![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 5, 9:46 am, PD wrote:
On 10/5/2011 10:34 AM, wrote: Hey PD before you try to teach anybody you need to read the papers. An accelerating universe means that the more distance galaxies are the MORE redshifted than the current theory expected. At a specific z (redshift), they found that 50 supernovae were *dimmer* than expected. Since these are standard candles, this means they were further *out* than expected by the Hubble law. The whole business of accelerating expansion of your universe is believe in the Chandrasekhar limit which itself is made up of several dubious assumptions. You got to be nuts to believe in all the assumptions that manifest the Chandrasekhar limit. You are out of your mind to dictate how your universe behaves by believing in the Chandrasekhar limit. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How to Win the Nobel Peace Prize In 12 Days | Phil Bouchard | Astronomy Misc | 18 | October 12th 09 06:50 PM |
Nobel Prize life is dangerous | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 5 | February 25th 09 04:43 AM |
Nobel prize or academic fraud? | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 4 | June 7th 08 11:51 PM |
How to win a Nobel Prize | jacob navia | Research | 0 | May 29th 06 09:43 AM |
Nobel Prize for David Thomson?! | Twittering One | Misc | 0 | December 25th 04 10:23 PM |