A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

One way trip to mars 2023



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 3rd 13, 03:15 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Bob Haller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,197
Default One way trip to mars 2023

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...n_1564745.html

  #2  
Old April 3rd 13, 03:17 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Bob Haller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,197
Default One way trip to mars 2023

On Apr 2, 10:15*pm, bob haller wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...ize-red-planet...


I think we should take up a collection to send fred, provided he has
no internet access

At least no google group access
  #3  
Old April 4th 13, 01:09 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Nun Giver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 89
Default One way trip to mars 2023

On Tuesday, April 2, 2013 7:17:14 PM UTC-7, bob haller wrote:
On Apr 2, 10:15*pm, bob haller wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...ize-red-planet....




I think we should take up a collection to send fred, provided he has

no internet access



At least no google group access


Too costly, much better to enforce residency next door to
the The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear park. A lower cost way
to get spam in a can. No internet would be good.
I'd be generous and provide only rice wine to drink and
to eat that has to be GMO soy and corn.
  #4  
Old April 5th 13, 08:12 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Nun Giver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 89
Default One way trip to mars 2023

On Thursday, April 4, 2013 8:31:29 PM UTC-7, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Nun Giver wrote:





Too costly, much better to enforce residency next door to


the The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear park.






Any time you think you can try to 'enforce' such a thing, nymskull...



--

"Der Feige droht nur, wo er sicher ist."

--Johann Wolfgang von Goethe


It's not a just world, dipwood so you are safe.

So you think its not safe now? Funny how that is.................Trig
  #5  
Old April 5th 13, 10:44 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Bob Haller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,197
Default One way trip to mars 2023

On Apr 5, 3:12*am, Nun Giver wrote:
On Thursday, April 4, 2013 8:31:29 PM UTC-7, Fred J. McCall wrote:
Nun Giver wrote:


Too costly, much better to enforce residency next door to


the The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear park.


Any time you think you can try to 'enforce' such a thing, nymskull...


--


"Der Feige droht nur, wo er sicher ist."


* * * * --Johann Wolfgang von Goethe


It's not a just world, dipwood so you are safe.

So you think its not safe now? Funny how that is.................Trig


yep he runs his mouth on how safe fukashima is but doesnt want to live
there.......

thats ok theres always the chance of a fukashima type event here in
the US...

Despite Fred assurances its perfectly safe. People told the japanese
the same thing, and now look

  #6  
Old April 5th 13, 03:38 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Bob Haller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,197
Default One way trip to mars 2023


yep he runs his mouth on how safe fukashima is but doesnt want to live
there.......


Another idiot wanting to make things up and pretend I've said them. Oh
well, at least this one knows his own name.


Fred orders all his posts to disappear so we cant prove he said so
many dumb things!


  #7  
Old April 6th 13, 09:04 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default One way trip to mars 2023

On Apr 2, 7:17*pm, bob haller wrote:
On Apr 2, 10:15*pm, bob haller wrote:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...ize-red-planet...


I think we should take up a collection to send fred, provided he has
no internet access

At least no google group access


At least his Usenet/newsgroup context could be easily moderated.
  #8  
Old April 5th 13, 10:41 AM posted to sci.space.policy
Bob Haller
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,197
Default One way trip to mars 2023


I think we should take up a collection to send fred, provided he has
no internet access


At least no google group access


I don't access Goggle Gropes now, you ignorant ****.



If that were only true

This place would be so much better
  #9  
Old April 6th 13, 09:06 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default One way trip to mars 2023

On Apr 5, 2:41*am, bob haller wrote:
I think we should take up a collection to send fred, provided he has
no internet access


At least no google group access


I don't access Goggle Gropes now, you ignorant ****.


If that were only true

This place would be so much better


Fred has no idea what gets his crap published in Usenet/newsgroups,
because others are in charge of making it happen.
  #10  
Old April 6th 13, 09:03 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default One way trip to mars 2023

On Apr 2, 7:15*pm, bob haller wrote:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/0...ize-red-planet...


This could have been accomplished as of decades ago, as well as
several as easily paid to go one-way to Mars.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Humans to colonize Mars by 2023, claims Dutch company [email protected] Policy 6 June 4th 12 09:12 PM
39-day trip to Mars William Mook[_2_] Policy 25 April 6th 10 05:28 AM
One-man-one-way trip to Mars Pat Flannery History 14 March 9th 08 04:00 PM
90-day trip to Mars Roger Hamlett Misc 0 October 22nd 04 09:14 AM
One Way Trip to Mars? Nomen Nescio Space Shuttle 6 November 23rd 03 02:46 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:05 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.