FR Per. Prec. + Light Bending

Phil Bouchard wrote:

PD wrote:

[...]

Natural selection makes people agree on things?
Hmmm, Phil, it seems you are moving from making factual errors about
GPS to making factual errors about evolution.

I just want everybody knowing PD:
- Agrees parallel universes does not make any sense

That's quantum mechanics. Einstein argued against it.

- Agrees Einstein GR plagiarism likeliness equals 94%
- Agrees Einstein was accused of domestic violence many times
- Wouldn't give GR $5

On Nov 13, 3:32*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
PD wrote:

[...]

Natural selection makes people agree on things?
Hmmm, Phil, it seems you are moving from making factual errors about
GPS to making factual errors about evolution.

I just want everybody knowing PD:
- Agrees parallel universes does not make any sense
- Agrees Einstein GR plagiarism likeliness equals 94%
- Agrees Einstein was accused of domestic violence many times
- Wouldn't give GR $5

Oh, now, Phil, you'll have to point to where I agreed to any of this
stuff.
Is the problem related to dosage?

On Nov 13, 3:32*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
PD wrote:

[...]

Natural selection makes people agree on things?
Hmmm, Phil, it seems you are moving from making factual errors about
GPS to making factual errors about evolution.

I just want everybody knowing PD:
- Agrees parallel universes does not make any sense
- Agrees Einstein GR plagiarism likeliness equals 94%
- Agrees Einstein was accused of domestic violence many times
- Wouldn't give GR $5

You seem to be degrading even more quickly than usual.
It MUST be a medication issue that brought you back here in such a
weakened state.

eric gisse wrote:

That's quantum mechanics. Einstein argued against it.

Well yes, he both agreed and disagreed with it; just like his
cosmological constant. So according to you, in both cases that makes
him right?

On Nov 13, 2:18*pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
eric gisse wrote:

That's quantum mechanics. Einstein argued against it.

Well yes, he both agreed and disagreed with it; just like his
cosmological constant. *So according to you, in both cases that makes
him right?

Einstein was right about quantum mechanics. Science judeged him for
it.
They needed that.

Science only knows the odds. God knows every outcome.
" I don't believe that God plays dice with the universe." Albert
Einstein

PD wrote:
On Nov 13, 2:05 pm, Phil Bouchard wrote:
PD wrote:

Phil, pardon me, but this assurance of nothing.
I haven't spent a year to get flagged as a hacker, how about that?

Sorry, Phil, but your avowals of personal integrity just don't cut it.
What hacker doesn't say "Trust me"?

The auld farts who did real hacking. The term hackers has changed
over the decades :-(.

/BAH

Phil Bouchard wrote:
eric gisse wrote:

I run linux. How am I supposed to run your windows program that
depends on windows binaries?

Use a Windows emulator.

Blasphemy!

/BAH

wrote:
On Nov 13, 10:18 am, Phil Bouchard wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote:

That makes about as much sense as putting a smaller wheel on the front
of your bicycle so's you can be going down hill all the time.
Hey Phil, See: Physics FAQ: Are There Any Good Books on Relativity
Theory?
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic..._booklist.html
Welcome back to get your nose bloodied some more, Phil. You must really
like the process (even be addicted to it) to be posting your drivel here
again. Potter does the same thing.
Sam does not know GPS is about to get replaced by Google Navigator:http://www.google.com/mobile/navigat...html#p=default

I did not know that Google Navigator was GPS-driven. But I
_immediately_ suspected it when you said the one would replace the
other, your track record being what it is.

I missed this one. I do keep getting surprised at the extent of
ignorance.

snip

/BAH

On Nov 14, 4:40*am, jmfbahciv jmfbahciv@aol wrote:
wrote:

* I did not know that Google Navigator was GPS-driven. But I
_immediately_ suspected it when you said the one would replace the
other, your track record being what it is.

I missed this one. *I do keep getting surprised at the extent of
ignorance.

Hey, I can't keep track of every new trick Google pulls out of its
ass either!


Mark L. Fergerson

wrote:
On Nov 14, 4:40 am, jmfbahciv jmfbahciv@aol wrote:
wrote:

I did not know that Google Navigator was GPS-driven. But I
_immediately_ suspected it when you said the one would replace the
other, your track record being what it is.
I missed this one. I do keep getting surprised at the extent of
ignorance.

Hey, I can't keep track of every new trick Google pulls out of its
ass either!

The assumption made appeared to be that simply running the code
would produce expected results.

There is another worrisome aspect which has to do with the computtering
biz which I can't describe in English ASCII. My red flag went
straight up in the air when I read the blurb. My red flag gear
is usually wrong about specifics but usually marks a mess potential.

/BAH