|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#42
March 27th 06, 03:14 PM
posted to comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
OS/2 word processor: Describe
Raving Loonie writes:
writes: Raving Loonie wrote: Double-A wrote: ah wrote: Double-A wrote: Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote: Martin T wrote: off topic Figures. Irrelevant, given that I never said that you did say that, Tholen. In fact, responding has never been the issue. Rather, enduring has been the issue. Classic evasion. Unfortunatly his exactly like Eliza (that early computer AI inspired software who tries, poorly, to emulate a human conversation) -- he can't help him self -- he will never stop responding to such conversations. Michael Baldwin Bruce is hardly "exactly like Eliza", Törnsten. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Tholen? Classic erroneous presupposition. Someone had once an a good idea to make a Usenet version of ELIZA and try that on him. Anything to keep Michael Baldwin Bruce occupied and entertained. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Non sequitur. What does this have to do with OS/2, Tholen? That would make possible some very intresting human behavior experiment. As if Michael Baldwin Bruce's behavior isn't already a very interesting experiment. It's more of your classic evasion, Tholen. Illogical, Tholen, and rather ironic, coming from the person who has tholed more, using your concept of the term. My own guess would be that Tholen would "win" (computer die before he stops responding). What you guess is irrelevant, Törnsten. On what basis do you speak for everybody around here, Tholen? What you think is irrelevant, Tholen. Touche! Illogical, given that I didn't say anything about what I think, Bruce. Brilliant! Just brilliant, Martin! Illogical, given that I didn't say anything about what I think, Bruce. You make Dickless look the fool that he is. Who is "Dickless", Bruce? There is no such person involved in the discussion. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems? Thank you for posting to alt.astronomy, Dr. Tholen. It was Michael Baldwin Bruce who chose to add that irrelevant newsgroup to the distribution. An update on your studies of asteroids near the Sun would always be welcome here. I do not subscribe to alt.astronomy. Well, don't just re-buff the Man, Tholen! Dr. Tholen has made many discoveries in astronomy. He would have much to offer an astronomy group if he wanted to. I subscribe to sci.astro, which is an astronomy group. But it seems that when he gets on Usenet, he just wants to fool around. What seems to you is irrelevant, Double-A. The fact is that I don't fool around at all. I do stand my ground against antagonists like Michael Baldwin Bruce. It was Michael Baldwin Bruce who was doing the fooling around, trolling in a thread about colored text in DeScribe. Maybe that's how he blows off steam. Maybe not. Trout 'tickling' ... Key words: "He blows" ! Non sequitur. If I wanted any lip off you, I'd wipe it off of Bruce's zipper! What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe? Orbes volantes exstare. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Those who claim that 'alien abductions' are real, make some very "non sequitur" assertions. Is that why you just made a non sequitur assertion, Loonie? Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. .. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. [posted from alt.astronomy] Irrelevant; what is relevant is what it was posted *to*. Wrong, Tholen. It does matter what group it's posted from. Non sequitur. Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. It affects which group of a crossposted message the reader is directed to when he/she/it does a seach of the Google archive. [ *maybe*] ... Different news groups can have different thread contents. sticks tongue out as way of showing "mock" insult and signalling victory Still non sequitur. Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Ignored, by way of being irrelevent. Illogical, given that you responded to it, Loonie. Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Wait a minute! ... T'is relevent, too. What does your inability to make up your mind have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. sticks tongue out as way of showing insult What does your insult have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Tautological. That which is non sequitur, is irrelevant. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Note: still no response. Quid nunc? What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Are you on automatic mindlessness in these responses; doing something like tapping your fingers whilst reading a journal article; or is there a more interesting signal buried in your responses. I see that you didn't answer the question, Loonie. No surprise there, really. Note: no response. I get the distinct impression that I'm just shooting the breeze below the noise threshold. Your impression is irrelevant, Loonie. I see that you still haven't answered the question, Loonie. No surprise there, really. Note: no response. Frankly, the null hypothesis is looking more and more attractive! What does the null hypothesis have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Read any good articles lately? What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? What am I missing, here. The subject of the thread, Loonie. ??????????????? What do your question marks have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? 
|
|
#43
March 27th 06, 04:11 PM
posted to comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
OS/2 word processor: Describe
wrote:
Raving Loonie writes: writes: Raving Loonie wrote: Double-A wrote: ah wrote: Double-A wrote: Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote: Martin T wrote: off topic Figures. Irrelevant, given that I never said that you didsay that, Tholen. In fact, responding has never been the issue. Rather, enduring has been the issue. Classic evasion. Unfortunatly his exactly like Eliza (that early computer AI inspired software who tries, poorly, to emulate a humanconversation) -- he can't help him self -- he will never stop responding to such conversations. Michael Baldwin Bruce is hardly "exactly like Eliza", Törnsten. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Tholen? Classic erroneous presupposition. Someone had once an a good idea to make a Usenet version of ELIZA and try that on him. Anything to keep Michael Baldwin Bruce occupiedand entertained. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Non sequitur. What does this have to do with OS/2, Tholen? That would make possible some very intresting human behavior experiment. As if Michael Baldwin Bruce's behavior isn't already a very interesting experiment. It's more of your classic evasion, Tholen. Illogical, Tholen, and rather ironic, coming from the person who has tholed more, using your concept of the term. My own guess would be that Tholen would "win" (computer die before he stops responding). What you guess is irrelevant, Törnsten. On what basis do you speak for everybody around here, Tholen? What you think is irrelevant, Tholen. Touche! Illogical, given that I didn't say anything about what I think, Bruce. Brilliant! Just brilliant, Martin! Illogical, given that I didn't say anything about what I think, Bruce. You make Dickless look the fool that he is. Who is "Dickless", Bruce? There is no such personinvolved in the discussion. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems? Thank you for posting to alt.astronomy, Dr. Tholen. It was Michael Baldwin Bruce who chose to add that irrelevant newsgroup to the distribution. An update on your studies of asteroids near the Sunwould always be welcome here. I do not subscribe to alt.astronomy. Well, don't just re-buff the Man, Tholen! Dr. Tholen has made many discoveries in astronomy. Hewould have much to offer an astronomy group if he wanted to. I subscribe to sci.astro, which is an astronomy group. But it seems that when he gets on Usenet, he just wants to fool around. What seems to you is irrelevant, Double-A. The fact isthat I don't fool around at all. I do stand my ground against antagonists like Michael Baldwin Bruce. It was Michael Baldwin Bruce who was doing the fooling around, trolling in a thread about colored text in DeScribe. Maybe that's how he blows off steam. Maybe not. Trout 'tickling' ... Key words: "He blows" ! Non sequitur. If I wanted any lip off you, I'd wipe it off of Bruce's zipper! What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe? Orbes volantes exstare. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Those who claim that 'alien abductions' are real, make some very "non sequitur" assertions. Is that why you just made a non sequitur assertion, Loonie? Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. .. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. [posted from alt.astronomy] Irrelevant; what is relevant is what it was posted *to*. Wrong, Tholen. It does matter what group it's posted from. Non sequitur. Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. It affects which group of a crossposted message the reader is directed to when he/she/it does a seach of the Google archive. [ *maybe*] ... Different news groups can have different thread contents. sticks tongue out as way of showing "mock" insult and signalling victory Still non sequitur. Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Ignored, by way of being irrelevent. Illogical, given that you responded to it, Loonie. Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Wait a minute! ... T'is relevent, too. What does your inability to make up your mind have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. sticks tongue out as way of showing insult What does your insult have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Tautological. That which is non sequitur, is irrelevant. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Note: still no response. Quid nunc? What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Are you on automatic mindlessness in these responses; doing something like tapping your fingers whilst reading a journal article; or is there a more interesting signal buried in your responses. I see that you didn't answer the question, Loonie. No surprise there, really. Note: no response. I get the distinct impression that I'm just shooting the breeze below the noise threshold. Your impression is irrelevant, Loonie. I see that you still haven't answered the question, Loonie. No surprise there, really. Note: no response. Frankly, the null hypothesis is looking more and more attractive! What does the null hypothesis have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Read any good articles lately? What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? What am I missing, here. The subject of the thread, Loonie. ??????????????? What do your question marks have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Yes, I know that, " Note: no response. " pattern. You emphasized it deliberately in your earlier response. Thus, I concluded that I wasn't seeking some ghostly, meaningless message below the noise floor. If that had been such' I would have expected your response to be deliberately more random. I certainly don't "think" that you are mindless about it; notwithstanding that 'mindlessness' could be the mindfull message. The question that I asked was a wishful, rhetorical one. I expected you to respond with further clues; yet also to appreciate that I was asking a rhetorical qurestion in an open manner. Thus, you could hardly be more obivious in your clue, aside from repeating the same pattern for a response, herein. Give me a while to "think about it", eh. Your message could be one of dumb, bloody mindedness. ... That would be an unfortunate thing for me to accept; albeit that I am prepared to do so. Nevertheless; should 'dumb, bloody mindedness', or the set of inferences that fall in that category; be so .... ... it would indicate: 1) You are are exceedingly, cynical ... ... and/or... ( and I don't even know if such is inclusive or exclusive ) 2) You are being very boring about it. If either or both of these 2 inferences were so; it would sadden me. And yes; I am assuming responses of the form ... "Note: no response." "What you ...*... is irrelevant" "Classic erroneous presupposition" ... and/or in conjunction with other common reiterations. Cordially, RL
|
|
#44
March 27th 06, 04:59 PM
posted to comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
OS/2 word processor: Describe
Raving Loonie writes:
writes: Raving Loonie wrote: Double-A wrote: ah wrote: Double-A wrote: Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote: Martin T wrote: off topic Figures. Irrelevant, given that I never said that you did say that, Tholen. In fact, responding has never been the issue. Rather, enduring has been the issue. Classic evasion. Unfortunatly his exactly like Eliza (that early computer AI inspired software who tries, poorly, to emulate a human conversation) -- he can't help him self -- he will never stop responding to such conversations. Michael Baldwin Bruce is hardly "exactly like Eliza", Törnsten. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Tholen? Classic erroneous presupposition. Someone had once an a good idea to make a Usenet version of ELIZA and try that on him. Anything to keep Michael Baldwin Bruce occupied and entertained. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Non sequitur. What does this have to do with OS/2, Tholen? That would make possible some very intresting human behavior experiment. As if Michael Baldwin Bruce's behavior isn't already a very interesting experiment. It's more of your classic evasion, Tholen. Illogical, Tholen, and rather ironic, coming from the person who has tholed more, using your concept of the term. My own guess would be that Tholen would "win" (computer die before he stops responding). What you guess is irrelevant, Törnsten. On what basis do you speak for everybody around here, Tholen? What you think is irrelevant, Tholen. Touche! Illogical, given that I didn't say anything about what I think, Bruce. Brilliant! Just brilliant, Martin! Illogical, given that I didn't say anything about what I think, Bruce. You make Dickless look the fool that he is. Who is "Dickless", Bruce? There is no such person involved in the discussion. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems? Thank you for posting to alt.astronomy, Dr. Tholen. It was Michael Baldwin Bruce who chose to add that irrelevant newsgroup to the distribution. An update on your studies of asteroids near the Sun would always be welcome here. I do not subscribe to alt.astronomy. Well, don't just re-buff the Man, Tholen! Dr. Tholen has made many discoveries in astronomy. He would have much to offer an astronomy group if he wanted to. I subscribe to sci.astro, which is an astronomy group. But it seems that when he gets on Usenet, he just wants to fool around. What seems to you is irrelevant, Double-A. The fact is that I don't fool around at all. I do stand my ground against antagonists like Michael Baldwin Bruce. It was Michael Baldwin Bruce who was doing the fooling around, trolling in a thread about colored text in DeScribe. Maybe that's how he blows off steam. Maybe not. Trout 'tickling' ... Key words: "He blows" ! Non sequitur. If I wanted any lip off you, I'd wipe it off of Bruce's zipper! What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe? Orbes volantes exstare. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Those who claim that 'alien abductions' are real, make some very "non sequitur" assertions. Is that why you just made a non sequitur assertion, Loonie? Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. .. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. [posted from alt.astronomy] Irrelevant; what is relevant is what it was posted *to*. Wrong, Tholen. It does matter what group it's posted from. Non sequitur. Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. It affects which group of a crossposted message the reader is directed to when he/she/it does a seach of the Google archive. [ *maybe*] ... Different news groups can have different thread contents. sticks tongue out as way of showing "mock" insult and signalling victory Still non sequitur. Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Ignored, by way of being irrelevent. Illogical, given that you responded to it, Loonie. Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Wait a minute! ... T'is relevent, too. What does your inability to make up your mind have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. sticks tongue out as way of showing insult What does your insult have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Tautological. That which is non sequitur, is irrelevant. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Quid nunc? What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Are you on automatic mindlessness in these responses; doing something like tapping your fingers whilst reading a journal article; or is there a more interesting signal buried in your responses. I see that you didn't answer the question, Loonie. No surprise there, really. Note: no response. Note: still no response. I get the distinct impression that I'm just shooting the breeze below the noise threshold Your impression is irrelevant, Loonie. I see that you still haven't answered the question, Loonie. No surprise there, really. Note: no response. Note: still no response. Frankly, the null hypothesis is looking more and more attractive! What does the null hypothesis have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Note: still no response. Read any good articles lately? What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? What am I missing, here. The subject of the thread, Loonie. Note: no response. ??????????????? What do your question marks have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Yes, I know that, " Note: no response. " pattern. You emphasized it deliberately in your earlier response. Thus, I concluded that I wasn't seeking some ghostly, meaningless message below the noise floor. If that had been such' I would have expected your response to be deliberately more random. I certainly don't "think" that you are mindless about it; notwithstanding that 'mindlessness' could be the mindfull message. I see that you didn't answer the question, Loonie. No surprise there, really. The question that I asked was a wishful, rhetorical one. I expected you to respond with further clues; yet also to appreciate that I was asking a rhetorical qurestion in an open manner. I see that you still didn't answer the question, Loonie. No surprise there, really. Thus, you could hardly be more obivious in your clue, aside from repeating the same pattern for a response, herein. I see that you still didn't answer the question, Loonie. No surprise there, really. Give me a while to "think about it", eh. Your message could be one of dumb, bloody mindedness. ... That would be an unfortunate thing for me to accept; albeit that I am prepared to do so. I see that you still didn't answer the question, Loonie. No surprise there, really. Nevertheless; should 'dumb, bloody mindedness', or the set of inferences that fall in that category; be so .... ... it would indicate: I see that you still didn't answer the question, Loonie. No surprise there, really. 1) You are are exceedingly, cynical ... ... and/or... ( and I don't even know if such is inclusive or exclusive ) 2) You are being very boring about it. Classic erroneous presupposition that those are the only two possibilities. If either or both of these 2 inferences were so; it would sadden me. What does your potential sadness have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? And yes; I am assuming responses of the form ... "Note: no response." "What you ...*... is irrelevant" "Classic erroneous presupposition" ... and/or in conjunction with other common reiterations. What does your assumption have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie?
|
|
#45
March 27th 06, 09:56 PM
posted to comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
OS/2 word processor: Describe
|
|
#46
March 28th 06, 01:46 AM
posted to comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
OS/2 word processor: Describe
Raving Loonie writes:
I see that you still didn't answer the question, Loonie. No surprise there, really. Note: no response. 1) You are are exceedingly, cynical ... ... and/or... ( and I don't even know if such is inclusive or exclusive ) 2) You are being very boring about it. ------------------------------------------------------------ I did not presuppose *only* two possibilities; more accurately; I expressed two possibilites. For myself, the distinction, between "assumed" and "emphasized" is neither obscure; nor frivolous. ... Rather, it is immensely important to me personally. I am strongly sensitized to such things. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? These qualities, both motivate me to engage you in this dialogue and set out the context by which I mean that which I intend. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? You will *perhaps* notice a tautological quality to that which I am asserting. The slightly disparate emphasis; as set out in the circular flow; serves to define an oxymoron which in turn affords an extreme amplification in descriptive emphasis. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? I have casually known theoretical physicists, theoretical chemists and mathematicians in the course of my work in RL. For many years I viewed them all as being quite similar, in the manner they went about their activities. More recently, I realized that there were some very striking and consequential, FUNDAMENTAL differences w.r.t. the ways that they approached their interests. More importantly, I started to realize that many of those professionals; were either unaware of such a distinction or had long since, assumed such a cognizance and had subsequently forgotten about it's existence. I can perceive that such oversights, do result in serious impediments which also pass by unnoticed. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? When I started reading this newsgroup, a year ago I presupposed that astronomers were similar in temprement and and skills to physicists; accepting of couse that theoreticians and experimentalists are very different 'breeds' of individual. It was a great pleasure for me to gain the realization that astronomer's are a breed unto their own, by a wide margin. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Moreover, as I write this, it starts to occur to me that ' astronomy' and 'cosmology' aren't the same thing at all, nothwistanding that they share the ' Universe ' as an overlapping interest. They differ in the approach by which they go about describing that joint concern. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Often, I presuppose that you have a knack for perceiving the obvious. Elsewhere, Nightingale reminisced about you, ' thus ' ... What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Tholen once made a comment of "Always on trial", which bothered me, and I asked if he didn't ever decide one way or the other at some point, which is actually kind of funny considering how often I do that kind of thing myself - some people I decide & fairly quickly, but even when I've "decided", I'm still always watching and analyzing I didn't write the above, Loonie, so why are you attributing that text to me? Classic dishonesty. I was impressed by thinking that that you might express such a sentiment. For me, the remark suggested a very skillfull and delicate appreciation with something that is very difficult. IME, being able to think in a criticl and strongly convegent manner can be a big disadvantage. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Below, is an example from everyday, life. I posted it, elsewhere ... What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? If it walks like a duck, talks like a duck, looks like a duck, smells like a duck, it MUST BE A DUCK! Right? 1) It is a duck ( Ockham's razor ) 2) It is sly Mr. Fox fraudulently misrepresenting himself as a duck. ( ? ) How can one select between the two choices? Cleverness is not allowed! [ I am deliberately squashing any extended consideration :-) ] Answer: ... a person cannot. .. that's how it is ACCEPT IT. ( Aside: to discriminate, one needs to use anti-ockham ... Ockhams, teacher Duns Scotus ... splitting hairs, 'Doctor Subtilis' ) now THAT'S IRONIC! I didn't write the above, Loonie, so why are you attributing that text to me? Classic dishonesty. Fraud is a very real and a very difficult problem. When viewed in another context, the same qualities and considerations can be seen to limit and confound scientific enquiry, profoundly. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? The distinction between philosophy and sophistry is a secondary one. Whether one likes it or not; ' bull**** ' makes the word go round, eh. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? T'would seem that a person who has sensibilty concerning the obvious is apt to have great skill at discrimination. In my uninformed opinion, it may also provide a plausible, essential ingredient for a great astronomer. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? --------------------------------------- What you have stated below is NOT how it is with myself. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Classic erroneous presupposition that those are the only two possibilities. If your intent in saying such a thing was to riddicule, me ... (... and I do not know your intent ...) What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Then in truth, you are mocking yourself. What does your classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? In this specific circumstance, such holds, regardless of what I might think, understand, be cognizant in regard, or infer. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? For me there are too many inferred possibilities to see what you are implying. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Only a few of those possibilities would carry the connotation that you were re-acting and/or being bitter. For myself, those paths are boring and pointless. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Those inferences, for which it is implict that you are being sincere; or that you are more skillfull than myself; or that your ability resides elsewhere than my own; or that I might be over closed minded about it, or .. , or ... What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Should your response to me be cast in this manner; it is tantalizing, stimulating and worthwhile. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Answer if, when, and, as may you choose .... What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? This is Usenet. You are free to say or ignore whatever you please. I have the liberty of an equivalent, pleasure. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie?
|
|
#47
March 28th 06, 02:35 AM
posted to alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
|
|||
|
|||
|
OS/2 word processor: Describe
Art Deco writes:
Another cowardly sneck of the attributions, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? Another cowardly sneck of AUK, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? Nice post edit and sneck of the attributions, Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic lie. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? Classic evasion. I'm well aware that your failure to answer my questions constitutes evasion, Deco. No need to tell me about it. Nice post edit and sneck of the attributions, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic lie, On your part, Deco. Classic lie. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? Classic evasion. I'm well aware that your failure to answer my questions constitutes evasion, Deco. No need to tell me about it. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? That would be you, Tholen. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic lie. Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Still suffering from attribution problems? Still stupid. Is that your explanation for your ongoing attribution problem, Deco? Very well. Classic stupidity. Is that your explanation for your ongoing attribution problem, Deco? Very well. Oh, and your lame attempt to hide from AUK, Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic lie, On your part, Deco. Classic lie. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? Tholen graduates to monkey-see-monkey-do lames. I see that you didn't answer the questions, Deco. No surprise there, really. Instead, you chose to spew yet another invective. where you are always on-topic, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic lie, On your part, Deco. Note: no response. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? Classic IKYABWAI. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. is defeated. Classic pontification. Classic Tholenization. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic lie. Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. [cowardly snecked froups restored] Classic erroneous presupposition, but good to see you admit that you're responsible for the addition of irrelevant newsgroups to the distribution, Deco. Classic lie, On your part, Deco. Classic lie. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? Classic evasion. I'm well aware that your failure to answer my questions constitutes evasion, Deco. No need to tell me about it. *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* Non sequitur, but an interesting parallel to Michael Baldwin Bruce. Classic cowardice. Also non sequitur, unless you're using that as an explanation for why you're emulating Michael Baldwin Bruce. Double-A wrote: wrote: Ah go easy on Tholen, John. I didn't invite him over her to be ridiculed. Bruce has already done enough of that. He really is a accomplished scientist, and I respect him for that, not just your usual Usenet blowhard, even though he is a bit eccentric here. He has discovered many asteroids, and even has one named after him. More dauntingly, he discovered an asteroid that is on a track to bring possible doom to the Earth in the 2030's. If it misses the Earth, it is thought it will swing into an orbit that will bring it back for 2nd and 3rd runs at it! Dr. Tholen is also and expert on Pluto and a consultant to NASA. He's also an award-winning ko0k: Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic. Oh look, the Coward of the Month alumnus is trying to run away from his awards again: Referring to yourself, Deco? Your reading comprehension problems are rife, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic, coming from someone who still hasn't gotten the attribution correct. St. Foamy mode now, too, Is that what you call your response style, Deco? Classic IKYABWAI. I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there, really. along with your serial hypocrisy. Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic lie. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Froth on, Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic lie. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? Classic IKYABWAI. I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there, really. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? Note: no response. Classic Tholobot response. Is that how you describe your failure to respond, Deco? After all, you are still using a fake name, as cowards do. Please post evidence that I've won Coward of the Month. Non sequitur. I was talking about your fake name, Deco. Oh it is highly seqitur, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic lie. Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? Classic IKYABWAI. I see that you didn't answer the question, Deco. No surprise there, really. You've won both Coward of the Month and Kook of the Month. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, but rather ironic, coming from someone so cowardly that he uses a fake name, and someone who has an affinity for kooks and their newsgroup. Classic lie. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. But you will try to lie about this again, I predict. What does your failed prediction have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Deco? Classic Tholobot response. Is that how you describe your failure to respond, Deco? Better yet, nominate me. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Deco? Note: no response. Classic Tholobot response. Is that how you describe your failure to respond, Deco? Hi, oar pin! Non sequitur. Another chance to run away from your awards, Also non sequitur. Also highly seqitur, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic lie. Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? Classic IKYABWAI. Is that how you describe your failure to respond, Deco? oar pin: Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? I see you've got the Tholobot Lamer working well again, Classic erroneous presupposition, coupled with classic evasion. Classic lie. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. will you be starting the Holy Digestor up also? What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Deco? Classic Tholobot response. Is that how you describe your failure to respond, Deco? Another chance to run away from your awards, Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic lie. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin: Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? Classic IKYABWAI. Is that how you describe your failure to respond, Deco? *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* Non sequitur, but an interesting parallel to Michael Baldwin Bruce. Classic cowardice. Also non sequitur, unless you're using that as an explanation for why you're emulating Michael Baldwin Bruce. [cowardly snecked froups restored] Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic lie, as anyone can plainly see by comparing the newsgroups header line. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. [cowardly snecked AUK restored] What does your erroneous presupposition have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Deco?
|
|
#48
March 28th 06, 02:56 AM
posted to alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
|
|||
|
|||
|
OS/2 word processor: Describe
Art Deco writes:
Another cowardly sneck of the attributions, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? Another cowardly sneck of AUK, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? Another cowardly sneck of the attributions, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Is that how you choose to describe your ongoing attribution problem, Deco? Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Is that how you choose to describe your ongoing attribution problem, Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, indicative of a serious reading comprehension problem on your part, Deco. Who is "Tholobot", Deco? Still stupid? Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Is that how you choose to describe your ongoing attribution problem, Deco? Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Is that how you choose to describe your response, Deco? Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic Tholobot responses, Is that how you describe your hypocritical snecking of context, Deco? rife with evasions, I'm well aware that your failure to answer the questions constitutes evasions, Deco. No need to tell me about it. lies, I'm well aware that you've lied, Deco. No need to tell me about it. cowardice, I'm well aware that your use of a fake name represents cowardice, Deco. No need to tell me about it. monkey-see-monkey-dos, I'm well aware that your use of "*BWAK*" dozens of times emulates Michael Baldwin Bruce, Deco. No need to tell me about it. and IKYABWAIs. What does your personal problem have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Deco? [AUK restored] What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Deco?
|
|
#49
March 28th 06, 04:29 AM
posted to alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
|
|||
|
|||
|
OS/2 word processor: Describe
tholen tholed:
(snip) I see you're back to your utterly pointless troll-feeding again, tholen. Deco and Bruce? Just plonk the freaking idiots. Sheesh.
|
|
#50
March 28th 06, 01:29 PM
posted to alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
|
|||
|
|||
|
OS/2 word processor: Describe
dizzy writes:
tholen tholed: How does one allegedly endure when writing, dizzy? (snip) I see you're back to your utterly pointless troll-feeding again, tholen. I see that you're hallucinating again, dizzy. Deco and Bruce? What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe, dizzy? Just plonk the freaking idiots. Glad you recognize them as idiots, dizzy. Sheesh. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, dizzy?
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, March 2005 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 108 | May 16th 05 02:55 AM |
| digest 2453240 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 38 | September 15th 04 02:18 AM |
| UFO Activities from Biblical Times (Long Text) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | UK Astronomy | 3 | December 25th 03 10:41 PM |
| UFO Activities from Biblical Times (LONG TEXT) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 2 | December 25th 03 07:33 PM |
| UFO Activities from Biblical Times | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 25th 03 05:21 AM |
Linear Mode
