![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?art...4583414B7F0000
"One of the most intriguing mysteries in physics is the "Pioneer anomaly," the slowing down of two spacecraft by an unknown force. NASA launched Pioneer 10 and 11 in 1972 and 1973, respectively, and the craft returned stunning images of Jupiter and Saturn. But as both spacecraft continued their voyages at speeds of roughly 27,000 miles per hour, astronomer John Anderson of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory in Pasadena, Calif., noticed anomalies in telemetry data dating from as far back as 1980. With continued analysis, researchers determined that the spacecraft had been slowing down at a constant rate: each year they fell 8,000 miles short of their calculated positions. The strange behavior sparked several theories, but the lack of data made culling the ideas difficult. Now a proposal to analyze telemetry from the early years could literally point toward the correct explanation. "The most obvious theory was that something on the spacecraft themselves created a braking force--leaking gas or heat radiation, perhaps. Over the years, however, researchers increasingly viewed this hypothesis as less likely, and some physicists began to explore possible flaws in Newton's laws and relativity. Others posited that dark matter was the culprit: it might exert a gravitational or drag force. A third theory embraces the idea that a minute acceleration exists in the velocity of light, which might result in the appearance that the probes are slowing down: if light travels faster, telemetry signals arrive faster, and the craft seem to be closer. "Anderson and theorist Michael M. Nieto of Los Alamos National Laboratory have proposed a way to filter the ideas, noting the interesting fact that the direction of the anomalous force would be different for each theory. If the force points toward the sun, then it should be a gravitational effect. If it points toward Earth, it should be an anomaly relating to the velocity of light. If it points in the direction of motion, it should be a drag force or a modification of inertia. And finally, if it points along the spin axis of the probes, it should indicate a force generated by the craft. ..." (Alexander Hellemans, "A Force to Reckon With: What applied the brakes on Pioneer 10 and 11? ", Scientific American, 10 October 1995) Where's *your* money, ladies and gentlemen? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
30 Years of Pioneer Spacecraft Data Rescued: The Planetary Society Enables Study of the Mysterious Pioneer Anomaly | [email protected] | News | 0 | June 6th 06 05:35 PM |
New Horizon pluto mission might investigate Pioneer 10 anomaly | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | November 6th 05 06:43 AM |
Pioneer anomaly x disappears.!! | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | October 29th 05 10:16 AM |
Pioneer anomaly x disappears.!! | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 29th 05 10:16 AM |