Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7

Negating Plate Tectonics - Strike 7

THE TROUBLE WITH RUBBLE

The Subduction Zone. They call it a 'slab' . I mean, ..how dopey can
you get? A slab of rubble - falling off the back of a truck pulls the
prime mover right up over the front end of the tray and off the back
end?

Or if you were building a house and contracted your foundation slab
from Plate Tectonics Ltd, and they came along and dumped a heap of
rubble about 200km thick in your back yard, .. still pulsing with
earthquakes, and told you it was coherent and competent enough to fall
through the mantle if you liked, ..AND pull half of the Earth surface
down with it, ..wouldn't you think they were just a mob of pullers,
...and ask for your money back?

Or would you feel ok and take their advice when they said, .."Well,
...we'll dump it in the sea for you, right there. How would that be,
Sir?"

And that's just the rubble of the subduction zone. That's not counting
all the rubble that happened at the ridge and getting it over there.
How does Plate Tectonics work as a heap of rubble - 100-200km thick?
http://users.indigo.net.au/don/abstr...verriding.html

Why hasn't physics had something to say about this nonsense (spouted
ever since records?) Because they've had the support of a worldful of
geologists who know what they're talking about? Or Wot?

(Thick as two timbers. I tell you...)