Wally Dumbassea proves himself a quack over and over again

Wally,

This one's a keeper!

Tom McDonald

Mad Scientist wrote:

You're nothing but a loser dip****. It is easy to debunk assholes like
you who have no answer for a great deal of things, except to scorn with
laughter. ****ing asswipe proves again how stupid he is.

Wally Anglesea wrote:

"Mac" wrote in message
...

On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 04:23:29 GMT, "Wally Anglesea"
wrote:


"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
t.cable.rogers.com...

This explains why Wally Dumbassea jumped all over my saying that 'God
agrees with me' which was only mean to draw out and trap the morons on
this newsgroup.


***********************************
WALLY A.:

No, it wasn't. You know quite well that you beleive it, and it was only


when

you realised that no-one did, that you did the typical kook thing and
backpeddalled at a million miles an hour
Just as you claimed that we are all part of an psych expeirment when
your
favourite fantasy about a moon hoax was rapidly shown to be idiocy on


your

part.


******************************
On one level that is the funny part; watching people like Min and
Poor Little Mad Scientist makes these statements which they then post
out to the Internet, and then, suddenly getting feed-back that they
have passed over the line and have exposed themselves as complete
loons.
They can't tolerate the laughter, the snickers, and so, must
frantically declare that they, from their vast wisdome and abilities
and expertise, were "testing" others.... etc., etc., etc.
Some of their statements are so outrageous that they are definitely
worthwhile printing out and sharing with others. The laughter that
ensues certainly helps draw people together as they read aloud what
Mad Scientist posts.
You should hear what some of the women have to say about Mad Scientist
after reading his comments!!!
Poor Little Mad Scientist.
---Mac




I use Danny Min, Marshall Masters, a few other prime examples, (and
now MS),
in classes as examples of nitwittery, and how quick and easy it is to
show
how science, and a dash of common sense makes it easy to debunk them.

It also gets a huge laugh from the audience.

In message , Wally
Anglesea writes

I use Danny Min, Marshall Masters, a few other prime examples, (and now MS),
in classes as examples of nitwittery, and how quick and easy it is to show
how science, and a dash of common sense makes it easy to debunk them.

I still think you're taking him too seriously.
He's just the sort of little kid who scrawls graffiti on walls, and I'm
beginning to think that he wants to hurt this newsgroup.
I doubt an abuse report would do any good, but _please_ ignore him.

Thats all dip****s like you are good for. You really amount to a big zero.

Wally Anglesea wrote:

"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
et.cable.rogers.com...

You're nothing but a loser dip****. It is easy to debunk assholes like
you who have no answer for a great deal of things, except to scorn with
laughter.


All you deserve is scorn, so that's pretty much all you will ever get (apart
from kook awards). Live with it.


****ing asswipe proves again how stupid he is.




Wally Anglesea wrote:


"Mac" wrote in message
...


On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 04:23:29 GMT, "Wally Anglesea"
wrote:



"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
. is.net.cable.rogers.com...


This explains why Wally Dumbassea jumped all over my saying that 'God
agrees with me' which was only mean to draw out and trap the morons on
this newsgroup.

***********************************
WALLY A.:


No, it wasn't. You know quite well that you beleive it, and it was only

when


you realised that no-one did, that you did the typical kook thing and
backpeddalled at a million miles an hour
Just as you claimed that we are all part of an psych expeirment when

your

favourite fantasy about a moon hoax was rapidly shown to be idiocy on

your


part.

******************************
On one level that is the funny part; watching people like Min and
Poor Little Mad Scientist makes these statements which they then post
out to the Internet, and then, suddenly getting feed-back that they
have passed over the line and have exposed themselves as complete
loons.
They can't tolerate the laughter, the snickers, and so, must
frantically declare that they, from their vast wisdome and abilities
and expertise, were "testing" others.... etc., etc., etc.
Some of their statements are so outrageous that they are definitely
worthwhile printing out and sharing with others. The laughter that
ensues certainly helps draw people together as they read aloud what
Mad Scientist posts.
You should hear what some of the women have to say about Mad Scientist
after reading his comments!!!
Poor Little Mad Scientist.
---Mac



I use Danny Min, Marshall Masters, a few other prime examples, (and now

MS),

in classes as examples of nitwittery, and how quick and easy it is to

show

how science, and a dash of common sense makes it easy to debunk them.

It also gets a huge laugh from the audience.

You too are nothing but a big ass zero. Dip****, no one except the
other insane people care what you think.

Mac wrote:

On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 04:23:29 GMT, "Wally Anglesea"
wrote:


"Mad Scientist" wrote in message
. net.cable.rogers.com...

This explains why Wally Dumbassea jumped all over my saying that 'God
agrees with me' which was only mean to draw out and trap the morons on
this newsgroup.

***********************************
WALLY A.:

No, it wasn't. You know quite well that you beleive it, and it was only when
you realised that no-one did, that you did the typical kook thing and
backpeddalled at a million miles an hour
Just as you claimed that we are all part of an psych expeirment when your
favourite fantasy about a moon hoax was rapidly shown to be idiocy on your
part.

******************************
On one level that is the funny part; watching people like Min and
Poor Little Mad Scientist makes these statements which they then post
out to the Internet, and then, suddenly getting feed-back that they
have passed over the line and have exposed themselves as complete
loons.
They can't tolerate the laughter, the snickers, and so, must
frantically declare that they, from their vast wisdome and abilities
and expertise, were "testing" others.... etc., etc., etc.
Some of their statements are so outrageous that they are definitely
worthwhile printing out and sharing with others. The laughter that
ensues certainly helps draw people together as they read aloud what
Mad Scientist posts.
You should hear what some of the women have to say about Mad Scientist
after reading his comments!!!
Poor Little Mad Scientist.
---Mac

"Jonathan Silverlight" wrote
in message ...
In message , Wally
Anglesea writes

I use Danny Min, Marshall Masters, a few other prime examples, (and now
MS),
in classes as examples of nitwittery, and how quick and easy it is to
show
how science, and a dash of common sense makes it easy to debunk them.

I still think you're taking him too seriously.
He's just the sort of little kid who scrawls graffiti on walls, and I'm
beginning to think that he wants to hurt this newsgroup.
I doubt an abuse report would do any good, but _please_ ignore him.

In one respect I agree with you. He's a kid who scrawls graffiti because he
wants to be noticed.
Any knowledge myself, Mac or Tom or others try to give him will immediately
go ignored by him, but personally, I'm not addressing him, but giving the
odd bit of science in case anyone stumbles across his crap, and they will
hopefully see it for what it is instead of him having the floor all to
himself. I'll admit I enjoy making him dance, though.

I'll give you an example. During a recent "Discovery night" at our local
planetarium, I was manning one of the scopes on the roof. Whilst most of our
members ignore the troublemakers who inevitably show up to claim the US
didn't land on the moon, or that the universe is only 6,000 years old or
that NASA is hiding secrets about approaching rocks of doom or UFO's, I
always ask them to send them to me. Then I reply to their claims to the
gathered crowd who have come to learn. Once the "big lie" of their
favourite fantasy is exposed, the audience sees the nitwit for what they
are. I will add that I'm polite up to a point, and *always* polite to
genuine questions from the general public, but show very little mercy to the
deliberately stupid. The main audience is the crowd, who always walk away
armed to take on the occasional nitwits better than when they arrived, (I
hope).

Yes you and all the other dumbass please ignore my posts since all you
have to offer amounts to a big zero anyways.

Jonathan Silverlight wrote:

In message , Wally
Anglesea writes


I use Danny Min, Marshall Masters, a few other prime examples, (and
now MS),
in classes as examples of nitwittery, and how quick and easy it is to
show
how science, and a dash of common sense makes it easy to debunk them.


I still think you're taking him too seriously.
He's just the sort of little kid who scrawls graffiti on walls, and I'm
beginning to think that he wants to hurt this newsgroup.
I doubt an abuse report would do any good, but _please_ ignore him.

"Wally Anglesea" wrote in
message ...

"Tom McDonald" wrote in message
...
SNIP

It doesn't. But it does follow the pattern of a kook whose
meltdown has passed a certain critical point. I expect he'll be
a puddle on the cushion of his computer chair in a week or two.
Hopefully, though, not before he gets a second consecutive
award. I didn't vote last time; I will this time.

Tom,

I'll see if I can make sure he gets a nomination.
One cool thing about kooks like MS is that their world view is that
"Everyone else is out of step. It's the world that is at fault, not
me" It
flows on from usenet onto their personal relationships. Usenet
behaviour is
just a facet of their behaviour in the real world.
Assuming he has a job, his interaction with colleagues and employers
will be
similar to what we see here, in particular, the language.

I dunno, Wally. In my experience some of these clowns (and I use that
term affectionately, MS) will say things on-line that they would never
say to anyone in person. I remember meeting one extremely foul mouthed
flamer in person (though he didn't know I knew who he was), and he
turned out to be a very polite and respectful 14 year old.

"Paul Lawler" wrote in message
ink.net...
"Wally Anglesea" wrote in
message ...

"Tom McDonald" wrote in message
...
SNIP

It doesn't. But it does follow the pattern of a kook whose
meltdown has passed a certain critical point. I expect he'll be
a puddle on the cushion of his computer chair in a week or two.
Hopefully, though, not before he gets a second consecutive
award. I didn't vote last time; I will this time.

Tom,

I'll see if I can make sure he gets a nomination.
One cool thing about kooks like MS is that their world view is that
"Everyone else is out of step. It's the world that is at fault, not
me" It
flows on from usenet onto their personal relationships. Usenet
behaviour is
just a facet of their behaviour in the real world.
Assuming he has a job, his interaction with colleagues and employers
will be
similar to what we see here, in particular, the language.

I dunno, Wally. In my experience some of these clowns (and I use that
term affectionately, MS) will say things on-line that they would never
say to anyone in person. I remember meeting one extremely foul mouthed
flamer in person (though he didn't know I knew who he was), and he
turned out to be a very polite and respectful 14 year old.

It takes all kinds I guess, but of the one or two I've actually known
offline, both were pretty much as they appeared.
My guess on MS is that he's just as frustrated in real life as he is on
line. :-)

On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 02:18:29 -0500, Tom McDonald
wrote:

Wally,
This one's a keeper!
Tom McDonald
**********************************
Mad Scientist stomped his little feet and thrashed about in his tantrum and screamed the following:
You're nothing but a loser dip****. It is easy to debunk assholes like
you who have no answer for a great deal of things, except to scorn with
laughter. ****ing asswipe proves again how stupid he is.
***********************************
Wow!!
Poor little Mad Scientist finally managed to spew forth more than his
usual three or four word profanity rejoinder.
He actually managed three whole sentences all on his own!!
Poor Wally, I bet he is just devestated at the ire from poor little
Mad Scientist....
---Mac

"Mac" wrote in message
...
On Tue, 10 Aug 2004 02:18:29 -0500, Tom McDonald
wrote:

Wally,
This one's a keeper!
Tom McDonald
**********************************
Mad Scientist stomped his little feet and thrashed about in his tantrum
and screamed the following:
You're nothing but a loser dip****. It is easy to debunk assholes like
you who have no answer for a great deal of things, except to scorn with
laughter. ****ing asswipe proves again how stupid he is.
***********************************
Wow!!
Poor little Mad Scientist finally managed to spew forth more than his
usual three or four word profanity rejoinder.
He actually managed three whole sentences all on his own!!
Poor Wally, I bet he is just devestated at the ire from poor little
Mad Scientist....


I cried myself to sleep. NOT. :-)