![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
S.H. Atoms take up lots of space. If the compression force of gravity
can push electrons back into the nucleus to form neutron stars,and a BH gravity is 3 times that of a neutron star you can see why the Earth would be the size of a pea. Gravity takes away the space,but the weight(mass) of the object stays the same. Bert |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Luigi Gravity created the BB,and has evolved everything in the
universe then,now,and tomorrow. That includes life. Bert |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ralph Hertle wrote:
From what you say you did no research on that. No rational and factual research would result in thew conclusion that, "I (you) don't think its Kepler". There is no evidence for that. In saying, 'I don't think', I confess that it indeed could have been Kepler but my quick look into geometers didn't mention him at all. And, you say, "more like"...? That is the puniest attempt at lying about the facts of science that I have heard yet. "More like"? Is that some sort of Platonic approximation that "Archimedes or Euclid" created the theory concerning the stellated geometric solids? Really, now....is it the one, or is it the other....just to pin down your claim with a little anti-Platonic precision of thought. I said, 'More Like', because Kepler is most commonly placed with Galileo and Newton, astronomers and physicists, not geometers. In fact the site that I checked out mentioned 30 different geometers and not one of those was Kepler. If you knew the facts you would have said, for example, that the theory of the primary closest packing solids, and the discussions of their properties and proofs, was first set forth by Pythagoras. So I will state the facts as I have learned them. First off, my vague knowledge was the result of something I learned as a child. A concept I remember learning but do not recall the geometer that made comment about it. Secondly, again, I went back to the web page that I got my recent knowledge from and found there to be a controversy about who 'discovered the first five facts of elemental geometry.' Was it Thales of Miletus or Pythagoras of Samos? Since there is a controversy as to who is credited with this discovery it would be unwise of me to state that Pythagoras was the originator. The final fact is that any one of those geometers could have said what I remember hearing regardless of who the originator was. Cited link: http://www.geometryalgorithms.com/history.htm I do appreciate the challenge to what I know. Only a fool makes a mistake without trying to understand where the mistake was made and adjust so that the mistake is not made again. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
SunDancingGuy wrote:
What evidence is there for the existence of a "neutron star"? The concept is just another patch applied to current cosmology because it cannot come up with an explanation for millisecond pulsars. Rather than re-examine the current theory when it can't explain how a star sized object could possible rotate so fast, and look for a better explanation, such as electrical oscillation, we conjure up an imaginary substance, such as dark matter", "dark energy", "neutorn star". Maybe it's made of condensed milk. Whether you're right or wrong, you do make an excellent point that I would like to have an answer to. I never put pulsars together with dark energy/matter, but I agree that the current explainations are hard to swallow. I'd be more inclined to put my betting dollar on cold fusion before dark matter/energy. |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brilliant One wrote:
_______ Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me! A HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A Absolutely Dreadful! http://www.despair.com/indem.html |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Absolutely Dreadful!
http://www.despair.com/indem.html Dreadful, indeed, my fave site! _______ Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me! A HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Absolutely Dreadful!
Have you a penny? _______ Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me! A HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A |
#48
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "I don't know half of you half as well as I should like; and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve." Great quite, who's? Maybe you refer to something else with "quantum school of thought" Met any Gravitons recently? Or are you merely aggrivated? Or agrieved? Here, wipe your tears On my sleeve. Or would you care For a packet of Black Lifesavers, Infinite circle, a hole in the center? Clearly, that hole, the missing link. Wouldn't you think? All this spilled ink, Spilling more, only now a phosphorescent Screen reveals to my truth. Not first read, No, certainly not. It's the second one That counts. Call that a twice-told tale, Or just an unravelld, descrambled, pentimentio Silly word game. Or perhaps my heart's rubric ~ An old trick played well, Less often told, rarely held by both players, As the goal requires. My mind tires Not. A closer walk with thee, yes, That's what I want, why I live. So, my requirements met, now, give Me, hear? Got that? _______ Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me! A HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A |
#49
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" ha scritto nel messaggio
... Luigi Gravity created the BB,and has evolved everything in the universe then,now,and tomorrow. That includes life. Bert If BB is created from quantum fluctuation there isn't any kind of gravity at this level. The only way to say that gravity created the BB is thinking of black holes like nursery of infinite universes... But in this way we can't avoid the question of the first BB creating the first universe, mother (via black holes) of infinite ones. Luigi Caselli |
#50
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The only way to say that gravity created the BB is thinking of black holes
like nursery of infinite universes... But in this way we can't avoid the question of the first BB creating the first universe, mother (via black holes) of infinite ones. Interesting! A nursery & Mum. A garden, too. And a baby. _______ Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me! A HREF="http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo"http://journal s.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo/A |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
All technology outdated | betalimit | Policy | 0 | September 20th 04 03:41 PM |
All technology outdated | betalimit | Policy | 0 | September 20th 04 03:41 PM |
The Gravitational Instability Cosmological Theory | Br Dan Izzo | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 31st 04 02:35 AM |
Hawking Recants on Black Hole Theory! | Double-A | Misc | 134 | July 30th 04 11:08 AM |
Chandra 'Hears' A Black Hole | Ron Baalke | Misc | 30 | October 4th 03 06:22 PM |