Our Moon as BattleStar

wouldnt it make a really good max security
"rehab" center for third time offenders

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 15:42:21 GMT, (Rick Sobie) wrote:

In article , says...

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 05:53:58 GMT, (Rick Sobie) wrote:

In article , says...

(Rick Sobie) wrote:

If you are still in doubt that the moon does not rotate
on its axis, then take two plastic cups and see for
yourself.

So, you took two plastic cups of...what? Everclear? Castor oil?

What's its axis?



What's this? One of the on-board cabins number 139,999 has just come
vacant. That leaves a vacancy for the trip home. Feel free to
make suggestions as to who shouuld fill that spot. Jennifer Lopez?

I most heartily agree with that suggestion. All in favor say I. "I"
motion passed.

Terribly sorray old chap.

They can change their mind any time they want you know.




What you mean 'they' white man.

Troll! Your math is off.

(Rick Sobie) wrote in message news:BdISb.335505$JQ1.42778@pd7tw1no...

For example some moons rotate one way and others rotate another
and still others like ours, doesn't rotate at all except
for around the earth. Which of course is unheard of anywhere else
in the known universe.

'Hell you talking about? Our moon does rotate, but is tidally
locked, so that its rotational & orbital periods are synchronised. And
it's not whatsoever the only such body to be so configured. There are
a number of other moons right here in this solar system which are
tidally locked with their larger massed so-called parent bodies. The
Moon is hardly unique in this respect.

-Mark Martin

On 1 Feb 2004 10:48:08 -0800, (Mark Martin) wrote:

(Rick Sobie) wrote in message news:BdISb.335505$JQ1.42778@pd7tw1no...

For example some moons rotate one way and others rotate another
and still others like ours, doesn't rotate at all except
for around the earth. Which of course is unheard of anywhere else
in the known universe.

'Hell you talking about? Our moon does rotate, but is tidally
locked, so that its rotational & orbital periods are synchronised. And
it's not whatsoever the only such body to be so configured. There are
a number of other moons right here in this solar system which are
tidally locked with their larger massed so-called parent bodies. The
Moon is hardly unique in this respect.

-Mark Martin


Don't confuse Rick with facts, dude.





--
Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed"
Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253.
You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com

"You are the kook, not me - and I won't even bother to see
what that acronym means."
- Joseph Bartlo responds to IKYABWAI

In article , says...

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 15:42:21 GMT, (Rick Sobie) wrote:

In article , says...

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 05:53:58 GMT, (Rick Sobie) wrote:

In article , says...

(Rick Sobie) wrote:

If you are still in doubt that the moon does not rotate
on its axis, then take two plastic cups and see for
yourself.

So, you took two plastic cups of...what? Everclear? Castor oil?

What's its axis?



What's this? One of the on-board cabins number 139,999 has just come
vacant. That leaves a vacancy for the trip home. Feel free to
make suggestions as to who shouuld fill that spot. Jennifer Lopez?

I most heartily agree with that suggestion. All in favor say I. "I"
motion passed.

Terribly sorray old chap.

They can change their mind any time they want you know.




What you mean 'they' white man.

Troll! Your math is off.


You are assuming he was the last of the Mohicans.

In article , says...

(Rick Sobie) wrote in message news:BdISb.335505$JQ1.42778@pd7tw1no...

For example some moons rotate one way and others rotate another
and still others like ours, doesn't rotate at all except
for around the earth. Which of course is unheard of anywhere else
in the known universe.

'Hell you talking about? Our moon does rotate, but is tidally
locked, so that its rotational & orbital periods are synchronised. And
it's not whatsoever the only such body to be so configured. There are
a number of other moons right here in this solar system which are
tidally locked with their larger massed so-called parent bodies. The
Moon is hardly unique in this respect.

-Mark Martin


You mean like this one...

http://www.astronomy.com/images/astr..._deathstar.jpg

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 01:39:39 GMT, (Rick Sobie) wrote:

In article , says...

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 15:42:21 GMT, (Rick Sobie) wrote:

In article , says...

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 05:53:58 GMT, (Rick Sobie) wrote:

In article , says...

(Rick Sobie) wrote:

If you are still in doubt that the moon does not rotate
on its axis, then take two plastic cups and see for
yourself.

So, you took two plastic cups of...what? Everclear? Castor oil?

What's its axis?



What's this? One of the on-board cabins number 139,999 has just come
vacant. That leaves a vacancy for the trip home. Feel free to
make suggestions as to who shouuld fill that spot. Jennifer Lopez?

I most heartily agree with that suggestion. All in favor say I. "I"
motion passed.

Terribly sorray old chap.

They can change their mind any time they want you know.




What you mean 'they' white man.

Troll! Your math is off.


You are assuming he was the last of the Mohicans.

I'm the Lone Ranger.

On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 17:00:14 GMT, The Ghost In The Machine
wrote:

In sci.physics, *

wrote
on Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:09:33 GMT
:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:03:32 -0500, "The Lord of the Rain\( Suresh
__NoJunkMail kumar\)" wrote:

The moon also a neat place to hide your ET saucer.

Maybe. Bear in mind we've photographed the far side
using satellites. Of course one can always cover it using
moondust-colored camo gear... :-)

Haha, first you have to beadle to fly it, and you can't. Geez, it takes
more than one telepath and they have to be mind synched.

Humans aren't capable.


hey, the moon has craters to seclude, every animal from every other animal.
-suresh

"Rick Sobie" wrote in message
news:1YoSb.330011$JQ1.286938@pd7tw1no...
In article ,
says...

how about the Moon as Noah's Arch?
-suresh


Well it ain't no Von Neuman Probe.
It is much too big to be a nanobot.

In article , says...

On Wed, 04 Feb 2004 01:39:39 GMT, (Rick Sobie) wrote:

In article , says...

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 15:42:21 GMT, (Rick Sobie) wrote:

In article , says...

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 05:53:58 GMT, (Rick Sobie) wrote:

In article , says...

(Rick Sobie) wrote:

If you are still in doubt that the moon does not rotate
on its axis, then take two plastic cups and see for
yourself.

So, you took two plastic cups of...what? Everclear? Castor oil?

What's its axis?



What's this? One of the on-board cabins number 139,999 has just come
vacant. That leaves a vacancy for the trip home. Feel free to
make suggestions as to who shouuld fill that spot. Jennifer Lopez?

I most heartily agree with that suggestion. All in favor say I. "I"
motion passed.

Terribly sorray old chap.

They can change their mind any time they want you know.




What you mean 'they' white man.

Troll! Your math is off.


You are assuming he was the last of the Mohicans.

I'm the Lone Ranger.


Say hello to Tonto for me.
And give Silver a sugar cube for me as well.

;-)

In article , says...

On Sat, 31 Jan 2004 17:00:14 GMT, The Ghost In The Machine
wrote:

In sci.physics, *

wrote
on Fri, 30 Jan 2004 18:09:33 GMT
:
On Fri, 30 Jan 2004 13:03:32 -0500, "The Lord of the Rain\( Suresh
__NoJunkMail kumar\)" wrote:

The moon also a neat place to hide your ET saucer.

Maybe. Bear in mind we've photographed the far side
using satellites. Of course one can always cover it using
moondust-colored camo gear... :-)

Haha, first you have to beadle to fly it, and you can't. Geez, it takes
more than one telepath and they have to be mind synched.

Humans aren't capable.

I was trained to beadle. (I think)




hey, the moon has craters to seclude, every animal from every other animal.
-suresh

"Rick Sobie" wrote in message
news:1YoSb.330011$JQ1.286938@pd7tw1no...
In article ,
says...

how about the Moon as Noah's Arch?
-suresh


Well it ain't no Von Neuman Probe.
It is much too big to be a nanobot.