orbiting mascon and somewhat salty moon, nor of any such
planetology that's dead and nearly frozen to the core likes of Mars,
or of whatever's so much further away. At timesVenusis actually
crusing extremely nearby (a little over 100X the distance of our moon),
and it's absolutely chuck full of its very own geothermal cache of raw
energy that's sharing a surface of 20.5 w/m2 (roughly 256 fold greater
than Earth), that which only a born-again dork of a naysayer like most
of our usenet anti-think-tank rusemasters couldn't possibly appreciate.

Why exclude the unknown simply because it's unknown? In other words,
most likely your whole intellectual mindset worth of whatever's
supposedly so much wiser and thus greater than what most of us can
muster, that's simply faith-based obligated on behalf of what has to
go out of its infomercial spewing way in order to exclude upon any
such off-world intelligent other life, regardless of whatever's the
applied technology, or even to banish anything that's of off-world
intelligent potential regardless of whatever's the viable alternative
planetology and of its local evolution, of which yourself, others and
even I know absolutely nothing objective about, is what seems a bit
anti-research or just downright counter-productive.

If at all possible, please do further share your review as to those
very intelligent and/or rational community looking items, as if
somehow those were being purely natural, by way of offering us some
other image examples, as to sharing in where such a rational complex
community looking group of planetology considerations are otherwise
to be found within common/terrestrial planetology w/o AI benefit of
whatever intelligent life accomplished, such as right here on Earth
should offer. For one basic observationology argument example; How
many complex looking tarmacs are there on Earth that had absolutely
nothing whatsoever of AI to do with their having been created or
otherwise crafted/modified for their rational use by intelligent life?

Thanks once again to our once upon a time "tomcat", for his once
having posted a link to this updated page ofVenusimages.
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting AI worthy information can be found
within image No.17 from the top left, as being the 225 m/pixel
composite frame of such radar obtained pixels that so happens to
include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex community
of 'GUTHVenus', of which you should apply your very own PhotoShop/
resampling enlargement of at least 3X, along with whatever unsharp
mask filter plus other image cleaning or worthy treatment options
you'd care to apply. Remember that a purely negative or naysay
mindset of a true rusemaster simply can't accomplish such PhotoShop
enlargements without knowingly making the image look worse off than
it really is.
"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles,Venusfrom Magellan Cycle 1"
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/ht...115s095_1.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif

If you still can not find this community of interesting pixels, then
you are not nearly as good at observationology as you think you are.
- Brad Guth -

Ever take notice how the usenet borg collective backs itself way the
hell off from a given topic, such as whenever we catch them red-handed
and/or brown-=nosed with their phony (pretend atheist) faith-based
pants all the way down?

Apparently their Yiddish nose browning is priority No.1 in usenet
naysayville, and secondly is their infowar/infomercial spewing
regardless of the consequences and without a speck of remorse for
whatever's the collateral damage or carnage of the innocent, and
typically these very same folks never give a tinkers damn as to how
bloody or spendy energy gets. (go figure otherwise)

Meanwhile, we have an extremely interesting and most likely
intelligent and rational looking items of whatever's existing/
coexisting onVenus, that has been recorded by way of radar imaging
and as such is about as good and trustworthy of what such image pixels
can offer, yet it's still being treated as taboo/nondisclosure rated,
as is the ESAVenusExpress PFS data being kept in stealth (aka need-
to-know) status.

BTW, the ongoing rusemaster expertise of usenet robo word tagging with
whatever's before of after a given key word or link isn't going
unnoticed, or under appreciated by those few of us attempting to share
the whole truth and nothing but the truth, as always based upon the
regular laws of physics and otherwise supported from the best
available science that's independently replicated via peers of the
honest kind.
- Brad Guth -

Why doesn't the toasty environment of Venus have more than its fair
share of local/renewable energy?

It seems only entirely logical that the local energy that's mostly
geothermal of Venus is nearly unlimited, and as such what can't be
accomplished (with or w/o The Ove Glove)?

- Brad Guth

On Nov 6 2007, 10:46 am, BradGuth wrote:
BradGuth wrote:
Whenever sharing science and honest notions about our moon or
Venus, it's almost exactly as though we're not being told the
whole truth and nothing but the truth about much of anything these
days. Talk about revising history, science and a whole lot more,
whereas those hot rocks of Venus that just so happen to look as
though having been arranged so gosh darn unusually intelligent, are
most likely still there to behold, and we've had the technology for
having taken a much closer look-see for better than a decade.

This observationology of image interpretation isn't the least bit
hocus-pocus phony, nor is it having any ulterior motives or hidden
agenda like our mutually perpetrated cold-war(s), or even hot-war(s)
over fossil and yellowcake energy as of lately, and there's nothing
but an all around win-win for science and humanity if in fact any
of those hot rocks of Venus are actually of those modified and/or
having been put into good use by intelligent other life. At least
there's nothing about surviving Venus that's technically all that
insurmountable, that is unless you're not quite half as smart as a
hot rock.

The official NASA/Magellan image of a GIF format, as being that which
offers a 36 look per pixel composite as having been given essentially
the benefit of those 36 confirming radar looks per each pixel, is by
itself worthy of getting our consideration for all kinds of honest
reasons besides those extremely interesting patterns of whatever's
interpreting as so AI/(intelligent/artificial), as opposed to all of
the perfectly natural appearing items that are of equally outstanding
planetology, such as their absolutely impressive FLUID ARCH.

The bigger question of the day is; Does anyone within Google/NOVA's
usenetland of such all-knowing wizards care to discuss/review the long
and growing list of what-ifs? (after all, for all we know those hot-
foot Venusians could even be of a Zion/semitic faith)

For a topic starter, we are obviously not talking about any such cool
and wet Earth like polluted environment, or even as to that of our
local naked orbiting mascon and somewhat salty moon, nor of any such
planetology that's dead and nearly frozen to the core likes of Mars,
or of whatever's so much further away. At times Venus is actually
crusing extremely nearby (a little over 100X the distance of our moon),
and it's absolutely chuck full of its very own geothermal cache of raw
energy that's sharing a surface of 20.5 w/m2 (roughly 256 fold greater
than Earth), that which only a born-again dork of a naysayer like most
of our usenet anti-think-tank rusemasters couldn't possibly appreciate.

Why exclude the unknown simply because it's unknown? In other words,
most likely your whole intellectual mindset worth of whatever's
supposedly so much wiser and thus greater than what most of us can
muster, that's simply faith-based obligated on behalf of what has to
go out of its infomercial spewing way in order to exclude upon any
such off-world intelligent other life, regardless of whatever's the
applied technology, or even to banish anything that's of off-world
intelligent potential regardless of whatever's the viable alternative
planetology and of its local evolution, of which yourself, others and
even I know absolutely nothing objective about, is what seems a bit
anti-research or just downright counter-productive.

If at all possible, please do further share your review as to those
very intelligent and/or rational community looking items, as if
somehow those were being purely natural, by way of offering us some
other image examples, as to sharing in where such a rational complex
community looking group of planetology considerations are otherwise
to be found within common/terrestrial planetology w/o AI benefit of
whatever intelligent life accomplished, such as right here on Earth
should offer. For one basic observationology argument example; How
many complex looking tarmacs are there on Earth that had absolutely
nothing whatsoever of AI to do with their having been created or
otherwise crafted/modified for their rational use by intelligent life?

Thanks once again to our once upon a time "tomcat", for his once
having posted a link to this updated page of Venus images.
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/th...humbnails.html

Some of the most interesting AI worthy information can be found
within image No.17 from the top left, as being the 225 m/pixel
composite frame of such radar obtained pixels that so happens to
include the robust, rather sizable and somewhat complex community
of 'GUTH Venus', of which you should apply your very own PhotoShop/
resampling enlargement of at least 3X, along with whatever unsharp
mask filter plus other image cleaning or worthy treatment options
you'd care to apply. Remember that a purely negative or naysay
mindset of a true rusemaster simply can't accomplish such PhotoShop
enlargements without knowingly making the image look worse off than
it really is.
"Lava channels, Lo Shen Valles,Venusfrom Magellan Cycle 1"
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/ht...115s095_1.html
http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/imgcat/hi...c115s095_1.gif

If you still can not find this community of interesting pixels, then
you are not nearly as good at observationology as you think you are.
- Brad Guth -

Ever take notice how the usenet borg collective backs itself way the
hell off from a given topic, such as whenever we catch them red-handed
and/or brown-=nosed with their phony (pretend atheist) faith-based
pants all the way down?

Apparently their Yiddish nose browning is priority No.1 in usenet
naysayville, and secondly is their infowar/infomercial spewing
regardless of the consequences and without a speck of remorse for
whatever's the collateral damage or carnage of the innocent, and
typically these very same folks never give a tinkers damn as to how
bloody or spendy energy gets. (go figure otherwise)

Meanwhile, we have an extremely interesting and most likely
intelligent and rational looking items of whatever's existing/
coexisting on Venus, that has been recorded by way of radar imaging
and as such is about as good and trustworthy of what such image pixels
can offer, yet it's still being treated as taboo/nondisclosure rated,
as is the ESA Venus Express PFS data being kept in stealth (aka need-
to-know) status.

BTW, the ongoing rusemaster expertise of usenet robo word tagging with
whatever's before of after a given key word or link isn't going
unnoticed, or under appreciated by those few of us attempting to share
the whole truth and nothing but the truth, as always based upon the
regular laws of physics and otherwise supported from the best
available science that's independently replicated via peers of the
honest kind.
- Brad Guth -

Venus is still looking as though intelligent souls have been hard at
work, and to think that on Venus there's no shortage of easily
obtainable and fully renewable energy.

It's almost as though our NASA and of those continually butt-sucking
up to their pretend atheists mindset are still pulling out all the
usual faith-based stops, trying to avoid Venus in very much the same
as having avoided our physically dark and nasty moon.

- Brad Guth