![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 17:53:33 +0000, DrPostman wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 19:30:34 +1000, "Dat's Me" wrote: On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:21:43 -0500, ebeeed wrote: WHAT are you smoking in your hookah pipe...? (I want some!) Why is it, when people think another person has said something weird, ask the question above and _then_ say: "I want some!", when surely they mean: "So I can stay away from it if it makes you think (& say) such stupid things!"? What if he really wants some? I don't have an answer ... The concept simply makes no sense to me. |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:26:34 +1000, "Dat's Me"
wrote: On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 17:53:33 +0000, DrPostman wrote: On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 19:30:34 +1000, "Dat's Me" wrote: On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:21:43 -0500, ebeeed wrote: WHAT are you smoking in your hookah pipe...? (I want some!) Why is it, when people think another person has said something weird, ask the question above and _then_ say: "I want some!", when surely they mean: "So I can stay away from it if it makes you think (& say) such stupid things!"? What if he really wants some? I don't have an answer ... The concept simply makes no sense to me. You've never gotten high? -- Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed" Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253. You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com "Yes, there are thankfully no lights in my head, pest." - Joseph Bartlo |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"DrPostman" wrote in message
... On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:26:34 +1000, "Dat's Me" wrote: On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 17:53:33 +0000, DrPostman wrote: On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 19:30:34 +1000, "Dat's Me" wrote: On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:21:43 -0500, ebeeed wrote: WHAT are you smoking in your hookah pipe...? (I want some!) Why is it, when people think another person has said something weird, ask the question above and _then_ say: "I want some!", when surely they mean: "So I can stay away from it if it makes you think (& say) such stupid things!"? What if he really wants some? I don't have an answer ... The concept simply makes no sense to me. You've never gotten high? I guess he's "high on reality." The PTB obviously said "No more for him" long ago. Jim |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 06:35:08 +0000, DrPostman wrote:
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:26:34 +1000, "Dat's Me" wrote: On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 17:53:33 +0000, DrPostman wrote: On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 19:30:34 +1000, "Dat's Me" wrote: On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:21:43 -0500, ebeeed wrote: WHAT are you smoking in your hookah pipe...? (I want some!) Why is it, when people think another person has said something weird, ask the question above and _then_ say: "I want some!", when surely they mean: "So I can stay away from it if it makes you think (& say) such stupid things!"? What if he really wants some? I don't have an answer ... The concept simply makes no sense to me. You've never gotten high? Yes. I've gotten high. The point I was trying to make is, why would anyone want to intentionally make themselves (what they consider to be) stupid. I, when I smoked, did so more for the relaxing effect than the buzz and certainly not to make me more inclined to dribble ****! Yeah, I dribble **** on occasion, everyone does. I interpreted the question by ebeeed: "WHAT are you smoking in your hookah pipe...?" to mean, "You're smoking something really nasty there, to come out with such crap" and then to top it off with:"(I want some!)" caused me to ask the question I did. There's mind altering & there's mind altering! |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 19:44:25 +1000, "Dat's Me"
wrote: On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 06:35:08 +0000, DrPostman wrote: On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 14:26:34 +1000, "Dat's Me" wrote: On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 17:53:33 +0000, DrPostman wrote: On Sat, 24 Jan 2004 19:30:34 +1000, "Dat's Me" wrote: On Fri, 23 Jan 2004 12:21:43 -0500, ebeeed wrote: WHAT are you smoking in your hookah pipe...? (I want some!) Why is it, when people think another person has said something weird, ask the question above and _then_ say: "I want some!", when surely they mean: "So I can stay away from it if it makes you think (& say) such stupid things!"? What if he really wants some? I don't have an answer ... The concept simply makes no sense to me. You've never gotten high? Yes. I've gotten high. The point I was trying to make is, why would anyone want to intentionally make themselves (what they consider to be) stupid. I, when I smoked, did so more for the relaxing effect than the buzz and certainly not to make me more inclined to dribble ****! Yeah, I dribble **** on occasion, everyone does. I stopped getting high 16 years ago, so I don't dribble **** anymore. I interpreted the question by ebeeed: "WHAT are you smoking in your hookah pipe...?" to mean, "You're smoking something really nasty there, to come out with such crap" and then to top it off with:"(I want some!)" caused me to ask the question I did. There's mind altering & there's mind altering! And whatever he was smoking would have had to be good to come up with something like that. -- Dr.Postman USPS, MBMC, BsD; "Disgruntled, But Unarmed" Member,Board of Directors of afa-b, SKEP-TI-CULT® member #15-51506-253. You can email me at: TuriFake(at)hotmail.com "Yes, there are thankfully no lights in my head, pest." - Joseph Bartlo |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... BV NASA will never know it tiped over or was hit by a meteorite. It will always be an anomaly because NASA likes that word,for it tells nothing. NASA has an anomaly between its ears. It fits for there is nothing there. NASA has only one thing to say "WHERE IS THE MONEY $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ Bert Well we now know that the problem is linked to a memory issue. I assume NASA will be requested a refund from Crucial.com. Either way, I agree NASA is not perfect. Anytime you have a large organization you will have culture issues, which I think is NASA's problem. Either way, I am not qualified to propose a solution. Do you care to lay out a business model and plan for how NASA can be "corrected"? I am sure a reasonable, and clearly laid fiscal and scientific plan would be well accepted here. Please, show us. BV. www.iheartmypond.com |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
BV Being a business man,and dealing with the public to stay in business
over lots of years with three companies,you have to do things right,or you go out of business.( no free rides) NASA is not worried about screwing up,for it is run by the goverment,and that means it is pork barrel,and that means it gets a free ride(the ultimate free lunch) After the Challenger I offered my services to to sit down once a month to give my opinion on construction safety that can save lives. I have been in construction all my life. I have both an electrical license and plumbers. I know about what can cause metal fatigue. Why pipes can crack or have pin holes develop. I know a part(tiles) that is glued is for the most part only as strong as its glue. I know what the strongest glue is BV I asked for no money. That could have been why they refused. NASA can't hire an honest person.(few honest people left 6 months before the Columbia) They might not like having me around for I might say 32 million for a toilet is to much to pay,and that means no kick back money. I would demand new pipes for the Columbia.Not welding up the cracked pipes. All shuttles would have to be built with only safety in mind no matter how much it would cost. To me a buck is only money,but a life is the most valuble thing in the universe. Bert |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... BV Being a business man,and dealing with the public to stay in business over lots of years with three companies,you have to do things right,or you go out of business.( no free rides) NASA is not worried about screwing up,for it is run by the goverment,and that means it is pork barrel,and that means it gets a free ride(the ultimate free lunch) After the Challenger I offered my services to to sit down once a month to give my opinion on construction safety that can save lives. I have been in construction all my life. I have both an electrical license and plumbers. I know about what can cause metal fatigue. Why pipes can crack or have pin holes develop. I know a part(tiles) that is glued is for the most part only as strong as its glue. I know what the strongest glue is BV I asked for no money. That could have been why they refused. NASA can't hire an honest person.(few honest people left 6 months before the Columbia) They might not like having me around for I might say 32 million for a toilet is to much to pay,and that means no kick back money. I would demand new pipes for the Columbia.Not welding up the cracked pipes. All shuttles would have to be built with only safety in mind no matter how much it would cost. To me a buck is only money,but a life is the most valuble thing in the universe. Bert Bert, it sounds like you have it all figured out. How about sharing your plan? BV. www.iheartmypond.com |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi BV My plan to finish off the remaining shuttles would be to make
the last use of them in orbit have the 3 astronauts return to Earth in an Apollo type pod using parachutts,and landing on water,and picked up by the navy The shuttle would not come back to Earth,but jetted out into space. As everyone knows I don't like wings on rockets. These wings have to hold together when hitting the atmosphere at a speed 20 times that of sound. They have to come in at a perfect angle. They have to have tiles to protect their metal structure from melting. NASA was very lucky that over 50 shuttle flights did not blow up. Truth of the matter is if Rube Goldberg was serious he would do a much better job of building an orbiting rocket ship. NASA is a joke,but killing people is no laughing matter. Bert |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Hi BV My plan to finish off the remaining shuttles would be to make the last use of them in orbit have the 3 astronauts return to Earth in an Apollo type pod using parachutts,and landing on water,and picked up by the navy The shuttle would not come back to Earth,but jetted out into space. As everyone knows I don't like wings on rockets. These wings have to hold together when hitting the atmosphere at a speed 20 times that of sound. They have to come in at a perfect angle. They have to have tiles to protect their metal structure from melting. NASA was very lucky that over 50 shuttle flights did not blow up. Truth of the matter is if Rube Goldberg was serious he would do a much better job of building an orbiting rocket ship. NASA is a joke,but killing people is no laughing matter. Bert OK, so we jettison the shuttles. Then what? What is the replacement vehicle? What is your plan for that? BV. www.iheartmypond.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Save the 2009 Mars rover. . . | Tom Merkle | Policy | 24 | February 20th 04 08:07 PM |
Tones Break Silence During Mars Exploration Rover Landings | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 12th 03 04:12 PM |
Space Calendar - November 26, 2003 | Ron Baalke | History | 2 | November 28th 03 09:21 AM |
Space Calendar - July 24, 2003 | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | July 24th 03 11:26 PM |
Farewell to the Earth and the Moon - ESA's Mars Express Successfully Tests Its Instruments | Ron Baalke | Misc | 0 | July 17th 03 04:08 PM |