![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cardman wrote:
My point more goes along the line that Odyssey findings indicate that water content in the top few meters of soil exceeds any scientist's expectations. Those finding refer to *ice*, no? If I recall correctly, then a site like this could have around 30% water ice content in the soil, where it is assumed to be mostly contained below the immediate top soil in ways that they do not fully understand. It would not be, and could not be, liquid water. Paul |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 27 Jan 2004 09:48:38 -0600, "Paul F. Dietz"
wrote: Cardman wrote: A lava flow according to them, but yes there is water everywhere. Does not that ground look a touch wet to you? No. BTW, liquid water cannot exist over almost all the Martian surface -- the pressure is too low. Well, there is one theory that morning heating of the top soil causes a brief water ice change to flowing water before the low atmospheric pressure causes it to evaporate. Due to the rapid evaporation of water ice in the top soil, then this would increase atmospheric density in the few centimeters above the top soil before a brief time. Thus very cold water could flow. I believe that's the case at that location. My point more goes along the line that Odyssey findings indicate that water content in the top few meters of soil exceeds any scientist's expectations. If I recall correctly, then a site like this could have around 30% water ice content in the soil, where it is assumed to be mostly contained below the immediate top soil in ways that they do not fully understand. In other colder parts of Mars the water ice content is assumed to even exceed 50% of the soil mass even going up to about 70%. One theory to explain why there is so much water ice in the top soil is that there is simply tons of liquid water in the lower layers, which is kept warm by the top blanket and any remaining heating from the core of Mars. The other factor is that as there is crap loads of water on Mars, then this simply does not go away due to the low pressure. So what all these factors together can tell you is that maybe warmish water deep below Mars is slowly rising to the surface, where of course it would quickly cool. However, the further warmer water below this is constantly pushing upwards and is warming this above cooler water. And so when you get to the surface there is a sudden change where this low atmospheric pressure causes a sudden change from water ice to a gas as it evaporated away. The thing in this is that there is always more water coming up from below during the early daylight hours, which is constantly keeping the top soil packed with water ice from below. Naturally, when things turn dark and gets a lot colder, then so can your water in the atmosphere return to the ground. My point I guess is that scientists have a very long way to go before they understand how Mars works, where this vast volume of water in the top soil must be moving around somehow. Since they do not yet understand how there could be so much water ice in the top soil, then it is a little early to say that the top soil does not look wet. It looks a touch wet to me. Cardman http://www.cardman.com http://www.cardman.co.uk |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Hobbs aka McDaniel" wrote I picked 7th/8th grade because in the mainstream movie business that is considered to be the understanding level of the majority of viewers and it seems to me that NASA has added a lot of showbiz techniques to their public presentations. But you still have to be impressed with the wizardry of their (recreated) audio of the Opportunity landing, released today: http://www.copperas.com/astro/merb_landing.mp3 (18KB) Joe |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cardman wrote:
Those finding refer to *ice*, no? Odyssey has been finding it's water through detecting hydrogen, which is a very good indication of water. As far as I am aware there has been no evidence for if this hydrogen trace of water is in solid of liquid form. Most scientists assume that it is in the form of solid ice due to the very cold nature of Mars. And due to the fact that liquid water is physically impossible under those conditions. Even then this ice should not exist in the very top of the Martian soil due to the low pressure evaporation problem. Nonsense. If the relative humidity above the ice is 100% then the ice can remain stable indefinitely, even if the atmospheric pressure is quite low. One idea to consider is that below the soil you could well have greater atmospheric density in trapped pockets containing liquid or ice water, maybe even between individual grains, where certainly there could well be warmth obtained from both above and below. Water is not going to exist in liquid form at a depth that the neutron detectors can see (over most of the martian surface). Paul |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 07:29:55 -0600, "Paul F. Dietz"
wrote: Cardman wrote: As far as I am aware there has been no evidence for if this hydrogen trace of water is in solid of liquid form. Most scientists assume that it is in the form of solid ice due to the very cold nature of Mars. And due to the fact that liquid water is physically impossible under those conditions. That would be nice had they understood the nature of the environment, but the soil is a big unknown, where the much more studied atmosphere is capable of the more than a few surprises. Unless you have an explanation of how there can be so much detected water in the few meters of top soil, despite the low pressure problem, then there is more than one possible explanation. Even then this ice should not exist in the very top of the Martian soil due to the low pressure evaporation problem. Nonsense. If the relative humidity above the ice is 100% then the ice can remain stable indefinitely, even if the atmospheric pressure is quite low. And the odds of 100% humidity? Not very high at all I would say, which is why I previous said that it would be only a very brief early morning phenomenon. As you certainly won't be explaining some of this water volume in the soil using this idea, when it simply cannot last very long. One idea to consider is that below the soil you could well have greater atmospheric density in trapped pockets containing liquid or ice water, maybe even between individual grains, where certainly there could well be warmth obtained from both above and below. Water is not going to exist in liquid form at a depth that the neutron detectors can see (over most of the martian surface). Excluding the possible chance of warmer water rising from deep within the ground. Want to have a shot at explaining those slopes that have water-like trails running down the slope? After all some people would claim that these were made by running water. Cardman http://www.cardman.com http://www.cardman.co.uk |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cardman wrote:
And due to the fact that liquid water is physically impossible under those conditions. That would be nice had they understood the nature of the environment, but the soil is a big unknown, where the much more studied atmosphere is capable of the more than a few surprises. Unless you have an explanation of how there can be so much detected water in the few meters of top soil, despite the low pressure problem, then there is more than one possible explanation. They detected *ice* in the top few meters of soil. Not liquid water. Water cannot exist there because the pressure is too low (over almost all the Martian surface). The low pressure does not preclude the existence of ice, as I have already explained. Now, are we going to iterate this several dozen more times, or are you going to try to think about what I said? I'll give you one more chance before I right you off as a hopeless moron. Paul |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Paul F. Dietz" wrote in message ...
you going to try to think about what I said? I'll give you one more chance before I right you off as a hopeless moron. Paul I hoPe yew doNt rite OFF annyune az a hopeless moron... Pot this is kettle... Tom Merkle |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Merkle wrote:
I hoPe yew doNt rite OFF annyune az a hopeless moron... Pot this is kettle... I cancelled that after noticing the spelling error. But, in any case: **** you, Mr. Merkle. A spelling error isn't the same as persistent aggressive ignorance from the poster I was castigating. Paul |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 29 Jan 2004 19:32:15 -0600, "Paul F. Dietz"
wrote: Cardman wrote: That would be nice had they understood the nature of the environment, but the soil is a big unknown, where the much more studied atmosphere is capable of the more than a few surprises. Unless you have an explanation of how there can be so much detected water in the few meters of top soil, despite the low pressure problem, then there is more than one possible explanation. They detected *ice* in the top few meters of soil. Not liquid water. No. Odyssey can only detect hydrogen, which is *assumed* (to a high degree) to be due to water. These findings do not say one way or the other if this is water ice, liquid water or the long shot of hydrogen in another form like within rocks. The problem for you presented by the Odyssey data is that hydrogen levels in water form detected in the top few meters of soil can be anything up to 70% of the volume. That would be based upon liquid water, when this same amount in ice form would take up even more of the soil volume. That would result in a pure sheet of water ice covered by a thin layer of soil, which is a very unlikely possibility. Since even warmer regions have like 30% and 50% water levels, then scientist are still working out how there can be so much. Having warmer water rising from below is one possible explanation. Not my theory mind you, but of some scientist who has the qualifications to back it up. Water cannot exist there because the pressure is too low (over almost all the Martian surface). Pressure you refer to involves the atmosphere, where under the soil you have a natural barrier allowing for different pressures in limited forms. I would even suggest small pockets between the grains, but there could well be whole caves and underground lakes there. The low pressure does not preclude the existence of ice, as I have already explained. Except in the very top soil due to a combination of the atmospheric pressure and heat, when quite correctly such water ice would quickly evaporate into gas. Ice water can only exist in the polar regions due to the very low temperatures freezing it out of the atmosphere. As you point out ice can exist in the top soil if the atmosphere immediately above it has a 100% humidity level, but that simply is not going to happen beyond extremely rapid evaporation lasting a very short time before the local Martian weather disperses it. In other words your explanation cannot match the Odyssey data, when ice cannot exist in the top soil in the warmer regions for more than a brief time. Now, are we going to iterate this several dozen more times, or are you going to try to think about what I said? I'll give you one more chance before I right you off as a hopeless moron. Except that your logic is flawed, where it also seems that you missed that Odyssey detected hydrogen and the claimed water ice. I look forwards to seeing the results from Mars Express over the coming months, which will be looking for both liquid and iced water in the top soil and all the way down to a few kilometers in depth. I have a feeling that a lot of liquid water is going to be found, maybe all the way up to just below the surface. That would explain some of those recent Martian water features after all. Cardman http://www.cardman.com http://www.cardman.co.uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 2nd 04 12:01 AM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | February 2nd 04 03:33 AM |
NASA's year of sorrow, recovery, progress and success | Jacques van Oene | Space Shuttle | 0 | December 31st 03 07:28 PM |
NASA's year of sorrow, recovery, progress and success | Jacques van Oene | Space Station | 0 | December 31st 03 07:28 PM |
Unofficial Space Shuttle Launch Guide | Steven S. Pietrobon | Space Shuttle | 0 | September 12th 03 01:37 AM |