|
|
|||||||
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#31
March 27th 06, 12:10 AM
posted to alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
|
|||
|
|||
OS/2 word processor: Describe
Art Deco writes:
Double-A wrote: Art Deco wrote: Double-A wrote: wrote: Raving Loonie wrote: Double-A wrote: ah wrote: Double-A wrote: Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote: Martin T wrote: off topic Figures. Irrelevant, given that I never said that you did say that, Tholen. In fact, responding has never been the issue. Rather, enduring has been the issue. Classic evasion. Unfortunatly his exactly like Eliza (that early computer AI inspired software who tries, poorly, to emulate a human conversation) -- he can't help him self -- he will never stop responding to such conversations. Michael Baldwin Bruce is hardly "exactly like Eliza", Törnsten. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Tholen? Classic erroneous presupposition. Someone had once an a good idea to make a Usenet version of ELIZA and try that on him. Anything to keep Michael Baldwin Bruce occupied and entertained. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Non sequitur. What does this have to do with OS/2, Tholen? That would make possible some very intresting human behavior experiment. As if Michael Baldwin Bruce's behavior isn't already a very interesting experiment. It's more of your classic evasion, Tholen. Illogical, Tholen, and rather ironic, coming from the person who has tholed more, using your concept of the term. My own guess would be that Tholen would "win" (computer die before he stops responding). What you guess is irrelevant, T=F6rnsten. On what basis do you speak for everybody around here, Tholen? What you think is irrelevant, Tholen. Touche! Illogical, given that I didn't say anything about what I think, Bruce. Brilliant! Just brilliant, Martin! Illogical, given that I didn't say anything about what I think, Bruce. You make Dickless look the fool that he is. Who is "Dickless", Bruce? There is no such person involved in the discussion. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems? Thank you for posting to alt.astronomy, Dr. Tholen. It was Michael Baldwin Bruce who chose to add that irrelevant newsgroup to the distribution. An update on your studies of asteroids near the Sun would always be welcome here. I do not subscribe to alt.astronomy. Well, don't just re-buff the Man, Tholen! Dr. Tholen has made many discoveries in astronomy. He would have much to offer an astronomy group if he wanted to. I subscribe to sci.astro, which is an astronomy group. But it seems that when he gets on Usenet, he just wants to fool around. What seems to you is irrelevant, Double-A. The fact is that I don't fool around at all. I do stand my ground against antagonists like Michael Baldwin Bruce. It was Michael Baldwin Bruce who was doing the fooling around, trolling in a thread about colored text in DeScribe. Maybe that's how he blows off steam. Maybe not. Trout 'tickling' ... Key words: "He blows" ! Non sequitur. If I wanted any lip off you, I'd wipe it off of Bruce's zipper! What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe? The red colored text perfectly matches the red silk panties you're wearing right now. Ah go easy on Tholen, John. I didn't invite him over her to be ridiculed. Bruce has already done enough of that. He really is a accomplished scientist, and I respect him for that, not just your usual Usenet blowhard, even though he is a bit eccentric here. He has discovered many asteroids, and even has one named after him. More dauntingly, he discovered an asteroid that is on a track to bring possible doom to the Earth in the 2030's. If it misses the Earth, it is thought it will swing into an orbit that will bring it back for 2nd and 3rd runs at it! Dr. Tholen is also and expert on Pluto and a consultant to NASA. He's also an award-winning ko0k: NASA doesn't seem to care about that. Which has zippo to do with the kook awards he's earned. Classic erroneous presupposition. What a liar you are, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? [cowardly snecked froups restored] How ironic, coming from someone cowardly using a fake name. So why don't you nominate me for Coward of the Month, Tholen? What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Deco? [cowardly snecked froups restored] Non sequitur, coupled with an erroneous presupposition. 
|
|
#32
March 27th 06, 02:01 AM
posted to alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
|
|||
|
|||
|
OS/2 word processor: Describe
Art Deco writes:
Another cowardly sneck of the attributions, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? Another cowardly sneck of AUK, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Tholenator(tm). Who is "Tholenator(tm)", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? [Tholodrool flush] How ironic, coming from someone who just finished complaining (twice, no less) about cowardly snecking. It always amuses me when people engage in hypocritical behavior and don't even realize it. Which has zippo to do with the kook awards he's earned. Classic erroneous presupposition. What a liar you are, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Continuing your lie doesn't make it true, Classic erroneous presupposition. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? That would be you, Tholen. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. You would know this if you weren't as dumb as an oar pin, Tholen. Classic erroneous presupposition. [cowardly snecked froups restored] How ironic, coming from someone cowardly using a fake name. So why don't you nominate me for Coward of the Month, Tholen? What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Deco? Note: no response. [cowardly snecked froups restored] Non sequitur, coupled with an erroneous presupposition. Another classic lie. On your part, Deco. [cowardly snecked froups restored] Classic erroneous presupposition.
|
|
#33
March 27th 06, 02:11 AM
posted to alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
|
|||
|
|||
|
OS/2 word processor: Describe
Art Deco writes:
Nice post edit and sneck of the attributions, Classic erroneous presupposition. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? Nice post edit and sneck of the attributions, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic lie, On your part, Deco. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? That would be you, Tholen. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Still suffering from attribution problems? Still stupid. Is that your explanation for your ongoing attribution problem, Deco? Very well. Oh, and your lame attempt to hide from AUK, Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic lie, On your part, Deco. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? where you are always on-topic, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic lie, On your part, Deco. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? is defeated. Classic pontification. Classic Tholenization. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. [cowardly snecked froups restored] Classic erroneous presupposition, but good to see you admit that you're responsible for the addition of irrelevant newsgroups to the distribution, Deco. Classic lie, On your part, Deco. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* Non sequitur, but an interesting parallel to Michael Baldwin Bruce. Double-A wrote: wrote: Ah go easy on Tholen, John. I didn't invite him over her to be ridiculed. Bruce has already done enough of that. He really is a accomplished scientist, and I respect him for that, not just your usual Usenet blowhard, even though he is a bit eccentric here. He has discovered many asteroids, and even has one named after him. More dauntingly, he discovered an asteroid that is on a track to bring possible doom to the Earth in the 2030's. If it misses the Earth, it is thought it will swing into an orbit that will bring it back for 2nd and 3rd runs at it! Dr. Tholen is also and expert on Pluto and a consultant to NASA. He's also an award-winning ko0k: Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic. Oh look, the Coward of the Month alumnus is trying to run away from his awards again: Referring to yourself, Deco? Your reading comprehension problems are rife, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic, coming from someone who still hasn't gotten the attribution correct. St. Foamy mode now, too, Is that what you call your response style, Deco? along with your serial hypocrisy. Classic erroneous presupposition. Froth on, Classic erroneous presupposition. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? Note: no response. After all, you are still using a fake name, as cowards do. Please post evidence that I've won Coward of the Month. Non sequitur. I was talking about your fake name, Deco. Oh it is highly seqitur, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? You've won both Coward of the Month and Kook of the Month. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, but rather ironic, coming from someone so cowardly that he uses a fake name, and someone who has an affinity for kooks and their newsgroup. But you will try to lie about this again, I predict. What does your failed prediction have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Deco? Better yet, nominate me. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Deco? Note: no response. Hi, oar pin! Non sequitur. Another chance to run away from your awards, Also non sequitur. Also highly seqitur, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? oar pin: Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? I see you've got the Tholobot Lamer working well again, Classic erroneous presupposition, coupled with classic evasion. will you be starting the Holy Digestor up also? What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Deco? Another chance to run away from your awards, Classic erroneous presupposition. oar pin: Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* *BWAK* Non sequitur, but an interesting parallel to Michael Baldwin Bruce. [cowardly snecked froups restored] Classic erroneous presupposition.
|
|
#34
March 27th 06, 05:56 AM
posted to alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
|
|||
|
|||
|
OS/2 word processor: Describe
|
|
#35
March 27th 06, 07:34 AM
posted to alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
|
|||
|
|||
|
OS/2 word processor: Describe
*The Commentator* writes:
wrote: Nothing of any importance. I did not write the above, Commentator. Classic dishonesty on your part, Commentator.
|
|
#36
March 27th 06, 07:48 AM
posted to alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
|
|||
|
|||
|
OS/2 word processor: Describe
Art Deco writes:
Another cowardly sneck of the attributions, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? Another cowardly sneck of AUK, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still stupid? Another cowardly sneck of the attributions, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic lie. Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? Classic stupidity. Is that how you choose to describe your ongoing attribution problem, Deco? Another cowardly sneck of AUK, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic lie. Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Tholenator(tm). Who is "Tholenator(tm)", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? Classic stupidity. Is that how you choose to describe your ongoing attribution problem, Deco? [Tholodrool flush] How ironic, coming from someone who just finished complaining (twice, no less) about cowardly snecking. So now you admit you lied. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, indicative of a serious reading comprehension problem on your part, Deco. It always amuses me when people engage in hypocritical behavior and don't even realize it. Judging from your usenet behaviour, Tholobot, there is very little mirth in your pathetic existence. Who is "Tholobot", Deco? Still stupid? Which has zippo to do with the kook awards he's earned. Classic erroneous presupposition. What a liar you are, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Continuing your lie doesn't make it true, Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic lie. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? Classic stupidity. Is that how you choose to describe your ongoing attribution problem, Deco? oar pin. Who is "oar pin", Deco? Still suffering from attribution problems? That would be you, Tholen. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Classic lie. Another unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. You would know this if you weren't as dumb as an oar pin, Tholen. Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic lie. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. [cowardly snecked froups restored] How ironic, coming from someone cowardly using a fake name. So why don't you nominate me for Coward of the Month, Tholen? What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Deco? Note: no response. Note: Tholobot response. Is that how you choose to describe your response, Deco? [cowardly snecked froups restored] Non sequitur, coupled with an erroneous presupposition. Another classic lie. On your part, Deco. Classic lie. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. [cowardly snecked froups restored] Classic erroneous presupposition. Classic lie. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. [cowardly snecked froups restored] Classic erroneous presupposition.
|
|
#38
March 27th 06, 11:41 AM
posted to comp.os.os2.misc,comp.os.os2.advocacy,alt.astronomy
|
|||
|
|||
|
OS/2 word processor: Describe
Raving Loonie writes:
writes: Raving Loonie wrote: Double-A wrote: ah wrote: Double-A wrote: Michael Baldwin, Bruce wrote: Martin T wrote: off topic Figures. Irrelevant, given that I never said that you did say that, Tholen. In fact, responding has never been the issue. Rather, enduring has been the issue. Classic evasion. Unfortunatly his exactly like Eliza (that early computer AI inspired software who tries, poorly, to emulate a human conversation) -- he can't help him self -- he will never stop responding to such conversations. Michael Baldwin Bruce is hardly "exactly like Eliza", Törnsten. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems, Tholen? Classic erroneous presupposition. Someone had once an a good idea to make a Usenet version of ELIZA and try that on him. Anything to keep Michael Baldwin Bruce occupied and entertained. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Non sequitur. What does this have to do with OS/2, Tholen? That would make possible some very intresting human behavior experiment. As if Michael Baldwin Bruce's behavior isn't already a very interesting experiment. It's more of your classic evasion, Tholen. Illogical, Tholen, and rather ironic, coming from the person who has tholed more, using your concept of the term. My own guess would be that Tholen would "win" (computer die before he stops responding). What you guess is irrelevant, Törnsten. On what basis do you speak for everybody around here, Tholen? What you think is irrelevant, Tholen. Touche! Illogical, given that I didn't say anything about what I think, Bruce. Brilliant! Just brilliant, Martin! Illogical, given that I didn't say anything about what I think, Bruce. You make Dickless look the fool that he is. Who is "Dickless", Bruce? There is no such person involved in the discussion. Still suffering from reading comprehension problems? Thank you for posting to alt.astronomy, Dr. Tholen. It was Michael Baldwin Bruce who chose to add that irrelevant newsgroup to the distribution. An update on your studies of asteroids near the Sun would always be welcome here. I do not subscribe to alt.astronomy. Well, don't just re-buff the Man, Tholen! Dr. Tholen has made many discoveries in astronomy. He would have much to offer an astronomy group if he wanted to. I subscribe to sci.astro, which is an astronomy group. But it seems that when he gets on Usenet, he just wants to fool around. What seems to you is irrelevant, Double-A. The fact is that I don't fool around at all. I do stand my ground against antagonists like Michael Baldwin Bruce. It was Michael Baldwin Bruce who was doing the fooling around, trolling in a thread about colored text in DeScribe. Maybe that's how he blows off steam. Maybe not. Trout 'tickling' ... Key words: "He blows" ! Non sequitur. If I wanted any lip off you, I'd wipe it off of Bruce's zipper! What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe? Orbes volantes exstare. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Those who claim that 'alien abductions' are real, make some very "non sequitur" assertions. Is that why you just made a non sequitur assertion, Loonie? Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. .. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. [posted from alt.astronomy] Irrelevant; what is relevant is what it was posted *to*. Wrong, Tholen. It does matter what group it's posted from. Non sequitur. Note: no response. Note: still no response. It affects which group of a crossposted message the reader is directed to when he/she/it does a seach of the Google archive. [ *maybe*] ... Different news groups can have different thread contents. sticks tongue out as way of showing "mock" insult and signalling victory Still non sequitur. Note: no response. Note: still no response. Ignored, by way of being irrelevent. Illogical, given that you responded to it, Loonie. Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. Wait a minute! ... T'is relevent, too. What does your inability to make up your mind have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Note: still no response. Note: still no response. sticks tongue out as way of showing insult What does your insult have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Tautological. That which is non sequitur, is irrelevant. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Note: no response. Quid nunc? What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Are you on automatic mindlessness in these responses; doing something like tapping your fingers whilst reading a journal article; or is there a more interesting signal buried in your responses. I see that you didn't answer the question, Loonie. No surprise there, really. I get the distinct impression that I'm just shooting the breeze below the noise threshold. Your impression is irrelevant, Loonie. I see that you still haven't answered the question, Loonie. No surprise there, really. Frankly, the null hypothesis is looking more and more attractive! What does the null hypothesis have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie? Read any good articles lately? What does your question have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Loonie?
|
|
#39
March 27th 06, 11:56 AM
posted to alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
|
|||
|
|||
|
OS/2 word processor: Describe
On Mon, 27 Mar 2006 06:34:23 GMT, wrote:
*The Commentator* writes: wrote: Nothing of any importance. I did not write the above, Commentator. Yes, yhou did, Classic Tholenator, since you always write Nothing of any importance. HTH. Classic dishonesty on your part, Commentator. Classic lie on your part, Oar Pin. Embarassed by your actual Kook of the Month award, then? ESL! -- Bookman -The Official Overseer of Kooks and Trolls in AFA-B Kazoo Konspirator #668 (The Neighbor of the Beast) Clue-Bat Wrangler Keeper of the Nickname Lists Despotic Kookologist of the New World Order Monthly Hammer of Thor award, October 2005 "I'd love to kill you in a ring" - Bartmo gets all touchy-feely "****SPV....... So yes I am an idiot." "ASK THE NWS, YOUR TAX DOLLAR GOES TO THEM NOT TO DR.TURI." - Mr. Turi explains how to accurately predict hurricanes http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/afa-b/ http://www.insurgent.org/~kook-faq/afa-b/index.html WWFSMD?
|
|
#40
March 27th 06, 01:10 PM
posted to alt.astronomy,alt.fan.art-bell,comp.os.os2.advocacy,rec.music.classical
|
|||
|
|||
|
OS/2 word processor: Describe
Bookman writes:
*The Commentator* writes: Nothing of any importance. I did not write the above, Commentator. Yes, yhou did, Who is "yhou", Bookman? And if "yhou" did write it, then you're agreeing with me that I did not write it, in which case your use of "Yes" is inappropriate. Classic Tholenator, Who is "Tholenator", Bookman? Suffering from attribution problems? since you always write Nothing of any importance. Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim, and rather ironic, coming from someone who wrote nothing of any importance. HTH. What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Bookman? Classic dishonesty on your part, Commentator. Classic lie on your part, Classic unsubstantiated and erroneous claim. Oar Pin. Who is "Oar Pin", Bookman? Also suffering from attribution problems? Embarassed by your actual Kook of the Month award, then? Classic erroneous presupposition. ESL! What does that have to do with colored text in DeScribe, Bookman?
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| VOTE! Usenet Kook Awards, March 2005 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 108 | May 16th 05 02:55 AM |
| digest 2453240 | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 38 | September 15th 04 02:18 AM |
| UFO Activities from Biblical Times (Long Text) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | UK Astronomy | 3 | December 25th 03 10:41 PM |
| UFO Activities from Biblical Times (LONG TEXT) | Kazmer Ujvarosy | SETI | 2 | December 25th 03 07:33 PM |
| UFO Activities from Biblical Times | Kazmer Ujvarosy | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 25th 03 05:21 AM |
Linear Mode
